The Actor–Network Theory is used to reflect relevant issues of local interaction and involvement in this paper's analysis of Tehran. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods is used in the project to investigate non-human and human factors. The Perceived Residential Environment Quality Index was used to study 422 residents of Bagh-Shater, and community semi-structured interviews and interviews with key informants were performed using an interpretive approach. According to the analysis, a diagnosis of the current state of local interactions and involvement is given by transposing the situation in Bagh-Shater into elements that can demonstrate successive urban changes. These components form a single collection when combined with macro and main networks. Our concentration is on the urban situation, which is a place where changes occur at a time when modern aspects of Tehran's urban life align with local characteristics and country structures, or vice versa. As a result, the dominant model in Tehran's development could be machine-centered rather than human-centered, and people, both elites and lower classes may hold a favorable opinion of it and use it to further their own interests. Convergence may be motivated by a variety of factors, as well as community-based conservation projects. The city government has begun the process of implementing the oriented-community strategy. Nevertheless, many such plans due to some facts like the fact that urban technocrats and bureaucrats do not have the adequate motivation, ability, and knowledge to be able to use culture as a great resource for improving urban conditions also they have wasted resources and expanded bureaucracy.
This is a preview of subscription content,to check access.
Access this article
Similar content being viewed by others
It can be referring to the associations as black boxes that are not questioned anymore. ‘‘only voices speaking in unison will be heard. As a result of these black boxes, translation is completed, actor interests are stabilized and controversy is removed and fourth phase, Mobilization occurs (Blok, Farías, & Roberts, 2020; Costa & Cunha, 2015).
This research is the result of a research project entitled (encouraging local participation in community interest and the environment in Tehran) and it should be noted that this project is the result of a collaboration between 6 researchers from the Buin Zahra technical University, the Politecnico di Torino, the Shahid Beheshti University, and the University of Guilan. More to the point, the project manager was from the planning department of the Buin Zahra Technical University.
Abrahamian, E. (2018). A history of modern Iran: Cambridge University Press.
Aka, K. G. (2019). Actor-network theory to understand, track and succeed in a sustainable innovation development process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 524–540.
Bagheri, M., Sedighorei, G., & Yousefi, A. (2019). Social Interaction in Iran: A Review on Problems of Interpersonal Interaction in the “Articles on Social Situations of the Country.” Journal of Social Problems of Iran, 10(1), 53–80.
Bayat, A. (2013). Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East, Second Edition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bencherki, N. (2017). Actor–Network Theory. In C.R. Scott, J.R. Barker, T. Kuhn, J. Keyton, P.K. Turner & L.K. Lewis (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication.
Blok, A., Farias, I., & Roberts, C. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315111667
Bonaiuto, M., & Alves, S. (2012). Residential places and neighborhoods: Toward healthy life, social integration, and reputableresidence. In S. D. Clayton (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservationpsychology (pp. 221–247). Oxford University Press.
Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The sociological review, 32(1), 196–233.
Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro-and Macro-Sociologies (pp. 277–303). Boston, MA: Routledge.
Cohen, P. (2010). ‘Culture of Poverty’ Makes a Comeback. New York Times, 17.
Costa, C., & Cunha, P. (2015). The social dimension of business models: an Actor-Network Theory perspective. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS).
Crawford, T. H. (2020). Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press.
Cvetinovic, M., Nedovic-Budic, Z., & Bolay, J.-C. (2017). Decoding urban development dynamics through actor-network methodological approach. Geoforum, 82, 141–157.
Czarniawska, B. (2016). Actor-network theory. In A. Langley & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of process organization studies (pp. 160–172). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957954.n10
Farías, I., & Bender, T. (2012). Urban assemblages: How actor-network theory changes urban studies. Routledge.
Fazeli, N. (2006). Politics of culture in Iran. Routledge.
Fazeli, N. (2012). Culture and city: Cultural turn in urban discourses focusing on tehran studies. Edare Kole Motaleate Ejtemai va Farhangi Share Tehran and Entesharate Tisa.
Fazeli, N. (2018). A problematization of feelings in contemporary Iran: A theory on the mechanisms of emotional patterns in Iran. Journal of Culture-Communication Studies, 19(43), 1–36.
Grigor, T. (2009). Building Iran: Modernism, architecture, and national heritage under the Pahlavi monarchs, Periscope Publishing, distributed by Prestel New York, NY.
Islamic Parliament Research Center of the Islamic Republic of IRAN. (1984). The law of the definitions and rules of division of the country. Retrieved from http://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/90769
Jahanbegloo, R. (2004). Iran: Between tradition and modernity. Lexington Books.
Kalantari, A., Roshanfekr, P., & Javaheri, J. (2014). three decades of researches about “divorce causes” in Iran: A review. Women’s Strategic Studies (Ketabe Zanan), 14(53), 129–162.
Kamp, A. (2019). Actor-network theory oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press.
Katouzian, H. (1981). The political economy of modern Iran: Despotism and pseudo-modernism, 1926–1979: Springer.
Keshavarzian, A. (2007). Bazaar and state in Iran: The politics of the Tehran marketplace. Cambridge University Press.
Kim, J. (2019). Designing multiple urban space: An actor-network theory analysis on multiplicity and stability of public space. Journal of Urban Design, 24(2), 249–268.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. (2011). Network theory| networks, societies, spheres: Reflections of an actor-network theorist. International Journal of Communication, 5, 15.
Latour, B. (2013b). What’s the story? Organizing as a mode of existence. In D. Robichaud & F. Cooren (Eds.), Organization and Organizing: Materiality, Agency and Discourse (pp. 37–51). New York: Routledge.
Law, J., & Callon, M. (1992). The life and death of an aircraft: a network analysis of technical change. Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, 21–52.
Lewis, O. (1998). The culture of poverty. Society, 35(2), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02838122
Matthews, A. (2019). Design as a discipline for Postdigital learning and teaching: Bricolage and actor-network theory. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(2), 413–426.
Michael, M. (2017). Actor Network Theory. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory (pp. 1–4). Wiley.
Milani, A. (2004). Lost wisdom rethinking modernity in Iran. DC: Mage Publishers Washington.
Mol, A. (2010). Actor-network theory: Sensitive terms and enduring tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Sonderheft, 50, 253–269.
Muniesa, F. (2016). The problem with economics: Naturalism, critique and performativity. In I. Boldyrev & E. Svetlova (Eds.), Enacting Dismal Science Perspectives from Social Economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48876-3_5.
Ruming, K. (2009). Following the actors: Mobilising an actor-network theory methodology in geography. Australian Geographer, 40(4), 451–469.
Rydin, Y. (2013). Using actor-network theory to understand planning practice: Exploring relationships between actants in regulating low-carbon commercial development. Planning Theory, 12(1), 23–45.
Sharifi, A., & Murayama, A. (2013). Changes in the traditional urban form and the social sustainability of contemporary cities: A case study of Iranian cities. Habitat International, 38, 126–134.
Small, M. L., Harding, D. J., & Lamont, M. (2010). Reconsidering culture and poverty. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Sage CA.
Statistical Centre of Iran, S. (2016). Population and Housing Censuses. Tehran: Statistical Center Press. Retrieved from https://www.amar.org.ir/english/Population-and-Housing-Censuses
Tavassoli, G., & Ghiasi Nodoushan, A. (2011). Social causes of divorce in Yazd province in the past decade. Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies (JISDS), 3, 35–49.
Tehran, D. (2015). Urban local communtiy affairs. Teharn: Tehran Municipality Publications.
The Social Council of Iran, I. (2016). Collection of articles on the social situation of Iran (Vol. 3). Tehran: The Social Council of the country and the Research Institute for Cultural and Social Studies of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology.
Tummons, J. (2021). Ontological pluralism, modes of existence, and actor-network theory: Upgrading latour with latour. Social Epistemology, 35(1), 1–11.
Vallecha, H., & Bhola, P. (2019). Sustainability and replicability framework: Actor network theory based critical case analysis of renewable community energy projects in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 108, 194–208.
Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258–273.
Ward, E. (2018). An actor–network theory model of property development. Journal of European Real Estate Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JERER-06-2017-0022
Wissink, B. (2013). Enclave urbanism in Mumbai: An actor-network-theory analysis of urban (dis) connection. Geoforum, 47, 1–11.
Yousefi, A., & Akbari, H. (2016). Individual and Collective Conflicts, Collection of Articles Reporting the Social Situation of the Country, Gholamreza Ghaffari and Mohammadreza Javadi Yeganeh, Tehran: Social Council; Research Institute for Cultural and Social Studies, Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, pp. 327-387.
We would like to thank the reviewers for their careful reading of our manuscript and their many insightful comments and suggestions which improve the quality of manuscript.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Valibeigi, M., Shaneh, A. Actor–network theory analysis of local interactive space and participation in Tehran. GeoJournal 87, 3591–3606 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10448-9