Memorial landscapes: analytic questions and metaphors

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Over the past two decades, geographers have probed the intersection of collective memory and urban space. Their sustained interest in the subject reflects an understanding of the social condition of commemoration and the important role that space plays in the process and politics of collective memory. Along with other critical social scientists, geographers envision these public symbols as part of larger cultural landscapes that reflect and legitimate the normative social order. A review of the extant literature indicates that geographers scrutinize memorial landscapes through three conceptual lenses that may be understood via the metaphors of ‘text,’ ‘arena,’ and ‘performance.’ These metaphors are in turn mobilized through a series of analytic questions that serve to identify the interests served and denied by landscape ‘texts,’ the ‘arenas’ in which they are produced, and the ways in which they are enacted via ‘performance.’ This article’s synopsis of the subfield’s predominant metaphors and its attendant questions contributes to the ongoing cultural geographic project of articulating and implementing methods for interpreting landscapes as open-ended symbolic systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The inspiration for this synoptic treatment of the memorial landscape via its metaphors and attendant questions lies with three sources: first, the seminal volume, The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes (Meinig 1979), and in particular Peirce F. Lewis’s essay “Axioms for Reading the Landscape;” second, Stephen Daniels and the late Denis Cosgrove’s chapter, “Spectacle and Text: Landscape Metaphors in Cultural Geography” published in the collection Place/Culture/Representation (Duncan and Ley 1993); and third, the provocative questions that Denis Wood and his colleagues’ put to a series of maps in their booklet Seeing Through Maps (Wood et al. 2006). Further encouragement came in the form of the collection of essays dedicated to Yi-Fu Tuan and edited by Adams et al. (2001).

  2. 2.

    Compare and contrast this traditional orientation of memorials toward the figural and concrete with recent explorations of ambiguity and complexity in the context of Holocaust memorials, several of which radically de-center the locus of collective memory from designer to viewer. For examples, see Till (2005) and Young (2002).

References

  1. Adams, P., Hoelscher, S., & Till, K. (Eds.). (2001). Textures of place: Exploring humanist geographies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alderman, D. (2000). A street fit for a King: Naming places and commemoration in the American South. The Professional Geographer, 52, 672–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alderman, D. (2002a). School names as cultural arenas: The naming of U.S. public schools after Martin Luther King, Jr. Urban Geography, 23, 601–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alderman, D. H. (2002b). Street names as memorial arenas: The reputational politics of commemorating Martin Luther King Jr. in a Georgia county. Historical Geography, 30, 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alderman, D. (2006). Naming streets after Martin Luther King, Jr.: No easy road. In R. Schein (Ed.), Landscape and race in the United States (pp. 213–236). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alderman, D., & Campbell, R. (2008). Symbolic excavation and the artifact politics of remembering slavery in the American South: Observations from Walterboro, South Carolina. Southeastern Geographer, 48, 338–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson, K. (1987). The idea of Chinatown: The power of place and institutional practice in the making of a racial category. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77, 580–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ashworth, G., & Hartmann, R. (Eds.). (2005). Horror and human tragedy revisited: The management of sites of atrocities for tourism. Elmsford: Cognizant Communication Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Atkinson, D., & Laurier, E. (1998). A sanitized city? Social exclusion at Bristol’s 1996 international festival of the sea. Geoforum, 29, 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Azaryahu, M. (1996). The power of commemorative street names. Environment and Planning D, 14, 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Azaryahu, M. (2003). RePlacing memory: The reorientation of Buchenwald. Cultural Geographies, 10, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barnes, T., & Duncan, J. (Eds.). (1992). Writing worlds: Discourse, text, and metaphor in the representation of landscapes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Benton, L. (2006). Politics, public space, and memorials: The brawl on the mall. Urban Geography, 26, 297–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bosco, F. (2004). Human rights and scaled performances of memory: Conflicts among the Madres de Plaza de Mayo in Argentina. Social & Cultural Geography, 5, 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burk, A. (2006a). In sight, out of view: A tale of three monuments. Antipode, 38, 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Burk, A. (2006b). Beneath and before: Continuums of publicness in public art. Social & Cultural Geography, 7, 949–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang, T., & Huang, S. (2005). Recreating place, replacing memory: Creative destruction at the Singapore River. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 46, 267–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Charlesworth, A. (1994). Contesting places of memory: The case of Auschwitz. Environment and Planning D, 12, 579–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cosgrove, D. (1985). Social formation and symbolic landscape. Totowa: Barnes & Noble Books.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cresswell, T. (1996). In place/out of place: Geography, ideology, and transgression. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Daniels, S. (1989). Marxism, culture, and the duplicity of landscape. In R. Peet & N. Thrift (Eds.), New models in geography (Vol. 2, pp. 196–220). London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Daniels, S. (1993). Fields of vision: Landscape imagery and national identity in England and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Daniels, S., & Cosgrove, D. (1993). Spectacle and text: Landscape metaphors in cultural geography. In J. Duncan & D. Ley (Eds.), Place/culture/representation (pp. 57–77). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dann, G. M. S., & Seaton, A. V. (2001). Slavery, contested heritage and thanatourism. New York: Haworth Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  25. DeLyser, D. (1999). Authenticity on the ground: Engaging the past in a California ghost town. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89, 602–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. DeLyser, D. (2005). Ramona memories: Tourism and the shaping of southern California. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Duncan, J. (1990). The city as text: The politics of landscape interpretation in Kandyan Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Duncan, J., & Duncan, N. (1988). (Re)Reading the landscape. Environment and Planning D, 6, 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Duncan, J., & Ley, D. (Eds.). (1993). Place/culture/representation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dwyer, O. (2002). Location, politics and the production of civil rights landscapes. Urban Geography, 23, 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dwyer, O. (2004). Symbolic accretion and commemoration. Social & Cultural Geography, 5, 419–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dwyer, O., & Alderman, D. (2008). Civil rights memorials and the geography of memory. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Eichstedt, J., & Small, S. (2002). Representations of slavery: Race and ideology in southern plantation museums. Washington: Smithsonian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fenster, T. (2004). Belonging, memory and the politics of planning in Israel. Social & Cultural Geography, 5, 403–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Foote, K. (2003). Shadowed ground: America’s landscapes of violence and tragedy (2nd ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Foote, K., Tóth, A., & Árvay, A. (2000). Hungary after 1989: Inscribing a new past on place. Geographical Review, 90, 301–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Forest, B., & Johnson, J. (2002). Unraveling the threads of history: Soviet-era monuments and post-Soviet identity in Moscow. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92, 524–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Forest, B., Johnson, J., & Till, K. (2004). Post-totalitarian national identity: Public memory in Germany and Russia. Social & Cultural Geography, 5, 357–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Graham, B., Ashworth, G., & Tunbridge, J. (2000). A geography of heritage: Power, culture & economy. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gulley, H. (1993). Women and the lost cause: Preserving a confederate identity in the American Deep South. Journal of Historical Geography, 19, 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hanna, S., Del Casino, V., Jr., Selden, C., & Hite, B. (2004). Representation as work in “America’s most historic city”. Social & Cultural Geography, 5, 459–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Harvey, D. (1979). Monument and myth. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 69, 362–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hay, I., Hughes, A., & Tutton, M. (2004). Monuments, memory, and marginalization in Adelaide’s Prince Henry Gardens. Geografiska Annaler Series B, 86, 201–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hayden, D. (1997). The power of place: Urban landscapes as public history. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hoelscher, S. (1998). Heritage on stage: The invention of ethnic place in America’s Little Switzerland. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hoelscher, S. (2003). Making place, making race: Performances of whiteness in the Jim Crow South. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93, 657–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hoelscher, S., & Alderman, D. (2004). Memory and place: Geographies of a critical relationship. Social & Cultural Geography, 5, 347–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jackson, P. (1994). Maps of meaning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Johnson, N. (1995). Cast in stone: Monuments, geography, and nationalism. Environment and Planning D, 13, 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Legg, S. (2007). Reviewing geographies of memory/forgetting. Environment and Planning A, 39, 456–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Leib, J. (2002). Separate times, shared spaces: Arthur Ashe, Monument Avenue and the politics of Richmond, Virginia’s symbolic landscape. Cultural Geographies, 9, 286–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Leib, J., Webster, G., & Webster, R. (2000). Rebel with a cause? Iconography and public memory in the southern United States. GeoJournal, 52, 303–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Light, D. (2000). An unwanted past: Contemporary tourism and the heritage of communism in Romania. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 6, 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Light, D. (2004). Street names in Bucharest, 1990–1997: Exploring the modern historical geographies of post-socialistic change. Journal of Historical Geography, 30, 154–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lowenthal, D. (1975). Past time, present place: Landscape and memory. Geographical Review, 65, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Lowenthal, D., & Prince, H. (1965). English landscape tastes. Geographical Review, 55, 186–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Meinig, D. (Ed.). (1979). The interpretation of ordinary landscapes: Geographical essays. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Mitchell, D. (2000). Cultural geography: A critical introduction. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mitchelson, M., Alderman, D., & Popke, J. (2007). Branded: The economic geographies of MLK streets. Social Science Quarterly, 88, 120–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Monk, J. (1992). Gender in the landscape: Expressions of power and meaning. In K. Anderson & F. Gale (Eds.), Inventing places: Studies in cultural geography (pp. 123–138). Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Nash, C. (1996). Reclaiming vision: Looking at landscape and the body. Gender, Place & Culture, 3, 149–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Natter, W., & Jones, J. P., III (1997). Identity, space, and other uncertainties. In U. Strohmayer & G. Benko (Eds.), Space and social theory (pp. 141–161). London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Peet, R. (1996). A sign taken for history: Daniel Shay’s memorial in Petersham, Massachusetts. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86, 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Price, P. (2000). Inscribing the border: Schizophrenia and the aesthetics of Aztlán. Social & Cultural Geography, 1, 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Radford, J. (1992). Identity and tradition in the post-Civil War South. Journal of Historical Geography, 18, 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Schein, R. (1997). The place of landscape: A conceptual framework for an American scene. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87, 660–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Schein, R. (2003). Normative dimensions of landscape. In C. Wilson & P. Groth (Eds.), Everyday America: Cultural landscape studies after J.B. Jackson (pp. 199–218). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Schwartz, B. (1991). Iconography and collective memory: Lincoln’s image in the American mind. Sociological Quarterly, 32, 301–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Till, K. (2003). Places of memory. In J. Agnew, K. Mitchell, & G. Toal (Eds.), A companion to political geography (pp. 289–301). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Till, K. (2005). The New Berlin: Memory, politics, place. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Tunbridge, J., & Ashworth, G. (1996). Dissonant heritage: The management of the past as a resource in conflict. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Whelan, Y. (2002). The construction and destruction of a colonial landscape: Monuments to British monarchs in Dublin before and after independence. Journal of Historical Geography, 28, 508–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Whelan, Y. (2005). Mapping meanings in the cultural landscape. In G. Ashworth & B. Graham (Eds.), Senses of place: Senses of time (pp. 61–71). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Winberry, J. (1983). Lest we forget: The confederate monument and the southern townscape. Southeastern Geographer, 23, 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wood, D., Kaiser, W., & Abramms, B. (2006). Seeing through maps (2nd ed.). Amherst: ODT, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Young, J. (1993). The texture of memory: Holocaust memorials and meaning. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Young, J. (2002). At memory’s edge: After-images of the Holocaust in contemporary art and architecture. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to express our gratitude to Reuben Rose-Redwood, Maoz Azaryahu, and the three anonymous referees for their generous comments and insights on earlier drafts of this article.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Owen J. Dwyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dwyer, O.J., Alderman, D.H. Memorial landscapes: analytic questions and metaphors. GeoJournal 73, 165 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9201-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Collective memory
  • Commemoration
  • Landscape
  • Memorial
  • Space