Place, gender and the appeal of video lottery terminal gambling: unpacking a focus group study of Montreal youth
- 156 Downloads
Youth gambling has become an important public health issue in Canada and elsewhere owing to the known associations between gambling and delinquency, family dysfunction and suicide. Modern electronic and virtual gambling activities like video lottery terminals (VLTs) may have particular appeal to youth who have been raised in social environments that are increasingly dependent on information and communication technologies. The main objective of the study was to explore why youth gamble and what makes gambling activities like VLTs popular to youth in the places where youth live, study and play. The research is framed within a population health perspective that recognizes the role of social and physical environments in influencing health-related behaviours. Group discussions were conducted with youth to explore the popularity and appeal of gambling and VLTs, and how gambling fits into the daily routines of youth and the spaces they occupy. Methodologically, this research was conscious of responding to calls in the literature to analyze focus groups as an interactive group process rather a collection of individual responses, and to exercise analytic rigour by explicitly making the research team’s positionality and the data collection process transparent. Group discussions revealed gender differences in the appeal of particular gambling activities with young males being more likely to discuss poker, dice, sports-betting and online gambling as exciting social activities, while females described lottery and scratch (instant win) tickets as fun solitary activities. Substantive results point to the need for interventions to address social aspects of gambling that appeal, in particular, to young males potentially through increased provision of healthier alternatives to social engagement and greater attention to young people’s use of space.
KeywordsFocus group interviews Gambling Health behaviours Health geography Population health Youth
D. H. Wilson was supported by a Canada Graduate Scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. The research project was supported by a grant from the Fonds québécois de la recherche sur la société et la culture. The authors are grateful to all members of the broader research team, the International Centre for Youth Gambling Problems and High-Risk Behaviors at McGill University, and for the research assistance provided by Lucio De Martinis.
- Agar, M., & Macdonald, J. (1995). Focus groups and ethnography. Human Organization, 54(1), 78–86.Google Scholar
- Azmier, J., & Clements, M. (2001). Gambling in Canada 2001: An overview. Calgary, AB: Canada West Foundation.Google Scholar
- Bauer, K., Yang, Y., & Austin, S. (2004). “How can we stay healthy when you’re throwing all of this in front of us?” Findings from focus groups and interviews in middle schools on environmental influences on nutrition and physical activity. Health Education & Behavior, 31(1), 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berg, B. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Berg, B. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., & Robson, K. (2001). Focus groups in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cameron, J. (2005). Qualitative research methods in human geography. In I. Hay (Ed.), Focussing on the focus group (pp. 83–101). New Yorks: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research-procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie, 19(6), 418–427.Google Scholar
- Cortazzi, M. (1993). Narrative analysis. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Cox, B., Yu, N., Afifi, T., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). A national survey of gambling problems in Canada. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50(4), 213–217.Google Scholar
- Crabtree, B., Yanoshik, K., Miller, W., & O’Connor, P. (1993). Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. In D. Morgan (Ed.), Selecting individual or group interviews (pp. 137–152). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Inc: London.Google Scholar
- Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (2000). Adolescents with gambling problems: From research to treatment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(2,3), 315–342.Google Scholar
- Doiron, J., & Nicki, R. (2001). Epidemiology of problem gambling in Prince Edward Island: A Canadian microcosm? Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46(5), 413–417.Google Scholar
- Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Loncoln (Eds.), The interview: From structured questions to negotioated texts (Vol. 2, pp. 645–672). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Gilliland, J., & Ross, N. (2005). Opportunities for video lottery terminal gambling in Montreal: An environmental analysis. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96(1), 55–59.Google Scholar
- Goss, J., & Leinbach, T. (1996). Focus groups as alternative research practice. Area, 28(2), 115–123.Google Scholar
- Griffiths, M. (1995). Adolescent gambling. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hoggart, K., Loretta, L., Davies, A. (2002). Method and methodology in human geography. Researching Human Geography (London: Arnold) pp. 1-35.Google Scholar
- ISI Web of Science. (2007). ISI Web of Knowledge. Copyright © 2007 The Thomson Corporation. Accessed at: http://portal.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi.
- Jacobs, D. (2004). Gambling problems in youth, theoretical and applied perspectives. In J. Derevensky & R. Gupta (Eds.), Youth gambling in North America: Long-term trends and future prospects (pp. 1–24). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
- Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. In K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Focus groups: Strategic articulations of pedagogy, politics and inquiry (Vol. 3, pp. 887–907). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research–introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311(7000), 299–302.Google Scholar
- Krueger, R. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
- Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Loto-Quebec. (2004). Loto-Quebec (2004)-2007 Development Plan: Assuring a Balance Between Business Mission and Social Responsibility. May (2004): Loto-Quebec. Accessed at: http://www.slvq.com.
- Loto-Quebec. (2008). La Societe des Loteries Video du Quebec, Inc: Retailers. June 2008 : Loto-Quebec. Accessed at : http://www.slvq.com.
- McMillen, J. (1996). Gambling cultures. In J. McMillen (Ed.), Understanding gambling: History, concepts and theories. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
- Pratt, G. (2002). Feminist geography in practice: Research and methods. In P. Moss (Ed.), Studying immigrants in focus groups. Blackwell: London & New York.Google Scholar
- Stewart, D., & Shamdasani, P. (1992). Focus groups: Theory and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Turner, N., & Horbay, R. (2004). How do slot machines and other electronic gambling machines actually work? Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues: egambling, Issue 11.Google Scholar
- United Nations. (2005). WorldYOUTHReport (2005): Young people today, and in 2015. United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
- Wilson, D., Gilliland, J., Ross, N., Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (2006). Video lottery terminal access and gambling among high school students in Montréal. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 97(3), 202–206.Google Scholar
- Wynne, H., Smith, G., & Jacobs, D. (1996). Adolescent gambling and problem gambling in Alberta: Final report. Edmonton: Alberta Alcohol & Drug Abuse Commission.Google Scholar