Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 84, Issue 2, pp 483–496 | Cite as

Capabilities of a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis approach in modelling migration

  • Mohd Fadzil Abdul RashidEmail author
Article

Abstract

Internal migration is one of the influential factors of urban growth. This phenomenon needs to be well understood for urban planning decision making, in order to avoid a shortfall or inefficiency in urban development. Consequently, by the multiple factors of migration decision-selectivity in terms of spatial-economic factors, spatial-social factors and personal factors make this phenomenon difficult to estimate. This paper utilises the capability of a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach in formulating a spatial migration model so-called migration potential model (MGP model) for modelling the distribution of potential migrants in urban areas. The model incorporates the migration decision-selectivity factors identified from a migration behavioural survey on households in the Klang Valley region into an environment of GIS-based MCDA. For this attempt, the land suitability model-based weighted linear combination so-called spatial AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) technique was selected as a base model for the MGP formulation. The paper concludes the integration of GIS with MCDA would contribute towards an advanced methodology of migration analysis for urban planning purposes.

Keywords

Internal migration Migration decision-selectivity factors GIS-based MCDA Urban planning Spatial migration modelling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thanks to Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) for granting me a sabbatical leave at Center for Population Studies, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. My thanks also go to my colleagues at the centre especially to my supervisor, Professor Dr Rshood M. Khraif, and my fellow’s friends, Dr Asharaf Abdul Salam and Dr Ibrahim Elsegaey for their help and support. This paper is a part of the exercises in the centre and is extracted from my PhD research which was done in 2010.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Author declare that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Banai-Kashani, R. (1989). A new method for site suitability analysis: The analytic hierarchy process. Environmental Management, 13(6), 685–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry, J. K. (1995). What’s in a model? GIS World, 8(1), 26–28.Google Scholar
  3. Carver, S. J. (1991). Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 5(3), 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Çetinkaya, C., Özceylan, E., Erbas, M., & Kabak, M. (2016). GIS-based fuzzy MCDA approach for siting refugee camp: A case study for south-eastern Turkey. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 18(2016), 218–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chamratrithirong, A., Archavanitkul, K., Richter, K., Guest, P., & Thongthai, V. (1995). National migration survey of Thailand. Bangkok: Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University.Google Scholar
  6. Cheng, E. W. L., Li, H., & Yu, L. (2007). A GIS approach to shopping mall location selection. Building and Environment, 42(2), 884–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cushing, B., & Poot, J. (2004). Crossing boundaries and borders: Regional science advances in migration modelling. Regional Science, 83(1), 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Vries, J. J. D., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (2000). Alonso’s general theory of movement: Advances in spatial interaction modelling. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, No. 2000-062/3, Tinbergen Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Eastman, J. R., Jin, W., Kyem, P. A. K., & Toledano, J. (1995). Raster procedures for multi-criteria/multi-objectives decisions. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 61(15), 539–547.Google Scholar
  10. Eldrandaly, K., Eldin, N., & Sui, D. (2003). A com-based spatial decision support system for industrial site selection. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 7(2), 72–92.Google Scholar
  11. ESRI. (2001). ArcGIS spatial analyst: Advances GIS spatial analysis using raster and vector data. New York: Environmental System Research Institute. Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Henrie, C. J. (2004). The emergence of a west coast Megalopolis and its role within the US interurban migration system. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  13. Ishikawa, Y. (2001). Population geography with GIS in Japan. GeoJournal, 52(3), 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jankowski, P. (1995). Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 9(3), 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kawabe, H., Hirosima, K., Inoue, T., Hayase, Y., Sato, K., Aihara, Y., et al. (1990). Migration rates by age group and migration patterns: Application of Roger’s migration schedule model to Japan, the Republic of Korea and Thailand. Tokyo: Statistical Research Department, Institute of Developing Economies.Google Scholar
  16. Laaribi, A., Chevallier, J. J., & Martel, J. M. (1997). A spatial decision aid: A multi-criterion evaluation approach. Computer, Environment and Urban Systems, 20(6), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1), 47–57.Google Scholar
  18. Malczewski, J. (1999a). GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. New York: Willey.Google Scholar
  19. Malczewski, J. (1999b). Spatial multi-criteria decision analysis. In J.-C. Thill (Ed.), Spatial multi-criteria decision making and analysis: A geographic information sciences approach. Alsershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  20. Malczewski, J. (2000). On the use of weighted linear combination method in GIS: Common and best practice approaches. Transaction in GIS, 4(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Malczewski, J. (2004). GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: A critical overview. Progress in Planning, 2(2004), 3–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mohd Fadzil, A. R. (2017). Characteristics, trends and spatial distribution of urban migration in Malaysia: A case study of the Klang Valley region. UPLanD, 2(2), 107–127.Google Scholar
  23. Mohd Fadzil, A. R., & Ishak, A. G. (2008). The implementation of systematic sampling for behavioural migration survey in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi Maklumat & Sains Kuantitatif, 10(1), 59–69.Google Scholar
  24. Mohd Fadzil, A. R., & Ishak, A. G. (2011). The importance of internal migration in urban planning process: a case study of Klang Valley. International Journal of Social Planning and Development, 1(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  25. Mohd Fadzil, A. R., Ishak, A. G., Ibrahim, N., & Suziana, M. Y. (2014). Evaluation of migration-decision selectivity factors in the metropolitan area: A case study in Klang Valley Malaysia. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (e-Bangi), 9(1), 034–044.Google Scholar
  26. Nakaya, T. (2001). Local spatial interaction modelling based on the Geographically Weighted Regression approach. GeoJournal, 53(4), 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neto, F., & Mullet, E. (1998). Decision-making as regards migration: Wage differential, job opportunity, and the network effect. Acta Psychologica, 98(1), 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Özceylan, E., Çetinkaya, C., Erbas, M., & Kabak, M. (2016a). Logistic performance evaluation of provinces in Turkey: A GIS-based multi criteria decision analysis. Transportation Research Part A, 94(2016), 323–337.Google Scholar
  29. Özceylan, E., Erbas, M., Tolon, M., Kabak, M., & Durğut, T. (2016b). Evaluation of freight villages: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis. Computers in Industry, 76(2016), 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pacione, M. (2001). Urban geography: A global perspective. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pettit, C., & Pullar, D. (1999). An integrated planning tool based upon multiple criteria evaluation of spatial information. Computer, Environment and Urban Systems, 23(1999), 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Plane, D. A., & Rogerson, P. A. (1994). The geographical analysis of population with application to planning and business. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Ravenstein, E. G. (1885). The laws of migration. Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 48(2), 167–235.Google Scholar
  34. Rogers, A. (2002). The indirect estimation of migration: A proposal for a multinational study. Working Paper, Institute of Behavioural Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  35. Rogers, A. (2006). Demographic modelling of the geography of migration and population: A multiregional perspective. Working Paper, Institute of Behavioural Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  36. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  37. Saaty, T. L., & Kearns, K. P. (1985). Analytical planning: The organisation of systems. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  38. Saaty, T. L., & Ozdemir, M. S. (2003). Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38(2003), 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Samat, N. (2007). Integrating GIS and cellular automata spatial model in evaluating urban growth: Prospects and challenges. Alam Bina, 9(1), 79–93.Google Scholar
  40. Shen, J. (1999). Modelling regional migration in China: estimation and decomposition. Environment and Planning, 31(7), 1223–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Siddiqui, M. Z., Everett, J. W., & Vieux, B. E. (1996). Landfill sitting using geographic information systems: A demonstration. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 122(6), 515–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skeldon, R. (1998). Urbanisation and migration in the ESCAP region. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 13(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Skeldon, R. (2002). Migration and poverty. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 17(4), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tomlin, C. D. (1990). Geographic information systems and cartographic modelling. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  45. UNDP. (2009). Human Development Report 2009. USA: UNDP.Google Scholar
  46. von Thünen, J. H. (1826). Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie, Hamburg, Perthes. The isolated state (C. M. Wartenberg, Trans.). Oxford: Pergamon Press (1966).Google Scholar
  47. Voogd, H. (1983). Multi-criteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. London: Pion Limited.Google Scholar
  48. Wegener, M. (2000). Spatial models and GIS. In A. S. Fotheringham & M. Wegener (Eds.), Spatial models and GIS: New potential and new models. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  49. Wilson, T., & Bell, M. (2004). Comparative empirical evaluations of internal migration models in sub-national population projections. Population Research, 21(2), 127–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wissen, L. V., Gaag, N. V. D., Rees, P., & Stillwell, J. (2002). In search of a modelling strategy for projecting internal migration in European countries. Demographic versus economic-geographical approaches. Eurostat.Google Scholar
  51. Yano, K., Nakaya, T., & Ishikawa, Y. (2000). An analysis of inter-municipal migration flows in Japan using GIS and spatial interaction modelling. Geographical Review of Japan, Series B, 73(2), 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Perak BranchUniversiti Teknologi MARASeri IskandarMalaysia

Personalised recommendations