Skip to main content
Log in

Diffusion of GIS in Uganda: the role of change agents, opinion leaders, champions, social network links and re-invention

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses the diffusion of innovations theory to analyse the role played by change agents, opinion leaders, champions, social network links and re-invention in the diffusion of GIS technology in a developing country, Uganda. Understanding the roles played by each of these elements leads to a more complete picture of the diffusion process of information systems, particularly within the context of the developing world. Mixed methods were used for data collection and analysis. Diffusion of innovations theory was employed in the analysis and a comparison made with the Universal Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. The findings indicate that change agents, opinion leaders, champions, social network links, and re-invention play a significant role in the diffusion of GIS technology in Uganda. The paper makes a contribution to the literature on GIS diffusion in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AlGhamdi, R., Nguyen, A., Nguyen, J., & Drew, S. (2012). Factors influencing E-commerce adoption by retailers in Saudi Arabia: A quantitative analysis. International Conference on Internet Studies,8(1), 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antenucci, J. C., Antenucci, R., & Smith, J. W. (2010). Private sector applications. In J. D. Bossler, J. B. Campbell, R. B. Mcmaster, & C. Rizos (Eds.), Manual of Geospatial Science and Technology (pp. 761–776). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apunyo, R. (2006). Managing wetlands with changing times-Uganda’s experience. Kampal, Uganda. Available at http://archive.riversymposium.com/2005/index.php?element=06APUNYORobert.

  • Balogun, E. E. (2004). Milestones and challenges of ARCSSTE-E. In 47th Session of the United Nations Committee on the peaceful uses of outer space (COPUOS), June 211, 2004, Vienna, Austria (p. 33). Vienna, Austria: United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS). Available at http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/pdf/sap/centres/ARCSSTE-E.pdf.

  • Baryamureeba, V., & Nerbonne, J. (2011). NUFFIC: Strengthening ICT training and research capacity in the four Public Universities in Uganda, Final Project Report. Kampala, Uganda. Available at http://news.mak.ac.ug/documents/cit/NufficIIFinalProjectReport.pdf.

  • Bos, E., Muhweezi, A., & West, K. (2005). From conversion to conservation: Fifteen Years of managing wetlands for people and the environment in Uganda. Kampala, Uganda; Nairobi, Kenya: Kampala, UG: Wetlands Inspection Division; Nairobi, KE: IUCN, Eastern Africa Regional Programme. Available at https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/8899.

  • Cavric, B. I., Nedović-Budić, Z., & Ikgopoleng, H. G. (2003). Diffusion of GIS technology in Botswana. The Interdisciplinary Design and Research e-Publication (IDRP),25(2), 195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y., Hwang, J., & Lee, D. (2012). Identification of effective opinion leaders in the diffusion of technological innovation: A social network approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.,79(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ClarkLabs. (2015). Clark Labs: Geospatial software for monitoring and modeling the Earth system, Clark Labs: Geospatial software for monitoring and modeling the Earth system. Available at http://www.clarklabs.org/. Accessed July 3, 2015.

  • Convery, M., & Ives-Dewey, D. (2008). Champions of GIS: Municipal implementation and organizational diffusion of GIS in Pennsylvania Governments. Middle States Geographer, 41, 9–18. Available at http://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/geog_facpub/13.

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, M. R. C., & Waters, N. M. (1991). Teaching the NCGIA curriculum evaluation program: A review and assessment. Cartographica,28(3), 94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2011). When should I choose a mixed methods approach?, Sage research methods. London: Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412993722.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drichi, P. (2002). National biomass study, population (English ed.). Kampala: Forest Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eria, S. (2012). The State of GIS in Developing Countries: A Diffusion and GIS & Society Analysis of Uganda, and the Potential for Mobile Location-Based Services. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Minnesota—Twin Cities. Available at https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/142282.

  • Eria, S., & McMaster, R. B. (2017). ‘GIS diffusion in Uganda. International Journal of Geographical Information Science,31(5), 884–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1242131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI. (2015). Environmental Systems Research Institute, ESRI. Available at http://www.esri.com/. Accessed July 3, 2015.

  • Foster, C., & Heeks, R. (2013). Innovation and scaling of ICT for the bottom-of- the-pyramid. Journal of Information Technology,28(4), 296–315. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2013.19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GIC. (2010). SDI Presentation to GEO-IM Working Group (pp. 1–10). Kampala.

  • GIC and ESRI-Canada. (2010). First interim report: Technical assistance for spatial data infrastructure development outcomes, Uganda, Development. Toronto, Canada and Kampal, Uganda.

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson. Available at http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=rtiNK68Xt08C&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Glaser+and+Strauss+1967&ots=UUxY_jZKXK&sig=eMaOJDzBXJRikZcOMnCcixBx4QU#v=onepage&q=GlaserandStrauss1967&f=false.

  • GoU. (2005). The Local Governments (Amendment) Act, 2005. Uganda: Government of Uganda.

  • GoU and UNFPA. (2010). The state of Uganda population report 2010, Population (English ed.). Kampala, Uganda. Available at http://www.popsec.org/publications_3_1868272171.pdf.

  • Goulet, L. R., & Frank, M. L. (2002). Organizational commitment across three sectors: Public, non-profit, and for-profit. Public Personnel Management,30(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600203100206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouws, Tina, & Van Oudtshoorn, G. P. R. (2011). Correlation between brand longevity and the diffusion of innovations theory. Journal of Public Affairs,11(4), 236–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. H. (1987). Organizations: Structures, processes, and outcomes (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, R., Van den Bulte, C., & Valente, T. W. (2011). Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Science,30(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerski, J. J. (2008). Geographic information systems in education. In J. P. Wilson & S. A. Fotheringham (Eds.), The handbook of geographic information science (pp. 540–556). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C., & Baylor, A. L. (2008). A virtual change agent: Motivating pre-service teachers to integrate technology in their future classrooms. Educational Technology and Society,11(2), 309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, C. P., & Yeung, A. K. W. (2007). Concepts and techniques in geographic information systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lwasa, S., Bamutaze, Y., Karatunga, A., Muhwezi, B. J., Mukwaya, P., & Sjaak, D., et al. (2006). National spatial data infrastructure workshop. In National spatial data infrastructure workshop, 7th June 2006, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda (pp. 1–29). Kampala: Makerere University.

  • Masser, I., & Craglia, M. (1996). A comparative evaluation of GIS diffusion in local government in nine European Countries. In I. Masser, H. Campbell, & M. Craglia (Eds.), GIS diffusion: The adoption and use of geographical information systems in local government in Europe (pp. 211–228). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooneyhan, W. D. (1998). International Applications of GIS. In T. W. Foresman (Ed.), The history of geographic information systems: Perspectives from the Pioneers (pp. 349–366). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhwezi, B. J. (2006). Solving complexities in implementation of SDI in Uganda, Development. Kampala, Uganda. Available at http://www.ugandaclusters.ug/geo-im.htm.

  • Musinguzi, M. (2003). Spatial data infrastructureA new challenge for GIS application in Uganda. Mukono, Uganda.

  • Mustaffa, N., Ibrahim, F., Mahmud, W. A. W., Ahmad, F., Kee, C. P., & Mahbob, M. H. (2011). Diffusion of innovations: The adoption of Facebook among youth in Malaysia. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal,16(3), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S., Zhu, C., & Leskovec, J. (2012). Information diffusion and external influence in networks. In KDD’12 The 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1–9). Beijing, China: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2339530.2339540.

  • NAPE. (2009). Oil Economy. In NAPE Lobby, June, (pp. 1–24).

  • Noongo, E. N. (2007). The Implementation of Geographic Information Systems in Namibia. Joensuu: Social Science Publications, University of Joensuu, Sweden. Available at http://joypub.joensuu.fi/publications/frameappl/pdf.php?pdf=dissertations/noongo_implementation/noongo.

  • NPA. (2010). National Development Plan (2010/11–2014/15), Development. Kampala: Government of Uganda.

    Google Scholar 

  • NPA. (2015). Second National Development Plan (NDPII), 2015/2016–2019/20 (p. 315). Kampala: National Plannig Authority, Government of Uganda. Available at http://npa.ug/wp-content/uploads/NDPII-Final.pdf.

  • NRC. (2002). Down to earth: Geographical information for sustainable development in Africa. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olafsson, A. S., & Skov-Petersen, H. (2014). The use of GIS-based support of recreational trail planning by local governments. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy,7(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-013-9094-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribot, F. (1989). Télédétection en Afrique subsaharienne, bilan régional. In Télédétection en Francophonie, (AUPELF-UREF, John Libbey Eurotext, Paris) (pp. 17–34). Available at http://www.francophonie.org/.

  • RMCA. (2015). Earth Sciences, Royal Museum for Central Africa. Available at http://www.africamuseum.be/museum/research/natural-sciences/earth-sciences/index_html. Accessed July 5, 2015.

  • Rogers, E. M. (1993). The diffusion of innovations model. In I. Masser & H. J. Onsrud (Eds.), Diffusion and use of geographic information technologies (pp. 9–24). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanely, R. (2012). Finding Success on the Oil Frontier, New York Times. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/04/business/global/tullow-oil-finds-success-exploring-where-others-dont.html?pagewanted=all. Accessed May 27, 2018.

  • Starling, G. (2011). The Nature of Public Administration. In Merrill, C. (Ed.), Managing the Public Sector. (9th ed., pp. 1–48.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Available at https://books.google.com/books?id=CdAEAAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=editions:cNUA0SJgywEC&hl=en&sa=X&ei=R9wpVbyMIo_0oASxtYGQBw&ved=0CB0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false.

  • Sui, D. Z., & Morril, R. (2004). Computers and geography: From automated geography to digital earth. In S. D. Brunn, S. L. Cutter, & J. W. Harrington Jr. (Eds.), Geography and technology (pp. 81–109). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.) (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. SAGE. Available at http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=F8BFOM8DCKoC&pgis=1. Accessed December 24, 2011.

  • Taylor, F. D. R. (1986). Computer assisted cartography in developing nations. In AutoCartoDigital mapping and spatial information systems: Proceedings of the international conference on the acquisition, management and presentation of spatial data (Vol. 2, pp. 462–471). Available at http://mapcontext.com/autocarto/proceedings/auto-carto-london-vol-2/pdf/computer-assisted-cartography-in-developing-nations.pdf.

  • Taylor, F. D. R. (1998). Modern cartography, policy issues and the developing nations: Rhetoric and reality. In F. D. R. Taylor (Ed.), Policy issues in modern cartography (pp. 185–214). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tchindjang, M., Menga, V. F., Makak, J. S., Nghonda, J. P., Nziengui, M., & Edou, M. (2005). Remote sensing in Africa: Mapping approach and perspectives. In Proceedings of the 22nd international cartographic conference (ICC), Coruna, Spain, July 916, 2005 (p. 10). Coruna, Spain. Available at http://icaci.org/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2005/htm/oral.htm.

  • Tolba, A., & Mourad, M. (2011). ‘Individual and cultural factors affecting diffusion of innovation. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies,5(1), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toppen, F. J. (1991). GIS eduction in the Netherlands: A bit of everything and everything about a BIT? Cartographica,28(3), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touzani, A. (2006). Activités du Centre R Régional Africain des Sciences et Technologies de l’Espace en Langue Française (CRASTE CRASTE-LF). In 49ème Session du Comité des Utilisations Pacifiques de l’Espace ExtraAtmosphAtmosphérique, Vienna, Austria, June 716, 2006 (pp. 1–35). Vienna: United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS). Available at http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/pdf/pres/copuos2006/10.pdf.

  • Turyareeba, P., & Drichi, P. (2001), Plan for Development of Uganda’s Biomass Energy Strategy, Energy Policy. Kampala, Uganda.

  • UgandaParliament. (2016). Oil production to start in 2020, Parliamentary News. Available at http://www.parliament.go.ug/new/index.php/about-parliament/parliamentary-news/1072-oil-production-to-start-in-2020. Accessed May 27, 2018.

  • UgandaWetlands, UBOS, ILRI, & WRI. (2009). Mapping a better future: How spatial analysis can benefit wetlands and reduce poverty in Uganda, Wetlands. Kampala, Uganda and Washington, DC, USA.

  • UNEP. (1972). Report of the United Nations conference on the Human Environment, United Nations Environmental ProgrammeEnvironment for Development. Available at http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=97.

  • USDoS. (2008). Global dialogues on emerging science and technology (GDEST). Washington, DC. Available at http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/131084.pdf.

  • Valente, T. W. (2005). Network models and methods for studying the diffusion of innovations. In P. J. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 98–116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511811395.006.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, P. S., Jager, W., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2011). Opinion leaders’ role in innovation diffusion: A simulation study. Journal of Product Innovation Management,28(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00791.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly,27(3), 425–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonk, G., Geertman, S., & Schot, P. (2007). New technologies stuck in old hierarchies: The diffusion of geo-information technologies in Dutch Public Organizations. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 745–756. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/4624622.

  • Wang, A., Redington, L., Steinmetz, V., & Lindeman, D. (2011). The ADOPT model: Accelerating diffusion of proven technologies for older adults. Ageing International,36(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-010-9072-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisfeld-Spolter, S., & and Thakkar, M. (2011). Is a designer only as good as a star who wears her clothes? Examining the roles of celebrities as opinion leaders for the diffusion of fashion in the US teen market. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 15(2), 133–144. Available at http://www.alliedacademies.org/articles/amsjvol15no22011.pdf.

  • West, R. E., Waddoups, G., & Graham, C. R. (2007). Understanding the experiences of instructors as they adopt a course management system. Educational Technology Research and Development,55(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9018-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, W., Von Pape, T., & Karnowski, V. (2008). An integrative model of mobile phone appropriation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,13(3), 593–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00412.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WorldBank. (2014). Updated income classifications, data. Available at http://data.worldbank.org/news/2015-country-classifications. Accessed April 9, 2015.

  • WorldBank. (2017). Uganda, country data: Uganda. Available at http://data.worldbank.org/country/uganda.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sami Eria.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Appendix 1: The influence of change agents, funding agencies, opinion leaders and champions at Ugandan institutions, 1989–2010

Appendix 1: The influence of change agents, funding agencies, opinion leaders and champions at Ugandan institutions, 1989–2010

ID

Institution name

Change agent

Funding agency

Opinion leader

Champion

1

National Environment Information Centre (NEIC)

UNEP-GRID

WB

Y

Y

2

National Forestry Authority (NFA)

NFP

NORAD

Y

Y

3

Wetlands Management Department (WMD)

IUCN

GoN

Y

Y

4

Makerere University, Department of Surveying

EEA, GIC, MUIENR

PBF

Y

Y

5

Makerere University, Institute of the Environment and Natural Resources (MUIENR)

UNEP-GRID

WB

Y

Y

6

Department of Surveys and Mapping (DoSM)

GCo, FCo, JCo

WB

N

Y

7

Computer Aided Mapping Project Uganda Surveys Project

(CAMPUS)

FCo

WB

N

Y

8

Famine Early Warning System Network (FEWSNET)

CI

USAID

N

N

9

Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA)

GTZ

USAID

N

Y

10

Department of Geological Survey and Mines (DoGSM)

SDSA, CCo

WB, ADB, NDF, GoB, UNDP

N

Y

11

Makerere University, Department of Geography

ITC

ITC

Y

Y

12

National Water and Sewerage Corporation (NW&SC)

GTZ

GoG

N

Y

13

National Agricultural Research Laboratories (NARL)

NEMA

WB, GEF, GoU

N

Y

14

Makerere University, Department of Forestry

NFA

NFA

Y

Y

15

Mobile Telecom Network Uganda (MTN)

0

PF

N

N

16

Northern Uganda Data Centre (NUDC)

EEA

PMO, UNDP, GTZ, WB, GoI

Y

Y

17

Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS)

EEA

MoF

Y

Y

18

USAID

OS, GIC, EEA

USAID

Y

Y

19

GeoInformation Communication (GIC)

EEA

PF

N

Y

20

Uganda National Roads Authority (UNRA)

SACo

WB, EU, ADB

Y

Y

21

Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industries and Fisheries (MAAIF), Cartographic Office

IAEA

IAEA, ADB, FAO

N

Y

22

Kampala City Council (KCC)

MUDG

WB

Y

Y

23

Makerere University, Faculty of Computing and Informatics Technology (MUFCIT)

UU

NUFFIC

N

Y

24

Umeme

UmSA

PF

Y

Y

25

WE-Consult

DCo

PF

N

N

26

Tullow Oil, Uganda

EEA

PF

Y

Y

27

Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Gulu (OCHA)

UNHCR, UNO CHA, GIC

UNOCHA

Y

Y

28

United Nations OCHA, Kampala (UNOCHA)

GIC, EEA

UNOCHA

N

Y

29

Infectious Disease Institute (IDI)

KCC

Pfizer, PEPFAR, CDC

Y

Y

30

Center for Disease Control (CDC), Uganda

EEA, ESA

PEPFAR, CDC

Y

Y

31

World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)

GIC

WWF

N

Y

32

NatureUganda

FE

PF

Y

Y

33

Spring, USAID Project

FE

USAID

Y

Y

34

Northern Uganda Malaria and Tuberculosis (NUMAT), USAID Project

GIC

USAID

Y

Y

35

Mbarara University, Department of Computer Science

MUFCIT

NUFFIC

Y

Y

36

Mbarara Police

MUDCS

NUFFIC

Y

N

37

Gulu University, Department of Computer Science

GIC

WCS, NUFFIC, USAID

Y

Y

38

Department of Petroleum Exploration and Production (DPEP)

GIC

MEMD

N

Y

39

Kyambogo University, Department of Computer Science

CE

NUFFIC

Y

Y

40

Nokia Siemens Networks

0

Private

N

N

41

UNICEF

FE

UNICEF

N

N

42

ACODE

NA

NA

NA

NA

43

FXB Uganda Program

NA

NA

NA

NA

44

BIN-IT Services Ltd

NA

NA

NA

NA

45

Uganda Land Alliance

NA

NA

NA

NA

46

National Association of Professional Environmentalists (NAPE)

NA

NA

NA

NA

47

Uganda National Health Research Organization (UNHRO)

NA

NA

NA

NA

48

TourGuide Publications

NA

NA

NA

NA

49

Central Police Station

NA

NA

NA

NA

50

MAP (U) Ltd

NA

NA

NA

NA

51

Mitland (U) Ltd

NA

NA

NA

NA

52

GeoMaps Africa Ltd

NA

NA

NA

NA

53

National Planning Authority (NPA)

NA

NA

NA

NA

  1. NA not applicable, Y yes, N no

Acronym

Full name of change agent or funding agency

Acronym

Full name of change agent or funding agency

ADB

African Development Bank

CDC

Center for Disease Control

CI

Chemonics International

EEA

ESRI Eastern Africa

ESA

ESRI South Africa

EU

European Union

FAO

Food and Agricultural Organization

FE

Former Employee

GCo,

German Company,

GEF

Global Environment Facility

FCo,

French Company,

  

JCo,

Japanese Company,

  

CCo,

Canadian Company,

  

SACo,

South African Company,

  

DCo

Dutch Company

  

GIC

GeoInformation Communication

GoB

Government of Belgium

GoG

Government of Germany

GoI

Government of Italy

GoN

Government of The Netherlands

GoU

Government of Uganda

GTZ

German Technical Services

IAEA

International Atomic Energy Agency

ITC

Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, The Netherlands

IUCN

International Union for Conservation of Nature

MEMD

Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development (Government of Uganda)

MoF

Ministry of Finance (Government of Uganda)

MUDCS

Mbarara University Department of Computer Science

MUDG

Makerere University Department of Geography

MUFCIT

Makerere University Faculty of Computing and Informatics Technology

MUIENR

Makerere University Institute of Environment and Natural Resources

NDF

Nordic Development Fund

NFA

National Forestry Authority (Uganda)

NFP

Norwegian Forestry Program

NORAD

Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation

NUFFIC

Netherlands Organization for International Cooperation in Higher Education

OS

Oakar Services

PBF

Project-Based Funding

PEPFAR

President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

PF

Private Funding

PMO

Prime Minister’s Office (Government of Uganda)

SDSA

Spatial Dimension South Africa Pty Limited

UmSA

Umeme South Africa

UNDP

United Nations Development Program

UNEP-GRID

United Nations Environment Program - Global Resource Information Database

UNHCR

United Nations High Commission for Refugees

USAID

United States Agency for International Development

UU

University of Utrecht, The Netherlands

WB

World Bank

WCS

Wildlife Conservation Society

  

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eria, S. Diffusion of GIS in Uganda: the role of change agents, opinion leaders, champions, social network links and re-invention. GeoJournal 84, 1567–1595 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9938-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9938-4

Keywords

Navigation