Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Grounding the digital: a comparison of Waze ‘avoid dangerous areas’ feature in Jerusalem, Rio de Janeiro and the US

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of the Waze avoid areas (WADA) feature in Jerusalem, Rio de Janeiro, and the US. I argue that, through comparative approaches, geographers can ‘ground’ the digital, developing situated accounts of how emerging technologies work at different sites. Taking as a starting point the controversies raised by WADA, I address the following research questions: How does the feature work in the three research sites? What political problems does it raise? What are its effects? Drawing on 124 news articles, blog posts and forum threads in English, Arabic, Hebrew and Portuguese, the analysis complicates existing characterisations of similar apps as emblematic of the smart city’s most oppressive characteristics, pointing at three themes: the relevance of local settings in the enactment of WADA, the interplay of different logics in its definition of danger, and the heterogeneity of public reactions to the app. More broadly, the study demonstrates that grounded comparative studies can decentre and enrich the scholarship on digital geographies, underscoring the contingency and ambivalence of digital technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: ochaopt.org

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The article, originally published in Hebrew on 08 August 2015, was republished on the Yedioth Ahronoth’s English-language website (www.ynetnews.com) on 28 August. All quotes are taken from the English version.

  2. Automatic translation by Google, with minor edits in the interest of readability.

  3. Automatic translation by Google, with minor edits in the interest of readability.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am very grateful to the reviewers and editor for their helpful suggestions. I also would like to thank the Hong Kong Grants Council for funding this research through the Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme (Grant No. PF14-16820), and the Research Center for Integrated Disaster Risk Management (CIGIDEN), CONICYT/FONDAP/15110017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentina Carraro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This paper does not contain any studies with human participants or animals as subjects performed by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carraro, V. Grounding the digital: a comparison of Waze ‘avoid dangerous areas’ feature in Jerusalem, Rio de Janeiro and the US. GeoJournal 86, 1121–1139 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10117-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10117-y

Keywords