Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing household income inequality in Pakistan: a subgroup decomposition of generalized entropy measures

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analyzing Income disparities across populations has remained to be the foremost objective for policymakers. The extent of inequality can be measured for a certain group of households which provides information on the homogeneity of the various groups. Information derived through household analysis helps policymakers to design interventions. Inequality analysis overtime over a different group of the population can also be carried out for a particular economy. Another aspect through which inequality can be assessed is the comparison of different dimensions such as health provisions, education, and cash transfers. Analysis of income sources and consumption categories also helps the government to focus on social welfare. This paper aims to analyze income inequality in Pakistan across two periods and indicate its main determinants. Microdata was obtained from Household Income Expenditure Survey HIES for the year 2001–02 and 2018–19. Generalized entropy measures have been used to decompose income inequality at the subgroup level. Six household characteristics are identified for analyzing their contribution to income inequality. The study proves that education level, nature of employment, asset ownership, and gender contribute significantly to income inequality. The study further indicates that changes in income distribution for the bottom of the population through paid employment, female income, and asset ownership could impact income inequality. The study's results can be used to assess policy impact on social welfare and help policymakers design targeted interventions, develop efficient taxation, and create a sustainable model for inclusive growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data can be easily accessible from the website of Pakistan Bureau of Statistics Household Income Expenditure Survey.

References

  • Afridi, U., Qadir, A., Zaki, J., & Khan, S. R. (1984). Effects of dual sector inflation across income levels in Pakistan [with Comments]. The Pakistan Development Review, 23(2/3), 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, E., & Ludlow, S. (1989). Poverty inequality and growth in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 28(4), 831–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S. M., & Silvey, S. D. (1966). A general class of coefficients of divergence of one distribution from another. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 28(1), 131–142.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, A., Iftikhar, S. F., Fatima, A., & Naz, L. (2015). Income inequality, redistribution of income and trade openness. The Pakistan Development Review, 54(4), 865–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, T., & Bilquees, F. (2003). Trends in Inequality in Pakistan between 1998–99 and 2001–02 [with Comments]. The Pakistan Development Review, 42(4), 809–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asad, M. A., & Ahmad, M. (2011). Growth and consumption inequality in Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 69–89.

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 12(2), 244–263.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F. (1979). Decomposable income inequality measures. Econometrica, 47(4), 901–920.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry, I. S. (2007). Gender inequality in education and economic growth: case study of Pakistan. Pakistan Horizon, 60(4), 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, F. A. (1980). Poverty measures, inequality and decomposability. In Welfare and efficiency in public economics (pp. 149–166). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

  • Cowell, F. A. (1985). Measures of distributional change: An axiomatic approach. The Review of Economic Studies, 52(1), 135–151.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, F. A., & Gardiner, K. (1999). Welfare weights. Economics Research Paper, 20.

  • Cowell, F. A., & Jenkins, S. P. (1995). How much inequality can we explain? A methodology and an application to the United States. The Economic Journal, 105(429), 421–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, F. A., & Kuga, K. (1981). Additivity and the entropy concept: An axiomatic approach to inequality measurement. Journal of Economic Theory, 25(1), 131–143.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Csiszár, I. (2008). Axiomatic characterizations of information measures. Entropy, 10(3), 261–273.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • De Kruijk, H., Van Leeuwen, M., & Kemal, A. R. (1985). Changes in poverty and income inequality in Pakistan during the 1970s [with Comments]. The Pakistan Development Review24(3/4), 407–422

  • Hirochman, O. A. (1973). The Changing Tolerance for Income Inequality in the Course of Economic Development. The Journal Economics 87(3), 544–566.

  • Jeetun, A. (1978). Trends in Inequality of Income Distribution in Pakistan. Applied Economic Research Center, University of Karachi, Karachi.

  • Jenkins, S. P. (2009). Distributionally-sensitive inequality indices and the GB2 income distribution. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(2), 392–398.

  • Jenkins, S. P., & O’Higgins, M. (1989). Inequality measurement using ‘norm incomes’: Were Garvy and Paglin onto something after all? Review of Income and Wealth, 3, 265–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandker, R. H. (1973). Distribution of Income and Wealth in Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 11(1), 1–39. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23006601

  • Kemal, A. R. (1981). Income distribution in Pakistan: A review. Islamabad: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics. (Research Report Series, No. 123).

  • Kemal, A. R. (1994). Structural adjustment, employment, income distribution and poverty. The Pakistan Development Review, 33(4), 901–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litchfield J. A. (1999). Inequality: Methods and tools, text for the world bank’s website on Inequality. Poverty and Socio-Economic Performance.

  • Magdalou, B., & Nock, R. (2011). Income distributions and decomposable divergence measures. Journal of Economic Theory, 146(6), 2440–2454.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, Z. (1984). Income Inequality in Pakistan: An analysis of existing evidence. The Pakistan Development Review, 23(2&3), 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, R., & Idrees, M. (2010). Income polarization in Pakistan: Measurement and decomposition. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 225–244.

  • Malik, S. J. (1993). Poverty in Pakistan, 1984–85 to 1987–88. In Lipton, M. & Van Der Gaag (Eds.), Including the poor. Washington, D. C.: The World Bank.

  • Mujahid, G. B. S. (1978). A Note on Measurement of Poverty and Income Inequalities in Pakistan: Some Observations of Methodology. The Pakistan Development Review, 17(3), 365–377.

  • Rohde, N. (2008). Lorenz curves and generalised entropy inequality measures (pp. 271–283). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1974). Information Base of Alternative Welfare Approach: Aggregation and Income Distribution. Journal of Public Economics 44(3), 219–231.

  • Shakeel, M., Ahmed, A., & Sharif, S. (2020). Linkages of corruption with income, inflation and income inequality in Pakistan. Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan, 57(1).

  • Sial, M. H., Noreen, A., & Awan, R. U. (2015). Measuring multidimensional poverty and inequality in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 685–696.

  • Shorrocks, A. F. (1980). The class of additively decomposable inequality measures. Econometrica, 48(3), 613–625.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, A. F. (1982). Inequality decomposition by factor components. Econometrica, 50(1), 193–211.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, A. F. (1984). Inequality decomposition by population subgroups. Econometrica, 52(6), 1369–1385.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1967). Economics and information theory. North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Younas Jafri, S. M., & Khattak, A. (1995). Income Inequality and Poverty in Pakistan. The Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 33(1&2), 165–193.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

First author contributed in data analysis, results interpretation & conclusion.

Second author contributed in theoretical framework, literature review and Introduction.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jazib Mumtaz.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

No interest of financial or personal nature can be found with respect to the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mumtaz, J., Hussain, S.I. Analyzing household income inequality in Pakistan: a subgroup decomposition of generalized entropy measures. GeoJournal 89, 27 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-024-11026-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-024-11026-5

Keywords

Navigation