Advertisement

Genetica

, Volume 138, Issue 7, pp 757–762 | Cite as

Positive selection drives lactoferrin evolution in mammals

  • Guo Ming Liang
  • Xun Ping Jiang
Article

Abstract

Lactoferrin (LF) is a member of the transferrin family that is abundantly expressed and secreted by glandular epithelial cells. The biological functions of LF involve in iron homeostasis regulation of the body and antibacterial activity. Previous studies demonstrated that it had a high cationic N-terminal domain that could interact with glycosaminoglycans, lipopolysaccharides and the bacterial virulence protein. Two anti-microbial peptides, lactoferricin (LFcin) and lactoferrampin (LFampin), were also isolated and identified in N-terminal of LF. Although the antibacterial mechanism was carefully studied, little was known about the molecular evolution of LF. In this study, we estimated the nonsynonymous-to-synonymous substitution ratios (\( \omega = {{d_{N} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{d_{N} } {d_{S} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {d_{S} }} \)) per site using maximum likelihood method to analyze the LF evolution. The results of ω > 1 and five identified positive selection sites of amino acid suggested that the evolution of LF gene was characterized by positive selection. Further study found that the positive selection sites were either located in the LF-bacteria binding region or the peptides of LFcin and LFampin, indicating that the selection pressure was related to LF-bacteria interaction. The identification of these sites may contribute to the mechanism of bacteria-LF interaction.

Keywords

Lactoferrin Lactoferricin Lactoferrampin Positive selection Antibacterial activity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Rasmus Nielsen of Biology at the University of Copenhagen who gave Jiang many suggestions concerning this research. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China grant 30300253 and the earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System to Professor X.P. Jiang.

References

  1. Aagaard JE, Phillips P (2004) Accuracy and power of the likelihood ratio test for comparing evolutionary rates among genes. J Mol Evol 60:426–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker EN, Baker HM (2009) A structural framework for understanding the multifunctional character of lactoferrin. Biochimie 91:3–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker HM, Baker CJ, Smith CA et al (2000) Metal substitution in transferrins: specific binding of cerium (IV) revealed by the crystal structure of cerium-substituted human lactoferrin. J Biol Inorg Chem 5:692–698CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellamy W, Takase M, Yamauchi K et al (1992) Identification of the bactericidal domain of lactoferrin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1121:130–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolscher GMJ, Adao R, Nazmi K et al (2009) Bactericidal activity of LFchimera is stronger and less sensitive to ionic strength than its constituent lactoferricin and lactoferrampin peptides. Biochimie 91:123–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Editorial (2009) Advances in lactoferrin research. Biochimie 91:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ford MJ (2001) Molecular evolution of transferrin: evidence for positive selection in Salmonids. Mol Biol Evol 18:639–647PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gifford JL, Hunter HN, Vogel HJ (2005) Lactoferricin: a lactoferrin-derived peptide with anti-microbial, antiviral, antitumor and immunological properties. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:2588–2598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Haney EF, Nazmi K, Lau F et al (2009) Novel lactoferrampin antimicrobial peptides derived from human lactoferrin. Biochimie 91:141–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Haridas M, Anderson BF, Baker EN (1995) Structure of human diferric lactoferrin refined at 2.2 Å resolution. Acta Cryst D51:629–646Google Scholar
  11. Havard J, Robert EWH (2009) Antimicrobial properties of lactoferrin. Biochimie 91:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karthikeyan S, Paramasivam M, Yadav S et al (1999) Structure of buffalo lactoferrin at 2.5 Å resolution using crystals grown at 303 K shows different orientations of the N and C lobes. Acta Cryst D55:1805–1813Google Scholar
  13. Khan JA, Kumar P, Paramasivam M et al (2001) Camel lactoferrin-a transferrincum-lactoferrin: crystal structure of camel apolactoferrin at 2.6 Å resolution and structural basis of its dual role. J Mol Biol 309:751–761CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lambert AL, Perri H, Meehan TJ (2005a) Evolution of duplications in the transferrin family of proteins. Comp Biochem Physiol, Part B 140:11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lambert AL, Perri H, Halbrooks JP et al (2005b) Evolution of the transferrin family: Conservation of residues associated with iron and anion binding. Comp Biochem Physiol, Part B 142:129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moore SA, Anderson BF, Groom CR et al (1997) Three dimensional structure of diferric bovine lactoferrin at 2.8 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 274:222–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nielsen R, Yang Z (1998) Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. Genetics 148:929–936PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC et al (2004) UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25:1605–1612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Retzer MD, Yu R, Schryvers AB (1999) Identication of sequences in human transferring that bind to the bacterial receptor protein, transferrin-binding protein B. Mol Microbiol 32:111–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sharma AK, Paramasivam M, Srinivasan A et al (1998) Three-dimensional structure of mare diferric lactoferrin at 2.6 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 289:303–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Susana AGC, Sigifredo AG, Quintín RC (2009) Lactoferrin: structure, function and applications. Int J Antimicrob Agents 33:301.e1–301.e8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M et al (2007) MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Trinchella F, Parisi E, Scudiero R (2009) Evolutionary analysis of the transferrin gene in Antarctic Notothenioidei: a history of adaptive evolution and functional divergence. Marine Genomics 1:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Valenti P, Antonini G (2005) Lactoferrin: an important host defence against microbial and viral attack. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:2576–2587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Van der Kraan MIA, Groenink J, Nazmi K et al (2004) Lactoferrampin: a novel antimicrobial peptide in the N1-domain of bovine lactoferrin. Peptides 25:177–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wong WSW, Yang Z, Goldman N et al (2004) Accuracy and power of statistical methods for detecting adaptive evolution in protein coding sequences and for identifying positively selected sites. Genetics 168:1041–1051CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Yang Z (2006) Computational molecular evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang Z (2007) PAML4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 24:1586–1591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang L, Gui JF (2004) Positive selection on multiple antique allelic lineages of transferrin in the polyploid carassius auratus. Mol Biol Evol 21:1264–1277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Yang Z, Nielsen R, Goldman N et al (2000) Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics 155:431–449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang Z, Wong WSW, Nielsen R (2005) Bayes empirical bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection. Mol Biol Evol 22:1107–1118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Animal Science DepartmentHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations