Abstract
According to reports from international institutions such as Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, United Nations Development Programme, and the World Bank, the impacts of climate change will continue affecting the Least Developed Countries (LDC) for the coming years and the less resilient countries, defined by the climate vulnerability index (CVI), will be the most vulnerable. The CVI relates the Exposure and Adaptive Capacity for a specific Hazard, offering feasible supports for decision-makers in identifying country-specific needs to adapt to climate change. However, even with this scenario, the LDCs are still unable to cope with the impact of extreme events. Therefore, the main question is, which part of Adaptive Capacity needs more effort to deal with extreme weather events? To address this issue, this paper discusses the governance role in the CVI definition, suggesting an alternative approach to assess climate vulnerability. Overall, we propose a tool, taking into account four main components: Exposure, Sensitivity, Adaptive Capacity, and Governance. In this case, the Governance component represents organizations, policies, and qualified human resources that could improve the planning and management of a specific system. More specifically, we explicitly considered the Governance component in the climate vulnerability function by adding specific indicators. As a study case, we consider Mozambique, a highly vulnerable country to the adverse impact of climate change. The results have shown that by adding the Governance component to assess climate vulnerability, the function becomes more sensitive. In conclusion, Governance is accepted as a powerful component in the CVI definition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
Anandhi, A., & Kannan, N. (2018). Vulnerability assessment of water resources—Translating a theoretical concept to an operational framework using systems thinking approach in a changing climate: Case study in Ogallala Aquifer. Journal of Hydrology, 557, 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.032
BR (2021). Boletim da República de Moçambique (BR), Mozambique. http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/moz206228.pdf
Brooks, N., Adger, W. N., & Kelly, P. M. (2005). The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 15, 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.006
Chen, C., Noble, I., Hellmann, J., Coffee, J., Murillo, M., & Chawla, N. (2015). Global adaptation index: Country index. University of Notre Dame. https://gain.nd.edu/our-work/country-index/. Accessed 30 August 2021
Dasgupta, S., Hamilton, K., Pandey, K. D., Wheeler, D., & Bank, W. (2006). Environment during growth: Accounting for governance and vulnerability. World Development, 34, 1597–1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.12.008
Eakin, H., & Bojórquez-Tapia, L. A. (2008). Insights into the composition of household vulnerability from multicriteria decision analysis. Global Environmental Change, 18, 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.001
Ford, J. D., & Smit, B. (2004). A framework for assessing the vulnerability of communities in the Canadian Arctic to risks associated with climate change. Arctic, 57, 389–400.
Hinkel, J. (2011). Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: Towards a clarification of the science–policy interface. Global Environmental Change, 21, 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.gloenvcha.2010.08.002
Huitema, D., Adger, W. N., Berkhout, F., Massey, E., Mazmanian, D., et al. (2016). The governance of adaptation: Choices, reasons, and effects. Introduction to the Special Feature. Ecology and Society, 21, 37. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08797-210337
IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf
IPCC (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge University Press. In Press.
Iyengar, N. S., & Sudarshan, P. (1982). A method of classifying regions from multivariate data. Economic and Political Weekly, 17, 2047–2052.
Jubeh, G., & Mimi, Z. (2012). Governance and climate vulnerability index. Water Resources Management, 26, 4147–4162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0137-7
Jury, M. R., & Lucio, F. D. E. (2004). The Mozambique floods of february 2000 in context. South African Geographical Journal, 86(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2004.9713818
Kc, B., Shepherd, J. M., & Johnson, C. (2015). Climate change vulnerability assessment in Georgia. Applied Geography, 62, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.04.007
Krishnamurthy, P. K., Lewis, K., & Choularton, R. J. (2014). A methodological framework for rapidly assessing the impacts of climate risk on national-level food security through a vulnerability index. Global Environmental Change, 25, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.004
Le, H. T., Chang, Y. (2017). Governance, vulnerability to climate change, and green growth: International evidence. Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series No. 500. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2894763.
Luers, A. L., Lobell, D. B., Sklar, L. S., Addams, C. L., & Matson, P. A. (2003). A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 13, 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(03)00054-2
Maiti, S., Kumar, S., Garai, S., Nag, A., Bera, A. K., et al. (2017). An assessment of social vulnerability to climate change among the districts of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Ecological Indicators, 77, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.006
Marques, G., Giulio, D., Bedran-Martins, A. M. B., Vasconcellos, P., Costa, W., & Carmen, M. (2018). Mainstreaming climate adaptation in the megacity of São Paulo, Brazil. Cities, 72-B, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.001
Mavume, A. F., Banze, B. E., Macie, O. A., & Queface, A. J. (2021). Analysis of climate change projections for Mozambique under the representative concentration. Atmosphere, 12, 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12050588
Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2013). Methods for constructing composite indices: One for all or all for one? RIEDS - Rivista Italiana Di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - the Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, 67, 67–80.
Meadowcroft J (2010). Climate Change Governance. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/9063. Accessed 30 August 2021
Mendoza, M. E. T., The, B. D., Naret, H., Ballaran, V. G., & Arias, K. B. (2014). Assessing vulnerability to climate change impacts in Cambodia, the Philippines and Vietnam: An analysis at the commune and household level. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 17, 78–91.
NDC (2021). Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) of Mozambique to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC); UNFCCC: Bonn, Germany. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/NDC_EN_Final.pdf
Oculi, N., & Stephenson, S. R. (2018). Conceptualizing climate vulnerability: Understanding the negotiating strategies of Small Island Developing States. Environmental Science & Policy, 85, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.025
Pandey, R., & Jha, S. (2012). Climate vulnerability index—measure of climate change vulnerability to communities: A case of rural. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 17, 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9338-2
Sarkodie, S. A., & Strezov, V. (2019). Economic, social and governance adaptation readiness for mitigation of climate change vulnerability: Evidence from 192 countries. Science of the Total Environment, 656, 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.349
Schellnhuber, H., Cramer, W., Nakicenovic, N., Wigley, T., & Yohe, G. (2006). Avoiding dangerous climate change. Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 44). https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-0979
Uele, D. I., Lyra, G. B., & de Oliveira Júnior, J. F. (2017). Variabilidade espacial e intranual das chuvas na região sul de moçambique, África Austral. Revista Brasileira De Meteorologia, 32, 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-77863230013
United Nations (2007). Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/guidelines.pdf. Accessed 30 August 2021
Vincent, K. (2004). Creating an index of social vulnerability to climate change for Africa. Global Environmental Change, 56, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.018
Vincent, K., & Colenbrander, W. (2018). Climate Risk Management Developing and applying a five step process for mainstreaming climate change into local development plans : A case study from Zambia. Climate Risk Management, 21(April), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2018.04.005
Weiler, F., Klöck, C., & Dornan, M. (2018). Vulnerability, good governance, or donor interests? The allocation of aid for climate change adaptation. World Development, 104, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.001
World Bank (2018). Mozambique Poverty Assessment: Strong but not Broadly Shared Growth. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/248561541165040969/pdf/Mozambique-Poverty-Assessment-Strong-But-Not-Broadly-Shared-Growth.pdf
Worker J (2016). National climate change governance: Topic guide. Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham. https://gsdrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/NatCCGov.pdf. Accessed 30 August 2021
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buchir, L.M.S.T., Detzel, D.H.M. The role of the governance on the climate vulnerability index definition in Mozambique. GeoJournal 88, 1687–1702 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10711-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10711-7