Skip to main content
Log in

The reasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences

  • Research Article
  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mathematics and its relation to the physical universe have been the topic of speculation since the days of Pythagoras. Several different views of the nature of mathematics have been considered: Realism—mathematics exists and is discovered; Logicism—all mathematics may be deduced through pure logic; Formalism—mathematics is just the manipulation of formulas and rules invented for the purpose; Intuitionism—mathematics comprises mental constructs governed by self evident rules. The debate among the several schools has major importance in understanding what Eugene Wigner called, The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences. In return, this ‘Unreasonable Effectiveness’ suggests a possible resolution of the debate in favor of Realism. The crucial element is the extraordinary predictive capacity of mathematical structures descriptive of physical theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wigner E.: Symmetries and Reflections. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bochner, S.: The Role of Mathematics in the Rise of Science, 4th edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1981). See p.v (Preface). The first edition was written in the mid sixties

  3. London Philosophy Study Guide, University of London, http://www.ucl.ac.uk/philosophy/LPSG/Ch22.pdf. NB Do not google the acronym LPSG to find the site

  4. Neugebauer O.: The Exact Sciences in Antiquity, 2nd edn. Dover Publications, New York (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allen, D.: Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans. http://www.math.tamu.edu/~dallen/history/pythag/pythag.html (1997)

  6. Klein J.: Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra, pp. 63–68. Dover Publications, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ross W.D.: Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book 1-Section 5. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1924)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Galilei, G.: Il Saggiatore (The Assayer) (1623). Drake, S., O’Malley, C.D., translators, 1960, The Controversy on the Comets of 1618. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA (1960)

  9. Weyl, H.: Raum-Zeit-Materie, 5th edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1923). See page 136. Translation furnished by E.L. Schucking, New York University

  10. Körner, S.: The Philosophy of Mathematics—An Introductory Essay. Dover Publications, New York (1986). See the first paragraph of the Introduction. Chapter VIII, on the relationship between pure and applied mathematics, contains the material most closely relevant to this paper

  11. Everett, E.: This observation was uttered in an address at the inauguration of Washington University of St. Louis (1947)

  12. Hardy, G.H.: Mind, new series 38, 1–25 (1929)

  13. Frege G.: Foundations of Arithmetic, revised 2nd edn, pp. 99. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weber, H.: In a eulogy, (Jahresberichte Deutscher Matematiker-Vereinigung 2, 5–31, (1893)), cites a lecture by Kronecker before a session of the Berliner Naturforschung-Sammelung in 1886, in which Kronecker stated, “Die ganzen Zahlen hat der liebe Gott gemacht, alles andere ist Menschenwerk.”

  15. Whitehead A.N., Russell B.: Principia Mathematica, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1910)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Quoted in N. Rose: Mathematical Maxims and Minims, Rome Press, Raleigh, NC (1988)

  17. Kleene, S.: Introduction to Metamathematics. (North-Holland, Amsterdam 1952 with corrections 1971, 10th reprint 1991), See in particular Chapter III: Critique of Mathematical Reasoning, sect. 13 Intuitionism

  18. Dirac P.A.M.: The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th edn. revised, pp. 15. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dirac, P.A.M.: The Relativistic Wave Electron. European Conference on Particle Physics, Budapest (1977)

  20. Appell, P.: Sur une interprétation des valeurs imaginaires du temps en Mécanique, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Scéances de l’Académie des Sciences 87(1), (1878)

  21. Dahaene S.: The Number Sense. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hawking, S.W.: Gödel and the End of Physics. http://www.hawking.org.uk/index.php/lectures/publiclectures (2002)

  23. Valenti, M.B.: The renormalization of charge and temporality in quantum electrodynamics (2008). http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu

  24. Neuenschwander D.E.: Does any piece of mathematics exist for which there is no application whatsoever in physics?. Am. J. Phys. 63, 1065 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. de la Torre A.C., Zamora R.: Answer to Question #31. Am. J. Phys. 69, 103 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gottlieb H.P.W.: Answer to Question #31. Am. J. Phys. 69, 103 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Harvey.

Additional information

It is a great pleasure to dedicate this paper to Josh Goldberg, long a valuable member of the commuunity of General Relativists, and a good friend.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harvey, A. The reasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Gen Relativ Gravit 43, 3657–3664 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-011-1248-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-011-1248-9

Keywords

Navigation