Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of deforestation, biodiversity loss and the associated factors: case study of Ijesa-Ekiti region of Southwestern Nigeria

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deforestation is driven by a variety of factors, and has resulted in land use changes that threaten biodiversity, water and energy resources. However, lack of reliable data and survey information in Nigeria has made the estimation of the effect of deforestation difficult to establish. Consequently, the extent and rate of deforestation are less well known. The study therefore, examined and analyzed the spatial and temporal patterns of deforestation over the period of 25 years (1978–2003); measured the rates, trends and explained the factors that determined deforestation in Ijesa-Ekiti region of southwestern Nigeria. The major sources of data for the study were satellites images. These were Landsat MSS 1978, with spatial resolution of 80 m, SPOT XS 1986, SPOT XS 1994, with 20 m spatial resolution and NigeriaSat_1 2003, with 32 m spatial resolution. To make them comparable, they were georeferenced to the same coordinates system, filtered, resampled and enhanced for visualization in a GIS environment. Furthermore, Ilesa, Ijebu-Ijesa, Efon-Alaaye, Iloko-Ijesa, Erin-Oke and Erin-Ijesa were identified and selected for ground truthing to validate the tonal values recorded in the images with the features on the ground. The result of ground truthing was combined with visual image interpretation as training sites for supervised classification. Focus Group Discussions were held with people who had lived in the area for over 20 years as a means of eliciting factors of deforestation and the effects on forest biodiversity. The results indicated forest loss of 53,469.23 ha over the period of 25 years at an annual deforestation rate of 7.21, 2.47, and 5.40% per year for 1978–1986, 1986–1994 and 1994–2003, respectively. FGDs with various categories of people in the bigger towns confirmed deforestation in the area and were due to illegal lumbering, intensive agricultural practices and growth of settlements resulted from increase in human population. FGDs also revealed extinction of many forest species in their communities. In conclusion, the study advanced our understanding on techniques of analyzing deforestation using geo-spatial technology. It also generated a synthesis of information on the rates of deforestation and its driving forces, which are a complex mix of anthropogenic factors, the chief of which has been the conversion of forest resources to agricultural land use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adesina, F. A. (1997). Vegetation degradation and environmental changes in the tropics. Ife Research Publications in Geography, 6(12), 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aina, T. D., & Salau, A. T. (1992). The challenge of sustainable development in Nigeria. Ibadan: Nigerian Environmental Study/Action Team, (NEST).

    Google Scholar 

  • Areola, O. (1991). Ecology of natural resources in Nigeria. New York: Avebury Studies UN Green Research, Athenaeum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Areola, O. (1994). Geography sense and national development. The Nigerian Geographical Journal, New series, 1, 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arokoyu, S. B. (1999). “Environmental degradation, resource alienation and peasant activities: A case study of Eleme Local Government Area of Rivers State, Nigeria”, Abstracts of Papers Presented at the 42nd Annual Conference of the Nigerian Geographical Association, Held at Ogun State University, Ago- Iwoye, Nigeria May 16–20th, In S. O. Onakomaiya & K. T. Gbadamosi (eds.), Geographical perspectives on Nigerian development in the Next Millennium. Ijebu-Ode, Ogun State, Topspeed Press. pp. 88–89.

  • Babbie, E. (1998). The practice of social research (8th ed.). Abanny NY: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boroffice, R. A. (2006). Press Conference Address at International Stakeholders’ Workshop on Geo-Information System-Based Forest Monitoring in Nigeria (GEOFORMIN), March 27–30, 2006 at NUC Auditorium, Maitama, Abuja.

  • Cassel-Gintz, M., & Petschel-Hels, G. (2001). GIS-based assessment of the threat to world forests by patterns of no sustainable civilization nature interaction. Journal of Environmental Management, 59, 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2001). Global forest resources assessment 2000: Main report. FAO Forestry Paper No. 140. Rome (www.fao.org/forestry/fo/fra/main/index.jsp).

  • FAO (Food, Agricultural Organization). (1983). Forest product prices, No. 46, 1963 1982. Rome: FAO of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibah, L. (2001). The Nigerian environment score sheet” The Punch, Thursday, January 11, pp. 29.

  • Ikhuoria, I. A. (1993). Vegetation and land use changes in a rainforest ecosystem. Nigeria Journal of Remote Sensing, 1, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaiyeoba, I. A. (2002). “Environment”, Africa atlases: Atlas of Nigeria (pp. 122–123). Paris: Les Edition, JA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimoh, H. I. (2000). Man—Environment interactions. In H. I. Jimoh & J. P. Ifabiyi (Eds.), Contemporary issues in environmental studies (pp. 20–24). Ilorin: Haytee Press & Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A. (1988). Focus groups. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lines, C., Bolwell, L., & Norman, M. (1997). Geography—Study guide GCSE (pp. 152–153). Letts Educational: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. (1989). Geography and resource analysis. Longman: Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, D. A., Bryant, T. J., Matte-Baker, A., & Naivasha Consultants. (1986). Learning from experience: A state-of-the-art review and evaluation of environmental impact assessment audits. Hull, QC: Background paper prepared for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagle, G., & Spencer, K. (1997). Advanced geography: Revision handbook (p. 79). Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogunsanya, A. A. (2000). Contemporary issues in environmental studies. Ilorin: Haytee Press & Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okafor, F. C. (1988). Rural development and the environment degradation versus protection. In P. O. Sada & F. O. Odemerho (Eds.), Environmental issues in Nigerian development. Ibadan, Nigeria: Evans Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olofin, E. A. (2000). Geography and environmental monitoring for effective resource management. The Nigerian Geographical Journal, 3 & 4, 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olokesusi, F. (1992). Environment impact assessment in Nigeria: Current situation and future directions for future. Journal of Environmental Management, 35, 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olorunfemi, J. F., & Jimoh, H. I. (2000). Anthropogenic activities and the environment. In H. I. Jimoh & J. P. Ifabiyi (Eds.), Contemporary issues in environmental studies (pp. 7–11). Ilorin: Haytee Press & Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D. (1996). Sustainable development. In D. Reed (Ed.), Structural adjustment, the environment, and sustainable development (pp. 25–44). London: Earthscan Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W. E. (1990). The ecology of sustainable development. The Ecology, 20, 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, R. N., Sharma, N. P., & Browder, J. (1992). Deforestation: Problems, causes and concerns. In N. P. Sharma (Ed.), Managing the World’s Forests: Looking for balance between conservation and development (pp. 33–45). Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. G. (1993). Impact assessment and sustainable resource management. Longman: Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabeauel, M., & Simon, L. (1996). Forest and greenhouse warming, (Forets et. Rechauffement global). Bulletin—Association de Geographes. Francais 1996, 4, 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. M., Hortin, D., Parnwell, M. J. G., & Marsden, T. K. (1994). The degradation of rainforests in Sarawak, East Malaysia, and its implications for future Management policies. Geoforum, 25(3), 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP, UNEP, World Bank, & WRI. (2000). World resources 2000–2001: People and ecosystems: The fraying web of life. Washington D.C: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2000). Global environment outlook 2000. New York: UNEP, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2002). Africa environment outlook; Past, present and future perspective, England, Earthprint Limited. http://www.unep.org/aoe.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledged the contributions of Prof. Bola Ayeni, of the Department of Geography, University of Ibadan, Nigeria who supervised the Ph.D thesis from which this paper was extracted. The effort of Dr. J. O. Aransiola of the Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Obafemi Awolowo University was appreciated for transcribing and analyzing the discussion of the FGD of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathaniel Olugbade Adeoye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adeoye, N.O., Ayeni, B. Assessment of deforestation, biodiversity loss and the associated factors: case study of Ijesa-Ekiti region of Southwestern Nigeria. GeoJournal 76, 229–243 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-009-9336-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-009-9336-z

Keywords

Navigation