Skip to main content
Log in

Europeanizing Timisoara: neoliberal reforms, continuity with the past, and unexpected side effects

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes how processes of Europeanization opened up opportunities and generated ideals, which in turn changed the articulation between political and economic powers in the city and county of Timisoara, Western Romania. It builds on case studies of local government agencies and foreign investors from Italy. In doing so, it discusses the circular relationship between the European and the local levels of governance: European governance affected the interactions between firms and institutions in the city, while at the same time city authorities used different understandings of ‘Europe’ to pursue their own agenda. It also shows some of the unexpected side-effects of Europeanization, due to the political activism of Italian investors. Beck and Grande’s concept of ‘reflexive modernization’ and the literature on regional economies frame the discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Map 1
Map 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Funded by a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant from the National Science Foundation, Off Campus Dissertation Research Fellowship from the Graduate School of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Doctoral Research Travel Award from the University Center for International Studies (presently called Center for Global Initiatives) of the UNC-Chapel Hill, Dissertation Completion Fellowship from the Graduate School of the UNC-Chapel Hill, this paper draws on empirical research undertaken between 2005–2006 from a project entitled ‘the Relationship between the Processes of Outsourcing of Italian Textile and Clothing Firms and the Emergence of Industrial Districts in Eastern Europe’.

  2. For further information, see the agency’s website, www.adetim.ro.

  3. This is a quite common arrangement in the apparel sector: in order to absorb seasonal fluctuation, the core of the production is done internally, and the extra is done by subcontractors.

References

  • ADETIM. (n.d.). Micro-monographic guide of Timis County. Timisoara, ADETIM.

  • Agnew, J. (2001). How many Europes? The European Union, eastward enlargement and uneven development. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(1), 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I. (2003) Europeanisation: A governance approach. Paper presented at the EUSA 8th International Biennial Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, March (copy available from the author, Department of Politics, University of Sheffield).

  • Bachtler, J. F., & McMaster, I. (2007). EU Cohesion Policy and the Role of the Regions: Investigating the influence of structural funds in the new member States. Environment and Planning C: Government Policy, 26(2), 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachtler, J., & Mendez, C. (2007). Who governs EU cohesion policy? Deconstructing the reforms of the structural funds. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(3), 535–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakić-Hayden, M. (1995). Nesting orientalisms: The case of former Yugoslavia. Slavic Review, 54(4), 917–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, G. (1979). Dal ‘settore’ industriale al ‘distretto’ industriale. Alcune considerazioni sull’unità d’indagine dell’economia industriale [From ‘industrial sectors’ to ‘industrial districts.’ Reflections upon the units of analysis in industrial economics]. Rivista di economia politica e industriale, 1, 7–21

  • Beck, U., & Grande, E. (2007). Cosmopolitan Europe. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg, R., Roukova, P., Pickles, J., & Smith, A. (2005). Industrial districts and commodity chains: The garage firms of Emilia Romagna (Italy) and Haskovo (Bulgaria). Problemy na Geografiiata, 1–2, 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilharz, P. (2009). Socialism and modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S., & Malerba, F. (Eds.). (2005). Clusters, networks and innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, S. (1982). The Emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6(2), 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, J., & Gamble, A. (2002). Conceptualising Europeanisation. Unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, University of York (copy available from the authors).

  • Checkel, J. T. (2007). Whither Europeanization? International Studies Review, 9(2), 307–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiarvesio, M., Di Maria, E., & Micelli, S. (2006). Global value chains and open networks: the case of Italian industrial districts. Paper presented at the 18th Annual meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics, held in Trier on June 30–July 2 (www.sase.org).

  • Child, J., & Faulkner, D. (1998). Strategies of cooperation: Managing alliances, networks and joint ventures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J., & Jones, A. (2008). The spatialities of Europeanization: Territory, power and governance in Europe. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 33(3), 300–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J., & Jones, A. (2009). Europeanisation and its discontents. Space and Polity, 13(3), 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convery, F., McInerney, D., Sokol, M., & Stafford, P. (2006). Organising space in a dynamic economy—Insights for policy from the Irish experience. Built Environment, 32(2), 172–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk, H. (2004). Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, G., & Rumford, C. (2005). Rethinking Europe: Social theory and the implications of Europeanization. Routledlge: London.

  • Dolfsma, W. (2008). Knowledge economies. Organization, location and innovation. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucet, P. (2006). Territorial cohesion of tomorrow: A path to cooperation on competition? European Planning Studies, 14(10), 1473–1485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, H. (2000). Jacques Delors: Perspectives on a European leader. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunford, M. (2006). Industrial districts, magic circles, and the restructuring of the Italian textile and clothing chain. Economic Geography, 82(1), 27–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunford, M., & Greco, L. (2006). After the three Italies: Wealth, inequality and industrial change. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (2007). The community deficit. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(1), 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU. (n.d). Regional Policy. http://europa.eu/pol/reg/index_en.htm (Feb. 7, 2010. date accessed)

  • Falkner, G. (2003). Comparing Europeanisation effects: From metaphor to operationalisation. European Integration Online Papers 7 (http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2003-013a.htm (Sept. 7 2010. date accessed).

  • Faludi, A. (2007). Territorial cohesion policy and the European model of society. European Planning Studies, 15(4), 567–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, K. (2003). Introduction: In the name of Europe. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 3–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Federico, S. (2004). L’internazionalizzazione produttiva italiana e i distretti industriali: un’analisi degli investimenti diretti all’estero [internationalization of production and industrial districts: an analysis of Italy’s outward foreign investments]. In n.a., Economie Locali, modelli di agglomerazione e apertura internazionale. Roma: Banca d’Italia.

  • Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M., & Swedberg, R. (Eds.). (2001). The sociology of economic life. Cambridge, Mass.: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, K. (2002). Globalisation, regions, nations and integration: Central and Western European perspectives. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 3(2), 199–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirt, S. (2007). The compact versus the dispersed city: History of planning ideas on Sofia’s urban form. Journal of Planning History, 6(2), 138–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofe, R., & vom Chen, K. (2006). Whither or not industrial clusters: Conclusions or confusions? The Industrial Geographer, 4(1), 2–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. (2005). Several roads lead to international norms, but few via international socialization: A case study of the European Commission. International Organization, 59(4), 861–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R. (2000). One Europe or many? Reflections on becoming European. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25(4), 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R. (2003). European integration and new forms of uneven development. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(1), 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R. (2004). Thinking through the geographies of the new Europe in the new millennium: Dialectics of circuits, flows and spaces. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(2), 99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICE. (2006). Economia 2005. Banato e Transilvania. Distretto di Timis [Economy 2005. Banat and Transylvania. Timis District]. Timisoara, Consolato Generale d’Italia a Timisoara.

  • ICE. (2010). Nota congiunturale Romania 2009, [economic trend Romania 2009]. Roma: Istituto per il Commercio Estero.

  • Jones, R., & Kierzkowski, H. (2000). A framework for fragmentation. In S. Arndt & H. Kierzkowski (Eds.), Fragmentation an international trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. (2001). The Europeanisation of national administrations: Patterns of institutional change and persistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (1999). The evolution and transformation of European governance. In B. Kohler-Koch & R. Eising (Eds.), The transformation of governance in the European Union (pp. 14–35). Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuus, M. (2004). Europe’s eastern expansion and the reinscription of otherness in East-Central Europe. Progress in Human Geography, 18(2), 472–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laegrid, P., Steinthorsson, R. S., & Thorhallsson, B. (2004). Europeanisation of central government administration in the Nordic states. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(2), 347–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibanath, M. (2007). Europeanization of cross-border governance? A case study on the cause, form and consequences of a co-operation project in the German–Polish–Czech border triangle. Space and Politi, 11(2), 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, H. (2003). The politics of scale and networks of spatial connectivity: transnational interurban networks and rescaling of political governance in Europe. In R. McMaster & E. Sheppard (Eds.), Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society and method (pp. 236–255). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovering, J. (1999). Theory led by policy: The inadequacies of the ‘New Regionalism’ (illustrated from the case of wales). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 379–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundequist, S., & Power, D. (2002). Putting Porter into practice? Practices of regional cluster building: Evidence from Sweden. European Planning Studies, 10(6), 686–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F. (2004). Sectoral systems of innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mamadouh, V., & van der Wusten, H. (2008). The European level in EU governance: Territory, authority and trans-scalar networks. GeoJournal, 72(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (1986). Profit cycles, oligopoly and regional development. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts economic geography, 72(3), 293–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (2003). Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies, 37(6/7), 701–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1919). Industry and trade. A study on industrial techniques and business organization: And of their influences on the conditions of various classes and nations. London: MacMillan.

  • Martin, R. (2008). Path dependence and path creation in the economic landscape. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1999). Spaces of politics. In D. Massey, J. Allen, & P. Sarre (Eds.), Human geography today (pp. 279–294). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihas, D. E. M. (1997). Romania between balkan nationalism and democratic transition. Politics, 17(3), 1175–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A. (2005). The changing geography of Europeanness. Geopolitics, 10(3), 586–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A. (2008). Rethinking multi-level governance in a changing European Union: Why metageography and territoriality matter. GeoJournal, 72(1–2), 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1993). National innovation systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, N. (2003). The government and politics of the European Union (5th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (2002). The many faces of Europeanisation. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(5), 921–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paasi, A. (2005). Remarks on Europe’s transforming metageography. Geopolitics, 10(3), 580–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, J. (2001). Space, territory and the European project: Reflections on Agnew and Paasi. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8, 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, J. (2003). Towards a post-disciplinary political geography. Political Geography, 22(6), 637–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paniccia, I. (2002). Industrial districts: Evolution and competitiveness in Italian firms. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlínek, P., & Janák, L. (2007). Regional restructuring of the Škoda auto supplier network in the Czech Republic. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(2), 133–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pence, K., & Betts, P. (2008). Socialist modern: East German everyday culture and politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, J. C. (1993). Pour une révision de la science régionale: l’approche en termes de milieu, notes de recherche 148(3) Aix-en-Provence Centre d’économie régionale.

  • Pickles, J. (1993). Environmental politics, democracy and economic restructuring in Bulgaria. In J. O’Loughlin & H. van Wusten (Eds.), The new political geography of Eastern Europe (pp. 167–185). London: Bellhaven Press.

  • Pickles, J. (1998). Institutions, social networks, and ethnicity in the cultures of transition: industrial change, mass unemployment and regional transformation in Bulgaria. In J. Pickles & A. Smith (Eds.), Theorising transition: The political economy of post-communist transformations (pp. 115–146). London: Routledge.

  • Pickles, J. (2002). Gulag Europe? Mass unemployment, new firm creation, and tight labormarkets in the Bulgarian apparel industry. In A. Smith, A. Swain, & A. Rainnie (Eds.), Work, unemployment, and economies. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickles, J. (2004). A history of spaces: Cartographic reason, mapping, and the geo-coded world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickles, J. (Ed.). (2008). Globalization and regionalization in postsocialist economies. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickles, J., Smith, A., Roukova, P., Begg, R., & Bucek, M. (2006). Upgrading and diversification in the East European industry: Competitive pressure and production networks in the clothing industry. Environment and Planning A, 38(12), 2305–2324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M., & Sabel, C. (1984). The second industrial divide. Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pislaru, D. (n. d.). Interview with OECD.

  • Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1998a). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1998b). The Adam Smith address: Location, clusters, and the ‘new’ microeconomics of competition. Business Economics, 33(1), 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pricewaterhouse Coopers. (2004). Regional attractiveness report Romania. http://www.pwc.com/ro/eng/ins-sol/spec-int/Regional%20Attractiveness%20Index.pdf (April 11 2007. date accessed).

  • Putnam, R., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. (2004). Europeanisation: Solution or problem? European Integration Online Papers, 8 http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004-016a.htm (March 19, 2010 date accessed).

  • Rehak, S., & Sokol, M. (2007). Regional pathways towards the knowledge economy—Experiences from Slovakia. In Piech, K. (Ed.), Knowledge and innovation processes in Central and Eastern Europe. Warsaw: The Knowledge & Innovation Institute.

  • Sadler, D. (1997). The role of supply chain management strategies in the ‘Europeanisation’ of the automobile production system. In R. Lee & J. Wills (Eds.), Geographies of economies (pp. 311–320). London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage. Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. (Ed.). (2001). Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A., & Storper, M. (1987). High technology industry and regional development: A theoretical critique and reconstruction. International Social science Journal, 112(2), 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellar, C. (2009). Geographical imaginaries of the ‘New Europe’ and the ‘East’ in a business context: The case of Italian investors in Slovakia, Romania, and Ukraine. Journal of Cultural Geography, 26(3), 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellar, C., Emilova, M., Petkova-Tancheva, C., & McNeil, K. (2010). Cluster Policies in Bulgaria: European integration, post socialist dynamics, and local level initiatives. International Journal of Urban and Regional Studies. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00959.x.

  • Sidaway, J. (2007). Spaces of postdevelopment. Progress in Human Geography, 31(3), 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2003). Power relations, industrial clusters, and regional transformations: Pan-European integration and outward processing in the slovak clothing industry. Economic Geography, 79(1), 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Pickles, J., Bucek, M., Begg, R., & Roukova, P. (2008). Reconfiguring “post-socialist” regions: Cross-border networks and regional competition in the Slovak and Ukrainian clothing industry. Global Networks, 8(3), 281–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokol, M. (2001). Central and Eastern Europe a decade after the fall of state-socialism: Regional dimensions of transition processes. Regional Studies, 35(7), 645–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokol, M., van Egeraat, C., & Williams, B. (2008). Revisiting the “Informational City”: Space of flows, knowledge intensive business services and polycentricity in an emerging global city-region of Dublin. Regional Studies, 42(8), 1133–1146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York and London: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Excluding the other: The production of scale and scaled politics. In R. Lee & J. Wills (Eds.), Geographies of economies (pp. 167–176). London: Edward Arnold.

  • Swyngedouw, E. (2000). Authoritarian governance, power and the politics of rescaling. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(1), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szeleny, I., & Szeleny, S. (1995). Circulation or reproduction of elites during the postcommunist transformation of Eastern Europe: Introduction. Theory and Society, 24(5), 615–638 (special issue on circulation vs. reproduction of elites during the postcommunist transformation of Eastern Europe).

  • Taylor, P. J. (1994). The state as container: Territoriality in the modern world-system. Progress in Human Geography, 18(3), 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (1995). Beyond containers: Internationality, interstateness and interterritoriality. Progress in Human Geography, 19(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondl, G., & Vuksic, G. (2003). What makes regions in Eastern Europe catching up? The role of foreign investment, human resources and geography. Working Paper B-12. Bonn: Center for European Integration Studies, University of Bonn.

  • Vink, M. (2002). What is Europeanisation and other questions on a new research agenda. Paper presented at the Second YEN Research Meeting on Europeanisation, University of Bocconi, Milan, November (copy available from the author).

  • Wesley Scott, J. (2005). The EU and ‘Wider Europe’: Toward an alternative geopolitics of regional cooperation? Geopolitics, 10(3), 429–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Sellar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sellar, C. Europeanizing Timisoara: neoliberal reforms, continuity with the past, and unexpected side effects. GeoJournal 78, 1–19 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-011-9421-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-011-9421-y

Keywords

Navigation