Skip to main content

Genetic divergence among sympatric colour morphs of the Dalmatian wall lizard (Podarcis melisellensis)

Genetica volume 138, pages 387–393 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

If alternative phenotypes in polymorphic populations do not mate randomly, they can be used as model systems to study adaptive diversification and possibly the early stages of sympatric speciation. In this case, non random mating is expected to support genetic divergence among the different phenotypes. In the present study, we use population genetic analyses to test putatively neutral genetic divergence (of microsatellite loci) among three colour morphs of the lizard Podarcis melisellensis, which is associated with differences in male morphology, performance and behaviour. We found weak evidence of genetic divergence, indicating that gene flow is somewhat restricted among morphs and suggesting possible adaptive diversification.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  • Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (1996–2004) GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France)

  • Belkhir K, Castric V, Bonhomme F (2002) IDENTIX, a software to test for relatedness in a population using permutation methods. Mol Ecol Notes 2:611–614. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8278.2002.00273.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleay C, Sinervo B (2007) Discrete genetic variation in mate choice and a condition-dependent preference function in the side-blotched lizard: implications for the formation and maintenance of coadapted gene complexes. Behav Ecol 18:304–310. doi:10.1093/behaco/arl101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick DI, Fitzpatrick BM (2007) Sympatric speciation: models and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:459–487. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann HJ, Taborsky M (2008) Alternative reproductive tactics and the evolution of alternative allocation phenotypes. In: Oliveira R, Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ (eds) Alternative reproductive tactics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield JFY (1996) A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency. Mol Ecol 5:453–455

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty R, De Andrade M, Daiger SP, Budowle B (1992) Apparent heterozygote deficiencies observed in DNA typing data and their implications in forensic applications. Ann Hum Genet 56:45–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakin EE, Avise JC (2004) Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity 93:504–509. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ford EB (1945) Polymorphism. Biol Rev 20:73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsman A, Appelqvist S (1998) Visual predators impose correlational selection on prey color pattern and behavior. Behav Ecol 9:409–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsman A, Ahnesjö J, Caesar S, Karlsson M (2008) A model of ecological and evolutionary consequences of color polymorphism. Ecology 89:34–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funk DJ, Filchak KE, Feder JL (2002) Herbivorous insects: model systems for the comparative study of speciation ecology. Genetica 116:251–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilet S, Waxman D (2002) Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:10533–10538. doi:10.1073/pnas.152011499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (1995) A computer program to calculate f-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Härdling R, Bergsten J (2006) Nonrandom mating preserves intrasexual polymorphism and stops population differentiation in sexual conflict. Am Nat 167:401–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry AP, Huber SK, De León LF, Herrel A, Podos J (2009) Disruptive selection in a bimodal population of Darwin’s finches. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:753–759. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber SK, De Leon LF, Hendry AP, Bermingham E, Podos J (2007) Reproductive isolation of sympatric morphs in a population of Darwin’s finches. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:1709–1714. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyghe K, Vanhooydonck B, Herrel A, Tadic Z, Van Damme R (2007) Morphology, performance, behavior and ecology of three color morphs of the lizard Podarcis melisellensis. Integr Comp Biol 47:211–220. doi:10.1093/icb/icm043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyghe K, Herrel A, Adriaens D, Tadic Z, Van Damme R (2009a) It is all in the head: morphological basis for differences in bite force among colour morphs of the Dalmatian wall lizard. Biol J Linn Soc 96:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyghe K, Breugelmans K, Small M, Tadic Z, Van Damme R, Vanhooydonck B, Backeljau T (2009b) Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite markers in the Dalmatian wall lizard Podarcis melisellensis (Squamata: Lacertidae). Mol Ecol Resour 9:299–301. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02381.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen K, Havenhand JN, Jonsson PR, Lindegarth M, Sundin A, Hollander J (2008) Male discrimination of female mucous trails permits assortative mating in a marine snail species. Evolution 62:3178–3184. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00510.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koblmüller S, Sefc KM, Duftner N, Katongo C, Tomljanovic T, Sturmbauer C (2008) A single mitochondrial haplotype and nuclear genetic differentiation in sympatric colour morphs of a riverine cichlid fish. J Evol Biol 21:362–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01443.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, Kirkpatrick M (1986) Ecological speciation by sexual selection. J Theor Biol 133:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latch EK, Dharmarajan G, Glaubitz JC, Rhodes OE Jr (2006) Relative performance of Bayesian software for inferring population substructure and individual assignment at low levels of population differentiation. Conserv Genet 7:295–302. doi:10.1007/s10592-005-9098-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn CE Jr, Dambroski HR, Feder JL, Berlocher SH, Nojima S, Roelofs WL (2004) Postzygotic isolation factor in sympatric speciation in Rhagoletis flies: reduced response of hybrids to parental host-fruit odors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:17753–17758. doi:10.1073/pnas.0408255101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsubayashi KW, Ohshima I, Nosil P (2009) Ecological speciation in phytophagous insects. Entomol Exp Appl 134:1–27. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7558.2009.00916.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon JS, Rundle HD (2002) Speciation in nature: the threespine stickleback model systems. TREE 17:480–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers JJ, Irschick DJ, Vanhooydonck B, Herrel A (2006) Divergent roles for multiple sexual signals in a polygynous lizard. Funct Ecol 20:709–716. doi:10.1111/j/1365-2435.2006.01152.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira RF, Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ (2008) Alternative reproductive tactics, an integrative approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke SR, Griffith SC (2006) Red dominates black: agonistic signaling among head morphs in the colour polymorphic Gouldian finch. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:949–957. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke SR, Griffith SC (2007) The relative role of male vs female mate choice in maintaining assortative pairing among discrete colour morphs. J Evol Biol 20:1512–1521. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01332.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke SR, Griffith SC (2009) Postzygotic genetic incompatibility between sympatric color morphs. Evolution 63:793–798. doi:10.1126/science.1168928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puebla O, Bermingham E, Guichard F, Whiteman E (2007) Colour pattern as a single trait driving speciation in Hypoplectrus coral reef fishes? Proc R Soc Lond B 274:1265–1271. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) Genepop version 1.2: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie MG (2007) Sexual selection and speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:79–102. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinervo B, Svensson E (2002) Correlational selection and the evolution of genomic architecture. Heredity 89:329–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinervo B, Svensson E, Comendant T (2000) Density cycles and an offspring quantity and quality game driven by natural selection. Nature 406:985–988

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinervo B, Heulin B, Surget-Groba Y, Clobert J, Miles DB, Corl A, Chaine A, Davis A (2007) Models of density-dependent genic selection and a new rock-paper-scissors social system. Am Nat 170:663–680. doi:10.1086/522092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Small MP, Beacham T, Withler R, Nelson RJ (1998) Discriminating coho salm (Oncorhynchus kisutch) populations within the Fraser River, British Columbia using microsatellite DNA markers. Mol Ecol 7:141–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TB, Skúlason S (1996) Evolutionary significance of resource polymorphisms in fish, amphibians and birds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:111–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson E, Abbott JK, Gosden TP, Coreau A (2009) Female polymorphisms, sexual conflict and limits to speciation processes in animals. Evol Ecol 23:93–108. doi:10.1007/s10682-007-9208-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn GS, Weissing FJ (2001) Ecological versus sexual selection models of sympatric speciation: a synthesis. Selection 2:17–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn GS, Dieckmann U, Weissing FJ (2004) Sympatric speciation by sexual selection: a critical reevaluation. Am Nat 163:709–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner AP, Creel S, Kalinowski ST (2006) Estimating relatedness and relationships using microsatellite loci with null alleles. Heredity 97:336–345. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walter RP, Haffner GD, Heath DD (2009) No barriers to gene flow among sympatric polychromatic ‘small’ Telmatherina antoniae from Lake Matano, Indonesia. J Fish Biol 74:1804–1815. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02256.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (2005) Developmental plasticity and the origin of species differences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:6543–6549. doi:10.1073/pnas.0501844102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank W.J. Etges and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of this paper. We also thank Karin Breugelmans (RBINS) for help in the lab and Patricija Okovič for help in the field. Bieke Vanhooydonck is a postdoctoral fellow of FWO-Vl. Samples were collected under permit no. 532-08-01/6-06-02 issued by the Croatian Ministry of Culture. This work was funded by an FWO-Vl research grant G.0111.06, a research grant of the University of Antwerp (BOF), and the Joint Experimental Molecular Unit (JEMU) at the RBINS.

Author information

Author notes

  1. K. Huyghe

    Present address: Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), Calle José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium

    K. Huyghe, B. Vanhooydonck, R. Van Damme & T. Backeljau

  2. Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 600 Capitol Way N, Olympia, WA, 98502, USA

    M. Small

  3. Département d’Ecologie et de Gestion de la Biodiversité, C.N.R.S/M.N.H.N, 57 rue Cuvier, Case postale 55, 75231, Paris Cedex 5, France

    A. Herrel

  4. Department of Animal Physiology, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia

    Z. Tadić

  5. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, 1000, Brussels, Belgium

    T. Backeljau

Authors
  1. K. Huyghe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Small
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Vanhooydonck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Herrel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Z. Tadić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. Van Damme
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. T. Backeljau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Huyghe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huyghe, K., Small, M., Vanhooydonck, B. et al. Genetic divergence among sympatric colour morphs of the Dalmatian wall lizard (Podarcis melisellensis). Genetica 138, 387–393 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-010-9435-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-010-9435-2

Keywords

  • Polymorphism
  • F ST
  • F IS
  • Non-random mating
  • Population divergence
  • Microsatellites