Skip to main content
Log in

The problem of motion in gauge theories of gravity

  • Research Article
  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article we consider the problem to what extent the motion of gauge-charged matter that generates the gravitational field can be arbitrary, as well as what equations are superimposed on the gauge field due to conditions of compatibility of gravitational field equations. Considered problem is analyzed from the point of view symmetry of the theory with respect to the generalized gauge deformed groups without specification of Lagrangians. In particular it is shown, that the motion of uncharged particles along geodesics of Riemannian space is inherent in an extremely wide range of theories of gravity and is a consequence of the gauge translational invariance of these theories under the condition of fulfilling equations of gravitational field. In the cause of gauge-charged particles, the Lorentz force, generalized for gauge-charged matter, appears in equations of motion as a consequence of the gauge symmetry of the theory under the condition of fulfilling equations of gravitational and gauge fields. In addition, we found relationships of equations for some fields that follow from the assumption about fulfilling of equations for other fields. At the end of the article there is an Appendix, which briefly describes the main provisions and facts from the theory of generalized gauge deformed groups and presents the main ideas of a single group-theoretical interpretation of gauge fields of both external (space-time) and internal symmetry, which is an alternative to their geometric interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hilbert, D.: Die grundlagen der physik. Math. Phys. Klasse 3, 395–408 (1915)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Noether, E.: Invariant variation problems. Transport theory and statistical physics 1, 183–207 (1971). (English translation). arXiv:physics/0503066 [physics.hist-ph]

  3. Einstein, A., Grommer, J.: Allgemeine relativitätstheorie und bewegungsgesetz. Phys. Math. Kl. 2–14 (1927)

  4. Fock, V.: On the motion of finite mass in the general relativity. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 4, 375–428 (1939). in Russian

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Einstein, A., Grossmann, M.: Entwurf einer verallgemeinerten relativitätstheorie und einer theorie der gravitation, Teubner, Leipzig. Reprinted as 4, Doc.13 CPAE (1913)

  6. Oltean, M., Epp, R., Sopuerta, C., Spallicci, A., Mann, R.: Motion of localized sources in general relativity: gravitational self-force from quasilocal conservation laws. Phys. Rev. D101, 064060 (2020). arXiv:1907.03012 [gr-qc]

  7. Samokhvalov, S.: The laws of electrodynamics in the gauge theory of gravity. Math. Mod. 7, 5–10 (2001). in Ukrainian

    Google Scholar 

  8. Samokhvalov, S.: Group-theoretical description of gauge fields. Theor. Math. Phys. 76, 709–717 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Cai Y., Capozziello S., De Laurentis M., Saridakis E.: f(T) teleparallel gravity and cosmology. Rept. Prog. Phys. 79, 106901 (2016). arXiv:1511.07586 [gr-qc]

  10. Pinto, P., Del Vecchio, L., Fatibene, L., Ferraris, M.: Extended cosmology in Palatini f(R)-theories. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 044 (2018). arXiv:1807.00397 [gr-qc]

  11. Petrov, A.: Field-theoretical construction of currents and superpotentials in Lovelock gravity. Class. Quantum Grav. 36, 235021 (2019). arXiv:1903.05500 [gr-qc]

  12. Maluf, J., Ulhoa, S., da Rocha-Neto, J., Carneiro, F.: Difficulties of teleparallel theories of gravity with local Lorentz symmetry. Class. Quantum Grav. 37, 067003 (2020). arXiv:1811.06876 [gr-qc]

  13. Guarnizo, A., Orjuela-Quintana, J., Valenzuela-Toledo, C.: Dynamical analysis of cosmological models with non-Abelian gauge vector fields. Phys. Rev. D 102, 083507 (2020). arXiv:2007.12964 [gr-qc]

  14. Samokhvalov, S.: Group-theoretical basis of the holographic principle. Math. Mod. 23, 7–11 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Samokhvalov, S. and Vanyashin, V.: Group theory approach to unification of gravity with internal symmetry gauge interactions. I. Canonical electrogravity. Class. Quantum Grav. 8, 2277–2282 (1991). arXiv:1802.08958 [gr-qc]

  16. Samokhvalov, S.: About the symmetry of general relativity. J. Geom. Symm. Phys. 55, 75–103 (2020). arXiv:2001.07081 [gr-qc]

  17. Ogievetski, V., Polubarinov, I.: On the meaning of the gauge invariance. Nuovo Cimento 23, 173–180 (1962)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Klein, F.: Vergleichende betrachtungen uber neuere geometrische forschungen (Erlangen Program). In: On Foundations of Geometry, pp. 399–434. Gostekhteorizdat, Moscow (Russian translation) (1956)

  19. Cartan, E.: Group theory and geometry. In: On Foundations of Geometry, pp. 438–507. Gostekhteorizdat, Moscow (Russian translation) (1956)

  20. Sulanke, R., Wintgen, P.: Differentialgeometrie und faserbundel. Veb Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin (1972)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Sabinin, L.: Methods of nonassociative algebra in differential geometry. In: Koboyashi, S., Nomizu, K. (eds.) Foundations of Differential Geometry 1, pp. 293–334. Nauka, Moscow (1981). in Russian

    Google Scholar 

  22. Samokhvalov, S.: On setting of connections in fiber bundles by the action of infinite Lie groups. Ukrain. Math. J. 43, 1599–1603 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Samokhvalov, S.: Group-theoretic description of Riemannian spaces. Ukrain. Math. J. 55, 1238–1248 (2003). arXiv:0704.2967 [math.DG]

  24. Hehl, F., Heyde, P., Kerlich, G., Nester, J.: General relativity with spin and torsion: foundations and prospects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 48, 393–416 (1976)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Cho, Y.: Einstein Lagrangian as the translational Yang–Mills Lagrangian. Phys. Rev. D 14, 2521–2525 (1976)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Konopleva, N., Popov, V.: Gauge fields. Atomizdat, Moscow (1980) (in Russian)

  27. Samokhvalov, S.: Group theory approach to unification of gravity with internal symmetry gauge interactions. II. Relativity of charges and masses. Probl. Nucl. Phys. Cosm. Rays 35, 50–58 (1991). arXiv:1802.09842 [gr-qc]

  28. Samokhvalov, S., Balakireva, E.: Group-theoretic matching of the length and the equality principles in geometry. Russ. Math. (Iz. VUZ) 59, 26–37 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to Alisa Gryshchenko for her help with the prepare of article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serhii Samokhvalov.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A Group-theoretic description of gauge fields

A Group-theoretic description of gauge fields

An infinite (local gauge) symmetry lies in a basis of modern theories of fundamental interactions. Theory of gravity (general relativity) is based on the idea of covariance with respect to the group of space-time diffeomorphisms. Theories of strong and electroweak interactions are gauge theories of internal symmetry. Moreover, the existence of these interactions is considered to be necessary for ensuring the local gauge symmetries.

But any physical theory can be written in covariant form without introduction of a gravitational field. Similarly, as first had been emphasized in [17], for any theory with global internal symmetry G corresponding gauge symmetry \(G^{g} \) can be ensured without introduction of nontrivial gauge fields by pure gauging. Presence of the gravitational or the gauge field of internal symmetry is manifested in presence of deformation—curvature of Riemannian space, or fiber bundles with connection accordingly.

Formally, nontrivial gauge fields are entered by continuation of derivatives up to covariant derivatives \(\partial _{\mu } \rightarrow \nabla _{\mu } \). Their commutators characterize strength of a field, which is considered, and from the geometrical point of view—curvature of corresponding space. On the other hand, covariant derivatives set infinitesimal space-time translations in the gauge field (curved spaces). That is why it is possible to suppose, that for introduction of nontrivial arbitrary gauge fields it is necessary to consider groups (wider than gauge groups \(G^{g} \)) which would generalize gauge groups \(G^{g} \) to a case of nontrivial action on space-time manifold and contain the information about arbitrary gauge fields in which motion occurs. Consequently, such groups must contain the information about appropriate geometrical structures with arbitrary variable curvature and set these geometrical structures on manifolds where they act. Hence from the mathematical point of view such groups should realize the Klein’s Erlangen Program [18] for these geometrical structures.

For a long time it was considered that such groups do not exist. E.Cartan [19] has named the situation in question as Riemann-Klein’s antagonism—antagonism between Riemann’s and Klein’s approaches to geometry. There are attempts of modifying of the Klein’s Program for geometrical structures with arbitrary variable curvature by means of refusal of group structure of used transformations with usage of categories [20] quasigroups [21] and so on. One can encounter widespread opinion that nonassociativity is an algebraic equivalent of the geometrical notion of a curvature [21].

In this Appendix we shall show that realization of the Klein’s Program for the geometrical structures with arbitrary variable curvature (Riemannian space and fiber bundles with connection) can be fulfilled within the framework of the so called infinite deformed groups which generalize gauge groups to the case of nontrivial action on the base space of bundles with use of idea of groups deformations.

Such groups have been constructed in [8]. Klein’s Erlangen Program was realized for fiber bundles with connection in [22] and for Riemannian space in [23].

This is important for physics because the widely known gauge approaches to gravity (see, for example, [24]) in fact gives gauge interpretation neither to metric fields nor to frame (tetrad) ones. An interpretation of these as connections in appropriate fibrings has been achieved in way of introduction (explicitly or implicitly) of the assumption about existence of the background flat space (see, for example, [25]). That is unnatural for gravity. The reason for these difficulties lies in the fact that the fiber bundles formalism is appropriate only for the internal symmetry Lie group, which do not act on the space-time manifold. But for the gravity this restriction is obviously meaningless because it does not permit considering gravity as the gauge theory of the translation group.

In this Appendix we also show that generalized gauge deformed groups give a group-theoretic description of gauge fields (gravitational field with its metric or frame part similarly to gauge fields of internal symmetry) which is alternative for their geometrical interpretation [26].

This approach allow to overcome the well known Coleman-Mandula no-go theorem within the framework of generalized gauge deformed groups and gives new possibilities to unification gravity with gauge theory of internal symmetry [27].

1.1 Generalized gauge groups

Gauge groups of internal symmetry \(G^{g} \) are a special case of infinite groups and have simple group structure—the infinite direct product of the finite-parameter Lie groups \(G^{g} =\prod _{x\in M} G\) where product takes on all points x of the space-time manifold M. Groups \(G^{g} \) act on M trivially: \(x'^{\mu } =x^{\mu } \).

For the aim of a generalization of groups \(G^{g} \) to the case of nontrivial action on the space-time manifold M, let’s now consider a Lie group \(G_{M}^{} \) with the multiplication law \(({\tilde{g}}\cdot {\tilde{g}}')_{}^{\alpha } ={\tilde{\varphi }}^{\alpha } ({\tilde{g}},{\tilde{g}}')\) which act on the space-time manifold M (perhaps inefficiently) according to the formula \(x'^{\mu } ={\tilde{f}}{}^{\mu } (x,{\tilde{g}})\). The infinite Lie group \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) is parameterized by smooth functions \({\tilde{g}}^{\alpha } (x)\) which meet the condition \(\left| d_{\nu } {\tilde{f}}^{\mu } (x,{\tilde{g}}(x))\right| \ne 0\) \(\forall x\in M\) (where \(d_{\nu } :=d/dx^{\nu } \)). For parameters of group \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) we will use the Greek indices from the beginning of the alphabet. The multiplication law in \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) is determined by the formulas:

$$\begin{aligned}&({\tilde{g}}\times {\tilde{g}}')_{}^{\alpha } (x)={\tilde{\varphi }}^{\alpha } ({\tilde{g}}(x),{\tilde{g}}'(x')), \end{aligned}$$
(88)
$$\begin{aligned}&x'^{\mu } ={\tilde{f}}{}^{\mu } (x,{\tilde{g}}(x)). \end{aligned}$$
(89)

It is a simple matter to check that these operations truly make \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) a group [8]. Formula (89) sets the action of \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) on M. In the case of trivial action of the group \(G_{M}^{} \) on M, \(x'^{\mu } =x^{\mu } \) and \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) becomes the ordinary gauge group \(G^{g} =\prod _{x\in M} G\). We name the groups \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) generalized gauge groups.

For the clearing of the groups deformations idea we will consider spheres of different radius R. All of them have isomorphic isometry groups—groups of rotations O(3). The information about radius of the spheres is in structure constants of groups O(3), which in the certain coordinates may be written as: \(F_{12}^{3} =1/R^{2} \), \(F_{13}^{2} =-1\), \(F_{23}^{1} =1\). Isomorphisms of groups O(3), which change R, correspond to deformations.

For gauge groups \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) some isomorphisms also play a role of deformations of space of groups representations, but unlike deformations of finite-parametrical Lie groups such deformations are more substantial, as these allow to independently deform space in its different points.

Let us pass from the group \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) to the group \(G_{M}^{g} \) isomorphic to it by the formula \(g^{a} (x)=H^{a} (x,{\tilde{g}}(x))\) (Latin indices assume the same values as the corresponding Greek ones). The smooth functions \(H^{a} (x,{\tilde{g}})\) have the properties:

  1. (1)

    \(H^{a} (x,0)=0 \quad \forall x\in M\);

  2. (2)

    \(\exists K^{\alpha } (x,g): \quad K^{\alpha } (x,H(x,{\tilde{g}}))={\tilde{g}}^{\alpha } \quad \forall {\tilde{g}}\in G, \quad x\in M\).

The group \(G_{M}^{g} \) multiplication law is determined by its isomorphism to the group \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) and formulas (88), (89):

$$\begin{aligned} (g*g')_{}^{a} (x)= & {} \varphi _{}^{a} (x,g(x),g'(x')):=H^{a} (x,{\tilde{\varphi }}(K(x,g(x)),K(x',g'(x')))), \end{aligned}$$
(90)
$$\begin{aligned} x'^{\mu }= & {} f_{}^{\mu } (x,g(x)):={\tilde{f}}{}^{\mu } (x,K(x,g(x))). \end{aligned}$$
(91)

Formula (91) sets the action of \(G_{M}^{g} \) on M.

We name such transformations between the groups \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) and \(G_{M}^{g} \) as deformations of infinite Lie groups, since (together with changing of the multiplication law) the corresponding deformations of geometric structures of manifolds subjected to group action are directly associated with them. We name the functions \(H^{a} (x,{\tilde{g}})\) deformation functions, functions \(h(x)_{\alpha }^{a} :=\left. \partial H^{a} (x,{\tilde{g}})/\partial {\tilde{g}}^{\alpha } \right| _{{\tilde{g}}=0} \) deformation coefficients, and the groups \(G_{M}^{g} \) infinite (generalized gauge) deformed groups.

Let us consider expansion

$$\begin{aligned} \varphi _{}^{a} (x,g,g')=g^{a} +g'^{a} +\gamma (x)^{a} _{bc} g^{b} g'^{c} +{\frac{1}{2}} \rho (x)^{a} _{bcd} g^{d} g'^{b} g'^{c} +... \end{aligned}$$
(92)

The functions \(\varphi ^{a} \), setting the multiplication law (90) in the group \(G_{M}^{g} \), are explicitly x dependent, so the coefficients of expansion (92) are x dependent as well. So x dependent became structure coefficients of group \(G_{M}^{g} \) (structure functions versus structure constants for ordinary Lie groups):

$$\begin{aligned} F(x)_{bc}^{a} :=\gamma (x)^{a} _{bc} -\gamma (x)^{a} _{cb} \end{aligned}$$
(93)

and coefficients

$$\begin{aligned} R(x)^{a} _{dbc} :=\rho (x)^{a} _{dbc} -\rho (x)^{a} _{dcb} , \end{aligned}$$
(94)

which we called a curvature coefficients of the deformed group \(G_{M}^{g} \).

Since \(\xi (x)_{a}^{\mu } :=\partial _{a} \left. f_{H}^{\mu } (x,g)\right| _{g=0} =h(x)_{a}^{\alpha } {\tilde{\xi }}(x)_{\alpha }^{\mu } \), where \(\partial _{b} :=\partial /\partial g^{b} \) and \(h(x)_{a}^{\alpha } \) is inverse to the \(h(x)_{\alpha }^{a} \) matrix, the generators \(X_{a} :=\xi (x)_{a}^{\mu } \partial _{\mu } \) (\(\partial _{\mu } :=\partial /\partial x^{\mu } \)) of the deformed group \(G_{M}^{g} \) are expressed through the generators \({\tilde{X}}_{\alpha } :={\tilde{\xi }}(x)_{\alpha }^{\mu } \partial _{\mu } \) of the group \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) by the deformation coefficients: \(X_{a} =h(x)_{a}^{\alpha } {\tilde{X}}_{\alpha } \). So in infinitesimal (algebraic) level, deformation is reduced to independent in every point \(x\in M\) nondegenerate liner transformations of generators of the initial Lie group.

Theorem A1

Commutators of generators of the deformed group \(G_{M}^{g} \) are liner combinations of generators with structure functions as coefficients:

$$\begin{aligned} {[}X_{a} ,X_{b} ]=F(x)_{ab}^{c} X_{c} . \end{aligned}$$
(95)

For generalized gauge nondeformed group \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) we have \([{\tilde{X}}_{\alpha } ,{\tilde{X}}_{\beta } ]={\tilde{F}}_{\alpha \beta }^{\gamma } {\tilde{X}}_{\gamma } \), where \({\tilde{F}}_{\alpha \beta }^{\gamma } \) is structure constants of the initial Lie group \(G_{M}^{} \). So for \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) \(F_{\alpha \beta }^{\gamma } ={\tilde{F}}_{\alpha \beta }^{\gamma } \).

1.2 Group-theoretic description of connections in fiber bundles and gauge fields of internal symmetry

Let \(P=M\times V\) be a principal bundle with the base M (space-time) and a structure group V with coordinates \({\tilde{\upsilon }}^{i} \) and the multiplication law \(\, ({\tilde{\upsilon }}\cdot {\tilde{\upsilon }}')^{i} ={\tilde{\varphi }}^{i} ({\tilde{\upsilon }},{\tilde{\upsilon }}')\) (indices ijk). As usually, we define the left \(l_{{\tilde{\upsilon }}} :P=M\times V\rightarrow P'=M\times {\tilde{\upsilon }}^{-1} \cdot V\) and the right \(r_{{\tilde{\upsilon }}} :P=M\times V\rightarrow P'=M\times V\cdot {\tilde{\upsilon }}\) action V on P.

Let’s consider a group \(G_{M} =T_{M} \otimes V\) where \(T_{M} \) is the group of space-time translations. The group \(G_{M} \) parameterized by the pair \({\tilde{t}}^{\mu } \), \({\tilde{\upsilon }}^{i} \), has the multiplication law \(({\tilde{g}}\cdot {\tilde{g}}')^{\mu } ={\tilde{t}}^{\mu } +{\tilde{t}}'^{\mu } \), \(\, ({\tilde{g}}\cdot {\tilde{g}}')^{i} ={\tilde{\varphi }}^{i} ({\tilde{\upsilon }},{\tilde{\upsilon }}')\) and act on M inefficiently: \(x'^{\mu } =x^{\mu } +{\tilde{t}}^{\mu } \). One can define the left action of the group \(G_{M} \) on the principal bundle P: \(x'^{\mu } =x^{\mu } +{\tilde{t}}^{\mu } \), \(\upsilon '^{i} =l_{{\tilde{\upsilon }}}^{i} (\upsilon )\).

The group \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) is parameterized by the functions \({\tilde{t}}^{\mu } (x)\), \({\tilde{\upsilon }}^{i} (x)\) which meet the conditions \(\left| \delta _{\nu }^{\mu } +\partial _{\nu } {\tilde{t}}^{\mu } (x)\right| \ne 0\) \(\forall x\in M\). The multiplication law in \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) is

$$\begin{aligned}&({\tilde{g}}\times {\tilde{g}}')^{\mu } (x)={\tilde{t}}^{\mu } (x)+{\tilde{t}}'^{\mu } (x'), \quad \, ({\tilde{g}}\times {\tilde{g}}')^{i} (x)={\tilde{\varphi }}^{i} ({\tilde{\upsilon }}(x),{\tilde{\upsilon }}'(x')), \end{aligned}$$
(96)
$$\begin{aligned}&x'^{\mu } =x^{\mu } +{\tilde{t}}^{\mu } (x), \end{aligned}$$
(97)

where (97) determines the inefficient action of \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) on M with the kern of inefficiency—gauge group \(V^{g} \). The group \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \) has the structure \(V^{g} \left. \times \right) \, T_{M}^{g} \), which is a semidirect product of the groups \(V^{g} \) and \(T_{M}^{g} \), act on P as:

$$\begin{aligned} x'^{\mu } =x^{\mu } +{\tilde{t}}^{\mu } (x), \quad \upsilon '^{i} =l_{{\tilde{\upsilon }}(x)}^{i} (\upsilon ) \end{aligned}$$

and is the group \(aut\, P\) of automorphisms of the principal bundle P.

Let us deform the group \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \rightarrow G_{M}^{g} \) by means of deformation functions with additional properties:

  1. (3)

    \(H^{\mu } (x,{\tilde{t}},{\tilde{\upsilon }})={\tilde{t}}^{\mu } \quad \forall \; {\tilde{t}}\in T,\quad {\tilde{\upsilon }}\in V,\quad x\in M\);

  2. (4)

    \(H^{i} (x,0,{\tilde{\upsilon }})={\tilde{\upsilon }}^{i} \quad \forall \; {\tilde{\upsilon }}\in V,\quad x\in M\).

The deformed group \(G_{M}^{g} \) is parameterized by the functions \(t^{\mu } (x)={\tilde{t}}^{\mu } (x)\) and \(\upsilon ^{i} (x)=H^{i} (x,{\tilde{t}}(x),{\tilde{\upsilon }}(x))\). Obviously, the group \(G_{M}^{g} \), as well as the group \({\tilde{G}}_{M}^{g} \), has the structure \(V^{g} \left. \times \right) \, T_{M}^{g} \) and acts on P as:

$$\begin{aligned} x'^{\mu } =x^{\mu } +t^{\mu } (x), \quad \upsilon '^{i} =l_{K(x,t(x),\upsilon (x))}^{i} (\upsilon ), \end{aligned}$$
(98)

where functions \(K^{i} (x,t(x),\upsilon (x))\) are determined by equation: \(K^{i} (x,t(x),\upsilon (x))={\tilde{\upsilon }}^{i} (x)\). Properties 3), 4) result in the fact that among deformation coefficients of the group \(G_{M}^{g} \), x-dependent is only \(h(x)_{\mu }^{i} =\left. \partial _{{\tilde{\mu }}} H^{i} (x,{\tilde{t}},0)\right| _{{\tilde{t}}=0} =:-A(x)_{\mu }^{i} \) (where \(\partial _{{\tilde{\mu }}} :=\partial /\partial {\tilde{t}}^{\mu } \)).

Generators of the \(G_{M}^{g} \)-action on P (98) are split in the pair

$$\begin{aligned} X_{\mu } =\partial _{\mu } +A(x)_{\mu }^{i} {\tilde{X}}_{i} , \quad X_{i} ={\tilde{X}}_{i} , \end{aligned}$$

where \({\tilde{X}}_{i} \) are generators of the left action of the group V on P. This result in the natural splitting of tangent spaces \(T_{u} \) in any point \(u\in P\) to the direct sum \(T_{u} =T\tau _{u} \oplus T\upsilon _{u} \) subspaces:

$$\begin{aligned} T\tau _{u} =\{ t^{\mu } X_{\mu } \} , \quad T\upsilon _{u} =\{ \upsilon ^{i} X_{i} \} . \end{aligned}$$

The distribution \(T\tau _{u} \) is invariant with respect to the right action of the group V on P, and \(T\upsilon _{u} \) is tangent to the fiber. So \(T\tau _{u} \) one can treated as horizontal subspaces of the \(T_{u} \) and generators \(X_{\mu } \)—as covariant derivatives. This set in the principal bundle P connection and deformation coefficients \(A(x)_{\mu }^{\, i} \) are the coordinates of the connection form, which on submanifold \(M\subset P\) may be written as \(\omega ^{i} =A(x)_{\mu }^{\, i} dx^{\mu } \). Necessary condition of existence of group \(G_{M}^{g} \) (95) for generators \(X_{\mu } \) gives

$$\begin{aligned} {[}X_{\mu } ,X_{\nu } ]=F(x)_{\mu \nu }^{\, i} X_{i} \end{aligned}$$
(99)

where

$$\begin{aligned} F(x)_{\mu \nu }^{\, i} =F_{jk}^{\, i} A(x)_{\mu }^{\, j} A(x)_{\nu }^{k} +\partial _{\mu } A(x)_{\nu }^{\, i} -\partial _{\nu } A(x)_{\mu }^{\, i} \end{aligned}$$
(100)

are the structure functions of the group \(G_{M}^{g} \) and \(F_{jk}^{i} ={\tilde{F}}_{jk}^{i} \) are the structure constants of the Lie group V. Relationship (100) one can write in the form:

$$\begin{aligned} d\omega ^{i} =-{\frac{1}{2}} F_{j k}^{ i} \omega ^{j} \wedge \omega ^{k} +\Omega ^{i}, \end{aligned}$$
(101)

where \(\Omega ^{i} ={\frac{1}{2}} F(x)_{\mu \nu }^{\, i} dx^{\mu } \wedge dx^{\nu } \) play the role of the curvature form on submanifold M. So equation (101) is a structural equation for connection, which has been set on principal bundle P by action of group \(G_{M}^{g}\).

Theorem A2

Acting on the principal bundle \(P=M\times V\) deformed group \(V^{g} \left. \times \right) \, T_{M}^{g} \) sets on P structure of connection. Any connection on the principal bundle \(P=M\times V\) may be set in such a way.

This theorem realizes Klein’s Erlangen Program for fiber bundles with connection [22].

We should emphasize that for the setting of a geometrical structure in P it is enough to consider the infinitesimal action (98) of the group \(G_{M}^{g} \).

The potentials of the gauge field of internal symmetry are identified with deformation coefficients \(A(x)_{\mu }^{\, i} \), a strength tensor—with structure functions \(F(x)_{\mu \nu }^{\, i} \) of the group \(G_{M}^{g} \) [8]. All groups \(G_{M}^{g} \) obtained one from another by internal automorphisms, which are generated by the elements \(\upsilon (x)\in V^{g} \), describe the same gauge field. These automorphisms lead to gauge transformations for fields \(A(x)_{\mu }^{\, i} \) and for infinitesimal \(\upsilon ^{i} (x)\) give:

$$\begin{aligned} A'(x)_{\mu }^{\, i} =A(x)_{\mu }^{\, i} -F_{j k}^{\, i} A(x)_{\mu }^{\, j} \upsilon ^{k} (x)-\partial _{\mu } \upsilon ^{i} (x). \end{aligned}$$
(102)

1.3 Group-theoretic description of Riemannian spaces and gravitational fields

The structure of Riemannian space is a special case of structure of affine connection in frame bundle and consequently it can be set by the way described above with the application of the deformed group \(SO(n)^{g} \left. \times \right) Diff\, M\). If we force the metricity and non-torsionity conditions, generators of translations \(X_{\mu } =\partial _{\mu } +\Gamma (x)_{\mu }^{(mn)} {\tilde{S}}_{(mn)} \), where \({\tilde{S}}_{(mn)} \) is generators of group SO(n), become covariant derivatives in Riemannian space. For the setting of Riemannian structure by such means, it is enough to consider the group \(SO(n)^{g} \left. \times \right) Diff\, M\) on algebraic level—on level its generators.

Potentials of a gravitational field in the given approach are represented by the connection coefficients \(\Gamma (x)_{\mu }^{(mn)} \) instead of the metrics or verbein fields that would correspond to sense of a gravitational field as a gauge field of translation group which is born by energy–momentum tensor, instead of spin.

Now we will show that the Riemannian structure on M is naturally set also by a narrower group than \(SO(n)^{g} \left. \times \right) Diff\, M\), namely, the deformed group of diffeomorphisms \(T_{M}^{g} \), though it demands consideration of its action on M up to the second order on parameters.

Let \(G_{M}^{} =T_{M} \) where \(T_{M} \) is the group of space-time translations. In this case \(({\tilde{t}}\cdot {\tilde{t}}')^{\mu } ={\tilde{t}}^{\mu } +{\tilde{t}}'^{\mu } \) and \(x'^{\mu } =x^{\mu } +t^{\mu } \). The group \({\tilde{T}}_{M}^{g} \) is parameterized by the functions \({\tilde{t}}^{\mu } (x)\), which meet the condition \(\left| \delta _{\nu }^{\mu } +\partial _{\nu } {\tilde{t}}^{\mu } (x)\right| \ne 0\) \(\forall x\in M\). The multiplication law in \({\tilde{T}}_{M}^{g} \) is

$$\begin{aligned}&({\tilde{t}}\times {\tilde{t}}')^{\mu } (x)={\tilde{t}}^{\mu } (x)+{\tilde{t}}'^{\mu } (x'), \end{aligned}$$
(103)
$$\begin{aligned}&x'^{\mu } =x^{\mu } +{\tilde{t}}^{\mu } (x), \end{aligned}$$
(104)

where (104) determines the action of \({\tilde{T}}_{M}^{g} \) on M. The multiplication law indicates that \({\tilde{T}}_{M}^{g} \) is the group of space-time diffeomorphisms DiffM in additive parametrization. Thus, in the approach considered, the DiffM group becomes the gauge group of local translations. The generators of the \({\tilde{T}}_{M}^{g} \) action on M are simply derivatives \({\tilde{X}}_{\mu } =\partial _{\mu } \) and this fact corresponds to the case of the flat M and the absence of gravitational field.

Let us deform the group \({\tilde{T}}_{M}^{g} \rightarrow T_{M}^{g} \): \(t^{m} (x)=H^{m} (x,{\tilde{t}}(x))\). The multiplication law in \(T_{M}^{g} \) is determined by the formulas:

$$\begin{aligned} (t*t')^{m} (x)= & {} \varphi ^{m} (x,t(x),t'(x')):=H^{m} (x,K(x,t(x))+K(x',t'(x'))), \end{aligned}$$
(105)
$$\begin{aligned} x'^{\mu }= & {} f^{\mu } (x,t(x)):=x^{\mu } +K^{\mu } (x,t(x)). \end{aligned}$$
(106)

Formula (106) sets the action of \(T_{M}^{g} \) on M.

Let us consider expansion

$$\begin{aligned} H^{m} (x,{\tilde{t}})=h(x)_{\mu }^{m} \left[ {\tilde{t}}^{\mu } +{\frac{1}{2}} \Gamma (x)_{\nu \rho }^{\mu } {\tilde{t}}^{\nu } {\tilde{t}}^{\rho } +{\frac{1}{6}} \Delta (x)_{\nu \rho \sigma }^{\mu } {\tilde{t}}^{\nu } {\tilde{t}}^{\rho } {\tilde{t}}^{\sigma } \right] + \cdots \end{aligned}$$
(107)

With usage of formula (105), for coefficients of expansion (92) we can obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \gamma ^{m} _{pn}= & {} h_{\mu }^{m} (\Gamma _{p n}^{\mu } +h_{p}^{\nu } \partial _{\nu } h_{n}^{\mu } ), \end{aligned}$$
(108)
$$\begin{aligned} \rho ^{m} _{spn}= & {} h_{\mu }^{m} (\Delta _{spn}^{\mu } -\Gamma _{n \sigma }^{\mu } \Gamma _{ps}^{\sigma } -h_{n}^{\nu } \partial _{\nu } \Gamma _{\sigma \rho }^{\mu } h_{p}^{\sigma } h_{ s}^{\rho } ). \end{aligned}$$
(109)

So formulas (93), (94) for structure coefficients and curvature coefficients of deformed group \(T_{M}^{g} \) give

$$\begin{aligned} F_{\mu \nu }^{n}= & {} -(\partial _{\mu } h_{\nu }^{n} -\partial _{\nu } h_{\mu }^{n} ), \end{aligned}$$
(110)
$$\begin{aligned} R^{\mu } _{\nu \kappa \rho }= & {} \partial _{\kappa } \Gamma _{\rho \nu }^{\mu } -\partial _{\rho } \Gamma _{\kappa \nu }^{\mu } +\Gamma _{\kappa \sigma }^{\mu } \Gamma _{\rho \nu }^{\sigma } -\Gamma _{\rho \sigma }^{\mu } \Gamma _{\kappa \nu }^{\sigma } . \end{aligned}$$
(111)

In these formulas deformation coefficients \(h_{\mu }^{m} \) and \(h_{m}^{\mu } \) we use for changing Greek index to Latin (and vice versa).

Formulas (110) and (111) show that groups \(T_{M}^{g} \) contain information about geometrical structure of space M where they act. The generators \(X_{m}^{} =h_{m}^{\nu } \partial _{\nu } \) of the \(T_{M}^{g} \)-action (106) on M can be treated as frames (tetrads). Structure functions \(F_{\mu \nu }^{n} \) are anholonomic coefficients of frames \(X_{m}^{} \).

