Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the impact of demographic characteristics on spatial error in volunteered geographic information features

GeoJournal volume 80, pages 587–605 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

The proliferation of volunteered geographic information (VGI), such as OpenStreetMap (OSM) enabled by technological advancements, has led to large volumes of user-generated geographical content. While this data is becoming widely used, the understanding of the quality characteristics of such data is still largely unexplored. An open research question is the relationship between demographic indicators and VGI quality. While earlier studies have suggested a potential relationship between VGI quality and population density or socio-economic characteristics of an area, such relationships have not been rigorously explored, and mainly remained qualitative in nature. This paper addresses this gap by quantifying the relationship between demographic properties of a given area and the quality of VGI contributions. We study specifically the demographic characteristics of the mapped area and its relation to two dimensions of spatial data quality, namely positional accuracy and completeness of the corresponding VGI contributions with respect to OSM using the Denver (Colorado, US) area as a case study. We use non-spatial and spatial analysis techniques to identify potential associations among demographics data and the distribution of positional and completeness errors found within VGI data. Generally, the results of our study show a lack of statistically significant support for the assumption that demographic properties affect the positional accuracy or completeness of VGI. While this research is focused on a specific area, our results showcase the complex nature of the relationship between VGI quality and demographics, and highlights the need for a better understanding of it. By doing so, we add to the debate of how demographics impact on the quality of VGI data and lays the foundation to further work.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Notes

  1. http://bit.ly/1pFDgnd.

  2. http://bit.ly/1oTz1EL.

References

  • Al-Bakri, M., & Fairbairn, D. (2010), Assessing the accuracy of ‘Crowdsourced’ data and its integration with official spatial data sets. In Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences, Leicester, UK, pp. 317–320.

  • Andrews, D. T., Chen, L., Wentzell, P. D., & Hamilton, D. C. (1996). Comments on the relationship between principal components analysis and weighted linear regression for bivariate data sets. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 34(2), 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aske, D., Corman, R. R., & Marston, C. (2011). Education policy and school segregation: A study of the Denver metropolitan region. Journal of Legal, Ethical & Regulatory Issues, 14(2), 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, M. T., & Oswald, F. L. (2011). Exploratory regression analysis: A tool for selecting models and determining predictor importance. Behavior Research Methods, 43(2), 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Pullar, D. (2012). An evaluation of the use of points versus polygons in public participation geographic information systems using quasi-experimental design and Monte Carlo simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(2), 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, J., Barber, G., & Rigby, R. (2009). Elementary statistics for geographers (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipeluch, B., Jacob, R., Winstanly, A., & Mooney, P. (2010). Comparison of the accuracy of OpenStreetMap for Ireland with Google Maps and Bing Maps. In Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences, Leicester, UK, pp. 337–340.

  • Clark, P. J., & Evans, F. C. (1954). Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology, 35(4), 445–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, D. J., Georgiadou, Y., & Labonte, J. (2009). Volunteered geographic information: The nature and motivation of produsers. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 4(1), 332–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutcher, M., & Zook, M. (2009). Placemarks and waterlines: Racialized cyberscapes in Post-Katrina Google Earth. Geoforum, 40(4), 523–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. (1973). Statistics and data analysis in geology. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Smith, M. J., Goodchild, M. F., & Longley, P. A. (2007). Geospatial analysis: A comprehensive guide to principles, techniques and software tools (2nd ed.). Winchelsea, UK: The Winchelsea Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S. (2008). Volunteered geographic information: Key questions, concepts and methods to guide emerging research and practice. GeoJournal, 72(3–4), 133–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S. (2009). Geographic information science: Emerging research on the societal implications of the geographical web. Progress in Human Geography, 34(3), 349–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. F., & Sui, D. (2013). Prospects for VGI research and the emerging fourth paradigm. In D. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. F. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice (pp. 361–375). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, D., & Al-Bakri, M. (2013). Using geometric properties to evaluate possible integration of authoritative and volunteered geographic information. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2(2), 349–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression & associated techniques. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghose, R., & Elwood, S. (2003). Public participation GIS and local political context: Propositions and research directions. URISA Journal, 15(2), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girres, J.-F., & Touya, G. (2010). Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Transactions in GIS, 14(4), 435–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F., & Li, L. (2012). Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spatial Statistics, 1(1), 110–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. D. (2005). Software-sorted geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 29(5), 562–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haklay, M. (2010). How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey datasets. Environment and Planning B, 37(4), 682–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haklay, M. M., Basiouka, S., Antoniou, V., & Ather, A. (2010). How many volunteers does it take to map an area well? The validity of Linus’ Law to volunteered geographic information. The Cartographic Journal, 47(4), 315–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haklay, M., & Weber, P. (2008). Openstreetmap: User-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(4), 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochmair, H. H., & Zielstra, D. (2013). Development and completeness of points of interest in free and proprietary data sets: A Florida case study. Creating the GISociety—Conference proceedings (pp. 39–48). Austria: Salzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, T., Bozicevic, M., & Börner, K. (2007). Analyzing and visualizing the semantic coverage of Wikipedia and its authors. Complexity, 12(3), 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberty, C. J. (1984). Issues in the use and interpretation of discriminant analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95(1), 156–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson-Smith, A., Crooks, A. T., Gibin, M., Milton, R., & Batty, M. (2009). Neogeography and Web 2.0: Concepts, tools and applications. Journal of Location Based Services, 3(2), 118–145.

  • Jackson, S. P., Mullen, W., Agouris, P., Crooks, A. T., Croitoru, A., & Stefanidis, A. (2013). Assessing completeness and spatial error of features in volunteered geographic information. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2(2), 507–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, F. J. (1986). A new generalized “Exposure-Based” segregation index demonstration in Denver and Houston. Sociological Methods & Research, 14(3), 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, J. D., & Capello, H. T. (2013). Spatial patterns and demographic indicators of effective social media content during the Horsethief Canyon fire of 2012. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40(2), 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koukoletsos, T., Haklay, M., & Ellul, C. (2012). Assessing data completeness of VGI through an automated matching procedure for linear data. Transactions in GIS, 16(4), 477–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetzov, S. (2006). Motivations of contributors to Wikipedia. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 35(2), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Goodchild, M. F., & Xu, B. (2013). ‘Spatial. Temporal, and socioeconomic patterns in the use of Twitter and Flickr’, cartography and geographic information science, 40(2), 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2010). Geographical information systems and science (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longley, P. A., & Singleton, A. D. (2009). Linking social deprivation and digital exclusion in England. Urban Studies, 46(7), 1275–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKechnie, J. (1983). Webster’s new twentieth century dictionary (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, P., & Corcoran, P. (2012). Characteristics of heavily edited objects in OpenStreetMap. Future Internet, 4(1), 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, P., Corcoran, P., & Winstanley, A. (2010). Towards quality metrics for OpenStreetMap. In Proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, San Jose, CA, pp. 514–517.

  • Moran, P. A. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37(1–2), 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neis, P., Zielstra, D., & Zipf, A. (2011). The street network evolution of crowdsourced maps: OpenStreetMap in Germany 2007–2011. Future Internet, 4(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neis, P., & Zipf, A. (2012). Analyzing the contributor activity of a volunteered geographic information project—The case of OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 1(2), 146–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nov, O., Arazy, O., & Anderson, D. (2011). Technology-mediated citizen science participation: A motivational model. In Proceedings of the 5th international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, Barcelona, Spain.

  • OpenStreetMap. (2013a). Tag: Amenity = school. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool. Accessed on 17 May 2013.

  • OpenStreetMap. (2013b). USGS geographic names information system. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GNIS. Accessed on 17 May 2013.

  • Oreg, S., & Nov, O. (2008). Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2055–2073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Over, M., Schilling, A., Neubauer, S., & Zipf, A. (2010). Generating Web-based 3D city models from OpenStreetMap: The current situation in Germany. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34(6), 496–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poore, B. S., Wolf, E. B., Korris, E. M., Walter, J. L., & Matthews, G. D. (2012). Structures data collection for the national map using volunteered geographic information. U.S. Geological Survey open-file report 2012–1209, Reston, VA. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1209.

  • Porter, C. E., & Donthu, N. (2006). Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 999–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press, S. J., & Wilson, S. (1978). Choosing between logistic regression and discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(364), 699–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M., & Klettner, S. (2013). Gender and experience-related motivators for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Online proceedings of the international workshop on action and interaction in volunteered geographic information (ACTIVITY) at the 16th AGILE conference on geographic information science, Leuven, Belgium.

  • Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, R., Grochenig, S., Rehrl, K., & Brunauer, R. (2013). Contribution profiles of voluntary mappers in OpenStreetMap. Online proceedings of the international workshop on action and interaction in volunteered geographic information (ACTIVITY) at the 16th AGILE conference on geographic information science, Leuven, Belgium.

  • Sui, D. (2008). The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie’s new tattoo and the future of GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32(1), 1–5.

  • The National Map. (2014). http://nationalmap.gov/TheNationalMapCorps/index.html. Accessed on 23 May 2014.

  • Tulloch, D. L. (2008). Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games. GeoJournal, 72(3–4), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). Geographic definitions. http://www.census.gov/geo/www/geo_defn.html#CensusTract. Accessed on 17 May 2013.

  • Vickery, G., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2007). Participative web and user-created content: Web 2.0 wikis and social networking. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Paris, France.

  • Wheeler, D., & Tiefelsdorf, M. (2005). Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression. Journal of Geographical Systems, 7(2), 161–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D. W. S., & Lee, J. (2005). Statistical analysis of geographic information with ArcView GIS and ArcGIS. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielstra, D., & Zipf, A. (2010). A comparative study of proprietary geodata and volunteered geographic information for Germany. In Proceedings of the 13th AGILE international conference on geographic information science, Guimarães, Portugal, pp. 1–15.

  • Zook, M. A., & Graham, M. (2007a). The creative reconstruction of the internet: Google and the privatization of cyberspace and DigiPlace. Geoforum, 38(6), 1322–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zook, M. A., & Graham, M. (2007b). Mapping DigiPlace: Geocoded internet data and the representation of place. Environment and Planning B, 34(3), 466–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography and GeoInformation Science, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, MS 6C3, Fairfax, VA, 22030-4444, USA

    William F. Mullen, Steven P. Jackson, Arie Croitoru, Anthony Stefanidis & Peggy Agouris

  2. Department of Computational Social Science, Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, MS 6B2, Fairfax, VA, 22030-4444, USA

    Andrew Crooks

Authors
  1. William F. Mullen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven P. Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arie Croitoru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew Crooks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anthony Stefanidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Peggy Agouris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William F. Mullen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mullen, W.F., Jackson, S.P., Croitoru, A. et al. Assessing the impact of demographic characteristics on spatial error in volunteered geographic information features. GeoJournal 80, 587–605 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9564-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9564-8

Keywords

search

Navigation