Surveys in Geophysics

, 29:187 | Cite as

A Survey of Techniques for Predicting Earthquake Ground Motions for Engineering Purposes

Original Paper

Abstract

Over the past four or five decades many advances have been made in earthquake ground-motion prediction and a variety of procedures have been proposed. Some of these procedures are based on explicit physical models of the earthquake source, travel-path and recording site while others lack a strong physical basis and seek only to replicate observations. In addition, there are a number of hybrid methods that seek to combine benefits of different approaches. The various techniques proposed have their adherents and some of them are extensively used to estimate ground motions for engineering design purposes and in seismic hazard research. These methods all have their own advantages and limitations that are not often discussed by their proponents. The purposes of this article are to: summarise existing methods and the most important references, provide a family tree showing the connections between different methods and, most importantly, to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

Keywords

Earthquake Earthquake scenario Seismic hazard assessment Strong ground motion Ground-motion prediction 

References

  1. Abrahamson NA, Shedlock KM (1997) Overview. Seismological Research Letters 68(1):9–23Google Scholar
  2. Abrahamson NA, Somerville PG, Cornell CA (1990) Uncertainty in numerical strong motion predictions. In: Proceedings of the fourth U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, vol 1, pp 407–416Google Scholar
  3. Abrahamson N, Atkinson G, Boore D, Bozorgnia Y, Campbell K, Chiou B, Idriss IM, Silva W, Youngs R (2008) Comparisons of the NGA ground-motion relations. Earthq Spectra 24(1):45–66. doi:10.1193/1.2924363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aki K (1982) Strong motion prediction using mathematical modeling techniques. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 72(6):S29–S41Google Scholar
  5. Aki K (2003) A perspective on the history of strong motion seismology. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 137:5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aki K, Larner KL (1970) Surface motion of a layered medium having an irregular interface due to incident plane SH waves. Journal of Geophysical Research 75(5):933–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative Seismology. University Science Books, Sausalito, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2006) Influence of long-period filter cut-off on elastic spectral displacements. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 35(9):1145–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ambraseys NN (1974) The correlation of intensity with ground motion. In: Advancements in Engineering Seismology in Europe, TriesteGoogle Scholar
  10. Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Sigbjörnsson R, Berge-Thierry C, Suhadolc P, Costa G, Smit PM (2004a) Dissemination of European strong-motion data, vol 2. In: Proceedings of thirteenth world conference on earthquake engineering, paper no. 32Google Scholar
  11. Ambraseys NN, Smit P, Douglas J, Margaris B, Sigbjörnsson R, Ólafsson S, Suhadolc P, Costa G (2004b) Internet site for European strong-motion data. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 45(3):113–129Google Scholar
  12. Anderson JG (1991) Strong motion seismology. Rev Geophys 29(Part 2):700–720Google Scholar
  13. Anderson JG (1997a) Benefits of scenario ground motion maps. Engineering Geology 48(1–2):43–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Anderson JG (1997b) Nonparametric description of peak acceleration above a subduction thrust. Seismological Research Letters 68(1):86–93Google Scholar
  15. Anderson JG (2004) Quantitative measure of the goodness-of-fit of synthetic seismograms. In: Proceedings of thirteenth world conference on earthquake engineering, paper no. 243Google Scholar
  16. Anderson G, Aagaard BT, Hudnut K (2003) Fault interactions and large complex earthquakes in the Los Angeles area. Science 302(5652):1946–1949, doi:10.1126/science.1090747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Aochi H, Douglas J (2006) Testing the validity of simulated strong ground motion from the dynamic rupture of a finite fault, by using empirical equations. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 4(3):211–229, doi:10.1007/s10518-006-0001-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Aochi H, Fukuyama E (2002) Three-dimensional nonplanar simulation of the 1992 Landers earthquake. J Geophys Res 107(B2). doi:10.1029/2000JB000061
  19. Aochi H, Madariaga R (2003) The 1999 Izmit, Turkey, earthquake: Nonplanar fault structure, dynamic rupture process, and strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93(3):1249–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Aochi H, Cushing M, Scotti O, Berge-Thierry C (2006) Estimating rupture scenario likelihood based on dynamic rupture simulations: The example of the segmented Middle Durance fault, southeastern France. Geophysical Journal International 165(2):436–446, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02842.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Aoi S, Fujiwara H (1999) 3D finite-difference method using discontinuous grids. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 89(4):918–930Google Scholar
  22. Apsel RJ, Luco JE (1983) On the Green’s functions for a layered half-space. Part II. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 73(4):931–951Google Scholar
  23. Archuleta RJ, Brune JN (1975) Surface strong motion associated with a stick-slip event in a foam rubber model of earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 65(5):1059–1071Google Scholar
  24. Atkinson GM (2001) An alternative to stochastic ground-motion relations for use in seismic hazard analysis in eastern North America. Seismological Research Letters 72:299–306Google Scholar
  25. Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2006) Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96(6):2181–2205. doi:10.1785/0120050245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Atkinson GM, Silva W (2000) Stochastic modeling of California ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90(2):255–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Atkinson GM, Somerville PG (1994) Calibration of time history simulation methods. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 84(2):400–414Google Scholar
  28. Atkinson GM, Sonley E (2000) Empirical relationships between modified Mercalli intensity and response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90(2):537–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Baker JW, Cornell CA (2006) Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 35(9):1077–1095, doi:10.1002/eqe.571 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Bao HS, Bielak J, Ghattas O, Kallivokas LF, O’Hallaron DR, Shewchuk JR, Xu JF (1998) Large-scale simulation of elastic wave propagation in heterogeneous media on parallel computers. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 152(1–2):85–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Bazzurro P, Cornell CA (1999) Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 89(2):501–520Google Scholar
  32. Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM (1998) FINSIM: A FORTRAN program for simulating stochastic acceleration time histories from finite faults. Seismological Research Letters 69:27–32Google Scholar
  33. Berge C, Gariel JC, Bernard P (1998) A very broad-band stochastic source model used for near source strong motion prediction. Geophysical Research Letters 25(7):1063–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Beyer K, Bommer JJ (2007) Selection and scaling of real accelerograms for bi-directional loading: A review of current practice and code provisions. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 11(S1):13–45, doi:10.1080/13632460701280013 Google Scholar
  35. Bommer JJ, Acevedo AB (2004) The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 8(Special issue 1):43–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Bommer JJ, Alarcón JE (2006) The prediction and use of peak ground velocity. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 10(1):1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Bommer JJ, Ruggeri C (2002) The specification of acceleration time-histories in seismic design codes. European Earthquake Engineering 16(1):3–17Google Scholar
  38. Bommer JJ, Scott SG, Sarma SK (2000) Hazard-consistent earthquake scenarios. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 19(4):219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Bommer JJ, Abrahamson NA, Strasser FO, Pecker A, Bard PY, Bungum H, Cotton F, Fäh D, Sabetta F, Scherbaum F, Studer J (2004) The challenge of defining upper bounds on earthquake ground motions. Seismological Research Letters 75(1):82–95Google Scholar
  40. Boore DM (1973) The effect of simple topography on seismic waves: Implications for the accelerations recorded at Pacoima Dam, San Fernando valley, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 63(5):1603–1609Google Scholar
  41. Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 73(6):1865–1894Google Scholar
  42. Boore DM (2001) Comparisons of ground motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake with empirical predictions largely based on data from California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 91(5):1212–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure and Applied Geophysics 160(3–4):635–676, doi:10.1007/PL00012553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Boore DM (2005) SMSIM—Fortran programs for simulating ground motions from earthquakes: Version 2.3—A revision of OFR 96-80-A. Open-File Report 00-509, United States Geological Survey, modified version, describing the program as of 15 August 2005 (Version 2.30)Google Scholar
  45. Bouchon M (1981) A simple method to calculate Green’s functions for elastic layered media. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 71(4):959–971Google Scholar
  46. Bouchon M, Sánchez-Sesma FJ (2007) Boundary integral equations and boundary elements methods in elastodynamics. In: Advances in Geophysics: advances in wave propagation in heterogeneous Earth, vol 48, Chap 3. Academic Press, London, UK, pp 157–189Google Scholar
  47. Brune JN (1970) Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research 75(26):4997–5009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Brune JN (1971) Correction. Journal of Geophysical Research 76(20):5002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Bycroft GN (1960) White noise representation of earthquake. Journal of The Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE 86(EM2):1–16Google Scholar
  50. Campbell KW (1986) An empirical estimate of near-source ground motion for a major, m b = 6.8, earthquake in the eastern United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 76(1):1–17Google Scholar
  51. Campbell KW (2002) A contemporary guide to strong-motion attenuation relations. In: Lee WHK, Kanamori H, Jennings PC, Kisslinger C (eds) International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology, Chap 60. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Campbell KW (2003) Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground-motion (attenuation) relations in eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93(3):1012–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Campbell KW (2007) Validation and update of hybrid empirical ground motion (attenuation) relations for the CEUS. Tech. rep., ABS Consulting, Inc. (EQECAT), Beaverton, USA, Award number: 05HQGR0032Google Scholar
  54. Cancani A (1904) Sur l’emploi d’une double échelle sismique des intensités, empirique et absolue. Gerlands Beitr z Geophys 2:281–283, not seen. Cited in Gutenberg and Richter (1942)Google Scholar
  55. Chaljub E, Komatitsch D, Vilotte JP, Capdeville Y, Valette B, Festa G (2007a) Spectral-element analysis in seismology. In: Advances in geophysics: advances in wave propagation in heterogeneous earth, vol 48, chap 7. Academic Press, London, UK, pp 365–419Google Scholar
  56. Chaljub E, Tsuno S, Bard PY, Cornou C (2007b) Analyse des résultats d’un benchmark numérique de prédiction du mouvement sismique dans la vallée de Grenoble. In: 7ème Colloque National AFPS 2007, in FrenchGoogle Scholar
  57. Chen XF (2007) Generation and propagation of seismic SH waves in multi-layered media with irregular interfaces. In: Advances in geophysics: advances in wave propagation in heterogeneous earth, vol 48, chap 4. Academic Press, London, UK, pp 191–264Google Scholar
  58. Chen M, Hjörleifsdóttir V, Kientz S, Komatitsch D, Liu Q, Maggi A, Savage B, Strand L, Tape C, Tromp J (2008) SPECFEM 3D: User manual version 1.4.3. Tech. rep., Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics (CIG), California Institute of Technology (USA); University of Pau (France). URL: http://www.gps.caltech.edu/jtromp/research/downloads.html
  59. Cotton F, Scherbaum F, Bommer JJ, Bungum H (2006) Criteria for selecting and adjusting ground-motion models for specific target regions: Application to central Europe and rock sites. Journal of Seismology 10(2):137–156, DOI: 10.1007/s10950-005-9006-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Dalguer LA, Irikura K, Riera JD (2003) Simulation of tensile crack generation by three-dimensional dynamic shear rupture propagation during an earthquake. J Geophys Res 108(B3), article 2144Google Scholar
  61. Dan K, Watanabe T, Tanaka T, Sato R (1990) Stability of earthquake ground motion synthesized by using different small-event records as empirical Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 80(6):1433–1455Google Scholar
  62. Day SM, Bradley CR (2001) Memory-efficient simulation of anelastic wave propagation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 91(3):520–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Day SM, Bielak J, Dreger D, Graves R, Larsen S, Olsen KB, Pitarka A (2005) Tests of 3D elastodynamic codes. Final report for Lifelines Project 1A03. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, USAGoogle Scholar
  64. Dormy E, Tarantola A (1995) Numerical simulation of elastic wave propagation using a finite volume method. Journal of Geophysical Research 100(B2):2123–2133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Douglas J (2003) Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: A review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earth-Science Reviews 61(1–2):43–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Douglas J (2007) On the regional dependence of earthquake response spectra. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 44(1):71–99Google Scholar
  67. Douglas J, Suhadolc P, Costa G (2004) On the incorporation of the effect of crustal structure into empirical strong ground motion estimation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2(1):75–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Douglas J, Bungum H, Scherbaum F (2006) Ground-motion prediction equations for southern Spain and southern Norway obtained using the composite model perspective. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 10(1):33–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Dowrick DJ (1977) Earthquake resistant design—a manual for engineers and architects. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  70. Erdik M, Durukal E (2003) Simulation modeling of strong ground motion. In: Earthquake engineering handbook, chap 6, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, USAGoogle Scholar
  71. Esteva L, Rosenblueth E (1964) Espectros de temblores a distancias moderadas y grandes. Boletin Sociedad Mexicana de Ingenieria Sesmica 2:1–18, in SpanishGoogle Scholar
  72. Faccioli E, Maggio F, Paolucci R, Quarteroni A (1997) 2D and 3D elastic wave propagation by a pseudo-spectral domain decomposition method. Journal of Seismology 1(3):237–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Field EH, Jordan TH, Cornell CA (2003) OpenSHA: A developing community-modeling environment for seismic hazard analysis. Seismological Research Letters 74(4):406–419Google Scholar
  74. Florsch N, Fäh D, Suhadolc P, Panza GF (1991) Complete synthetic seismograms for high-frequency multimode SH-waves. Pure and Applied Geophysics 136:529–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Frankel A (1995) Simulating strong motions of large earthquakes using recordings of small earthquakes: The Loma Prieta mainshock as a test case. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 85(4):1144–1160Google Scholar
  76. Frankel A, Clayton RW (1986) Finite-difference simulations of seismic scattering—Implications for the propagation of short-period seismic-waves in the crust and models of crustal heterogeneity. Journal of Geophysical Research 91(B6):6465–6489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Gallovič F, Brokešová J (2007) Hybrid k-squared source model for strong ground motion simulations: Introduction. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 160(1):34–50, DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2006.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Goda K, Hong HP (2008) Spatial correlation of peak ground motions and response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98(1):354–365, doi:10.1785/0120070078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Graves RWJ (1996) Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered-grid finite differences. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 86(4):1091–1106Google Scholar
  80. Guatteri M, Mai PM, Beroza GC, Boatwright J (2003) Strong ground motion prediction from stochastic-dynamic source models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93(1):301–313, DOI: 10.1785/0120020006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Guatteri M, Mai PM, Beroza GC (2004) A pseudo-dynamic approximation to dynamic rupture models for strong ground motion prediction. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94(6):2051–2063, DOI: 10.1785/0120040037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Gusev AA (1983) Descriptive statistical model of earthquake source radiation and its application to an estimation of short-period strong motion. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 74:787–808Google Scholar
  83. Gutenberg G, Richter CF (1942) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 32(3):163–191Google Scholar
  84. Guzman RA, Jennings PC (1976) Design spectra for nuclear power plants. Journal of The Power Division, ASCE 102(2):165–178Google Scholar
  85. Hadley DM, Helmberger DV (1980) Simulation of strong ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 70(2):617–630Google Scholar
  86. Hancock J, Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson NA, Bommer JJ, Markatis A, McCoy E, Mendis R (2006) An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 10(Special issue 1):67–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Hancock J, Bommer JJ, Stafford PJ (2008) Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics DOI: 10.1002/eqe.827, in press
  88. Hanks TC (1979) b values and ω−γ seismic source models: Implications for tectonic stress variations along active crustal fault zones and the estimation of high-frequency strong ground motion. Journal of Geophysical Research 84(B5):2235–2242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Hanks TC, McGuire RK (1981) The character of high-frequency strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 71(6):2071–2095Google Scholar
  90. Hartzell SH (1978) Earthquake aftershocks as Green’s functions. Geophysical Research Letters 5(1):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Hartzell S, Leeds A, Frankel A, Williams RA, Odum J, Stephenson W, Silva S (2002) Simulation of broadband ground motion including nonlinear soil effects for a magnitude 6.5 earthquake on the Seattle fault, Seattle, Washington. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 92(2):831–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Haskell NA (1969) Elastic displacements in the near-field of a propagating fault. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 59(2):865–908Google Scholar
  93. Hays WW (1980) Procedures for estimating earthquake ground motions. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1114, US Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  94. Heaton TH, Helmberger DV (1977) A study of the strong ground motion of the Borrego Mountain, California, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 67(2):315–330Google Scholar
  95. Herrero A, Bernard P (1994) A kinematic self-similar rupture process for earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 84(4):1216–1228Google Scholar
  96. Hershberger J (1956) A comparison of earthquake accelerations with intensity ratings. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 46(4):317–320Google Scholar
  97. Heuze F, Archuleta R, Bonilla F, Day S, Doroudian M, Elgamal A, Gonzales S, Hoehler M, Lai T, Lavallee D, Lawrence B, Liu PC, Martin A, Matesic L, Minster B, Mellors R, Oglesby D, Park S, Riemer M, Steidl J, Vernon F, Vucetic M, Wagoner J, Yang Z (2004) Estimating site-specific strong earthquake motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 24(3):199–223, DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2003.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Hisada Y (2008) Broadband strong motion simulation in layered half-space using stochastic Green’s function technique. Journal of Seismology 12(2):265–279, DOI:10.1007/s10950-008-9090-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Housner GW (1947) Characteristics of strong-motion earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 37(1):19–31Google Scholar
  100. Housner GW (1955) Properties of strong-ground motion earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 45(3):197–218Google Scholar
  101. Housner GW, Jennings PC (1964) Generation of artificial earthquakes. Journal of The Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE 90:113–150Google Scholar
  102. Irikura K, Kamae K (1994) Estimation of strong ground motion in broad-frequency band based on a seismic source scaling model and an empirical Green’s function technique. Annali di Geofisica XXXVII(6):1721–1743Google Scholar
  103. Jennings PC, Housner GW, Tsai NC (1968) Simulated earthquake motions. Tech. rep., Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  104. Joyner WB (1984) A scaling law for the spectra of large earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 74(4):1167–1188Google Scholar
  105. Joyner WB, Boore DM (1986) On simulating large earthquake by Green’s function addition of smaller earthquakes. In: Das S, Boatwright J, Scholtz CH (eds) Earthquake source mechanics, Maurice Ewing Series 6, vol 37. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
  106. Joyner WB, Boore DM (1988) Measurement, characterization, and prediction of strong ground motion. In: Proceedings of earthquake engineering & soil dynamics II, Geotechnical division, ASCE, pp 43–102Google Scholar
  107. Jurkevics A, Ulrych TJ (1978) Representing and simulating strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 68(3):781–801Google Scholar
  108. Kaka SI, Atkinson GM (2004) Relationships between instrumental ground-motion parameters and modified Mercalli intensity in eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94(5):1728–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Kamae K, Irikura K, Pitarka A (1998) A technique for simulating strong ground motion using hybrid Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 88(2):357–367Google Scholar
  110. Kanamori H (1979) A semi-empirical approach to prediction of long-period ground motions from great earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 69(6):1645–1670Google Scholar
  111. Käser M, Iske A (2005) ADER schemes on adaptive triangular meshes for scalar conservations laws. Journal of Computational Physics 205(2):486–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Kaul MK (1978) Spectrum-consistent time-history generation. Journal of The Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE 104(ME4):781–788Google Scholar
  113. Kennett BLN, Kerry NJ (1979) Seismic waves in a stratified half-space. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 57:557–583Google Scholar
  114. Kohrs-Sansorny C, Courboulex F, Bour M, Deschamps A (2005) A two-stage method for ground-motion simulation using stochastic summation of small earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95(4):1387–1400, DOI: 10.1785/0120040211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Koketsu K (1985) The extended reflectivity method for synthetic near-field seismograms. Journal of the Physics of the Earth 33:121–131Google Scholar
  116. Komatitsch D, Martin R (2007) An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation. Geophysics 72(5):SM155–SM167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Komatitsch D, Tromp J (1999) Introduction to the spectral element method for three-dimensional seismic wave propagation. Geophysical Journal International 139(3):806–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Komatitsch D, Vilotte JP (1998) The spectral element method: An efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2D and 3D geological structures. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 88(2):368–392Google Scholar
  119. Komatitsch D, Liu Q, Tromp J, Süss P, Stidham C, Shaw JH (2004) Simulations of ground motion in the Los Angeles basin based upon the spectral-element method. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94(1):187–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Kristeková M, Kristek J, Moczo P, Day SM (2006) Misfit criteria for quantitative comparison of seismograms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96(5):1836–1850, DOI: 10.1785/0120060012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Lee VW, Trifunac MD (1985) Torsional accelerograms. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 4(3):132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Lee VW, Trifunac MD (1987) Rocking strong earthquake accelerations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 6(2):75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Lee Y, Anderson JG, Zeng Y (2000) Evaluation of empirical ground-motion relations in southern California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90(6B):S136–S148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Levander AR (1988) Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms. Geophysics 53(11):1425–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. LeVeque RJ (2002) Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  126. Luco JE, Apsel RJ (1983) On the Green’s functions for a layered half-space. Part I. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 73(4):909–929Google Scholar
  127. Lysmer J, Drake LA (1972) A finite element method for seismology. In: Bolt BA (eds) Methods in Computational Physics. Academic Press Inc., New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  128. Ma S, Archuleta RJ, Page MT (2007) Effects of large-scale surface topography on ground motions as demonstrated by a study of the San Gabriel Mountains, Los Angeles, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 97(6):2066–2079, DOI: 10.1785/0120070040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Mai PM, Beroza GC (2003) A hybrid method for calculating near-source, broadband seismograms: Application to strong motion prediction. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 137(1–4):183–199, DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9201(03)00014-1 Google Scholar
  130. Maupin V (2007) Introduction to mode coupling methods for surface waves. In: Advances in geophysics: advances in wave propagation in heterogeneous earth, vol 48, chap 2. Academic Press, London, UK, pp 127–155Google Scholar
  131. McGuire RK (2004) Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Oakland, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  132. Miyake H, Iwata T, Irikura K (2003) Source characterization for broadband ground-motion simulation: Kinematic heterogeneous source model and strong motion generation area. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93(6):2531–2545, DOI: 10.1785/0120020183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Moczo P, Kristek J, Galis M, Pazak P, Balazovjech M (2007a) The finite-difference and finite-element modeling of seismic wave propagation and earthquake motion. Acta Physica Slovaca 57(2):177–406Google Scholar
  134. Moczo P, Robertsson JOA, Eisner L (2007b) The finite-difference time-domain method for modeling of seismic wave propagation. In: Advances in geophysics: advances in wave propagation in heterogeneous Earth, vol 48, chap 8. Academic Press, London, UK, pp 421–516Google Scholar
  135. Montaldo V, Kiremidjian AS, Thráinsson H, Zonno G (2003) Simulation of the Fourier phase spectrum for the generation of synthetic accelerograms. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 7(3):427–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Mora P, Place D (1994) Simulation of the frictional stick-slip instability. Pure and Applied Geophysics 143(1–3):61–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Motazedian D, Atkinson GM (2005) Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95(3):995–1010, DOI: 10.1785/0120030207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Mukherjee S, Gupta VK (2002) Wavelet-based generation of spectrum-compatible time-histories. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 22(9–12):799–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Murphy JR, O’Brien LJ (1977) The correlation of peak ground acceleration amplitude with seismic intensity and other physical parameters. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 67(3):877–915Google Scholar
  140. Naeim F, Lew M (1995) On the use of design spectrum compatible time histories. Earthquake Spectra 11(1):111–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Nau RF, Oliver RM, Pister KS (1982) Simulating and analyzing artificial nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 72(2):615–636Google Scholar
  142. Ólafsson S, Sigbjörnsson R (1995) Application of ARMA models to estimate earthquake ground motion and structural response. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 24(7):951–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Ólafsson S, Remseth S, Sigbjörnsson R (2001) Stochastic models for simulation of strong ground motion in Iceland. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 30(9):1305–1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Olsen K, Madariaga R, Archuleta RJ (1997) Three-dimensional dynamic simulation of the 1992 Landers earthquake. Science 278:834–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Olsen KB, Day SM, Minster JB, Cui Y, Chourasia A, Faerman M, Moore R, Maechling P, Jordan T (2006) Strong shaking in Los Angeles expected from southern San Andreas earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 33(L07305). doi:10.1029/2005GL025472
  146. Oprsal I, Zahradnik J (2002) Three-dimensional finite difference method and hybrid modeling of earthquake ground motion. J Geophys Res 107(B8). doi:10.1029/2000JB000082
  147. Ordaz M, Arboleda J, Singh SK (1995) A scheme of random summation of an empirical Green’s function to estimate ground motions from future large earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 85(6):1635–1647Google Scholar
  148. Panza GF (1985) Synthetic seismograms: The Rayleigh waves modal summation. Journal of Geophysics 58:125–145Google Scholar
  149. Panza GF, Suhadolc P (1987) Complete strong motion synthetics. In: Bolt BA (eds) Seismic strong motion synthetics. Academic Press, Orlando, pp. 153–204Google Scholar
  150. Papageorgiou AS, Aki K (1983) A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. Part I. Description of the model. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 73(3):693–702Google Scholar
  151. Pavic R, Koller MG, Bard PY, Lacave-Lachet C (2000) Ground motion prediction with the empirical Green’s function technique: an assessment of uncertainties and confidence level. Journal of Seismology 4(1):59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Pitarka A, Irikura K, Iwata T, Sekiguchi H (1998) Three-dimensional simulation of the near-fault ground motion for the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe), Japan, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 88(2):428–440Google Scholar
  153. Pitarka A, Somerville P, Fukushima Y, Uetake T, Irikura K (2000) Simulation of near-fault strong-ground motion using hybrid Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90(3):566–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Place D, Mora P (1999) The lattice solid model to simulate the physics of rocks and earthquakes: Incorporation of friction. Journal of Computational Physics 150(2):332–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Pousse G, Bonilla LF, Cotton F, Margerin L (2006) Non stationary stochastic simulation of strong ground motion time histories including natural variability: Application to the K-net Japanese database. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96(6):2103–2117, DOI: 10.1785/0120050134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Power M, Chiou B, Abrahamson N, Bozorgnia Y, Shantz T, Roblee C (2008) An overview of the NGA project. Earthquake Spectra 24(1):3–21, DOI: 10.1193/1.2894833 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Reiter L (1990) Earthquake Hazard Analysis: Issues and Insights. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  158. Ripperger J, Mai PM, Ampuero JP (2008) Variability of near-field ground motion from dynamic earthquake rupture simulations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98(3):1207–1228, DOI: 10.1785/0120070076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Ruiz J, Baumont D, Bernard P, , Berge-Thierry C (2007) New approach in the kinematic k 2 source model for generating physical slip velocity functions. Geophysical Journal International 171(2):739–754, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03503.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1996) Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 86(2):337–352Google Scholar
  161. Scherbaum F, Cotton F, Smit P (2004) On the use of response spectral-reference data for the selection and ranking of ground-motion models for seismic-hazard analysis in regions of moderate seismicity: The case of rock motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94(6):2164–2185, DOI: 10.1785/0120030147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Scherbaum F, Cotton F, Staedtke H (2006) The estimation of minimum-misfit stochastic models from empirical ground-motion prediction equations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96(2):427–445, DOI: 10.1785/0120050015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Shi B, Brune JN (2005) Characteristics of near-fault ground motions by dynamic thrust faulting: Two-dimensional lattice particle approaches. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95(6):2525–2533, DOI: 10.1785/0120040227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Shinozuka M (1988) Engineering modeling of ground motion. In: Proceedings of ninth world conference on earthquake engineering, vol VIII, pp 51–62Google Scholar
  165. Shome N, Cornell CA, Bazzurro P, Carballo JE (1998) Earthquakes, records and nonlinear responses. Earthquake Spectra 14(3):469–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Silva WJ, Lee K (1987) State-of-the-art for assessing earthquake hazards in the United States; report 24: WES RASCAL code for synthesizing earthquake ground motions. Miscellaneous Paper S-73-1, US Army Corps of EngineersGoogle Scholar
  167. Silva W, Gregor N, Darragh B (1999) Near fault ground motions. Tech. rep., Pacific Engineering and Analysis, El Cerrito, USA, PG & E PEER—Task 5.AGoogle Scholar
  168. Sokolov V, Wald DJ (2002) Instrumental intensity distribution for the Hector Mine, California, and the Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquakes: Comparison of two methods. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 92(6):2145–2162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Souriau A (2006) Quantifying felt events: A joint analysis of intensities, accelerations and dominant frequencies. Journal of Seismology 10(1):23–38, DOI: 10.1007/s10950-006-2843-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Spudich P, Xu L (2003) Software for calculating earthquake ground motions from finite faults in vertically varying media. In: IASPEI handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology, chap 85.14. Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 1633–1634Google Scholar
  171. Spudich P, Joyner WB, Lindh AG, Boore DM, Margaris BM, Fletcher JB (1999) SEA99: A revised ground motion prediction relation for use in extensional tectonic regimes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 89(5):1156–1170Google Scholar
  172. Strasser FO, Bommer JJ, Abrahamson NA (2008) Truncation of the distribution of ground-motion residuals. Journal of Seismology 12(1):79–105, DOI: 10.1007/s10950-007-9073-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Swanger HJ, Boore DM (1978) Simulation of strong-motion displacements using surface-wave modal superposition. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 68(4):907–922Google Scholar
  174. Takeo M (1985) Near-field synthetic seismograms taking into account the effects of anelasticity: The effects of anelastic attenuation on seismograms caused by a sedimentary layer. Meteorology & Geophysics 36(4):245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Tavakoli B, Pezeshk S (2005) Empirical-stochastic ground-motion prediction for eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95(6):2283–2296, DOI: 10.1785/0120050030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Tinti E, Fukuyama E, Piatanesi A, Cocco M (2005) A kinematic source-time function compatible with earthquake dynamics. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95(4):1211–1223, DOI: 10.1785/0120040177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Trifunac MD (1971) A method for synthesizing realistic strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 61(6):1739–1753Google Scholar
  178. Trifunac MD (1976) Preliminary analysis of the peaks of strong earthquake ground motion – dependence of peaks on earthquake magnitude, epicentral distance, and recording site conditions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 66(1):189–219Google Scholar
  179. Trifunac MD (1990) Curvograms of strong ground motion. Journal of The Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE 116:1426–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Trifunac MD (2007) Recording strong earthquake motion—instruments, recording strategies and data processing. Tech. Rep. CE 07-03. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  181. Trifunac MD, Brady AG (1975) On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 65(1):139–162Google Scholar
  182. Tufte ER (2006) Beautiful Evidence. Graphics Press, Cheshire, Connecticut, USAGoogle Scholar
  183. Tumarkin A, Archuleta R (1994) Empirical ground motion prediction. Annali di Geofisica XXXVII(6):1691–1720Google Scholar
  184. Vanmarcke EH (1979) Representation of earthquake ground motion: Scaled accelerograms and equivalent response spectra. State-of-the-Art for Assessing Earthquake Hazards in the United States 14, Miscellaneous Paper S-73-1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi, USAGoogle Scholar
  185. Vanmarcke EH, Gasparini DA (1976) Simulated earthquake motions compatible with prescribed response spectra. Tech. Rep. R76-4. Dept. of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Cambridge, USAGoogle Scholar
  186. Virieux J, Madariaga R (1982) Dynamic faulting studied by a finite difference method. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 72(2):345–369Google Scholar
  187. Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton TH, Kanamori H (1999) Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity in California. Earthquake Spectra 15(3):557–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Wang R (1999) A simple orthonormalization method for stable and efficient computation of Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 89(3):733–741Google Scholar
  189. Wang GQ, Boore DM, Tang G, Zhou X (2007) Comparisons of ground motions from collocated and closely-spaced 1-sample-per-second Global Positioning System (GPS) and accelerograph recordings of the 2003, M6.5 San Simeon, California, earthquake in the Parkfield Region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(1B):76–90. doi:10.1785/0120060053 Google Scholar
  190. Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson N (2006) Selection of ground motion time series and limits on scaling. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 26(5):477–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Wennerberg L (1990) Stochastic summation of empirical Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 80(6):1418–1432Google Scholar
  192. Wong HL, Trifunac MD (1978) Synthesizing realistic ground motion accelerograms. Tech. Rep. CE 78-07. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  193. Woodhouse JH (1974) Surface waves in a laterally varying layered structure. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 37:461–490Google Scholar
  194. Zeng Y, Anderson JG (1995) A method for direct computation of the differential seismogram with respect to the velocity change in a layered elastic solid. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 85(1):300–307Google Scholar
  195. Zeng T, Anderson JG, Yu G (1994) A composite source model for computing realistic synthetic strong ground motions. Geophysical Research Letters 21(8):725–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ARN/RISBRGMOrleans Cedex 2France

Personalised recommendations