, Volume 78, Issue 1, pp 21–40 | Cite as

GeoWeb and crisis management: issues and perspectives of volunteered geographic information

  • Stephane RocheEmail author
  • Eliane Propeck-Zimmermann
  • Boris Mericskay


Mapping, and more generally geopositioning, has become ubiquitous on the Internet. This democratization of geomatics through the GeoWeb results in the emergence of a new form of mapping based on Web 2.0 technologies. Described as Web-mapping 2.0, it is especially characterized by high interactivity and geolocation-based contents generated by users. A series of recent events (hurricanes, earthquakes, pandemics) have urged the development of numerous mapping Web applications intended to provide information to the public, and encourage their contribution to support crisis management. This new way to produce and spread geographic information in times of crisis brings up many questions and new potentials with regard to urgency services, Non Governmental Organisations (NGO), as well as individuals. This paper aims at putting into perspective the development of GeoWeb, both in terms of technologies and applications, against crisis management processes.


GeoWeb Volunteered geographic information Crisis management Web 2.0 Crowdsourcing 


  1. Bouchon, S. (2006). L’application du concept de vulnérabilité aux infrastructures critiques: Quelles implications pour la gestion territoriale des risques? Annales des Mines Responsabilité et environnement, 43, 35–40.Google Scholar
  2. Cahan, B., & Ball, M. (2002). GIS at ground zero: Spatial technology bolsters World trade center response and recovery. GEOWorld, 15(1), 26–29.Google Scholar
  3. Coyle, D., & Meier, P. (2009). New technologies in emergencies and conflicts: The role of information and social networks. Washington, DC: United Nation Foundation & Vodafone Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Cramptom, J. (2008). Cartography: Maps 2.0. Progress in Human Geography, 33(1), 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dalloz, X. (2004). Compte rendu du CES 2004 (Consumer Electronics Show), Xavier Dalloz Consulting, Direction Générale des Médias et des Industries Culturelles, Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication.
  6. Daudé, E., Provitolo, D., Dubas-Paillard, E., & Gaillard, D. (2007). Spatial risks and complex systems: methodological perspectives. In M. Aziz-Alaoui & C. Bertelle (Eds.), From system complexity to emergent properties (Understanding Complex Systems). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. De Longueville, B., Luraschi, G., Smits, P., Peedell, S., & De Groeve, T. (2010). Citizens as sensors for natural hazards: A VGI integration workflow. Geomatica, 64(1), 41–59.Google Scholar
  8. Elwood, S. (2009). Geographic information science: New geovisualization technologies–emerging questions and linkages with GIScience research. Progress in Human Geography, 33(2), 256–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gignac, N., & Fortin, D. (2008). L’utilisation des normes et technologies ouvertes en sécurité civile: Un contexte favorisant la géocollaboration. Paper presented at the 13e Congrès de l’Association québécoise de télédétection (AQT), Trois-Rivières (Québec).Google Scholar
  10. Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodchild, M. F. (2008). Commentary: Wither VGI. GeoJournal, 72(3–4), 199–213.Google Scholar
  12. Goodchild, M. F. (2009). NeoGeography and the nature of geographic expertise. Journal of Location Based Service, 3(2), 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodchild, M. F., & Glennon, J. A. (2010). Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: A research frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3(3), 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gouveai, C., & Fonseca, A. (2008). New approaches to environmental monitoring: The use of ICT to explore volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 72(3–4), 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guihou, X., Lagadec, P., & Lagadec, E. (2006). Les crises hors cadre et les grands réseaux vitaux. Katrina, faits marquants, pistes de réflexion. Mission de retour d’expérience. La nouvelle Orléans, Gulport (Mississipi): EDF direction des risques groupe.Google Scholar
  16. Guy, M., Earle, P., Ostrum, C., Gruchalla, K., & Horvath, S. (2010). Integration and dissemination of citizen reported and seismically derived earthquake information via social network technologies.In  Advances in intelligent data analysis IX, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6065, pp. 42–53.Google Scholar
  17. Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008). Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the GeoWeb. Geography Compass, 2(6), 2011–2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heinzelman, J., & Waters, C. (2010). Crowdsourcing crisis information in disaster-affected Haiti. Washington, DC: Special Report 252, United States Institue of Peace.Google Scholar
  19. Heipke, C. (2010). Crowdsourcing geospatial data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(6), 550–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herring, C. (1994). An architecture of cyberspace: Spatialization of the internet: US: Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
  21. Huang, C. M., Chan, E., & Hyder, A. A. (2010). Web 2.0 and internet social networking: A new tool for disaster management?—Lessons from Taiwan. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 10(57), 10–57.Google Scholar
  22. Hudson-Smith, A., Crooks, A., & Gibin, M. (2009). NeoGeography and Web 2.0: Concepts, tools and applications. Journal of Location Based Service, 3(2), 118–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jarvis, J. (2009). Recovery 2.0: A call to convene.
  24. Kevany, M. J. (2003). GIS in the world trade center attack–trial by fire. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27(6), 571–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lagadec, P. (1991). La gestion de crise. Outils de réflexion à l’usage des décideurs. Paris: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Lagadec, P. (2005). Nouvelles menaces et gouvernance. Des résistances à dépasser, des chemins à ouvrir. Gérer et comprendre, 80, 8–22.Google Scholar
  27. Liu, S., & Palen, L. (2010). The new cartographers: Crisis map mashups and the emergence of neogeographic practice. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 37(1), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meier, P. (2009). Ushahidi: From croudsourcing to crowdfeeding.
  29. Meier, P. (2010). Location based mobile alerts for disaster response in Haiti.
  30. Meier, P., & Coyle, D. (2011). Harvard humanitarian initiative. Disaster Relief 2.0: The future of information sharing in humanitarian emergencies. Washington, DC and Berkshire, UK: UN Foundation & Vodafone Foundation Technology Partnership.Google Scholar
  31. Meschinet de Richemond, N. (2007). Gestion de crise. In Y. Veyret (Ed.), Dictionnaire de l’environnement (p. 164). Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  32. Miller, C. (2007). A beast in the field: The google maps mashup as GIS/2. Cartographica, 41(3), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Monmonier, M. (1999). Maps with the news: The development of American journalistic cartography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Muntz, R. R., Barclay, T., Dozier, J., Faloutsos, C., Maceachren, A. M., & Martin, J. L. (2003). IT roadmap to a geospatial future (Report of the Committee on Intersections Between Geospatial Information and Information Technology). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  35. Perron, J. (2010). Les outils cartographiques en gestion de crise.
  36. Pisani, F., & Piotet, D. (2008). Comment le web change le monde: l’alchimie des multitudes. Paris: Pearson Village Mondial.Google Scholar
  37. Poser, K., & Dransch, D. (2010). Volunteered geographic information for disaster management with application to rapid flood damage estimation. Geomatica, 64(1), 89–98.Google Scholar
  38. Sample, J. T., Shaw, K., Tu, S., & Abdelguerfi, M. (2008). Geospatial services and applications for the internet. New-York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scharl, A., & Tochtermann, K. (2007). The geospatial web: How geobrowsers, social software and the Web 2.0 are shaping the network society. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Seeger, C. (2008). The role of facilitated volunteered geographic information in the landscape planning and site design process. GeoJournal, 72(3–4), 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sui, D. (2008). The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie’s new tatoo and the future of GIS. [Editorial]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2007). Wikinomics: Wikipédia, linux, you tube: comment l’intelligence collaborative bouleverse l’économie. Paris: Pearson/Village mondial.Google Scholar
  43. Williams, G., Batho, S., & Russell, L. (2000). Responding to urban crisis: The emergency planning response to the bombing of Manchester city centre. Cities, 4(17), 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wybo, J. L., & Tanguy, J. M. (2009). Risque inondation: quels défis pour la recherche en appui à l’action publique? Paper presented at the Colloque national MEEDDAT/Cemagref 4 juin 2009, Lyon.Google Scholar
  45. Zerger, A., & Smith, D. I. (2003). Impediments to using GIS for real-time disaster decision support’. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27(2), 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zook, M., Graham, M., Shelton, T., & Gorman, S. (2010). Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: A case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Medical & Health Policy, 2(2), 7–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephane Roche
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eliane Propeck-Zimmermann
    • 2
  • Boris Mericskay
    • 1
  1. 1.Université LavalQuebec CityCanada
  2. 2.Université de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations