Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 257–266 | Cite as

The case of missing toilets in Sardar Sarovar dam resettlements in Vadodara, Gujarat

  • Gaurav SikkaEmail author
Article
  • 292 Downloads

Abstract

Development projects bring tremendous changes in patterns of use of land, water, and other natural resources which leads to a range of resettlement effects. This process of economic and social dislocation most often exacerbates existing gender disparities and inequalities in affected areas. When gender differences are overlooked in project planning phase, projects are unlikely to respond to women’s need and may even have negative consequences. In this present study, it was found that while planning resettlement sites for the Sardar Sarovar dam affected families; the necessity of having toilets was completely ignored. This research note provides empirical evidences to voice the case of gender inequality prevalent in access to basic amenities in Sardar Sarovar resettlements in Vadodara, Gujarat. The manuscript also calls for the inclusion of gender issues and social equity in assessment, design and implementation and monitoring must be made a compulsory element for large-scale development projects like dams.

Keywords

Resettlement planning Gender Toilets Sardar Sarovar dam resettlements 

References

  1. Asian Development Bank. (2003). Gender checklist: Resettlement. Accessed at: http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/pub/2003/gender-checklist-resettlement.pdf
  2. Asif, M. (2000). Why displaced persons reject project resettlement colonies. Economic and Political Weekly, XXXV(24), 2005–2008.Google Scholar
  3. Banerjee, P., Chaudhury, S. B. R., & Das, S. K. (2005). Internal displacement in South Asia: The relevance of the UN’s guiding principles. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Buckingham, S. (2004). Ecofeminism in the twenty-first century. The Geographical Journal, 170(2), 146–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Center for Equity Studies. (2014). India Social Exclusion Report, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  6. Centre for Science and Environment (CSE). (1985). The State of India’s Environment: The Second Citizen’s Report, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  7. Cernea, M. (1997). The risks and reconstruction model for resettling displaced populations. World Development, 25(10), 1569–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernandes, W., & Thukral, E. G. (Eds.). (1989). Development, displacement and rehabilittaion: Issues for national debate. New Delhi: Indian Social Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Hemadri, R., Mander, H., & Nagaraj, V. (1999). Dams, displacement, policy and law in India, In: Thematic Review 1.3 Displacement, resettlement, rehabilitation, reparation and development, contributing paper to the world commission on dams, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  10. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kothari, A., & Bhartari, R. (1984). Narmada Valley Project: Development or destruction, Economic and Political Weekly, XIX(22–23), 907–920.Google Scholar
  12. Momsen, J. H. (2004). Gender and development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Morse, B. F. (1992). Sardar Sarovar: The report of the independent review (pp. 17–18). Ottawa: Resources Future International (RFI).Google Scholar
  14. Rayner, S. (2003). Democracy in the age of assessment: Reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public sector decision-making, paper presented at a conference entitled.Google Scholar
  15. Resource guide: Mainstreaming gender in water. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2006).Google Scholar
  16. Resources: Conceptions and Contestations by Social Science Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal, 7–8 January, (2003).Google Scholar
  17. Roy, A. (1999). The Greater Common Good, Frontline, 16(11). http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1611/16110040.htm.
  18. Scudder, T. (2005). The future of large dams: Dealing with social, environmental, institutional and political costs. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  19. Shettar, S. C. (2013). Sociology of sanitation: Incorporating gender issues in sanitation, paper presented in National Conference on Sociology of Sanitation. Retrieved 28–29 Jan 2013 from http://www.sociologyofsanitation.com/honble-guests/sessionspeakers/sociology-of-sanitation-incorporating-gender-issues-in-sanitation/#sthash.IxJ350DX.dpuf
  20. Shiva, V. (1993). Impoverishment of the environment: Women and children last’. In Maria Mies & Vandana Shiva (Eds.), Ecofeminism. New Delhi: Kali for Women.Google Scholar
  21. Thukral, G., & Enakshi, (Eds.). (1992). Big dams displaced people—Rivers of sorrow, rivers of change. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography, Delhi School of EconomicsUniversity of DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations