Skip to main content
Log in

Spatiality of a multidimensional poverty index: a case study of Khulna City, Bangladesh

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Poverty is a multidimensional phenomenon, and spatiality is an important dimension for defining a multidimensional poverty index (MPI). Acknowledging the fact that spatiality is dependent on scale, the MPI of six slums, selected to cover a range of tenure types (public, private, and private freehold), was measured to determine the intra-urban variation of poverty in Khulna City, Bangladesh. Five dimensions were considered to measure the MPI: economic, social, infrastructure, political, and spatial, and an analytic hierarchy process was used to calculate the weights of the indicators. The majority of the slum dwellers were found to be multidimensionally poor, rather than income poor, and the spatial dimension had a considerable impact on urban poverty. By calculating the MPI and identifying the contribution of the spatial dimension to poverty, this research could help policy makers to determine appropriate policy and intervention measures to reduce urban poverty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2005). Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy,113(5), 949–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. H., Jr. (2004). Economic growth, inequality and poverty: estimating the growth elasticity of poverty. World Development,32(12), 1989–2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alder, G. (1995). Tackling poverty in Nairobi’s informal settlements: developing an institutional strategy. Environment and Urbanization,7(2), 85–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., Apablaza, M., Chakravarty, S., & Yalonetzky, G. (2017). Measuring chronic multidimensional poverty. Journal of Policy Modeling,39(6), 983–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Understandings and Misunderstandings of Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. OPHI working paper, 43. University of Oxford.

  • Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2014). Measuring acute poverty in the developing world: Robustness and scope of the multidimensional poverty index. World Development,59(C), 251–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, Q., & Galor, O. (2013). The ‘Out of Africa’ hypothesis, human genetic diversity, and comparative economic development. American Economic Review,103(1), 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, N. (2008). A tale of two wards: Political participation and the urban poor in Dhaka city. Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, N. (2011). Neglecting the urban poor in Bangladesh: Research, policy and action in the context of climate change. Environment and Urbanization,23(2), 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begume, H., & Moinuddin, G. (2010). Spatial dimension of social exclusion. An imperial investigation into the relationship of housing and social exclusion in the slums of Dhaka City. Management Research and Practice,2(3), 314–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekar, J. (2008). Urban poverty: A global view. Urban paper-5, The World Bank Group. Washington D.C.

  • Bigman, D., & Srinivasan, P. V. (2002). Geographical targeting of poverty alleviation programs: methodology and applications in rural India. Journal of Policy Modeling,24(3), 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cali, M., & Carlo, M. (2012). Does urbanization affect rural poverty? Evidence from Indian Districts. World Bank Economic Review (2013),27(2), 171–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, S. A., & Smyth, R. (2017). Ethnic diversity and poverty. World Development,95(C), 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coudouel, J., Hentschel, J. S., & Wodon, Q. T. (2002). Poverty measurement and analysis. PRFC sourcebook. Washington, D.C: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • CUS (Center for Urban Studies), NIPORT (National Institute of Population Research Training), & MEASURE Evaluation. (2006). Slums of urban Bangladesh: Mapping and census 2005. Dhaka.

  • De Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital. London: Transworld Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deichmann, U. (1999). Geographic aspects of inequality and poverty. Text for World Bank’s web site on inequality, Poverty and Socioeconomic Performance. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPGI/Resources/Pro-Poor-Growth/5319_povmap.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2018.

  • Ehrenpreis, D. (2006). What is poverty? Concepts and measures. Poverty in Focus 9, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipc/ifocus/9.html. Accessed 5 Oct 2018.

  • Fan, S., Hazell, P., & Thorat, S. (2000). Government spending, growth and poverty in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,82(4), 1038–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortuny, G., Geier, R., & Marshall, R. (2011). Poor Settlements in Bangladesh: An assessment of 29 UPPR towns and cities. Urban partnerships for poverty reduction (UPPR), Local Government Engineering Department, Dhaka, Bangladesh. http://www.lged.gov.bd/UploadedDocument/ProjectLibraryGallery/101/Poor%20Settlements%20in%20Bangladesh.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2018.

  • Gebreslassie, G. H. (2015). Multidimensional measurements of poverty analysis in urban areas of Afar Regional State. International Journal of Science and Research,4(7), 2627–2635.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoB (Government of Bangladesh). (2016). Poverty and inequality of Bangladesh: Journey towards progress. Dhaka: Macroeconomic Wing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, U. (2010). Spatial inequality and urban poverty traps. ODI Working Paper 326/CPRC Working Paper 166.

  • Hackenbroch, K. (2013). The spatiality of livelihoods. Negotiations of access to public space in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, R. H., & Mullikin, M. (1999). Alternatives to the official poverty measure: perspectives and assessment. In: Conference on poverty: Improving the definition after 30 years. University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Healy, M., & Ooms, T. (2006). Poverty and urbanization. Pennsylvania: Joint Urban Studies Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M. S. (2006). Urban poverty and adaptations of the poor to urban life in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Ph.D. thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney.

  • International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. (2007). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–2006: India.

  • Jargoskym, P. (2014). The spatial dimension of inequality. The cities paper. citiespapers.ssrc.org/the- spatial-dimensions-of-inequality. Accessed 24 June 2018.

  • Liang, Z., & Xiaolin, W. (2013). China’s urban poverty: A multidimensional perspective. Beijing: The International Poverty Reduction Center in China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucci, P., Bhatkal, T., & Khan, A. (2018). Are we understanding urban poverty? World Development,103(2018), 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majale, M. (2008). Employment creation through participatory urban planning and slum upgrading: The case of Kitale, Kenya. Habitat International,32(2), 270–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, J., Mboup, G., Sliuzas, R., & Stein, A. (2008). Trends in urban and slum indicators across developing world cities, 1990–2003. Habitat International, 32(1), 86–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, A., & Macdonald, F. (1998). The social consequences of unemployment. Report for the Business Council of Australia.

  • Mitlin, D., & Satterthwaite, D. (2002). How the scale and nature of urban poverty are under-estimated—the limitations of the US $1 a day poverty line. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?. Accessed 15 Sept 2018.

  • Moser, C. N. (1995). Urban social policy and poverty reduction. Environment and Urbanization,7(1), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C. O. (1998). The asset vulnerability framework: Reassessing urban poverty reduction strategies. World Development, 26(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neckerman, K. M., Garfinkel, I., Teitler, J. O., Waldfogel, J., & Wimer, C. (2016). Beyond income poverty: Measuring disadvantage in terms of material hardship and health. Academic Pediatrics,16,(3), 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2008). Poverty lines. In Larry Blume & Steven Durlauf (Eds.), The new palgrave dictionary of economics (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringen, S. (1988). Direct and indirect poverty measure. Journal of Social Policy,17(3), 365–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, S. B. (1901). Poverty, a study of town life. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, L. (1994). How to make a decision: Analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research,48(1), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite, D. (1989). The Under-estimation of urban poverty in low and middle-income nations. In: Working paper on poverty reduction in urban areas 14. Human Settlement Programme, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). Funded by DFID and SIDA. http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/9322IIED.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2018.

  • Sen, A. K. (1981). Poverty and famines. An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, K. S. (2016). Child poverty: Definition and measurement. Academic Pediatrics,16(3), 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvaetro, S. (2017). When Can a sick child return to school or daycare? http://www.drstevesilvestro.com/when-can-a-sick-child-return-to-school. Accessed 24 June2018.

  • Sowgat, T. (2012). Pro-poor planning in Bangladesh: A case study of Khulna city (Doctoral dissertation, Heriot-Watt University).

  • Sulaiman, J., Azman, A., & Khan, Z. (2014). Re-modeling urban poverty: A multidimensional approach. International Journal of Social Work and Human Services Practice,2(2), 64–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2013). Human Development Report, 2013. New York. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/14/hdr2013_en_complete.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2018.

  • UN-Habitat (UN Human Settlements Programme). (2016). SDG goal 11 monitoring framework. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (The United Nations Children’s Fund). (2008). Bangladesh. www.unicef.org/bangladesh/cbg_ (18.10.08).pdf. Accessed 24 June 2018.

  • United Nations. (2015). The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. Geneva: United Nations. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2015_MDG_Report/pdf/MDG%202015%20rev%20(July%201).pdf. Accessed 26 June 2018.

  • UNSD (United Nation Statistics Division). (2005). Handbook on poverty statistics: Concept, methods and policy use. Special project on poverty statistics. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/poverty/pdf/UN_Book%20FINAL%2030%20Dec%2005.pdf. Accessed 3 Sept 2018.

  • World Bank. (2008). Poverty assessment for Bangladesh: Creating opportunities and bridging the East–West divide. Bangladesh development series, 26, Dhaka. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/BANGLADESHEXTN/Resources/295759-1240185591585/BanglaPD.pdf. Accessed June 24 2018.

  • World Bank. (2015). Global poverty line update, 2015. www.worldbank.org/global-poverty-line-faq. Accessed 24 June 2018.

  • Walker, R. (2015). Multidimensional poverty. GSDRC professional development reading pack no. 22. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

  • Wratten, E. (1995). Conceptualizing urban poverty. Environment and Urbanization,7(1), 11–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the slum dwellers for participating in the survey. We thank the Urban and Rural Planning Discipline of Khulna University for their kind cooperation in guiding this research. Dr. Kate Harris proofread this paper—we are grateful to her.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumya Sydunnaher.

Ethics declarations

Human and animals rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sydunnaher, S., Islam, K.S. & Morshed, M.M. Spatiality of a multidimensional poverty index: a case study of Khulna City, Bangladesh. GeoJournal 84, 1403–1416 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9941-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9941-9

Keywords

Navigation