, Volume 78, Issue 6, pp 949–965 | Cite as

Volunteered geographic information and networked publics? Politics of everyday mapping and spatial narratives



The issue of a changing public that undertakes and underpins Volunteered geographic information (VGI) practices has not been discussed in depth in the existing literature. This paper seeks to tackle this issue of publics regarding the intersection between VGI and public participation GIS. I draw upon the notion of “networked publics” to illustrate the complexities of social relations intersecting with VGI practices. Networked publics involve a connected set of social and technological developments associated with the growing engagement with digitally connected media. Networked publics embody several major characteristics including multiple memberships spanning over vast locations and possibilities for horizontal connections and bottom-up engagements. I argue that the emergence and proliferation of VGI reflect the major characteristics of networked publics. Through two examples of VGI constructions in China, I depict types of networked publics involved in these processes. I show that the mutual constitution of networked publics and sociopolitical and technological transformations has produced new landscapes of civic engagement in China. I also show the limits and challenges of these VGI practices in this context. As such, this study contributes to the efforts of theorizing the geoweb through conceptualizing and foregrounding these new forms of social relations and interactions engaging with VGI practices, which in turn may entail new forms of knowledge production and politics.


Volunteered geographic information (VGI) Networked publics Network culture China 


  1. An, N., (2010). Debates derived from China’s Civil Society Blue Book. (in Chinese). Accessed 28 June 2012.
  2. Bauwens, B. (2005). The political economy of peer production. CTHEORY. Accessed 27 June 2012.
  3. Bohman, J. (2004). Expanding dialogue: The internet, the public sphere and prospects for transnational democracy. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 131–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boland, A., & Zhu, J. (2012). Public participation in China’s green communities: Mobilizing memories and structuring incentives. Geoforum, 43, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bosworth, M., Donovan, J., & Couey, P. (2002). Portland Metro’s dream for public involvement. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 125–136). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  6. Budhathoki, N., Bruce, B., & Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2008). Reconceptualizing the role of the user of spatial data infrastructure. GeoJournal, 72(3/4), 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society: The information age: economy, society, and culture volume I (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Chang, W. (2008). The cyber balkanization and structural transformation of the public sphere in Korea. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 7(2), 29–48.Google Scholar
  10. CNNIC (China Internet Network Information Center). (2012). The 29th statistical report on internet development in China. (in Chinese). Accessed 27 June 27 2012.
  11. Convis, C, Jr (Ed.). (2001). Conservation geography: Case studies in GIS, computer mapping, and activism. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.Google Scholar
  12. Craig, W., Harris, T., & Weiner, D. (Eds.). (2002). Community participation and geographical information systems. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  13. Crampton, J. (2009). Cartography: Maps 2.0. Progress in Human Geography, 33(1), 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crutcher, M., & Zook, M. (2009). Placemarks and waterlines: Racialized cyberscapes in post-Katrina Google Earth. Geoforum, 40(4), 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on Control Societies. October, 59, 3–7.Google Scholar
  16. Dewey, J. (1954). The public and its problems. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2007). 'Outlines of a world coming into existence': pervasive computing and the ethics of forgetting. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(3), 431– 445. Google Scholar
  18. Elwood, S. (2004). Partnerships and participation: Reconfiguring urban governance in different state contexts. Urban Geography, 25(8), 755–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elwood, S. (2009). GIS, Public Participation. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 520–525). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elwood, S. (2010). Geographic information science: Emerging research on the societal implications of the geospatial web. Progress in Human Geography, 34(3), 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elwood, S., & Ghose, R. (2004). PPGIS in community development planning: Framing the organizational context. Cartographica, 38(3&4), 19–33.Google Scholar
  22. Elwood, S., Goodchild, M., & Sui, D. (2012). Researching volunteered geographic information (VGI): Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(3), 571–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2012). New spatial media, new knowledge politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00543.x.Google Scholar
  24. Fluri, J. (2006). “Our Website Was Revolutionary” Virtual Spaces of Representation and Resistance. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 5(1), 89–111.Google Scholar
  25. Gao, B. (2010a). Observations of China’s civil society in 2009: The formation of the social field. Bolan Qunxhu, 3, 2010. (in Chinese). Accessed 27 June 2012.
  26. Gao, B. (2010b). Yanshan Lecture Number 64: From People to Citizen. Available at (in Chinese). Accessed 27 June 2012.
  27. Ghose, R. (2005). The complexities of citizen participation through collaborative governance. Space and Polity, 9(1), 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ghose, R. (2007). Politics of scale and networks of association in public participation GIS. Environment and Planning A, 39, 1961–1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goodchild, M. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goodchild, M. (2008). Commentary: Whither VGI? GeoJournal, 72, 239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graham, M. (2011). Cloud collaboration: Peer-production and the engineering of the internet. In S. Brunn (Ed.), Engineering earth (pp. 67–83). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere (trans by T Burger). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Haklay, M. (2010). How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(4), 682–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008). Web mapping 2.0: The Neogeography of the GeoWeb. Geography Compass, 2(6), 2011–2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Haklay, M., & Weber, P. (2008). OpenStreetMap: User generated street map. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 12–18.Google Scholar
  36. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hertel, G., Niedner, S., & Herrmann, S. (2003). Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy, 32(7), 1159–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hu, Y. (2011). The surrounding gaze. Available at Accessed 27 June 2012.
  39. Huang, Y. (1999). Inflation and investment controls in China: The political economy of central-local relations during the reform era. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Ito, M. (2008). Introduction. In K. Varnelis (Ed.), Networked publics (pp. 1–14). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kingsbury, P., & Jones, J. P. (2009). Walter Benjamin’s Dionysian adventures on Google earth. Geoforum, 40, 502–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kluver, R. (2005). The architecture of control: A Chinese strategy for E-governance. Journal of Public Policy, 25(1), 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kyem, P. (2004). Of intractable conflicts and participatory GIS applications: The search for consensus amidst competing claims and institutional demands. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(1), 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leitner, H., Elwood, S., Sheppard, E., McMaster, S., & McMaster, R. (2002). Models for Making GIS available to community organizations: dimensions of difference and appropriateness. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems (pp. 37–52). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  45. Leszczynski, A. (2012). Situating the geoweb in political economy. Progress in Human Geography, 36(1), 72–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lim, M., & Kann, M. E. (2008). Politics: Deliberation, mobilization, and networked pectices of agitation. In K. Varnelis (Ed.), Networked publics (pp. 77–108). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lin, W. (2012). When Web 2.0 meets public participation GIS: Volunteered geographic information and spaces of participatory mapping in China. In D. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice. (pp. 83–103). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. Lin, W. (2013). Situating performative neogeography: Tracing, mapping, and performing “Everyone’s East Lake”. Environment and Planning A, 45(1), 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lin, W., & Ghose, R. (2008). Complexities in sustainable provision of GIS for urban grassroots organizations. Cartographica, 43(1), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. MacKinnon, R. (2010). Networked authoritarianism in China and beyond: Implications for global internet freedom. Paper presented at Liberation Technology in Authoritarian Regimes, Stanford University, October 11–12, 2010. Accessed 28 June 2012.
  51. Meier, P. (2011). What is crisis mapping? An update on the field and looking ahead. Accessed 30 June 2012.
  52. Miller, C. (2006). A beast in the field: The Google maps mashup as GIS/2. Cartographica, 41(3), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. People’s Daily (2009). China’s internet phenomenon: the sudden popularity of ‘Jia Junpeng’. July 22. Accessed 19 January 2013.
  54. Pierson, D. (2009). China’s favorite Internet craze: ‘Jia Junpeng, your mom is calling you to come home and eat.’ September 5, Los Angeles Times. Accessed 19 January 2013.
  55. Plummer, J., & Taylor, J. (2004). Community participation in China: Issues and processes for capacity building. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  56. Poster, M. (1990). The mode of information: Poststructuralism and social context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  57. Putman, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Chicago, IL: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  58. Qiu, J. (2000). Virtual censorship in China: Keeping the gate between the cyberspaces. International Journal of Communications Law and Policy, 4, 1–25.Google Scholar
  59. Ramm, F., Topf, J., & Chilton, S. (2011). OpenStreetMap: Using and enhancing the free map of the world. Cambridge: UIT Cambridge.Google Scholar
  60. Ramsey, K. (2008). A Call for Agonism: GIS and the politics of collaboration. Environment and Planning A, 40, 2346–2363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sassen, S. (Ed.). (2002). Global networks, linked cities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Sawicki, D. S., & Peterman, D. R. (2002). Surveying the extent of PPGIS practice in the United States. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 17–36). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  63. Schlossberg, M. A., & Shuford, E. (2005). Delineating “public” and “participation” in PPGIS. Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA) Journal, 16(2), 15–26.Google Scholar
  64. Schuurman, N. (2004). Databases and bodies: A cyborg update. Environment and Planning A, 36, 1337–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shirky, C. (2003). Power laws, weblogs, and inequality, Accessed 26 June 2012.
  66. Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sui, D. (2008). The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie’s new tattoo and the future of GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  68. Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  69. Thompson, J. (1995). The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  70. Tulloch, D. (2003). What PPGIS really needs is.… Proceedings of the Second Annual Public Participation GIS Conference, 20–22 July, Portland, OR, 208–14. Park Ridge, IL: URISA.Google Scholar
  71. Tulloch, D. (2007). Many, many maps: Empowerment and online participatory mapping. First Monday, 12(2). Accessed 30 June 2012.
  72. Tulloch, D. (2008). Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games. GeoJournal, 72(3–4), 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Turner, A. (2006). An Introduction to Neogeogrpahy. Sebastapol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  74. van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media Culture Society, 31(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Varnelis, K. (2008a). Networked publics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Varnelis, K. (2008b). Conclusion: The rise of network culture. In K. Varnelis (Ed.), Networked publics (pp. 145–163). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Warf, B. (2001). Segueways into cyberspace: Multiple geographies of the digital divide. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wilson, M. (2011). ‘Training the eye’: Formation of the geocoding subject. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(4), 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wu, F. (2002). China’s changing urban governance in the transition towards a more market oriented economy. Urban Studies, 39(7), 1071–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yang, G. (2009a). The power of the internet in China: Citizen Activism online. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Yang, G. (2009b). The curious case of Jia Junpeng, or the power of symbolic appropriation in Chinese Cyberspace. Accessed 28 June 2012.
  82. Yang, G., & Calhoun, C. (2007). Media, civil society and the rise of a green public sphere in China. China Information, 21, 211–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zook, M., & Graham, M. (2007). The creative reconstruction of the internet: Google and the privatization of cyberspace and Digi place. Geoforum, 38, 1322–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Geography, Politics and SociologyNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations