Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 83, Issue 6, pp 1373–1392 | Cite as

A GIS based planning support system for assessing financial feasibility of urban redevelopment

  • Simone Z. LeaoEmail author
  • Laurence Troy
  • Scott N. Lieske
  • Bill Randolph
  • Chris Pettit
Article

Abstract

Urban densification trends combined with redevelopment increasingly moving away from large former industrial and transport sites toward existing town centres and corridors indicate redevelopment is becoming increasingly complex, difficult to plan for and undertake. The interplay between land and property markets and planning frameworks suggest city planners and urban researchers need new tools and methodologies to gain insights into ways to deliver effective responses. Despite the need, there is a limited availability of comprehensive models to fulfil the task. This paper describes a GIS-based tool to assess parcel-level financial feasibility and housing supply associated with urban redevelopment within a precinct. The tool incorporates existing and potential built form and parameters associated with the planning framework and land and property markets. Using a real case study in a workshop, tool performance was evaluated by professional urban planners in terms of its capacity to produce metrics and visualisations of potential scenarios of redevelopment. Results indicate the usefulness of the tool for emulating land market conditions and testing scenarios of planning regulation and market changes for strategic planning purposes.

Keywords

Modelling Visualisation Scenario Urban consolidation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the City of Randwick, Australia, in 2016. The workshop and questionnaires used in the project were approved by the UNSW Human Research Ethics Committee on 16 May 2016 (HC16333). The authors would like to thank the urban planners who participated in the workshop testing the URFF PSS tool presented in this paper in a real-world case study, and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable revision of the text, comments and contributions to the improvement of this paper.

References

  1. Arciniegas, G., & Janssen, R. (2012). Spatial decision support for collaborative land use planning workshops. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107, 332–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ASBEC, Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (2010) Cities for the Future: Baseline Report and Key Issues.Google Scholar
  3. Boulange, C., Pettit, C., & Giles-Corti, B. (2017). The walkability planning support system: An evidence-based tool to design healthy communities. In Geertman, S., Allan, A., Pettit, C. & Stillwell, J. (Eds), Planning support science for smarter urban futures (pp. 153–165). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brueckner, J. K., & Sridhar, K. S. (2012). Measuring welfare gains from relaxation of land-use restrictions: The case of India’s building-height limits. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42, 1061–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler-Bowden, C., & Pickett, C. (2007). Homes in the sky: Apartment living in Australia. Melbourne: The Miegunyah Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cardew, R. (1980). Flats in Sydney: The thirty percent solution? In J. Roe (Ed.), Twentieth century Sydney: Studies in urban and social history (pp. 69–88). Sydney: Hale & Iremonger.Google Scholar
  7. Cheshire, P., & Sheppard, S. (2002). The welfare economics of land use planning. Journal of Urban Economics, 52, 242–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DPE, Department of Planning and Environment of New South Wales (2015) SEPP 65: State environmental planning policy no 65-design quality of residential apartment development. Sydney, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
  9. DPE, Department of Planning and Environment of New South Wales, Australia (2016) 2016 NSW population and households’ projection, http://www.planning.org.au/Research-and-Demography/Demography/Population-projections. Accessed 20 November 2016.
  10. ESRI 2017. What is modelbuilder? http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/analyze/modelbuilder/what-is-modelbuilder.htm Accessed 12 December 2017.
  11. Forster, C. (2006). The challenge of change: Australian cities and urban planning in the new millennium. Geographical Research, 44(2), 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geertman, S., Allan, A., Pettit, C., & Stillwell, J. (2017). Introduction to ‘planning support science for smarter urban futures’. In Geertman, S., Allan, A., Pettit, C. & Stillwell, J. (Eds), Planning support science for smarter urban futures (pp. 1–19). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geshkov, M. V., & DeSalvo, J. S. (2012). The effect of land-use controls on the spatial size of U.S. urbanized areas. Journal of Regional Science, 52(4), 648–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Habitat, U. N. (2013). Planning and design for sustainable urban mobility: Global report on human settlements. New York: United Nations.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harvard, T. (2014). financial feasibility studies for property development: theory and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Housing Industry Association (2017). Building approval. HIA research note February 2017.Google Scholar
  17. Ihlanfeldt, K. R. (2007). The effect of land use regulation on housing and land prices. Journal of Urban Economics, 61, 420–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leao, S. Z., Huynh, N., Taylor, A., Pettit, C., & Perez, P. (In press, Accepted in Feb 2017). Evolution of a synthetic population and its daily mobility patterns under spatial strategies for urban growth. In Geertman, S., Allan, A., Stillwell, J., & Pettit, C. (Eds.), Planning support science for smarter urban futures (pp. 399–417) Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Lieske, S. N., McLeod, D. M., & Coupal, R. H. (2015). Infrastructure development, residential growth and impacts on public service expenditure. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 8(2), 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Major Cities Unit. (2012). State of Australian cities 2011. Canberra: Department of Infrastructure and Transport, Australian Government.Google Scholar
  21. OECD. (2012). Compact city policies: A comparative assessment. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pinnegar, S., Randolph, B., & Freestone, R. (2015). Incremental urbanism: characteristics and implications of residential redevelopment through owner-driven demolition and rebuilding. Town Planning Review, 86(3), 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Randolph, B. (2006). Delivering the compact city in Australia: Current trends and future implications. Urban Policy and Research, 24(4), 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rawlinsons (2016) Australian construction handbook Rivervale: Rawlinsons Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Ruming, K. (2014). Urban consolidation, strategic planning and community position in Sydney, Australia: unpacking policy knowledge and public perceptions. Land Use Policy, 39, 254–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tajani, F., & Morano, P. (2015). An evaluation model of the financial feasibility of social housing in urban redevelopment. Property Management, 33(2), 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Troy, L., Easthope, H., Randolph, B., & Pinnegar, S. (2015a). Renewing the compact city: Interim report. Sydney, Australia: City Futures Research Centre, UNSW.Google Scholar
  28. Troy, L., Randolph, B., Pinnegar, S., & Easthope, H. (2015b). Planning the end of the compact city?, In Proceedings of the state of Australian cities Conference 2015 (pp. 9–11). Gold Coast: QLD, Australia.Google Scholar
  29. Troy, L., Easthope, H., Randolph, B., & Pinnegar, S. (2017). ‘It depends what you mean by the term rights’: strata termination and housing rights. Housing Studies, 32(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van den Nouwelant, R., Davison, G., Gurran, N., Pinnegar, S., & Randolph, B. (2015). Delivering affordable housing through the planning system in urban redevelopment contexts: converging government roles in Queensland, South Australia and New South Wales. Australian Planner, 52(2), 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Z. Leao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Laurence Troy
    • 1
  • Scott N. Lieske
    • 2
  • Bill Randolph
    • 1
  • Chris Pettit
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Built Environment, City Futures Research CentreUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations