Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An objective analysis of the relationship between quality of life and socio-economic characteristics in Kumasi, Ghana

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing urbanisation and the growth of urban areas in cities in developing countries present major challenges for local governments, policy makers and urban planners even though the phenomenon offers opportunities. Studies focusing on the quality of life (QoL) help in assessing objectively, urban conditions which inform urban policy and planning. Using Kumasi as a case study, this paper investigates the relationship between quality of life and socio-economic characteristics such as gender, age, marital status, educational background, household income and housing type. To this end, the paper uses data from 500 households to examine the relationship between urban dwellers socio-economic characteristics and quality of life index in Kumasi. Findings indicated that objective QoL varied considerably with some of the socio-economic variables (household income and housing type) in the study area and these variables contributed significantly to the objective quality of life in Kumasi. The paper concludes that there are six (6) dimension of quality of life in Kumasi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Source: GIS Department, KNUST 2016

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afrane, S., & Asamoah, P. K. B. (2011). Housing situation in Kumasi. In K. K. Adarkwa (Ed.), Future of the tree–towards growth and development of Kumasi (pp. 87–88). Kumasi: University Printing Press, KNUST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allardt, E. (1993). Having, loving, being: An alternative to the Swedish model of welfare research. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 88–94). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., Woolf, J. & Smith, C. (2010). The determinants of subjective wellbeing in New Zealand: An empirical look at New Zealand’s social welfare function. Retrieved from http://nzae.org.nz/wpcontent/uploads/2011/08/Brown_et_al__The_Determinants_of_Subjective_Wellbeing. pdf: Retrieved on 13/08/16.

  • Cattaneo, M. D., Galiani, S., Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., & Titiunik, R. (2009). Housing, health, and happiness. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(1), 75–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Y. K., Kwan, C. C. A., & Shek, T. L. D. (2005). Quality of life in Hong Kong: The CUHK Hong Kong quality of life index. Social Indicators Research, 71(1–3), 259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, K. W., & Chin, T. L. (2003). A critical review of literature on the hedonic price model. International Journal for Housing Science and Its Applications, 27(2), 145–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, D. (2008). Urban Quality of Life: A case study of Guwahati. Social Indicators Research, 88(2), 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1), 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockery, A. M. (2010). Culture and wellbeing: The case of Indigenous Australians. Social Indicators Research, 99(2), 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, H., Williams, A., Abonyi, S., & Crooks, V. (2008). ‘A mixed method approach to quality of life research. A case study approach. Social Indicators Research, 85(1), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth, 89, 89–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Din, H. S., Shalaby, A., Farouh, H. E., & Elariane, S. A. (2013). Principles of urban quality of life for a neighborhood. HBRC Journal, 9(1), 86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elariane, S. A. (2012). Neighborhood urban quality of life: Guidelines for urban planning and development of new assessment tool. Ph.D. thesis submitted to Faculty of Engineering. Egypt: Cairo University.

  • Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, M. C. S., Pinto, M. L. R., & Gomes dos Santos, G. (2010). Quality of life: A reappraisal. International Journal of Sociology and Social policy, 30(9/10), 559–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greyling, T. (2014). A composite index of quality of life for the Gauteng city-region: A principal component analysis approach. Occasional paper no. 7. Department of Economics and Econometrics, University of Johannesburg.

  • Han, K. T., Park, E. C., Kim, J. H., Kim, S. J., & Park, S. (2014). Is marital status associated with quality of life? Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinks, T., & Gruen, C. (2007). What is the structure of South African happiness equations? Evidence from quality of life surveys. Social Indicators Research, 82(2), 311–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, K. D. (2001). International quality of life: Current conceptual, measurement, and implementation issues. In L. M. Glidden (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation 24. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, L. & Farrie, D. (2005). Gender and neighborhoods satisfaction, conference paper When women gain, so does the World, IWPR’s eighth international women’s policy research conference, June 2005, http://www.iwpr.org/PDF/05_Proceedings/Farrie_Danielle.pdf (20.07.2010). Retrieved July 18, 2016.

  • Lebowitz, B. D. (2000). Outcomes research in mental disorders of late life: Alzheimer’s disease as example. In R. L. Rubenstein, M. Moss, & M. H. Kleban (Eds.), The many dimensions of Aging (pp. 267–275). Broadway, NY: Springer Publishing Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. S. (2003). Objective quality of life in Korea and the OECD countries. Social Indicators Research, 62, 481–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, K., Handy, S., & Mokhtarian, P. (2010). Neighborhood satisfaction in suburban versus traditional environments: An evaluation of contributing characteristics in eight California neighborhoods. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(1), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, M. (1999). Determinants of residential satisfaction: Ordered logit vs regression models. Growth and Change, 30(2), 264–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamuye, N. & Gotu, B. (2015). Statistical analysis of urban quality of life (Case study: Hawassa Town, SNNP Region, Ethiopia). American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics. 4(6), 547–554. Accessed from: http://www.Sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/paperinfo?journalid=146&doi=10.11648/j.ajtas.20150406.26 on August 10, 2016.

  • Marans, R. W., & Stimson, R. (2011). An overview of quality of urban life. In Investigating quality of urban life (pp. 1–29). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • McGillivray, M. (2005). Measuring non-economic well-being achievement. Review of Income and Wealth, 51(2), 337–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. (2006). Conceptual and philosophical foundations. Social Indicators Research, 76(53), 163–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, V., & Schlemmer, L. (1989). South African quality of life: A research note. Social Indicators Research, 21(3), 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoletti, G., Scarpetta, S. & Boylaud, O. (2000). Summary indicators of product and market regulation with an extension to employment protection legislation. Available at: www.oecd.org/eco/eco.

  • Noll, H. (2002). Social indicators and quality of life research: Background, achievements and current trends. In G. Nicolai (Ed.), Advances in sociological knowledge over half a century. Paris: International Social Science Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, H.-H. (2004). Social indicators and quality of life research: Background, achievements and current trends. In N. Genov (Ed.), Advances in sociological knowledge over half a century (pp. 151–181). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, A., Kearns, A., & Atkinson, R. (2002). What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods? Urban Studies, 39(13), 2413–2438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powdthavee, N. (2003). Is the structure of happiness equations the same in poor and rich countries? The case of South Africa. Warwick Economic Research Papers.

  • Powell, A., Lora, E., van Praag, B. M. S., & Sanguinetti, P. (2010). The quality of life in Latin American Cities: Markets and perception. Washington DC: World Bank Publications. (The World Bank, number 2452).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld, T., & Van Hout, R. (1993). Statistical techniques for the study of language and language behaviour. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, R. J., Findlay, A. M., Morris, A. S., & Coombes, M. G. (1989). Indicators of quality of life: Some methodological issues. Environment and Planning A, 21(12), 1655–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures. Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwirian, K. P., Nelson, A. L., & Schwirian, P. M. (1995). Modeling urbanism: Economic, social and environmental stress in cities. Social Indicators Research, 35(2), 201–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J., Michalos, A. C., Ferris, A. L., Easterlin, R. A., Patrick, D., & Pavot, W. (2006). The quality of life (QOL) research movement: Past, present and future. Social Indicators Research, 76(3), 343–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavuj, L. (2011). Urban quality of life—A case study: The City of Rijeka. Hrvatski geografski glasnik, 73(1), 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J., Sen, A. & Fitoussi, J. P., 2009. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Available at: www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesfazghi, E. S. (2009). Urban quality of life and its spatial distribution in Addis Ababa: Kirkos sub-city urban quality of life and its spatial distribution In Addis Ababa: Kirkos sub-city. Master’s dissertation, International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Geo-Information Science.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

    Michael Ayertey Nanor, Michael Poku-Boansi & Kwasi Kwafo Adarkwa

Authors
  1. Michael Ayertey Nanor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Poku-Boansi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kwasi Kwafo Adarkwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Ayertey Nanor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nanor, M.A., Poku-Boansi, M. & Adarkwa, K.K. An objective analysis of the relationship between quality of life and socio-economic characteristics in Kumasi, Ghana. GeoJournal 83, 835–851 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-017-9795-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-017-9795-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation