Classical and molecular cytogenetic characterization of Agonostomus monticola, a primitive species of Mugilidae (Mugiliformes)
- 129 Downloads
This study reports the first description of the karyotype of Agonostomus monticola, a species belonging to a genus which is considered to be the most primitive among living mugilid fish. Specimens from Panama and Venezuela were cytogenetically analysed by conventional chromosome banding (Ag and base-specific-fluorochrome staining, C-banding) and by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Agonostomus monticola showed a chromosome complement of 2n = 48, composed of 23 acrocentric and one subtelocentric chromosome pairs and a pericentromeric distribution of the C-positive heterochromatin in all chromosomes. Major ribosomal genes were found to be located on the short arms of the subtelocentric chromosome pair number 24 and minor ribosomal genes in a paracentromeric position of a single medium-sized chromosome pair. All these observed cytogenetic features are similar to those previously described in four representatives of two genera, Liza and Chelon, which are considered to be among the most advanced in the family. Thus, this karyotypic form might represent the plesiomorphic condition for the mullets. This hypothesis regarding the plesiomorphic condition, if confirmed, would shed new light on the previously inferred cytotaxonomic relationships for the studied species of Mugilidae, because the karyotype with 48 acrocentric chromosomes, which has been so far regarded as primitive for the family, would have to be considered as derived.
KeywordsConstitutive heterochromatin FISH Karyotype 18S and 5S rDNA NORs
Financial support was provided by the Italian Ministry of Instruction, University and Research (MIUR), DM n. 219, 22-12-05, National Relevant Interest Research Projects (PRIN), 2005; by Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) Brazil and by Consejo de Investigación, Universidad de Oriente, Venezuela.
- Nelson JS (2006) Fishes of the world, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- Nirchio M, Cequea H (1998) Karyology of Mugil liza and M. curema from Venezuela. Bol Invest Mar Cost 27:45–50Google Scholar
- Nirchio M, Oliveira C, Ferreira IA, Pérez JE, Gaviria JI, Harrison I, Rossi AR, Sola L (2007) Comparative cytogenetic and allozyme analysis of Mugil rubrioculus and Mugil curema (Teleostei: Mugilidae) from Venezuela. Interciencia 32:757–762Google Scholar
- Ohno S (1974) Protochordata, cyclostomata and pisces. In: John B (ed) Animal cytogenetics, vol. 4, Chordata 1. Gerbrüder Borntraeger, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Sola L, Rossi AR, Iaselli V, Rasch EM, Monaco PJ (1992) Cytogenetics of bisexual/unisexual species of Poecilia. II. Analysis of heterochromatin and nucleolar organizer regions in Poecilia mexicana mexicana by C-banding and DAPI, quinacrine, chromomycin A3 and silver staining. Cytogenet Cell Genet 60:229–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sola L, Gornung E, Mannarelli ME, Rossi AR (2007) Chromosomal evolution in Mugilidae, Mugilomorpha: an overview. In: Pisano E, Ozouf-Costaz C, Foresti F, Kapoor BG (eds) Fish cytogenetics. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH, USA, pp 165–194Google Scholar
- Souza IL, Galian J, De la Rua P, Bertollo LAC, Moreira-Filho O (2001) Non-random distribution of the GC-rich heterochromatin and nucleolar rDNA sites on Astyanax scabripinnis chromosomes. Cytologia 66:85–91Google Scholar
- Thomson JM (1997) The Mugilidae of the world. Mem Queensl Mus 41:457–562Google Scholar