Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evolution and future trends in global research on cadastre: a bibliometric analysis

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, the global research status and future trends of cadastre were evaluated by using bibliometric analysis. This study is based on the analysis of research topics, scientific production, collaboration among countries and authors, and most cited papers on cadastre research which obtained from database of Scopus during the time period from 1958 to 2018. A total of 4220 papers were published in 128 different journals and most of them were original articles (2906, 68.8%) followed by conference paper (966, 22.9%). It found that Germany was the most productive country with 218 papers and 5.2% of total literature followed by United States and Australia. University of Melbourne was found to publish the highest number of documents with 85 papers and to cover 4.2% of the total literature followed by Delft University of Technology. Most used five keywords were ‘‘cadastre’’, ‘‘GIS’’, ‘‘surveying’’, ‘‘mapping’’ and ‘‘land use’’ (n = 945, 791, 300, 296 and 294 times, respectively). The top two authors who contributed most were Williamson, I.P. (69 articles), Van Oosterom P. (40 articles). The top-cited publication was “Analysis of land-cover transitions based on seventeenth and eighteenth century cadastral maps and aerial photographs” written by Cousins, in Landscape Ecology in 2001.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abejón, R., Pérez-Acebo, H., & Garea, A. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of research on supported ionic liquid membranes during the 1995–2015 period: Study of the main applications and trending topics. Membranes, 7(4), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes7040063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al, U. (2008). Türkiye’nin Bilimsel Yayın Politikası: Atıf Dizinlerine Dayalı Bibliyometrik Bir Yaklaşım. Ankara: Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleixandre-Benaventa, R., Aleixandre-Tudó, J. L., Castelló-Cogollosc, L., & Aleixandre, J. L. (2018). Trends in global research in deforestation. A bibliometric analysis. Land Use Policy, 72, 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi, H. (2013). A bibliometric investigation of research trends on sulfate removal. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52(31–33), 6040–6049. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.812991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boztoprak, T., Demir, O., & Çoruhlu, Y. E. (2016). Türkiye’de Harita/Geomatik Mühendisliğinde Yapılan Doktora Tezlerinin İçerik Analizi. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 6(2), 252–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çete, M., & İnan, H. I. (2013). Kadastroda Modern Eğilimler ve Türkiye Kadastrosu, 14. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı.

  • Chen, Q., Geng, N., & Zhu, K. (2018). Review and bibliometric analysis of Chinese agricultural economics research: 2006–2015. China Agricultural Economic Review, 10(1), 152–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, W. T., & Ho, Y. S. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of homeopathy research during the period of 1991 to 2003. Scientometrics, 63(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chıu, W.-T., & Ho, Y.-S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research. Scientometrics, 73(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enemark, S., Williamson, I., & Wallace, J. (2005). Building modern land administration systems in developed economies. Journal of Spatial Science, 50(2), 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, B. P. F., Sampaio, R. B., Fonseca, M. V. A., & Zicker, F. (2016). Co-authorship network analysis in health research: Method and potential use. Health Research Policy and Systems, 14(1), 34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, N. (2017). A ‘‘review’’ of policy sciences: bibliometric analysis of authors, references, and topics during 1970–2017. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 527–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güzeller, C. O., & Çeliker, N. (2017). Gastronomy from past to today: A bibliometrical analysis. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 5(2), 88–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y.-S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of adsorption technology in environmental science. Journal of Environmental Protection Science, 1(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C. S. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, W.-H., Chiu, W.-T., Lee, Y.-S., & Ho, Y.-S. (2004). Bibliometric analysis of patent ductus arteriosus treatments. Scientometrics, 60(2), 105–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasemodel, M. G. C., Makishi, F., Souza, R. C. & Silva, V. L. (2016). Following the trail of crumbs: a bibliometric study on consumer behavior in the Food Science and Technology field. International Journal of Food Studies, 5(1), 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krigsholm, P., Riekkinen, K., & Ståhle, P. (2018). The changing uses of cadastral information: A user-driven case study. Land, 7(3), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7030083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N., Han, R., & Lua, X. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of research trends on solid waste reuse and recycling during 1992–2016. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 130(2018), 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2017). Evolution and future trends of integrated health care: A scientometric analysis. International Journal of Integrated Care, 17(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzoor, S., Qureshi, T. A., Liaqat, M. D., Farooq, M. K., & Shamail, S. (2009). A comparison between Cadastre 2014 and cadastral systems of different countries. In ICEGOV ‘09 Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, pp. 293–297

  • Navratil, G., & Frank, A. U. (2004). Processes in a cadastre. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 28(5), 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu, J., Tang, W., Xu, F., Zhou, X., & Song, Y. (2016). Global research on artificial intelligence from 1990–2014: Spatially-explicit bibliometric analysis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(5), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5050066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olfat, H., Shojaei, D., Briffa, M., Maley, S., & Rajabifard, A. (2018). Strategic actions for increasing the submission of digital cadastral data by the surveying industry based on lessons learned from Victoria, Australia. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7020047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Şakar, G. D., & Cerit, A. G. (2013). Uluslararası Alan İndekslerinde Türkiye Pazarlama Yazını: Bibliyometrik Analizler ve Nitel Bir Araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 27(4), 37–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scopus. (2016). Scopus content coverage guide; 02.16 version. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Şenel, E., & Demiri, E. (2018). Bibliometric and scientometric analysis of the articles published in the journal of religion and health between 1975 and 2016. Journal of Religion and Health, 57, 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0539-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Y., Wen, C., & Hong, S. (2008). Global scientific production on GIS research by bibliometric analysis from 1997 to 2006. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Molen, P. (2006). Tenure and tools, two aspects of innovative land administration. London: RICS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oosterom, P. (2013). Research and development in 3D cadastres. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 40, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oosterom, P., & Lemmen, C. (2015). The land administration domain model (LADM): Motivation, standardisation, application and further development. Land Use Policy, 49, 527–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Yang, Z., Yang, Y., Long, C., & Li, H. (2014). A bibliometric analysis of research on the risk of engineering nanomaterials during 1999–2012. Science of the Total Environment, 473–474, 483–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, I. P., (2011). The evolution of modern cadastres. In Proceedings of new technology for a new century conference, FWW2001, Seoul, South Korea.

  • Zevenbergen, J. (2004). A systems approach to land registration and Cadastre. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 1(1), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Huang, M., Qing, X., Li, G., & Tian, C. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of global remote sensing research during 2010–2015. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(11), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6110332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author conceived of the study, formulated its design, coordinated the conduct of the study including data collection, performed the statistical analysis and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeynel Abidin Polat.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The author declares that the study is in compliance with the Ethical Standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent provided by the author.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Polat, Z.A. Evolution and future trends in global research on cadastre: a bibliometric analysis. GeoJournal 84, 1121–1134 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-09973-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-09973-5

Keywords

Navigation