Reacting to critiques that the smart city is overly technocratic and instrumental, companies and cities have reframed their initiatives as ‘citizen-centric’. However, what ‘citizen-centric’ means in practice is rarely articulated. We draw on and extend Sherry Arnstein’s seminal work on participation in planning and renewal programmes to create the ‘Scaffold of Smart Citizen Participation’—a conceptual tool to unpack the diverse ways in which the smart city frames citizens. We use this scaffold to measure smart citizen inclusion, participation, and empowerment in smart city initiatives in Dublin, Ireland. Our analysis illustrates how most ‘citizen-centric’ smart city initiatives are rooted in stewardship, civic paternalism, and a neoliberal conception of citizenship that prioritizes consumption choice and individual autonomy within a framework of state and corporate defined constraints that prioritize market-led solutions to urban issues, rather than being grounded in civil, social and political rights and the common good. We conclude that significant normative work is required to rethink ‘smart citizens’ and ‘smart citizenship’ and to remake smart cities if they are to truly become ‘citizen-centric’.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
A gathering where programmers collaboratively code in an extreme manner over a short period of time, a few days or over a weekend.
At Croke Park Stadium, an 80,000 seater venue owned and operated by the Gaelic Athletics Association. https://dcu.asu.edu/content/smart-stadium.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
Breathnach, P. (2010). From spatial Keynesianism to post-Fordist neoliberalism: Emerging contradictions in the spatiality of the Irish State. Antipode, 42(5), 1180–1199.
Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10(2), 182–222.
Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode, 34(3), 349–379.
Cardullo, P., Kitchin, R., & Di Feliciantonio, C. (2017). Living labs and vacancy in the neoliberal city. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.008.
Carpentier, N. (2016). Beyond the ladder of participation: An analytical toolkit for the critical analysis of participatory media processes. Javnost—The Public, 23(1), 70–88.
Clark, J., & Shelton, T. (2016). Technocratic values and uneven development in the “Smart City.” Metropolitics. Retrieved from http://www.metropolitiques.eu/Technocratic-Values-and-Uneven.html.
Coletta, C., Heaphy, L., & Kitchin, R. (2017). From accidental to articulated smart city: The creation and work of Smart Dublin. Programmable City Working Paper 29. Retrieved from https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/93ga5.
Coletta, C., & Kitchin, R. (2017). Algorhythmic governance: Regulating the ‘heartbeat’ of a city using the Internet of Things. Big Data and Society, 4, 1–16.
Collins, K., & Ison, R. (2009). Jumping off Arnstein’s ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(6), 358–373.
Cowley, R., Joss, S., & Dayot, Y. (2017). The smart city and its publics: insights from across six UK cities. Urban Research and Practice, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2017.1293150.
Crutcher, M., & Zook, M. (2009). Placemarks and waterlines: Racialized cyberscapes in post-Katrina Google Earth. Geoforum, 40(4), 523–534.
Datta, A. (2015). New urban utopias of postcolonial India: “Entrepreneurial urbanization” in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1), 3–22.
de Lange, M., & de Waal, M. (2013). Owning the city: New media and citizen engagement in urban design. First Monday, 18(11). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4954.
de Waal, M. (2014). The city as interface: how digital media are changing the city. nai010 Rotterdam: Publishers.
Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2013). Crowdsourced cartography: Mapping experience and knowledge. Environment and Planning A, 45(1), 19–36.
Fuller, M. (2017). How to be a geek: Essays on the culture of software. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA, USA: Polity
Gabrys, J. (2014). Programming environments: Environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(1), 30–48.
Greenfield, A. (2013). Against the smart city (1.3 edition). Berlin: Do projects.
Hart, R. A. (2008). Stepping back from ‘the ladder’: Reflections on a model of participatory work with children. In A. Reid, B. B. Jensen, J. Nikel, & V. Simovska (Eds.), Participation and Learning (pp. 19–31). Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer.
Heaphy, L., & Pétercsák, R. (2016). Building smart city partnerships in the ‘Silicon Docks’, paper presented at the Creating Smart Cities workshop. Maynooth University, Ireland. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2mjmyfd.
Hill, D. (2013). Essay: On the smart city; Or, a “manifesto” for smart citizens instead. Retrieved October 26, 2017, from http://www.cityofsound.com/blog/2013/02/on-the-smart-city-a-call-for-smart-citizens-instead.html.
Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303–320.
Isin, E. F. (Ed.). (2000). Democracy, citizenship, and the global city. London; New York: Routledge.
Kitchin, R. (2014a). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. London: SAGE Publications.
Kitchin, R. (2014b). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14.
Kitchin, R. (2015). Making sense of smart cities: Addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 131–136.
Kitchin, R. (2016). The ethics of smart cities and urban science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 374(2083), 1–20.
Kitchin, R., Coletta, C., Evans, L., Heaphy, L., & Mac Donncha, D. (2017a). Smart cities, urban technocrats, epistemic communities, advocacy coalitions and the ‘last mile’ problem. it—Information Technology., 59(6), 275–284.
Kitchin, R., Coletta, C., & McArdle, G. (2017b). Urban informatics, governmentality and the logics of urban control. Programmable City Working Paper 25. Retrieved from https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/27hz8/.
Kitchin, R., O’Callaghan, C., Boyle, M., Gleeson, J., & Keaveney, K. (2012). Placing neoliberalism: The rise and fall of Ireland’s Celtic Tiger. Environment and Planning A, 44(6), 1302–1326.
Larner, W. (2003). Neoliberalism? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21, 509–512.
Ljungberg, J. (2000). Open source movements as a model for organising. European Journal of Information Systems, 9(4), 208–216.
MacLaran, A., & Kelly, S. (2014). Neoliberal urban policy and the transformation of the city: Reshaping Dublin. Berlin: Springer.
March, H., & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2016). Smart contradictions: The politics of making Barcelona a self-sufficient city. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(4), 816–830.
March, H., & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2017). Against, for and beyond the smart city: Towards technological sovereignty in Barcelona. Boston: In Association of American Geographers conference.
McCann, B. (2014). A review of SCATS operation and deployment in Dublin. In Presented at the 19th JCT traffic signal symposium and exhibition. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2pdLCs5.
McLaren, D., & Agyeman, J. (2015). Sharing cities: A case for truly smart and sustainable cities. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Miller, H. J. (2010). The data avalanche is here. Shouldn’t we be digging? Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 181–201.
Ong, A. (2006). Mutations in citizenship. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2–3), 499–505.
Perng, S.-Y. (2016). Creating infrastructure with citizens: Traffic light box artworks in Dublin streets, paper presented at the Creating Smart Cities workshop. Maynooth University, Ireland. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2mjmyfd.
Perng, S.-Y., & Kitchin, R. (2018). Solutions and frictions in civic hacking: collaboratively designing and building wait time predictions for an immigration office. Social and Cultural Geography, 19(1), 1–20.
Perng, S.-Y., Kitchin, R., & Mac Donncha, D. (2017). Hackathons, entrepreneurship and the passionate making of smart cities. The Programmable City Working Paper 28. Retrieved from osf.io/nu3ec.
Sadowski, J., & Pasquale, F. A. (2015). The spectrum of control: A social theory of the smart city. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5903/4660?curator=TechREDEF.
Sartori, L. (2015). Alla ricerca della “smart citizenship”. Istituzioni Del Federalismo: Rivista Di Studi Giuridici e Politici, 4, 927–948.
Seltzer, E., & Mahmoudi, D. (2013). Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing: Challenges and opportunities for planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 28(1), 3–18.
Shelton, T., Zook, M., & Wiig, A. (2015). The ‘actually existing smart city’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 13–25.
Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-State. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006.
Swyngedouw, E. (2016). The mirage of the sustainable ‘smart’ city. Planetary urbanization and the spectre of combined and uneven apocalypse. In O. Nel-lo & R. Mele (Eds.), Cities in the 21st Century (pp. 134–143). London: Routledge.
Tritter, J. Q., & McCallum, A. (2006). The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy, 76(2), 156–168.
Vanolo, A. (2016). Is there anybody out there? The place and role of citizens in tomorrow’s smart cities. Futures, 82, 26–36.
Wilcox, D. (1994). The Guide to Effective Participation. Retrieved from http://partnerships.org.uk/guide/AZpartic.html.
Wilson, W. J., & Chaddha, A. (2009). The role of theory in ethnographic research. Ethnography, 10(4), 549–564.
The research for this paper was provided by a European Research Council Advanced Investigator Award, ‘The Programmable City’ (ERC-2012-AdG-323636).
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
The research for this paper was passed for ethical approval by both the European Research Council and Maynooth University research ethics committees.
About this article
Cite this article
Cardullo, P., Kitchin, R. Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal 84, 1–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8
- Smart city