Abstract
The triumph of general relativity under the banner “gravity is geometry” began with confirming the crucial effects within the Solar system and proceeded recently to the strong-field shadow effect for the compact object in the center of the Milky Way. Here, we examine some of those phenomena for the Einstein-scalar equations in the antiscalar regime to reveal the difference from vacuum both in weak and strong fields. As a result, we find that for week-field perihelion shift the difference between vacuum and antiscalar cases proves to be observationally imperceptible in practice, even for S-cluster stars with high eccentricities, except for the S62 star with measurable difference per century. In strong-field case, we reconsider the shadow effect (this time without involving complex-valued scalar field) as the most perspective from an observational viewpoint. Even though the resulting difference is quite appreciable (about 5%), no conclusion can be made until the mass of the central object is known with the accuracy an order of magnitude higher than the currently available.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and in the literature cited in the paper.
References
Fisher, I.Z.: Scalar mesostatic field with regard for gravitational effects. Zhurnal Experimental’noj i Teoreticheskoj Fiziki 18, 636–640 (1948). arXiv: gr-qc/9911008
Janis, A.I., Newman, E.T., Winicour, J.: Reality of the Schwarzschild singularity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 20(16), 878–880 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.20.878
Faraoni, V., Giusti, A., Fahim, B.H.: Spherical inhomogeneous solutions of Einstein and scalar-tensor gravity: a map of the land. Phys. Rep. 925, 1–58 (2021)
Papapetrou, A.: Eine theorie des gravitationsfeldes mit einer feldfunktion. Zeitschrift für Physik A 139, 518–532 (1954)
Yilmaz, H.: New approach to general relativity. Phys. Rev. 111, 1417–1426 (1958)
Makukov, M.A., Mychelkin, E.G.: Simpler than vacuum: antiscalar alternatives to black holes. Phys. Rev. D 98(6), 064050 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.064050
Makukov, M., Mychelkin, E.: Rotation in vacuum and scalar background: are there alternatives to newman-janis algorithm? Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 32(05), 2350023 (2023)
Makukov, M., Mychelkin, E.: Triple path to the exponential metric. Found. Phys. 50, 1346–1355 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-020-00384-y
Boonserm, P., Ngampitipan, T., Simpson, A., Visser, M.: Exponential metric represents a traversable wormhole. Phys. Rev. D 98(8), 084048 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.084048. arXiv:1805.03781
Weinberg, S.: Gravitation and Cosmology. Wiley, Hoboken (1972)
...Abuter, R., Amorim, A., Bauböck, M., Berger, J.P., Bonnet, H., Brandner, W., Cardoso, V., Clénet, Y., Zeeuw, P.T.D., Dexter, J., Eckart, A., Eisenhauer, F., Schreiber, N.M.F., Garcia, P., Gao, F., Gendron, E., Genzel, R., Gillessen, S., Habibi, M., Haubois, X., Henning, T., Hippler, S., Horrobin, M., Jiménez-Rosales, A., Jochum, L., Jocou, L., Kaufer, A., Kervella, P., Lacour, S., Lapeyrère, V., Bouquin, J.-B.L., Léna, P., Nowak, M., Ott, T., Paumard, T., Perraut, K., Perrin, G., Pfuhl, O., Rodríguez-Coira, G., Shangguan, J., Scheithauer, S., Stadler, J., Straub, O., Straubmeier, C., Sturm, E., Tacconi, L.J., Vincent, F., Fellenberg, S.V., Waisberg, I., Widmann, F., Wieprecht, E., Wiezorrek, E., Woillez, J., Yazici, S., Zins, G.: Detection of the Schwarzschild precession in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole. Astron. Astrophys. 636, 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037813
Gillessen, S., Plewa, P.M., Eisenhauer, F., Sari, R., Waisberg, I., Habibi, M., Pfuhl, O., George, E., Dexter, J., von Fellenberg, S., Ott, T., Genzel, R.: An Update on Monitoring Stellar Orbits in the Galactic Center. Astrophys. J. 837(1), 30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa5c41. arXiv:1611.09144 [astro-ph.GA]
Peißker, F., Eckart, A., Parsa, M.: S62 on a 9.9 yr Orbit around SgrA*. Astrophys. J. 889(1), 61 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab5afd
Virbhadra, K., Narasimha, D., Chitre, S.: Role of the scalar field in gravitational lensing. arXiv:astro-ph/9801174 (1998)
Acknowledgements
This research is funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP19678165 and Program No. BR21881880). The authors thank Taras Panamarev for some useful ideas.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mychelkin, E., Makukov, M., Suliyeva, G. et al. On the weak and strong field effects in antiscalar background. Gen Relativ Gravit 56, 44 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-024-03227-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-024-03227-7