Let us write the multiplication law of the group \(T_{M}^{g} \) (105) for infinitesimal second factor:

$$\begin{aligned} (t*\tau )^{m} (x)=t^{m} (x)+\lambda (x,t(x))^{m} _{n} \tau ^{n} (x'), \end{aligned}$$
(112)

where \(\lambda (x,t)^{m} _{n} :=\partial _{n'} \left. \varphi _{}^{m} (x,t,t')\right| _{t'=0} \). Formula (112) gives the rule for the addition of vectors, which set in different points x and \(x'\) or a rule of the parallel transport of a vector field \(\tau \) from point \(x'\) to point x: \(\tau _{}^{m} (x)=\lambda (x,t(x))^{m} _{n} \tau ^{n} (x')\), or in coordinate basis \(\tau _{}^{\mu } (x)=\partial _{{\tilde{\nu }}} H^{\mu } (x,{\tilde{t}})\tau ^{\nu } (x+{\tilde{t}})\). This formula determines the covariant derivative

$$\begin{aligned} \nabla _{\nu } \tau ^{\mu } (x)=\partial _{\nu } \tau ^{\mu } (x)+\Gamma (x)_{\sigma \nu }^{\mu } \tau ^{\sigma } (x), \end{aligned}$$
(113)

where functions \(\Gamma (x)_{\sigma \nu }^{\mu } \) set the second order of expansion (107) and play the role of coefficients of an affine connection. They are symmetric on the bottom indexes so torsion equals zero. If \(\eta _{mn} \) is a metric of a flat space, in the manifold M we can determine metrics \(g_{\mu \nu } =h_{\mu }^{m} h_{\nu }^{n} \eta _{mn} \). In this case generators \(X_{m}^{} =h_{m}^{\nu } \partial _{\nu } \) of group \(T_{M}^{g} \) form an orthonormal frame (tetrad).

If we force \(\gamma _{ksl}^{ .} +\gamma _{lsk}^{ .} =0\) (lowering indices we perform by metric \(\eta _{mn} \)), we can show that coefficients \(\Gamma _{\mu \nu }^{\rho } \) of expansion (107) may be written as

$$\begin{aligned} \Gamma _{\mu \nu }^{\rho } ={\frac{1}{2}} g^{\rho \sigma } (\partial _{\mu } g_{\nu \sigma } +\partial _{\nu } g_{\mu \sigma } -\partial _{\sigma } g_{\mu \nu } ). \end{aligned}$$
(114)

So these coefficients coincide with Christoffel symbols \(\{ _{\sigma \nu }^{\, \mu } \} \) and curvature coefficients \(R^{\mu } _{\nu \kappa \rho } \) of group \(T_{M}^{g} \) coincide with the Riemann curvature tensor. In this case group \(T_{M}^{g} \) is called the group of Riemannian translations [28].

Theorem A3

Acting on the manifold M group of Riemannian translations \(T_{M}^{g} \) sets on M structure of Riemannian space. Any Riemannian structure on the manifold M may be set in such a way.

This theorem realizes Klein’s Erlangen Program for Riemannian space [23].

Information about Christoffel symbols is contained in the second order of expansion (107) of deformation functions, and about curvature in functions \(\rho ^{m} _{spn} \), which determine third order of expansion (92) in the multiplication law of the group \(T_{M}^{g} \). So in this approach we need consider not only infinitesimal (algebraic) level in the group \(T_{M}^{g} \) (as in previous section), but higher levels, too.

The gravitational field potentials are identified with deformation coefficients \(h(x)_{\mu }^{m} \), strength tensor of the gravitational field—with structure functions \(F(x)_{sn}^{m} \) of the group \(T_{M}^{g} \) [8]. All groups \(T_{M}^{g} \) obtained one from another by internal automorphisms describe the same gravitational field. These automorphisms, which can always be connected with the coordinate transformations on M, lead to a general covariance transformation law for fields \(h(x)_{\mu }^{m} \) and for infinitesimal \(t^{m} (x)\) yield:

$$\begin{aligned} h'(x)_{\mu }^{m} =h(x)_{\mu }^{m} -F(x)_{sn}^{m} h(x)_{\mu }^{ s} t^{n} (x)-\partial _{\mu } t^{m} (x). \end{aligned}$$
(115)

The transformation law (115) is similar to the transformation law (102) for gauge fields of internal symmetry and the only difference consists in the replacement of structure constants of finite Lie group by structure functions of the infinite deformed group \(T_{M}^{g} \). This fact permits us to interpret the group \(T_{M}^{g} \) as the gauge translation group and the vector fields \(h_{\mu }^{m} \) as the gauge fields of the translation group.

So we show that infinite deformed (generalized gauge) groups:

  1. (a)

    set on manifolds where they act geometrical structures of Riemannian spaces or fiber bundles with connection with arbitrary variable curvature;

  2. (b)

    give a group-theoretic description of gauge fields – gravitational field with its frame part and gauge fields of internal symmetry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samokhvalov, S. The problem of motion in gauge theories of gravity. Gen Relativ Gravit 53, 44 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-021-02814-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-021-02814-2

Keywords

Navigation