Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 83, Issue 4, pp 803–817 | Cite as

Using small spatial units to refine our perception of rural America

  • François-Michel Le Tourneau
Article
  • 134 Downloads

Abstract

More than half of the US rural population lives inside metro or micropolitan areas and even at more disaggregated scales, such as the census tracts, most spatial units mix rural and urban population. At a national scale, only 30% of the country are inhabited by 100% urban or 100% rural population, implying that more than two third of the US territory are somewhere in between both situations. As the rural/urban dichotomy appears today to be blurred by the emergence of new phenomena like rurbanization or exurbanization, our perception of rural America may be somewhat twisted and the reality of rural areas underplayed. This paper focuses on using finer-grade spatial units such as the census blocks and block groups, in order to provide new elements about the extension, localization and characteristics of rural America as well as about its inner dynamics. To that end, we analyze and process geographical and social data at these two levels of information, and use population density as a main factor of analysis. This allows us not only to propose new measurement of the extent of rural space in the USA but also to propose a new vision of its spatial dynamics by studying how several social indicators such as income, median age or sex ratio reveal regional and micro-regional variations and situations in the rural part of the US.

Keywords

Rural America Population density Social indicators Rural geography Spatial dynamics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the French National Center for Scientific Research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Antrop, M. (2000a). Changing patterns in the urbanized countryside of Western Europe. Landscape Ecology, 15(3), 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antrop, M. (2000b). Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agricultural Ecosystems Environment, 77(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barcus, H. R., & Simmons, L. (2012). Ethnic restructuring in rural America: Migration and the changing faces of rural communities in the Great Plains. The Professional Geographer, 65(1), 130–152. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2012.658713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berque, A. (2011). Le rural, le sauvage, l’urbain. Etudes Rurales, 187, 51–61. https://etudesrurales.revues.org/9367#quotation.
  5. Brondizio, E., & Le Tourneau, F.-M. (2016). Environmental governance for all. Science, 352(6291), 1272–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, D. L. (2014). Rural population change in social context. In L. Jensen, C. Bailey, & E. Ransom (Eds.), Rural America in a globalizing world (pp. 299–310). Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, D. G., Johnson, K. M., Loveland, T. R., & Theobald, D. M. (2005). Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United states, 1950–2000. Ecological Applications, 15(6), 1851–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calkin, D., Cohen, J., Finney, M., & Thompson, M. (2014). How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland–urban interface. PNAS, 111(2), 746–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitchen, J. (1991). Endangered spaces, enduring places: Change, identity, and survival in rural America. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  10. Glasgow, N., & Brown, D. L. (2012). Rural ageing in the United States: Trends and contexts. Journal of Rural Studies, 28(4), 422–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamilton, L. C., Hamilton, L. R., Duncan, C. M. and Colocousis, C. R. (2008). Place matters: Challenges and opportunities in four rural Americas. Reports on rural America (Vol. 1, No. 4), Durham, NH: Carsey Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Isserman, A. (2005). In the national interest: Defining rural and urban correctly in research and public policy. International Regional Science Review, 28(4), 465–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, K. M. (2013). Deaths Exceed Births in Record Number of U.S. Counties. Fact Sheet No. 25. Carsey Institute. http://www.carseyinstitute.unh.edu/sites/carseyinstitute.unh.edu/files/publications/fs-johnson-natural-decrease-uscounties-web.pdf. Accessed 14 March 2013.
  14. Johnson, K. M., & Cromartie, J. B. (2006). The rural rebound and its aftermath: Changing demographic dynamics and regional contrasts. In W. A. Kandel & D. L. Brown (Eds.), Population change and rural society (pp. 25–49). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, K. M., & Lichter, D. T. (2012). Rural natural increase in the new century: America’s third demographic transition. In L. J. Kulcsár & K. J. Curtis (Eds.), International handbook of rural demography (pp. 17–34). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, R., Fly, M., Talley, J., & Cordell, H. (2003). Green migration into rural America: The new frontier of environmentalism? Society & Natural Resources, 16(3), 221–238. doi: 10.1080/08941920309159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laidley, T. (2016). Measuring Sprawl: A new index, recent trends, and future research. Urban Affairs Review, 52(1), 66–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Landis, J. (2009). The changing shape of metropolitan America. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 626(1), 154–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lichter, D. T., & Brown, D. L. (2011). Rural America in an urban society: Changing spatial and social boundaries. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 565–592. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lopez, R. (2014). Urban sprawl in the United States: 1970–2010. Cities and the Environment (CATE), 7(1), 7. http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol7/iss1/7.
  21. Mc Granahan, D. A., Cromartie, J., & Wojan, T. (2010). Nonmetropolitan outmigration counties: some are poor, many are prosperous. Economic research report. No. 107. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  22. Meentemeyer, R., Tang, W., Dorning, M. A., Vogler, J. B., Cunniffe, N. J., & Shoemaker, D. A. (2013). FUTURES: Multilevel simulations of emerging urban–rural landscape structure using a stochastic patch-growing algorithm. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(4), 785–807. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2012.707591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murdock, S., Cline, M., & Zey, M. (2011). Challenges in the analysis of rural populations in the United States. In L. J. Kulcsár & K. J. Curtis (Eds.), International handbook of rural demography (Vol. 3)., International handbooks of population Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1842-5_2.Google Scholar
  24. Owens, P. M., Titus-Ernstoff, L., Gibson, L., Beach, M., Beauregard, S., & Dalton, M. (2010). Smart density: A more accurate method of measuring density for health related research. International Journal of Health Geographics, 9(1), 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prieger, J. (2013). The broadband digital divide and the economic benefits of mobile broadband for rural areas. Telecommunications Policy, 37(6–7), 483–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ratcliffe, M., Burd, C., Holder, K., & Fields, A. (2016). Defining rural at the U.S. Census Bureau. American community survey and geography brief, Washington: U.S. Bureau of Census.Google Scholar
  27. Schaeffer, P. V., Kahsai, M. S., & Jackson, R. W. (2013). Beyond the rural-urban dichotomy: Essay in Honor of Professor A. M. Isserman. International Regional Science Review, 36(1), 81–96. doi: 10.1177/0160017612449981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Snyder, A. R., & McLaughlin, D. K. (2004). Female-headed families and poverty in rural America. Rural Sociology, 69(1), 127–149. doi: 10.1526/003601104322919937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Terando, A. J., Costanza, J., Belyea, C., Dunn, R. R., McKerrow, A., & Collazo, J. A. (2014). The southern megalopolis: Using the past to predict the future of urban sprawl in the Southeast U.S. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e102261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Theobald, D. M. (2001). Land-use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe. The Geographical Review, 91(3), 544–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Theobald, D. (2005). Landscape patterns of exurban growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020. Ecology and Society, 10(1), 32. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art32/.
  32. Thomas, D. S., & Butry, D. T. (2014). Areas of the U.S. wildland–urban interface threatened by wildfire during the 2001–2010 decade. Natural Hazards, 71(3), 1561. doi: 10.1007/s11069-013-0965-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Travis, W. R. (2007). New geographies of the American West: Land use and the changing patterns of place. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  34. Trusty, R. R. (2004). Mapping population density using a dasymetric mapping technique (p. 1425487). San Jose State University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Ulrich-Schad, J. (2015). Recreational amenities, rural migration patterns, and the great recession. Population and Environment, 37, 157–180. doi: 10.1007/s11111-015-0238-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. US Bureau of Census (2012). 2010 census of population and housing, summary population and housing characteristics, CPH-1-A, selected appendixes. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  37. Von Reichert, S., Commartie, J., & Arthun, R. (2014). Reasons for returning and not returning to rural U.S. communities. The Professional Geographer, 66(1), 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Winkler, R. L., Cheng, C., & Golding, S. (2011). Boom or bust? Population dynamics in natural-resource dependent counties. In L. J. Kulcsar & K. J. Curtis (Eds.), International handbook of rural demography (pp. 349–367). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Woods, M. (2009). Rural geography: Blurring boundaries and making connections. Progress in Human Geography, 33(6), 849–858. doi: 10.1177/0309132508105001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UMI 3157 - iGLOBES, CNRS-University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations