GeoJournal

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 309–328 | Cite as

Keep costumes out, keep trains in: defining and defending spaces for “good jobs” in a Rust Belt city

Article

Abstract

The re-industrialization of brownfields has become an important economic redevelopment strategy in many “Rust Belt” cities, and labor-community coalitions have sought to ensure that such projects bring economic justice through good jobs to inner-city neighborhoods with high rates of unemployment. These coalitions have in many cases succeeded in establishing geographically defined job standards, such as living wage ordinances and community benefits agreements, but few studies have investigated how such “spatial fixes for labor” influence or fail to influence the relocation and investment decisions of firms. In this article, we compare and contrast two efforts to define and defend inner-city brownfields redevelopment projects as spaces for good local jobs in the city of Milwaukee, Wisconsin. We find that the influence of spatially defined job standards on relocation decisions varied with the different scales of political engagement and economic mobility involved in each case. In addition, we identify a common political factor in these decisions that previous research in labor geographies has not emphasized: the discursive trivialization of a firm’s primary product. In combination, the two cases suggest that future geographic research on economic justice and the agency of labor and its allies needs to attend both to the complex scalar dimensions of geographically defined job standards and to the roles of nonhuman products in political controversies over redevelopment.

Keywords

Labor geographies Economic justice Labor-community coalitions Brownfields redevelopment Rust Belt Milwaukee 

References

  1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (2008). Building healthy communities: A baseline characterization of Milwaukee’s 30th Street Corridor. Chicago: ATSDR.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, B., & McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and geography. Area, 43(2), 124–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barreto, H. (2006). Political opposition drives company out of valley. BizTimes Daily 14 April.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bergene, A. C., Endresen, S. B., & Knutsen, H. M. (Eds.). (2010). Missing links in labour geography. Farnham, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Braun, B. (2005). Environmental issues: Writing a more-than-human urban geography. Progress in Human Geography, 29(5), 635–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (Eds.). (2002). Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Business Journal (2010). Talgo plant will create 125 jobs, 2 March.Google Scholar
  9. Carswell, G., & De Neve, G. (2013). Labouring for global markets: Conceptualising labour agency in global production networks. Geoforum, 44, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castree, N. (2000). Geographic scale and grass-roots internationalism: The Liverpool Dock dispute, 1995–1998. Economic Geography, 76, 272–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castree, N. (2007). Labour geography: A work in progress. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(4), 853–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choose Milwaukee (2011). Manufacturing. http://www.choosemilwaukee.com/manufacturing.aspx. Accessed 25 June 2012.
  13. City of Milwaukee. (1998). Market study, engineering, and land use plan for the Menomonee Valley. Milwaukee: Department of City Development.Google Scholar
  14. City of Milwaukee. (2007). Mayor declares 30th Street Industrial Corridor Milwaukee’s ‘Greenlight District’ for jobs. Milwaukee: Department of City Development.Google Scholar
  15. City of Milwaukee. (2008). The City’s economic development policy plan. Milwaukee: Department of City Development.Google Scholar
  16. City of Milwaukee. (2009). Redevelopment Authority completes acquisition of former AO Smith/Tower property. Milwaukee: Department of City Development.Google Scholar
  17. Coe, N. M., & Jordhus-Lier, D. C. (2011). Constrained agency? Re-evaluating the geographies of labour. Progress in Human Geography, 35(2), 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cole, A., & Gasper, P. (2013). Wisconsin: From the uprising to recall Walker. International Socialist Review, 83, May. http://isreview.org/issue/83/wisconsin-uprising-recall-walker. Accessed 16 July 2013.
  19. Cox, K. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cox, K., & Mair, A. (1988). Locality and community in the politics of local economic development. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78(2), 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cumbers, A., Helms, G., & Swanson, K. (2010). Class, agency and resistance in the old industrial city. Antipode, 42(1), 46–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Daily Reporter (2006). BuySeasons move to valley backed, 2 May.Google Scholar
  23. Daykin, T. (2006a). Alderman jumps into relocation dispute: Full-time jobs, too, city says, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 25 March.Google Scholar
  24. Daykin, T. (2006b). Costume retailer seeks valley site: Halloween-based business may leave New Berlin, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 16 March.Google Scholar
  25. Daykin, T. (2006c). Lawmaker questions firm’s plan to relocate in valley: Moore concerned about quality of retailer’s jobs, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 21 March.Google Scholar
  26. Daykin, T. (2006d). Officials delay action on business park rules: They face decision on distribution center, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 4 April.Google Scholar
  27. Daykin, T. (2006e). Panel supports retailer’s move: BuySeasons’ possible valley relocation draws jobs debate, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 3 May.Google Scholar
  28. Daykin, T. (2009). Menomonee Valley Industrial Center wins EPA award. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. 4 November.Google Scholar
  29. Daykin, T. (2010a). Train factory at former Tower site expected to create 125 jobs, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 2 March.Google Scholar
  30. Daykin, T. (2010b). Train plant in Milwaukee may yield more benefits, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 3 March.Google Scholar
  31. De Sousa, C. (2005). Policy performance and brownfields redevelopment in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The Professional Geographer, 57(2), 312–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. De Sousa, C. (2008). Brownfields redevelopment and the quest for sustainability. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  33. Decker, E. (2008). Reviving Milwaukee’s next great corridor, Small Business Times 11 January.Google Scholar
  34. Digest of Conservative Issues and Ideas. (2010) Wisconsin is open to business!, December.Google Scholar
  35. Eimer, S. (1999). From “business unionism” to “social movement unionism”: The case of the AFL-CIO Milwaukee County Labor Council. Labor Studies Journal, 24(2), 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Forster, S. (2009). Lawmakers urge train company to set up shop in Milwaukee, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 29 July.Google Scholar
  37. Forster, S., & Sandler, L. (2009). State to purchase two trains from Spanish company locating here, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 17 July.Google Scholar
  38. Fox-Gotham, K. (2001). Urban redevelopment, past and present. Critical Perspectives on Urban Redevelopment, 6, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gatrell, J., & Reid, N. (2002). The cultural politics of local economic development: The case of Toledo Jeep. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 93(4), 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Geiger-Hemmer, A. (2010). The Epic Saga of the High Speed Choo-Choo, Part II, Living Lake Country 28 November.Google Scholar
  41. Getz, J. (2007) BuySeasons media statement, 9 March. http://www.buyseasons.com/images/pdf/BuySeasons%203-9-07. Accessed 10 June 2012.
  42. Gomez, M. (1998). Reflective images: The case of urban regeneration in Glasgow and Bilbao. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22(1), 106–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gurda, J. (2004). The Menomonee Valley: a historical overview. Milwaukee: The Menomonee Valley Partners.Google Scholar
  44. Hackworth, J. (2007). The neoliberal city: Governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Hajewski, D. (2006). Costume company drops Valley move: opposition over wages has delayed project too long, BuySeasons says, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 15 April.Google Scholar
  46. Hajewski, D. (2010). Buyseasons adds 84 full time, 41 part time jobs, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 3 February.Google Scholar
  47. Harvey, D. (1978). The urban process under capitalism: A framework for analysis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2(1–4), 101–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 71 B(1): 3–17.Google Scholar
  49. Hayter, R. (1997). The dynamics of industrial location: The factory, the firm and the production system. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  50. Held, T. (2010). Wisconsin lands $800 million for high-speed rail, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 28 January.Google Scholar
  51. Held, T., & Daykin, T. (2010). Doyle, mayors laud high-speed rail plan, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 28 January.Google Scholar
  52. Herod, A. (1997). From a geography of labor to a labor geography: Labor’s spatial fix and the geography of capitalism. Antipode, 29(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Herod, A. (2001). Labor geographies: Workers and the landscapes of capitalism. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  54. Hubbard, P. (1995). Urban design and local economic development: A case study in Birmingham. Cities, 12(4), 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hubbard, P. (1996). Re-imagining the city. Geography, 81(1), 26–36.Google Scholar
  56. Hudson, R. (2001). Producing places. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  57. Jackson, P. (1991). Mapping meanings: A cultural critique of locality studies. Environment and Planning A, 23(2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jackson, P. (2000). Rematerializing social and cultural geography. Social and Cultural Geography, 1(1), 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jordhus-Lier, D. (2013). The geographies of community-oriented unionism: Scales, targets, sites and domains of union renewal in South Africa and beyond. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(1), 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Katz, C. (2004). Growing up global: Economic restructuring and children’s everyday lives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  61. Kaufmann, G. (2012). This week in poverty: ‘Respect the worker’. The Nation. 3 August.Google Scholar
  62. Kenny, J. (1995). Making Milwaukee famous: Cultural capital, urban image and the politics of place. Urban Geography, 16(5), 440–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kenny, J., & Zimmerman, J. (2004). Constructing the ‘Genuine American City’: Neo-traditionalism, New Urbanism and neo-liberalism in the remaking of downtown Milwaukee. Cultural Geographies, 11(1), 74–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kirchen, R. (2009). Costume firm busting at seams: BuySeasons’ growth warrants more space, Business Journal 11 October.Google Scholar
  65. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Clarendon lectures in management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Lees, L. (2002). Rematerializing geography: The ‘new’ urban geography. Progress in Human Geography, 26(1), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lehrer, U., & Wieditz, T. (2009). Gentrification and the loss of employment lands: Toronto’s studio district. Critical Planning, 16, 139–160.Google Scholar
  68. Leibovitz, J., & Salmon, S. (1999). 20/20 Vision? Interurban competition, crisis and the politics of downtown development in Cincinnati, Ohio. Space and Polity, 3(2), 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Levine, M. (1998). The economic state of Milwaukee: The city and the region 1998. Milwaukee: Center for Economic Development, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  70. Levine, M. (2002). Economic state of Milwaukee’s inner city: 1970–2000. Milwaukee: Center for Economic Development, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  71. Levine, M. (2003). “Stealth Depression”: Joblessness in the City of Milwaukee since 1990. Milwaukee: Center for Economic Development, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  72. Levine, M. (2004). After the boom: Joblessness in Milwaukee since 2000. Milwaukee: Center for Economic Development, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  73. Levine, M. (2006). The economic state of Milwaukee’s inner city: 2006. Milwaukee: Center for Economic Development, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  74. Levine, M. (2013). The skills gap and unemployment in Wisconsin: Separating fact from fiction. Milwaukee: Center for Economic Development, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  75. Lier, D. C. (2007). Places of work, scales of organising: A review of labour geography. Geography Compass, 1(4), 814–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Logan, J., & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  77. MacLeod, G. (2002). From urban entrepreneurialism to a “revanchist city”? On the spatial injustices of Glasgow’s renaissance. Antipode, 34(3), 602–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Marley, P. (2009). State panel approves $47.1 million purchase of trains without bids, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 4 August.Google Scholar
  79. McBride, J., & Greenwood, I. (Eds.). (2009). Community unionism: A comparative analysis of concepts and contexts. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.Google Scholar
  80. McCann, E. (2002). The cultural politics of local economic development: Meaning-making, place-making, and the urban policy process. Geoforum, 33(3), 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. McCarthy, L. (2002). The brownfield dual land-use policy challenge: Reducing barriers to private redevelopment while connecting reuse to broader community goals. Land Use Policy, 19(4), 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. McCarthy, L. (2006). In the dark about brownfields. Papers of the Applied Geography Conferences, 29, 292–301.Google Scholar
  83. McCarthy, L. (2009). Off the mark? Economic efficiency in targeting the most marketable sites rather than spatial and social equity in public support for brownfield redevelopment. Economic Development Quarterly, 23(3), 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. McIlheran, P (2006). Quick hit. Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel 8 May.Google Scholar
  85. McWilliams, D. A. (1994). Environmental justice and industrial redevelopment: Economics and equality in urban revitalization. Ecology Law Quarterly, 21, 705.Google Scholar
  86. Menomonee Valley Benchmark Initiative (MVBI). (2005). State of the Valley report. Milwaukee: MVBI.Google Scholar
  87. Menomonee Valley Partners (MVP). (2004). Design and economic impact guidelines for the Menomonee Valley Stockyards redevelopment. Milwaukee: MVP.Google Scholar
  88. Menomonee Valley Partners (MVP). (2008). Menomonee Valley update. http://www.renewthevalley.org/files/pdf/ValleyUpdate_2007.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2012.
  89. Merrick, A. (2010). Racing to build Midwest rail line, Wall Street Journal 28 October.Google Scholar
  90. Merrifield, A. (2000). The urbanization of labor: Living-wage activism in the American city. Social Text, 18(1), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (2007) Editorial: Bold steps needed to help city’s poor, 30 August.Google Scholar
  92. Murdoch, J. (1998). The spaces of actor-network theory. Geoforum, 29(4), 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Northwest Side Community Development Corporation. (2003). Tower Automotive: Opportunities for community change. Milwaukee: Northwest Side CDC.Google Scholar
  94. Parks, V., & Warren, D. (2009). The politics and practice of economic justice: Community benefits agreements as tactic of the new accountable development movement. Journal of Community Practice, 17(1–2), 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Pastor, M. (2001). Common ground at ground zero? The new economy and the new organizing in Los Angeles. Antipode, 33(2), 260–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Pastor, M, Jr, Benner, C., & Matsuoka, M. (2009). This could be the start of something big: How social movements for regional equity are reshaping metropolitan America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Peck, J. (1996). Work-place: The social regulation of labor markets. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  98. Philo, C. (2000). More words, more worlds: Reflections on the cultural turn and human geography. In I. Cook, D. Crouch, S. Naylor, & J. Ryan (Eds.), Cultural turns/geographical turns: Perspectives on cultural geography (pp. 26–53). Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  99. Raco, M., & Henderson, S. (2006). Sustainable urban planning and the brownfield development process in the United Kingdom: Lessons from the Thames Gateway. Local Environment, 11(5), 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Raco, M., Henderson, S., & Bowlby, S. (2007). Delivering brownfield regeneration: sustainable community-building in London and Manchester. In T. Dixon, M. Raco, P. Catney, & D. Lerner (Eds.), Sustainable brownfield regeneration: Livable places from problem spaces (pp. 120–139). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  101. Rast, J. (2004). Transportation equity and access to jobs in Metropolitan Milwaukee. Milwaukee: Center for Economic Development, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  102. Rast, J. (2010). The economic state of Milwaukee: 1990–2008. Milwaukee: Center for Economic Development, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  103. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee (RACM). (2006). Menomonee Valley Industrial Center: Sales procedures and principles. Milwaukee: RACM.Google Scholar
  104. Roberts, S. M., & Schein, R. H. (1993). The entrepreneurial city: Fabricating urban development in Syracuse, New York. The Professional Geographer, 45(1), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rohde, M., &. Daykin, T. (2008). Judge says city can test for pollution on Tower Automotive site, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 13 October.Google Scholar
  106. Romell, R. (2013). BuySeasons’ bid to bring jobs to Milwaukee was rejected, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 21 April.Google Scholar
  107. Sandler, L. (2009). Fast track for high speed?, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 24 February.Google Scholar
  108. Sandler, L. (2010a). High-speed rail funds scatter to other states, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 9 December.Google Scholar
  109. Sandler, L. (2010b). Rail backers turn up heat on Walker, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 18 November.Google Scholar
  110. Sandler, L. (2010c). Spanish trains to be built at Tower Automotive, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 1 March.Google Scholar
  111. Sandler, L. (2010d). Talgo might move plant to Illinois if Walker kills train project, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 10 November.Google Scholar
  112. Sandler, L. (2010e). Talgo pulling out of Milwaukee in 2012, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 10 December.Google Scholar
  113. Sandler, L., Forster, S., & Marley, P. (2009). State touts no-bid deal with Spanish train firm, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 31 July.Google Scholar
  114. Sandler, L., & Johnson, A. (2010). Walker open to redirecting high-speed train money to other rail projects, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 15 November.Google Scholar
  115. Sandler, L., & Stein, J. (2010). State temporarily halts work on train projects, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 4 November.Google Scholar
  116. Schmid, J. (2009). Doyle touts potential for high-speed rail, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 25 February.Google Scholar
  117. Short, J. R., Benton, L. M., Luce, W. B., & Walton, J. (1993). Reconstructing the image of an industrial city. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 83(2), 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Sixteenth Street Community Health Center (SSCHC). (1999-2000). A vision for smart growth: Sustainable development design charrette, Milwaukee’s Menomonee River Valley. Milwaukee: SSCHC.Google Scholar
  119. Stein, J., & Marley, P. (2010). Walker urges Obama to let rail funds go to roads, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 9 November.Google Scholar
  120. Sullivan, T. (2012). The road ahead: Restoring Wisconsin’s workforce development. Madison, WI: Department of Administration. http://doa.wi.gov/secy/documents/sullivanreport.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2013.
  121. Sweeney, B., & Holmes, J. (2013). Problematizing labour’s agency: Rescaling collective bargaining in British Columbia pulp and paper mills. Antipode, 45, 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Sziarto, K. (2008). Placing legitimacy: Organizing religious support in a hospital workers’ contract campaign. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 99, 406–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Taylor, M., & Bryson, J. (2010). Erosion from above, erosion from below: Labor, value chain regulation and manufacturing sustainability. In A. Bergene, S. Endresen, & H. Knutsen (Eds.), Missing links in labour geography (pp. 185–198). Farnham, UK and Burlington. VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  124. Treleven, E. (2012). Train maker Talgo sues state, claims default on contract, Wisconsin State Journal 5 November.Google Scholar
  125. Tufts, S. (1998). Community unionism in Canada and labor’s (re) organization of space. Antipode, 30(3), 227–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Tufts, S. (2010). Schumpeterian unionism and ‘high-road’ dreams in Toronto’s hospitality sector. In A. Bergene, S. Endresen, & H. Knutsen (Eds.), Missing links in labour geography (pp. 83–98). Farnham, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  127. Tufts, S., & Savage, L. (2009). Labouring geography: Negotiating scales, strategies and future directions. Geoforum, 40(6), 945–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Union Membership and Coverage Database. (2013). Union membership, coverage, density, and employment by metropolitan area and sector, 1986-2012. http://www.unionstats.com/. Accessed 11 July 2013.
  129. US Census (2010). Milwaukee City, American Community Survey, Economic characteristics. http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk. Accessed 15 June 2012.
  130. US Environmental Protection Agency (2011). Brownfields definition. http://www.epa.gov/swerosps/bf/overview/glossary.htm. Accessed 23 April 2013.
  131. Walsh, J. (2000). Organizing the scale of labor regulation in the United States: Service sector activism in the city. Environment and Planning A, 32(9), 1593–1610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Ward, K. (2006). ‘Policies in Motion’, urban management and state restructuring: The trans-local expansion of Business Improvement Districts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(1), 54–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Ward, K. (2007). “Creating a personality for downtown”: Business Improvement Districts in Milwaukee. Urban Geography, 28(8), 781–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Warf, B., & Holly, B. (1997). The rise and fall and rise of Cleveland. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 208-221.Google Scholar
  135. Whatmore, S. (2006). Materialist returns: Practicing cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world. Cultural Geographies, 13(4), 600–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Wills, J. (2001). Community unionism and trade union renewal in the UK: Moving beyond the fragments at last? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(4), 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Wilson, D., & Wouters, J. (2003). Spatiality and growth discourse: The restructuring of America’s rust belt cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(2), 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WI DNR). (2005). Governor Doyle announces $3 million in brownfields grants to Milwaukee, West Allis, and DNR. Madison: WI DNR.Google Scholar
  139. Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WI DOT). (2001). The Governor’s Blue Ribbon: Task force on passenger rail service. Madison: WI DOT.Google Scholar
  140. Zimmerman, J. (2008). From brew town to cool town: Neoliberalism and the creative city development strategy in Milwaukee. Cities, 25, 230–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Zupan, S. (2010). Main Street Milwaukee: Program at a crossroads. Milwaukee: Public Policy Forum.Google Scholar
  142. Zupan, S. (2011). Enacting an equitable agenda: Exploring community strategies in Milwaukee’s inner-city redevelopment. Urban Geography, 32(7), 1043–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA
  2. 2.University of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations