Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The paradox of gender discrimination in land ownership and women’s contribution to poverty reduction in Anglophone Cameroon

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land is the core of the predominantly agrarian economy of Cameroon. It is therefore an important factor of production to both men and women particularly in rural areas. While the legal framework in Cameroon advocate for equal rights and opportunities to resources, the majority of rural women who are mostly peasant farmers can neither inherit nor own land due to gender discriminatory customary practices. This study examines some of the arguments for sustaining these customary practices that violate women’s rights over the years and the role of these ‘landless’ women in poverty alleviation. The study is based on a field survey which was conducted among some 2,205 respondents in 2009 using questionnaires, interviews and focus group discussions in Anglophone Cameroon. The findings revealed that although women are the livewire of rural households and key players in the struggle against poverty who depend solely on land, they still do not have security of tenure over the land they cultivate. The paper argues that even though women are assuming increasing roles in the education of the children, provision of food and paying for medical services for the homes, there are still some traditional belief systems that work against their rights to land. These belief systems have a strong grip on the attitudes and perception of both men and women on women’s rights to land in that even when men and women are unanimous on the need for women to own land, they both disagree on how they should own the land. The logical outcome of this dilemma is that men own the land while women work on it. The latter have very little possibilities to carry out any long term investment on land without the blessing of the former. We thus, advocate for gender mainstreaming in land reforms and gender consciousness among traditional authorities, men and even among the women as some of the ways of redressing gender discrimination in land ownership rights and poverty particularly in rural areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Agarwal, B. (1994). A field of one’s own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, S., & Singhi, L. (2009). Gender and reform in Punjab Raj Uttar Pradesh. In P. Chowdhry (Ed.), Gender discrimination in land ownership (land reforms in india series) (Vol. 11). USA: Barnes and Nobles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J., & Biesbrouck, K. (2000). The social dimension of rainforest management in Cameroon: Issues for co-management. Kribi: Tropenbos-Cameroon Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo-Baumann, H. (2000). Capitalisation of experiences on the contribution of livestock project to gander issues. Working document. Bern: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.

  • Bureau Central des Recensements et des Etudes de Population. (2010). Rapport de Presentation des Resultats Definitif. Bureau Central des Recensements et des Etudes de Population.

  • Cameroon PRSP. (2003). IMF Country Report No. 03/249. International Monetary Fund.

  • Constitution of Cameroon. (1996). Law No. 96-06 of January 18, 1996.

  • Cross, C., & Hornby, D. (2002). Opportunities and obstacles to promoting women’s land access in South Africa: A research report for the promoting women’s access to land programme. Johannesburg/Pretoria: National Land Committee/Department of Land Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., & May, J. (2000). Is there scope for growth with equity? The case for land reform in South Africa. Washington DC, USA: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Derman, B., et al. (2005). Intersections of human rights and customs: A livelihood perspective on water laws. In International workshop onAfrican water laws: Plural legislative frameworks for rural water management in Africa”, January 26–28, 2005, Johannesburg, South Africa.

  • DFID. (2004). Land reform, agriculture and poverty reduction. Working Paper for the Renewable Natural Resources and Agriculture Team, London DFID Policy Division.

  • FAO. (1995). Women, agriculture and rural development: A synthesis report of the Africa region. FAO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/X0250E/X0250E00.htm.

  • Fonjong, L. (2004a). Challenges and coping strategies of women food crops entrepreneurs in Fako Division, Cameroon. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 5(5), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonjong, L. (2004b). Changing fortunes of government policies and its implications on the application of agricultural innovations in Cameroon. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 13(1), 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonjong, L., Sama-Lang, I., & Fombe, L. (2010). An assessment of the evolution of land tenure system in Cameroon and its effects on women’s land rights and food security. Perspectives in Global Development and Technology: PGDT, 9(2010), 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda-Parr, S. (1999). What does the feminization of poverty mean? Isn’t just lack of income? Feminist Economics, 5(2), 99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, L., & Kevane, M. (1999). Diminished access, diverted exclusion: Women and land tenure is sub-Sahara Africa. African Studies Review, 42(2), 15–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gueorguieva, A. (2000). A critical review of the literature on structural adjustments and the environment. Environment Department Working Paper. The World Bank.

  • Harts-Broekhuis, A., & Huisman, H. (2001). Resettlement revisited: Land reform results in resource-poor regions in Zimbabwe. Geoforum, 32(3), 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFAD. (2010). Land tenure security and poverty reduction. http://www.ifad.org/english/land/index.htm.

  • Ikdahl, I., et al. (2005). Human’s rights formalisation and women’s land rights in Southern and Eastern Africa. In Studies in women’s law (Vol. 57). Oslo: Institute of Women’s Law, University of Oslo.

  • Lee, D., & Neves, B. (2010). Rural poverty and natural resources: Improving access and sustainable management. Background Paper for IFAD 2010 Rural Poverty Report: IFAD.

  • Liversage, H. (2010). Land tenure security for rural poverty reduction. http://www.undp.org/oslocentre/docs07/pps/6.pdf.

  • Ngwafor, E. N. (1993). Family law in Anglophone Cameroon. Regina: University of Regina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Njoh, A. J. (1995). Building and urban land use controls in developing countries: A critical appraisal of the Kumba (Cameroon) zoning ordinance. Third World Planning Review, 17, 37–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odhiambo, M. O. ( 2011). Commercial pressures on land in Africa: A regional overview of opportunities, challenges, and impacts. RECONCILE contribution to ILC Collaborative Research Project on Commercial Pressures on Land: Rome.

  • Palmer, R. (2002). Gendered land rights-process, struggle, or lost c(l)ause. Great Britain: Oxfam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. (2009). Challenges in asserting women’s land rights in Southern Africa. In Paper presented at workshop on decentralizing land, dispossessing women? Recovering gender voices and experiences of decentralized land reform in Africa Maputo, Mozambique May 4–7, 2009, OXFAM.

  • Pasura, D. (2010). A gendered analysis of land reforms in Zimbabwe. Women’s Studies International Forum, 33(5), 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, P. E. (2004). Inequality and social conflict over land in Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change, 4(3), 269–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, S. (2003). Feminist explanations for the feminization of poverty. Journal of Economic Issues, 37(2), 353–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw, L. (1995). The impact of structural adjustment on community life: Undoing development. USA: Oxfam America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugadya, M. et al. (2004). Gender and the land reform process in Uganda: Assessing gains and losses for women in Uganda. Land research series no. 2. Kampala: Associates for Development.

  • Sieghart, P. (1984). The international law of human rights. UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2004). Understanding poverty from a gender perspective. Women and development unit series (Vol. 52). Santiago: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1997). Human development report. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A., & Tsikata, D. (2003). Policy discourses of women’s land rights in sub-Saharan Africa: The implications of the return to the customary. Journal of Agrarian Change, 3(1–2), 67–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1990). Poverty: The world development report. Washington: Oxford University Press.

  • World Bank. (2004). World development indicators. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Online http://www.worldbank.org/data/onlinedbs/onlinedbases.htm.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has received full sponsorship from the Canadian based International Development Research Centre (IDRC) through Project Grant No. 105467 for which the authors are sincerely grateful.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Fonjong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fonjong, L., Fombe, L. & Sama-Lang, I. The paradox of gender discrimination in land ownership and women’s contribution to poverty reduction in Anglophone Cameroon. GeoJournal 78, 575–589 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-012-9452-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-012-9452-z

Keywords

Navigation