Advertisement

Genetica

, 135:283 | Cite as

A ZZ–ZW sex chromosome system in the finless eel Dalophis imberbis (Anguilliformes, Ophichtidae)

  • S. Salvadori
  • E. Coluccia
  • R. Cannas
  • A. Cau
  • A. M. Deiana
Article

Abstract

The karyotype of the finless eel Dalophis imberbis was investigated by conventional (C and replication banding, CMA3 fluorescence) and molecular (FISH with 45S rDNA probe) techniques. The diploid chromosome number was 2n = 46 and the karyotype consisted of four pairs of meta-submetacentric and 18 pairs of subtelo-acrocentric autosomes and a pair of sex chromosomes heteromorphic in females, composed by a large subtelocentric Z, and a medium sized acrocentric W chromosome; in males this pair was composed by two large subtelocentric ZZ chromosomes. Multiple NORs have been localized by FISH and have been found to be CMA3 positive; one of the NORs was located on the W chromosome and it was found transcriptionally active by silver staining. The Z chromosome contained distinct intercalar C-positive heterochromatin and W was almost completely heterochromatic. Our report contributes to the knowledge to the cytotaxonomy of Anguilliformes where differentiated sex chromosomes are reported in about a quarter of the species: both male and female heterogamety as well as a multiple chromosome system have been reported. Moreover, this is the first anguilliform species in which multiple NORs have been reported.

Keywords

Karyotype Chromosome banding Fish cytogenetics FISH Sex chromosomes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Prof. Ugo Laudani for helpful suggestions. This research was supported by Italian Ministry of Instruction, University and Research (MIUR) Grant No. DM219-22-12-05, National Relevant Interest Research Projects (PRIN), 2005.

References

  1. Ayling L-J, Griffin DK (2002) The evolution of sex chromosomes. Cytogenet Genome Res 99:125–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cau A, Salvadori S, Deiana AM, Bella JL, Mezzanotte R (1988) The characterization of Muraena helena mitotic chromosomes: karyotype, C-banding, nucleolar organizer regions and in situ digestion with restriction endonucleases. Cytogenet Cell Genet 47:223–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Almeida-Toledo LF, Daniel-Silva MFZ, Moysés CB, Fonteles SBA, Lopes CE, Akama A, Foresti F (2002) Chromosome evolution in fish: sex chromosome variability in Eigenmannia virescens (Gymnotiformes: Sternopygidae). Cytogenet Genome Res 99:164–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deiana AM, Coluccia E, Cannas R, Pesci P, Fonnesu A, Salvadori S (2006) Colocalization of the ribosomal gene families in Conger conger (Anguilliformes, Congridae). Ital J Zool 73(1):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Devlin RH, Nagahama Y (2002) Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: an overview of genetic, phsiological, and environmental influences. Aquaculture 208:191–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Francis RC (1992) Sexual lability in teleosts: developmental factors. Q Rev Biol 67(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Inoue JG, Miya M, Tsukamoto K, Nishida M (2004) Mitogenomic evidence for the monophyly of elopomorph fishes (Teleostei) and the evolutionary origin of the leptocephalus larva. Mol Phylogenet Evol 32:274–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Klinkhardt M, Tesche M, Greven H (1995) Database of fish chromosomes. Westarp Wissenschaften, Magdeburg, pp 28–179Google Scholar
  9. Lavoué S, Miya M, Poulsen JY, Møller PR, Nishida M (2008) Monophyly, phylogenetic position and inter-familial relationships of the Alepocephaliformes (Teleostei) based on whole mitogenome sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.12.002
  10. Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AA (1964) Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52:201–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mank JE, Promislow DEL, Avise JC (2006) Evolution of alternative sex-determining mechanisms in teleost fishes. Biol J Linn Soc 87:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Murofushi M, Yosida TH (1984) Cytogenetical studies on fishes. VIII. XX–Y Sex chromosome mechanism newly found in the snake eel, Muraenichthys gymnotus (Anguilliformes, Piscea). Proc Jpn Acad Sci 60:21–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nanda I, Feichtinger W, Schmid M, Schroeder JH, Zischler H, Epplen JT (1990) Simple repetitive sequences are associated with differentiation of the sex chromosomes in the guppy fish. J Mol Evol 30:456–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Obermiller LE, Pfeiler E (2003) Phylogenetic relationships of elopomorph fishes inferred from mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 26:202–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Porto-Foresti F, Oliveira C, Foresti F (2005) First chromosome characterization in the neotropical eel, Gymnothorax ocellatus (Pisces, Muraenidae). Cytologia 70(3):283–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rishi S, Rishi KK, Gill PK (1999) Sex chromosomes in fishes. Ichthyology 308–320Google Scholar
  17. Rufas JS (1985) NOR and nucleolus in the spermatogenesis of acridoid grasshoppers. Genetica 66:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Salvadori S, Deiana AM, Coluccia E, Floridia G, Rossi E, Zuffardi O (1995) Colocalization of (TTAGGG) n telomeric sequences and ribosomal genes in Atlantic eels. Chromosome Res 3:54–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Salvadori S, Coluccia E, Cannas R, Cau A, Deiana AM (2003) Replication banding in Mediterranean moray eels: chromosomal characterization and comparison. Genetica 119(3):253–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Salvadori S, Coluccia E, Cannas R, Milia A, Deiana AM (2006) Studio del cariotipo di Gymnothorax tile Ostichthyes, Anguilliformes. Biol Mar Medit 13(1):1109–1111Google Scholar
  21. Schweizer D (1976) Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma 58:307–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sola L, Monaco PJ, Rasch EM (1990) Cytogenetics of bisexual/unisexual species of Poecilia: C-bands, Ag-NOR polymorphisms, and sex chromosomes in three populations of Poecilia latipinna. Cytogenet Cell Genet 53:148–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sumner AT (1990) Genome organization in the light of chromosome banding. In: Sumner AT (ed) Chromosome banding. London, Unwin Hyman Ltd., pp 332–348Google Scholar
  24. Ueno K, Ota K, Kobayashi T (2001) Heteromorphic sex chromosomes of lizardfish (Synodontidae): focus on the ZZ–ZW1W2 system in Trachinocephalus myops. Genetica 111:133–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Volff JN, Schartl M (2001) Variability of genetic sex determination in poeciliid fishes. Genetica 111:101–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Salvadori
    • 1
  • E. Coluccia
    • 1
  • R. Cannas
    • 1
  • A. Cau
    • 1
  • A. M. Deiana
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Biologia animale ed EcologiaUniversità di CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations