GeoJournal

, Volume 78, Issue 6, pp 967–980 | Cite as

Avoiding the Ghetto through hope and fear: an analysis of immanent technology using ideal types

Article

Abstract

With over one hundred million smart-phone users in the world, mobile, spatially-aware devices are radically altering how individuals move through and experience both physical and social environments. This article presents a theoretical and methodological framework for engaging the emerging geoweb as part of a longer tradition of research into society and technology. A close reading of Microsoft’s Pedestrian Route Production patent, dubbed the “avoid ghetto GPS”, is used to construct two ideal type futures—one hopeful and one frightening. One where spatial technology ensures efficiency, safety, and new forms of coordination, while the other algorithmically sorts society by race and class. Despite not yet and potentially never existing, the patent offers a viable means through which potential futures are made real in the present. Through comparative analysis of these futures, their underlying commonalities are drawn out, revealing the relationship between technology and the delimitation of human experience. This analysis avoids grand narratives and teleological arguments, while making it possible to draw forth the unthought acceptance within each ideal type for the future: the continuing shift of human life itself towards a teleological, always already-calculated standing-reserve. The work on technology of Martin Heidegger and Herbert Marcuse (re)situate the geoweb within long-standing theoretical work on technology and its role in society, modernity, and capitalism.

Keywords

Geoweb Technology Gps Ideal-type Patent Standing-reserve Futures 

References

  1. Andrejevic, M. (2005). Nothing comes between me and my CPU. Theory, Cultury & Society, 22(3), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, L. (2012). Facebook is using you. The New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/05/opinion/sunday/facebook-is-using-you.html?_r=1&pagewanted=1&ref=opinion. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  3. Berry, D. M. (2011). The philosophy of software: Code and mediation in the digital age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, J. S. (2001). Where have all computers gone? Technology Review, January/February, 86–87.Google Scholar
  6. Budhathoki, N. R., Bruce, B., & Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2008). Reconceptualizing the role of the user of spatial data infrastructure. GeoJournal, 72(3–4), 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calhoun, C., Gerteis, J., Moody, J., Pfaff, S., & Virk, I. (Eds.). (2007). Classical sociological theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Chansanchai, A. (2012). Does ‘unsafe’ translate to ‘ghetto’ in Microsoft GPS patent? MSNBC Technolog. Available at: http://www.technolog.msnbc.msn.com/technology/technolog/does-unsafe-translate-ghetto-microsoft-gps-patent-117927. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  9. Chen, B., & Winfield, N. (2012). Apple’s iPhone update leaves out Google’s maps. The New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/20/technology/apple-ios-6-leaves-out-googles-maps.html?_r=0. Accessed December 10, 2012.
  10. Cheng, J. (2011). Android tops everyone in 2010 market share; 2011 may be different. Ars Technica. Available at: http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/2011/01/android-beats-nokia-apple-rim-in-2010-but-firm-warns-about-2011.ars. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  11. Cooper, S. (2012). Telenav’s Scout: personalized GPS for you and your car, too. Engadget. Available at: http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/telenavs-scout-personalized-gps-for-you-and-your-car-too/. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  12. Crampton, J. (2009). Cartography: Maps 2.0. Progress in Human Geography, 33(1), 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. David, P. A. & Foray, D. (2001). An introduction to the economy of the knowledge society. Economic series working papers 084, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  14. Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2007). The automatic management of drivers and driving spaces. Geoforum, 38(2), 264–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edwards, J. C. (2007). The thinging of the thing: The ethic of conditionality in Heidegger’s later work. In H. L. Dreyfus & M. A. Wrathall (Eds.), A companion to Heidegger (pp. 456–467). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Elwood, S. (2008). Volunteered geographic information: Future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal, 72(3–4), 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elwood, S. (2009). Geographic information science: New geovisualization technologies–emerging questions and linkages with GIScience research. Progress in Human Geography, 33(2), 256–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. English, H. S. (2012) Microsoft taking heat for ‘avoid ghetto’ GPS App. The Inquisitr. http://www.inquisitr.com/179382/microsoft-taking-heat-for-avoid-ghetto-gps-app/. Accessed November 12, 2012.
  19. Gane, N. (2006). When we have never been human, what is to be done? Interview with Donna Haraway. Theory Culture Society, 23(7–8), 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodchild, M. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodchild, M., & Glennon, J. A. (2010). Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: A research frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3(3), 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham, S. (2005). Software-sorted geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 29(5), 562–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenman, C. (2001). What’s next; new rules for net search: Location, location, location. The New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/05/technology/what-s-next-new-rules-for-net-searches-location-location-location.html. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  24. Hamilton, J. F., & Heflin, K. (2011). User production reconsidered: From convergence, to autonomia and cultural materialism. New Media Society, 13(7), 1050–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harman, G. (2010). Technology, objects and things in Heidegger. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hecht, B., & Gergle, D. (2010). On the “Localness” of user-generated content. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (CSCW 2010).Google Scholar
  27. Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays (trans by. William Lovitt). New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  28. Herbert, G. (2012). Microsoft ‘avoid ghetto’ app for smartphones’ GPS navigation stirs controversy. Syracuse.com Available at: http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2012/01/microsoft_avoid_ghetto_app_windows_phone.html. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  29. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002 [1947]). Dialectic of enlightenment: philosophical fragments. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Janowicz, K., Raubal, M., & Kuhn, W. (2011). The semantics of similarity in geographic information retrieval. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 2, 29–57.Google Scholar
  31. Jenkins, H. W. (2010). Google and the search for the future. The Wall Street Journal. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704901104575423294099527212.html. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  32. Johnson, P. A., & Sieber, R. E. (2011). Motivations driving government adoption of the Geoweb. GeoJournal,. doi:10.1007/s10708-011-9416-8.Google Scholar
  33. Keyes, A. (2012). This app was made for walking: But is it racist? NPR. Available at: http://www.npr.org/2012/01/25/145337346/this-app-was-made-for-walking-but-is-it-racist. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  34. Kingsbury, P., & Jones, J. P, I. I. I. (2009). Walter Benjamin’s Dionysian adventures on Google earth. Geoforum, 40(4), 502–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kinsley, S. (2011). Anticipating ubiquitous computing: Logics to forecast technological futures. Geoforum, 42(2), 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kinsley, S. (2012). Futures in the making: Practices to anticipate ‘ubiquitous computing’. Environment and Planning A, 44(7), 1554–1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kitchin, R. (2011). The programmable city. Environment and Planning B, 38(6), 945–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Krumm, J. (2011). Ubiquitous advertising: The killer application for the 21st century. Pervasive Computing, January-March, 66–73.Google Scholar
  40. Leclerc, Y. G., Reddy, M., Iverson, L., & Eriksen, M. (2001). The GeoWeb: A new paradigm for finding data on the web. In Proceedings of the international cartographic conference (ICC 2001).Google Scholar
  41. Leszczynksi, A. (2012). Situating the geoweb in political economy. Progress in Human Geography, 36(1), 72–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Luke, R. (2012). The Phoneur: Mobile commerce and the digital pedagogies of the wireless web. In P. Trifonas (Ed.) Communities of difference: Culture, language, technology. Palgrave MacMillan, 2005.Google Scholar
  43. Mackenzie, A. (2009). Intensive movement in wireless digital signal processing: From calculation to envelopment. Environment and Planning A, 41(6), 1294–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maguire, H. (2009). Managing mobility: Location-based services and the politics of mobile spaces. Paper presented at Conference workshop at the international communication association (ICA 2009). http://lirneasia.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/final-paper_maguire.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  45. Marcuse, H. (1969). An essay on liberation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  46. Marcuse, H. (1982 [1941]). Some social implications of modern technology. In A. Arato and E. Gebhardt (Eds.) The essential frankfurt school reader (pp. 138–162). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  47. Marcuse, H. (1991 [1964]). One-dimensional man. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  48. Massumi, B. (2007). Potential politics and the primacy of preemption. Theory and Event, 10(2), Available at: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event.
  49. Matyszczyk, C. (2012). The joy of Microsoft’s ‘avoid ghetto’ GPS patent. CNET. Available at: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-57354445-71/the-joy-of-microsofts-avoid-ghetto-gps-patent/. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  50. Miller, C. (2006). A beast in the field: The google maps Mashup as GIS. Cartographic, 41(3), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Milo, P. V. (2012) Microsoft patents ‘Avoid Ghetto Feature For GPS Devices. CBS Seattle. Available at: http://seattle.cbslocal.com/2012/01/06/microsoft-patents-avoid-ghetto-feature-for-gps-devices/. Accessed August 15, 2012.
  52. Mommsen, W. J. (1977). Max weber as a critic of Marxism. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 2(4), 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Morrow, N., Mock, N., Papendieck, A., & Kocmich, N. (2011). Independent Evaluation of the Ushahidi Haiti Project. Available at: https://sites.google.com/site/haitiushahidieval/news/finalreportindependentevaluationoftheushahidihaitiproject. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  54. Murphy, D. (2012). Microsoft’s Pedestrian navigation patent dubbed ‘Avoid Ghetto.’ Really? PC Magazine. Available at: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2398562,00.asp. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  55. Ngak, C. (2012). Microsoft ‘avoid ghetto’ patent sparks controversy. CBS News. Available at: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-57355325-501465/microsoft-avoid-ghetto-patent-sparks-controversy/. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  56. November, V., Camacho-Hubner, E., & Latour, B. (2010). Entering a risky territory: Space in the age of digital navigation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(4), 581–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Palen, L., Vieweg, S., Liu, S. B., & Hughes, A. L. (2009). Crisis in a networked world: Features of computer-mediated communication in the April 16, 2007, Virginia Tech Event. Social Science Computer Review, 27(4), 467–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Panabaker, R., Krumm, J. C., Couckuyt, J. D., Tashev, I. J., Seltzer, M. L., Black, N. W. (2007). Route monetization. US Patent Application No. 20080091341.Google Scholar
  59. Parry, M. (2011). Academics Join Relief efforts around the world as crisis mappers. The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 27, 2011.Google Scholar
  60. Presley, S. (2011). Mapping out #LondonRiots. NFPvoice. Available at: http://www.nfpvoice.com/2011/08/mapping-out-londonriots/. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  61. Savelyev, A., Janowicz, K., Thatcher, J., Xu, S., Mulligann, C., Luo, W. (2011). Volunteered geographic services: Developing a linked data driven location-based service. In Proceedings of SIGSPATIAL international workshop on spatial semantics and ontologies (SSO 2011).Google Scholar
  62. Schuurman, N. (2009). An Interview with Michael Goodchild. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(4), 573–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sui, D. (2008). The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie’s new tattoo and the future of GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sutko, D. M., & de Souza e Silva, A. (2011). Location-aware mobile media and urban sociability. New Media Society, 13(5), 807–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tashev, I. J., Couckuyt, J. D., Black, N. W., Krumm, J. C., Panabaker, R., Seltzer, M. L. (2012). Pedestrian Route Production. US Patent No. 8090532. Available at: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/viewer?url=www.google.com/patents/US8090532.pdf. Accessed: February 15, 2013.
  66. Thatcher, J. (2012a). Can we get there from here? Teleological red-lining and avoiding the ghetto. Antipode Foundation. Available at: http://antipodefoundation.org/2012/03/14/can-we-get-there-from-here-teleological-red-lining-and-avoiding-the-ghetto.
  67. Thatcher, J. (2012b). From volunteered geographic information to volunteered geographic services: The open-source VGSs system. In D. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowd sourcing geographic knowledge. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  68. The Economist (2007). The world on your desktop. Available at: http://www.economist.com/node/9719045. Accessed August 15, 2012.
  69. Thrift, N. (2004). Remembering the technological unconscious by foregrounding knowledges of position. Environment and Planning D, 22(1), 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tristram, C. (1999). Has GPS lost its way? Technology Review. Available at: http://www.technologyreview.com/featured-story/400444/has-gps-lost-its-way/. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  71. Urken, R. K. (2012). Microsoft ‘avoid ghetto’ App Draws Controversy. AOL Autos. Available at: http://autos.aol.com/article/microsoft-avoid-ghetto-app/. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  72. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2012). U.S. Patent statistics chart: Calendar years 1963–2011. Available at: http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/us_stat.htm. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  73. Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. In G. Roth, & C. Wittich (Eds.), New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
  74. Weber, M. (2005 [1930]). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (Trans Talcott Parsons). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Williams, S. (2012). App that would guide users away from high-crime areas proves controversial. CBS Dallas. Available at: http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2012/01/17/app-that-would-guide-users-away-from-high-crime-areas-proves-controversial/. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  76. Wilson, M. W. (2012). Location-based services, conspicuous mobility, and the location-aware future. Geoforum, 43(6), 1266–1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zook, M. A., & Graham, M. (2007). Mapping DigiPlace: Geocoded internet data and the representation of place. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(3), 466–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyClark UniversityWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations