GeoJournal

, Volume 83, Issue 1, pp 13–30 | Cite as

Modelling the effect of deprived physical urban environments on academic performance in the Philippines

  • Ligaya Leah Lara Figueroa
  • Samsung Lim
  • Jihyun Lee
Article
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigates how physical urban environments affect academic performance of urban public elementary schools in the Philippines by analysing the physical environment of school facilities and slum areas. Global, local, and semi-parametric regression analyses indicate that there is disproportionate provision of resources among the government schools and that lower academic performance is associated with the provision of fewer clinics rather than the proximity to poverty hotspots. Semiparametric, geographically weighted regression modelling outperformed global and local modelling, and estimated up to 30 % of the variation in math scores where the semi-parametric regression model is based on each school’s number of teachers and rooms, building conditions, availability of health clinics, and the location of slum areas near the school. On the basis of the research findings, it is concluded that the current state of school buildings is adequate and is a lower priority than the provision of health care support and smaller pupil–teacher ratios. Hence, government programs that aim to enhance the academic performance of children from the deprived physical urban environments should prioritize the provision of health clinics as well as maintaining few large schools with small pupil–teacher ratios.

Keywords

Philippines Public elementary schools Educational facilities Physical urban environments Informal settlers GIS Semi-parametric geographically weighted regression 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the School Mapping Unit of the Department of Education, Philippines as well as Dr. Wilmina Lara of Geodata Systems Technologies for allowing the use of their data. This research was supported by the Engineering Research and Development for Technology—Human Resource Development Program (ERDT-HRD) of the Department of Science and Technology, Philippines.

Funding

This study was funded by the Engineering Research and Development for Technology—Human Resource Development Program (ERDT-HRD) of the Department of Science and Technology, Philippines.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Ligaya Leah Figueroa has received research grants from the funding organization. Samsung Lim and Jihyun Lee has no relationship with the funding organization.

Ethical approval

This paper does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Alba, M. (2010). Congestion in public elementary schools. Search of A human face: 15 Years of knowledge building for human development in the Philippines (pp. 238–247). Quezon City: Human Development Network.Google Scholar
  2. Alcazaren, P., Ferrer, L., Icamina, B., & Oshima, N. (2010). Lungsod iskwater: The evolution of informality as a dominant pattern in Philippine cities. Pasig City: Anvil.Google Scholar
  3. Alkire, S., Chatterjee, M., Conconi, A., Seth, S., & Vaz, A. (2014). Poverty in rural and urban areas: Direct comparisons using the global MPI 2014. OPHI Briefing, 24. Oxford University. Retrieved from https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/123456789/11802/Poverty-in-Rural.pdf?sequence=1.
  4. Altonji, J. G., & Blank, R. M. (1999). Race and gender in the labor market. In C. A. Orley & C. David (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (pp. 3143–3259). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. Angrist, J. D., & Lavy, V. (1997). Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 533–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anselin, L. (1996). The Moran scatterplot as an ESDA tool to assess local instability in spatial association. In H. S. M. Fischer & D. Unwin (Eds.), Spatial analytical perspectives on GIS in environmental and socio-economic sciences (pp. 111–125). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  7. Anselin, L., & Getis, A. (2010). Spatial statistical analysis and geographic information systems. In L. Anselin & S. Rey (Eds.), Perspectives on spatial data analysis (pp. 35–47). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Attfield, I., & Vu, B. T. (2013). A rising tide of primary school standards—The role of data systems in improving equitable access for all to quality education in Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(1), 74–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bacolod, M. P., & Tobias, J. L. (2006). Schools, school quality and achievement growth: Evidence from the Philippines. Economics of Education Review, 25(6), 619–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Balfanz, R., & Byrnes, V. (2006). Closing the mathematics achievement gap in high-poverty middle schools: Enablers and constraints. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 11(2), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ballesteros, M. M. (2010). Linking poverty and the environment: evidence from slums in Philippine cities. PIDS Discussion Paper Series, 2010-33.Google Scholar
  12. Bartlett, S. (2011). Children in urban poverty: Can they get more than small change? Child Poverty Insights, UNICEF.Google Scholar
  13. Batley, R., & McLoughlin, C. (2015). The politics of public services: A service characteristics approach. World Development, 74, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beall, J., Crankshaw, O., & Parnell, S. (2000). Local government, poverty reduction and inequality in Johannesburg. Environment and Urbanization, 12(1), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Benzian, H. (2012). Keeping Children ‘Fit for School’: Simple, Scalable and Sustainable School Health in the Philippines. German Health Practice Collection. Bonn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). Retreived from http://www.bmz.de/en///healthportal/ghpc/case-studies/Fit_for_school/FIT_EN_long.pdf.
  16. Berner, E. (2001). Learning from informal markets: Innovative approaches to land and housing provision. Development in Practice, 11(2 & 3), 292–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Borland, M. V., Howsen, R. M., & Trawick, M. W. (2005). An investigation of the effect of class size on student academic achievement. Education Economics, 13(1), 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, A. S., & Charlton, M. E. (1996). Geographically weighted regression: a method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis, 28(4), 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cabalfin, E. (2014). The politics of nation in the urban form of informal settlements in Quezon City, Philippines. In N. Elleh (Ed.), Reading the architecture of the underprivileged classes (p. 153). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  20. Caoili, M. A. (1999). The origins of Metropolitan Manila: A social and political analysis. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.Google Scholar
  21. Carunungan, C. (1982). Quezon City: A saga of progress. Quezon City: Cultural and Tourism Affairs Office.Google Scholar
  22. Caspi, A., Taylor, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Plomin, R. (2000). Neighborhood deprivation affects children’s mental health: environmental risks identified in a genetic design. Psychological Science, 11(4), 338–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chamarbagwala, R. (2009). Social interactions, spatial dependence, and children’s activities: Evidence from India. Journal of Developing Areas, 42(2), 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  25. da Cunha, J. M. P., Jimenez, M. A., Perez, J. R. R., & de Andrade, C. Y. (2009). Social segregation and academic achievement in state-run elementary schools in the municipality of Campinas, Brazil. Geoforum, 40(5), 873–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Delisio, E. (2009). Lack of school nurses impacts students health, academics. Education World. Retrieved from http://www.educationworld.com/a_issues/issues/issues430.shtml.
  27. Duldulao, M. D. (1995). Quezon City. Manila: Japuzinni Publishing Division.Google Scholar
  28. Dyson, A., & Raffo, C. (2007). Education and disadvantage: The role of community-oriented schools. Oxford Review of Education, 33(3), 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Elias, M., & Rey, S. (2011). Educational performance and spatial convergence in Peru. Région et Développement, 33, 107–135.Google Scholar
  30. Feitosa, F. F., Camara, G., Monteiro, A. M. V., Koschitzki, T., & Silva, M. P. (2007). Global and local spatial indices of urban segregation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21(3), 299–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1999). Tennessee’s class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fotheringham, A. S. (2009). Geographically weighted regression. In S. Fotheringham & P. Rogerson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of spatial analysis (p. 243). London: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fotheringham, A. S., Charlton, M. E., & Brunsdon, C. (2001). Spatial variations in school performance: A local analysis using geographically weighted regression. Geographical and Environmental Modelling, 5(1), 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Friedkin, N. E., & Necochea, J. (1988). School system size and performance: A contingency perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(3), 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Funkhouser, E. (2009). The effect of kindergarten classroom size reduction on second grade student achievement: Evidence from California. Economics of Education Review, 28(3), 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gardner, P. W., Ritblatt, S. N., & Beatty, J. R. (1999). Academic achievement and parental school involvement as a function of high school size. The High School Journal, 83(2), 21–27.Google Scholar
  37. Garner, C. L., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1991). Neighborhood effects on educational attainment: A multilevel analysis. Sociology of Education, 64(4), 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ghuman, S., Behrman, J., & Gultiano, S. (2006). Children’s nutrition, school quality and primary school enrollment in the Philippines. In Paper presented at the Population Association of America (PAA) Annual Meetings, Los Angeles, USA, 30th March.Google Scholar
  39. Glewwe, P. W., Hanushek, E. A., Humpage, S. D., & Ravina, R. (2011). School resources and educational outcomes in developing countries: A review of the literature from 1990 to 2010. In P. W. Glewwe (Ed.), Education policy in developing countries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Glewwe, P., & Jacoby, H. (1994). Student achievement and schooling choice in low-income countries: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Human Resources, 29(3), 843–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gordon, I., & Monastiriotis, V. (2006). Urban size, spatial segregation and inequality in educational outcomes. Urban Studies, 43(1), 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hanushek, E. A. (1995). Interpreting recent research on schooling in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 10(2), 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hanushek, E. A., & Luque, J. A. (2003). Efficiency and equity in schools around the world. Economics of Education Review, 22(5), 481–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. HealthDev Institute. (2013). DepEd fails to keep students fit. www.Rappler.com.
  45. Herbert, D. T. (1972). Urban geography: A social perspective. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  46. Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council. (2014). Developing a national informal settlements upgrading strategy for the Philippines (Appendix I: Comprehensive assessment report). Makati: HUDCC.Google Scholar
  47. Howley, C. B., & Howley, A. A. (2004). School size and the influence of socioeconomic status on student achievement: Confronting the threat of size bias in national data sets. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(52), n52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Husén, T. (1990). Education and the global concern. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  49. James, W. L. (2009). Has the education and health relationship changed over time? A panel analysis of age, period, and cohort effects. PhD Thesis, Mississippi State University. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.630.7861&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  50. Jimenez, E., & Paqueo, V. (1996). Do local contributions affect the efficiency of public primary schools? Economics of Education Review, 15(4), 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jimenez, E., & Sawada, Y. (2001). Public for private: The relationship between public and private school enrollment in the Philippines. Economics of Education Review, 20(4), 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kitaev, I. (2007). Education for all and private education in developing and transitional countries. In Proceedings of private schooling in less economically developed countries. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  53. Lagman, M. S. B. (2012). Informal settlements as spatial outcomes of everyday forms of resistance: The case of three depressed communities in Quezon city. Philippine Social Sciences Review, 64(12), 1–31. Retrieved from http://www.journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/pssr/article/viewFile/3481/3205.
  54. Lam, L. T. A. (2005). Human resource development and poverty in the Philippines. Makati: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.Google Scholar
  55. Lanzona, L. J. (2012). Geography, classrooms and policies: Inefficiencies of the internal government structure. HDN Discussion Paper Series, 6.Google Scholar
  56. Lee, V. E., & Loeb, S. (2000). School size in Chicago elementary schools: effects on teachers’ attitudes and students’ achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2009). A review of empirical evidence about school size effects: A policy perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 464–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lu, D. (2010). Third world modernism: Architecture, development and identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Ludwig, J., Ladd, H. F., Duncan, G. J., Kling, J., & O’Regan, K. M. (2001). Urban poverty and educational outcomes [with comments]. In Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs (ArticleType: research-article/Full publication date: 2001/Copyright © 2001 Brookings Institution Press), pp. 147–201.Google Scholar
  60. Lupton, R. (2004). Schools in disadvantaged areas: Recognising context and raising quality. Case Paper 76, Center for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London.Google Scholar
  61. Machin, S. (2006). Social disadvantage and education experiences. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 32.Google Scholar
  62. Marshall, J. H. (2009). School quality and learning gains in rural Guatemala. Economics of Education Review, 28(2), 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Matthews, S. A., & Yang, T.-C. (2012). Mapping the results of local statistics: Using geographically weighted regression. Demographic Research, 26(6), 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Monse, B., Benzian, H., Naliponguit, E., Belizario, V., Schratz, A., & van Palenstein Helderman, W. (2013). The Fit for School health outcome study-a longitudinal survey to assess health impacts of an integrated school health programme in the Philippines. BMC Public Health, 2013(13), 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Monse, B., & Yanga-Mabunga, S. (2001). Urgent oral health needs of Filipino children: the results of the 2006 national oral health survey. Developing Dentistry, 8(1), 7–9.Google Scholar
  66. Monteiro, J., & Rocha, R. (2013). Drug battles and school achievement: Evidence from Rio de Janeiro’s favelas. CAF Working Paper, 2013/05, Caracas: CAF. Retrieved from http://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/250.
  67. Murnane, R. J., Willett, J. B., Duhaldeborde, Y., & Tyler, J. H. (2000). How important are the cognitive skills of teenagers in predicting subsequent earnings? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(4), 547–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Naidoo, A. G. V., van Eeden, A., & Münch, Z. (2013). Spatial variation in school performance, a local analysis of socio-economic factors in Cape Town. South African Journal of Geomatics, 3(1), 78–94.Google Scholar
  69. Nakaya, T. (2014). GWR 4 User Manual.Google Scholar
  70. Nakaya, T., Fotheringham, A., Charlton, M., & Brunsdon, C. (2009). Semiparametric geographically weighted generalised linear modelling in GWR 4.0. In Proceedings of 10th international conference on GeoComputation.Google Scholar
  71. Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2010). Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2(Spring 2010)), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nye, B., Hedges, L. V., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2000). The effects of small classes on academic achievement: The results of the Tennessee class size experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Páez, A., Farber, S., & Wheeler, D. (2011). A simulation-based study of geographically weighted regression as a method for investigating spatially varying relationships. Environment and Planning-Part A, 43(12), 2992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Perloff, H. S. (2015). The quality of the urban environment: Essays on “new resources” in an urban age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Racelis, M., & Aguirre, A. D. M. (2002). Child rights for urban poor children in child friendly Philippine cities: Views from the community. Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Raffo, C. (2013). Educational area based initiatives: issues of redistribution and recognition. In D. Manley, M. van Ham, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects or neighbourhood based problems?: A policy context. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  77. Raffo, C., Dyson, A., Gunter, H., Hall, D., Jones, L., & Kalambouka, A. (2009). Education and poverty: Mapping the terrain and making the links to educational policy. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(4), 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ragragio, J. M. (2003). Urban slums report: the case of Metro Manila, Philippines. In UN-Habitat (Ed) Understanding slums: Case studies for the global report on human settlements 2003. London: Development Planning Unit, University College London.Google Scholar
  79. Ratan, K., & Tania, C. (2007). Enrolling and retaining slum children in formal schools: A field survey in eastern slums of Kolkata. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(22), 2091–2098.Google Scholar
  80. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Roberts, L. W. (2009). Measuring school facility conditions: An illustration of the importance of purpose. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(3), 368–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rothstein, R. (2013). Why children from lower socioeconomic classes, on average, have lower academic achievement than middle class children. In P. L. Carter, & K. G. Welner (Eds.), Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance (pp. 61–74). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Satterthwaite, D. (2003). The millennium development goals and urban poverty reduction: Great expectations and nonsense statistics. Environment and Urbanization, 15(2), 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schneider, B., Wyse, A. E., & Keesler, V. (2006). Is small really better? Testing some assumptions about high school size. Brookings Papers on Education Policy, 9, 15–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schütz, G., Ursprung, H. W., & Wößmann, L. (2008). Education policy and equality of opportunity. Kyklos, 61(2), 279–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Slate, J. R., & Jones, C. H. (2005). Effects of school size: A review of the literature with recommendations. Essays in Education, 13(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  87. Stevenson, H. W., & Chen, C. (1989). Schooling and achievement: A study of Peruvian children. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(8), 883–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tan, J. P., Lane, J., & Coustere, P. (1997). Putting inputs to work in elementary schools: What can be done in the Philippines? Economic Development and Cultural Change, 45(4), 857–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tan, J.-P., & Paqueo, V. B. (1989). The economic returns to education in the Philippines. International Journal of Educational Development, 9(3), 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tilak, J. B. (2002). Education and poverty. Journal of Human Development, 3(2), 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. United Nations (1997). Glossary of Environment Statistics, Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 67, United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
  92. Vlahov, D., Freudenberg, N., Proietti, F., Ompad, D., Quinn, A., Nandi, V., et al. (2007). Urban as a determinant of health. Journal of Urban Health, 84(1), 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Vorthmann, C. D. (2011). The relationship between school size and student achievement in Missouri. Ph.D. Thesis, Baker University.Google Scholar
  94. Webber, R., & Butler, T. (2007). Classifying pupils by where they live: How well does this predict variations in their GCSE results? Urban Studies, 44(7), 1229–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Webb-Prather, N. T. (2011). Before the bell rings: The effects of negative neighborhood characteristics on educational achievement in Ohio public schools. Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects. Paper 237.Google Scholar
  96. Weinberger, C. J. (2001). Is teaching more girls more math the key to higher wages? In M. King (Ed.), Squaring up: Policy strategies to raise women’s incomes in the US. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  97. Werblow, J., & Duesbery, L. (2009). The impact of high school size on math achievement and dropout rate. The High School Journal, 92(3), 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Whipple, S. S., Evans, G. W., Barry, R. L., & Maxwell, L. E. (2010). An ecological perspective on cumulative school and neighborhood risk factors related to achievement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(6), 422–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Williams, D. T. (1990). The dimensions of education: Recent research on school size (Working paper series). Strom Thurmond Institute of Government and Public Affairs, Clemson, SC: Clemson University.Google Scholar
  100. Wößmann, L. (2003). Schooling resources, educational institutions and student performance: The international evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(2), 117–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zimmermann, D. (2009). Interview: The oral health of Filipino children is in an alarming state.” Dental Tribune.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Education, University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science, University of the PhilippinesDilimanPhilippines

Personalised recommendations