Abstract
Urbanization is increasing rapidly because of the economic, cultural, natural, political, etc. factors on a local or global scale. Therefore, this rapid growth in urbanization creates many challenges for local governments and policymakers. It is particularly important for local authorities to know how to manage, develop and design cities well in order to have more active and better cities. This study argues that a good survey for a city's existing urban areas will influence the development of planned urban areas. In this direction, primarily, the existing spatial characteristics of the study area were revealed through the current map showing the current situation. In the next section, the settlement plan is used as a base and its future spatial characteristics are determined. The current situation and the spatial characteristics which are obtained in settlement plan were compared in the last part of the study, in order to determine the spatial characteristics of the study field, integration, choice and connectivity analyses, which are the basic analyses of the Space syntax method, were performed and accessibility, readability levels were discussed in different radii by using these analyses. It is concluded that the current map shows the highest values with R3000 half-diameter 0.19 and settlement plan with 0.46 in R1000 radius. When examined in terms of readability values, it was found out that the highest values were obtained in the settlement plan with a radius of 0.73 in the R1000 radius and with a value of 0.87 on the current map. Consequently, the readability and accessibility values of the study area in the future have decreased in general.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All the data and material supporting the present study are included in the results section of this original research article.
References
Al-Hashimi, I., El-Azzawi, A.-S., & El-Kasbi, H. (2013). Dynamics of Urban Growth: Modeling the Fractal Dimension of the City of Irbid , Jordan. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 7(1). https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JJCE/article/view/18022
Asfour, O. S. (2012). Towards an effective strategy to cope with housing land scarcity in the Gaza Strip as a sustainable development priority. Habitat International, 36(2), 295–303.
Avner, P., Rentschler, J. E., & Hallegatte, S. (2014). Carbon price efficiency: Lock-in and path dependence in urban forms and transport infrastructure. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (6941).
Barkat, I., Ayad, H., & Elcherif, I. (2019). Detecting the physical aspects of local identity using a hybrid qualitative and quantitative approach: The case of Souk Al-Khawajat district. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(4), 1339–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.11.005
Battistin, F. (2021). Space Syntax and buried cities: The case of the Roman town of Falerii Novi (Italy). Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 35, 102712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102712
Beatley, T., Timothy, B., & Manning, K. (1997). The ecology of place: Planning for environment, economy, and community. Island Press.
Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2017). Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 183–212.
Chiaradia, A., Hillier, B., Schwander, C., & Barnes, Y. (2013). Compositional and urban form effects on residential property value patterns in Greater London. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning, 166(3), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.10.00030
Conroy Dalton, N. S. (2010). Synergy, Intelligibility and Revelation in neighbourhood places. London: University College of London (Doctoral Thesis). https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1334117 Accessed 18 Aug 2020
Dalton, R. C., & Dalton, N. S. (2007). Applying Depth Decay Functions to Space Syntax Network Graphs. Applying Depth Decay Functions to Space Syntax Network Graphs. Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, İstanbul. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1113/1/1113.pdf
Ewing, R., Pendall, R., & Chen, D. (2003). Measuring sprawl and its transportation impacts. Transportation Research Record, 1831(1), 175–183.
Fladd, S. G. (2017). Social syntax: An approach to spatial modification through the reworking of space syntax for archaeological applications. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 47, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2017.05.002
Gann, D. W. (2003). Spatial integration: A space syntax analysis of the villages of the Homol’ovi Cluster [PhD, The University of Arizona]. https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/280412
Gil, J. (2015). Examining ‘edge effects’: Sensitivity of spatial network centrality analysis to boundary conditions. 147.1–147.16. http://www.sss10.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/SSS10_Proceedings_147.pdf
Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X., & Briggs, J. M. (2008). Global Change and the Ecology of Cities. Science, 319(5864), 756–760. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195
Günaydin, A. S. (2018). Tarihi Şehir dokusunu koruyucu, geliştirici ve sokak tasarımlarına yönelik bir model önerisi; Gaziantep Örneği. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 242.
Gunaydin, A. S., & Tascioglu, S. (2021). Investigation of Historical City Centers in Terms of Accessibility: Case of Trabzon Castle, Turkey. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 147(4), 05021036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000729
Günaydin, A. S., & Yücekaya, M. (2020). Evaluation of the history of cities in the context of spatial configuration to preview their future. Sustainable Cities and Society, 59, 102202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102202
Günaydın, A. S., & Yücekaya, M. (2020). The evaluation of the perceptibility and accessibility: the case of gaziantep. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 8(2), 480–497. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2020.123. ISSN: 2147-9380.
Guo, D., Cao, Z., DeFrancia, K., Yeo, J. W. G., Hardadi, G., & Chai, S. (2018). Awareness, perceptions and determinants of urban sustainable development concerns–Evidence from a central province in China. Sustainable Development, 26(6), 652–662.
Habitat, U. N. (2016). World Cities Report 2016: Urbanization and Development-Emerging Futures. Publisher.
Hillier, B. (1996). Cities as movement economies. Urban Design International, 1(1), 41–60.
Hillier, B. (1999). The Hidden Geometry of Deformed Grids: Or, Why Space Syntax Works, When it Looks as Though it Shouldn’t. Environment and Planning b: Planning and Design, 26(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1068/b4125
Hillier, B. (2001). A theory of the city as object: Or, how spatial laws mediate the social construction of urban space. Presented at: 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. (2001). 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. http://undertow.arch.gatech.edu/homepages/3sss/
Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Space Syntax. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/3881/1/SITM.pdf.
Hillier, B. (2009). Spatial sustainability in cities: Organic patterns and sustainable forms. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237
Hillier, B., & Lida, S. (2005). Network and Psychological Effects in Urban Movement. In A. G. Cohn & D. M. Mark (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory (Vol. 3693, pp. 475–490). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Hillier, B., Burdett, R., Peponis, J., & Penn, A. (1987). Creating Life: Or, Does Architecture Determine Anything? Architecture & Comportement/Architecture & Behaviour, 3(3), 233–250.
Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning b: Planning and Design, 20(1), 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029
Hochmair, H., & Frank, A. U. (2000). Influence of estimation errors on wayfinding-decisions in unknown street networks–analyzing the least-angle strategy. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2(4), 283–313.
Hodson, R. (2016). Urban health and well-being. Nature, 531(7594), S49–S49.
Huang, L., Yan, L., & Wu, J. (2016). Assessing urban sustainability of Chinese megacities: 35 years after the economic reform and open-door policy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 145, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.09.005
Jenerette, G. D., & Wu, J. (2001). Analysis and simulation of land-use change in the central Arizona – Phoenix region, USA. Landscape Ecology, 16(7), 611–626. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013170528551
Karaarslan, E., & Çelikyay, S. (2019). YEŞİLYURT (MALATYA) TARİHİ KENT DOKUSUNUN İRDELENMESİ. Bartın University International Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 2(2), 261–273.
Keleş, R. (2013). Kentleşme politikası. 12. Baskı, Ankara: İmge Kitapevi.
Klarqvist, B. (2015). A space syntax glossary. NA, 6(2).
Kubat, A. S. (2015). Kentlerin Biçimsel Yapısındaki Sayısal Mantık: Space Syntax. Türkiye Kentsel Morfoloji Ağı, 32–58.
Lofland, L. H. (2017). The public realm: Exploring the city's quintessential social territory. Routledge.
MALATYA KÜLTÜR ENVANTERİ (2021). Malatya Büyükşehir Belediyesi.
Millward, H., Spinney, J., & Scott, D. (2013). Active-transport walking behavior: Destinations, durations, distances. Journal of Transport Geography, 28, 101–110.
Nes, A. van, & Yamu, C. (2017). Space Syntax: A method to measure urban space related to social, economic and cognitive factors. In The Virtual and the Real in Planning and Urban Design: Perspectives, Practices and Applications (pp. 136–150). Routledge.
Ochoa, J. J., Tan, Y., Qian, Q. K., Shen, L., & Moreno, E. L. (2018). Learning from best practices in sustainable urbanization. Habitat International, 78, 83–95.
Oktay, D. (2007). DOSYA: KENTSEL YAŞAM KALİTESİ Sürdürülebilirlik, Yaşanılabilirlik ve Kentsel Yaşam Kalitesi. MİMARLIK, 335. http://www.mimarlikdergisi.com/index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSayi=53&RecID=1329
Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., Kinder, T., & Vidal, I. (2015). The SERVICE framework: A public-service-dominant approach to sustainable public services. British Journal of Management, 26(3), 424–438.
Özbil, A., Peponis, J., & Stone, B. (2011). Understanding the link between street connectivity, land use and pedestrian flows. URBAN DESIGN International, 16(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2011.2
Park, H. T. (2009). Boundary effects on the intelligibility and predictability of spatial systems. In Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 8–11).
Peponis, J., Bafna, S., & Zhang, Z. (2008). The connectivity of streets: Reach and directional distance. Environment and Planning b: Planning and Design, 35(5), 881–901. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33088
Sayed, K. A., Hillier, B., Penn, A., & Turner, A. (2014). Space Syntax Methodology. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1415080
Sennett, R. (2021). The uses of disorder: Personal identity and city life. Verso Books.
Sev, A. (2009). How can the construction industry contribute to sustainable development? A Conceptual Framework. Sustainable Development, 17(3), 161–173.
Tan, Y., Xu, H., & Zhang, X. (2016). Sustainable urbanization in China: A comprehensive literature review. Cities, 55, 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.04.002
Turkish Statistical Institute. (2022). TUİK. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist.
Turner, A. (2007). From Axial to Road-Centre Lines: A New Representation for Space Syntax and a New Model of Route Choice for Transport Network Analysis. Environment and Planning b: Planning and Design, 34(3), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32067
Turner, A., Penn, A., & Hillier, B. (2005). An algorithmic definition of the axial map. Environment and Planning b: Planning and Design, 32(3), 425–444.
Turner, A. (2004). Depthmap 4—A Researcher’s Handbook. Bartlett School of Graduate Studies. http://www.vr.ucl.ac.uk/depthmap/depthmap4.pdf
Wineman, J. D., Marans, R. W., Schulz, A. J., van der Westhuizen, D. L., Mentz, G. B., & Max, P. (2014). Designing healthy neighborhoods: Contributions of the built environment to physical activity in Detroit. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(2), 180–189.
Wu, J. (2010). Urban sustainability: An inevitable goal of landscape research. Springer.
Xiao, Y., Sarkar, C., Webster, C., Chiaradia, A., & Lu, Y. (2017). Street network accessibility-based methodology for appraisal of land use master plans: An empirical case study of Wuhan, China. Land Use Policy, 69, 193–203.
Yang, Z. (2019). Sustainability of urban development with population decline in different policy scenarios: A case study of Northeast China. Sustainability, 11(22), 6442.
Yang, Z., Yang, H., & Wang, H. (2020). Evaluating urban sustainability under different development pathways: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61, 102226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102226
Yang, T., & Hillier, B. (2007). The Fuzzy Boundary: The Spatial Definition of Urban Areas. 091.01–091.16. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/4110
Zhang, X., & Li, H. (2018). Urban resilience and urban sustainability: What we know and what do not know? Cities, 72, 141–148.
Funding
No funding was obtained for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Eyüp Burak Selçuk In the preparation of figures and tables, language control and access to resources and Ahmet Salih Günaydın analyzes were made in the creation of the main manuscript text. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All authors have read, understood, and have complied as applicable with the statement on “Ethical responsibilities of Authors” as found in the Instructions for Authors and are aware that with minor exceptions, no changes can be made to authorship once the paper is submitted.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Günaydın, A.S., Selçuk, E.B. How urban growth influences the spatial characteristics of cities: empirical research in Malatya/Türkiye based on space syntax. GeoJournal 89, 81 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-024-11080-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-024-11080-z