, Volume 72, Issue 3–4, pp 149–160 | Cite as

Reconceptualizing the role of the user of spatial data infrastructure

  • Nama Raj BudhathokiEmail author
  • Bertram (Chip) Bruce
  • Zorica Nedovic-Budic


Spatial data infrastructures, which are Internet-based mechanisms for the coordinated production, discovery, and use of geospatial information in the digital environment, have diffused worldwide in the last two decades. Currently, there are about one hundred spatial data infrastructures at the national level and many other at supra- and sub-national levels. These contemporary spatial data infrastructures operate with two main assumptions: formal organizations are the producers and suppliers of geospatial information; users are the passive recipients of information. The recent phenomenon of volunteered geographic information departs from these assumptions. In this paper, we argue that reconceptualizing the user of a spatial data infrastructure can accommodate this new phenomenon. Such a reconceptualization creates a middle ground between spatial data infrastructure and volunteered geographic information, which has important implications for future research.


Spatial data infrastructure Volunteered geographic information Participatory design User Produser Web 2.0 



We are thankful to two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and the editor of this special issue for her suggestions that greatly helped to revise this paper.


  1. Bearden, M. J. (2007). The National Map Corps. The USGS’s Volunteer Geographic Information Program. Retrieved May 27, 2008, from
  2. Belkin, N. J., Oddy, R. N., & Brooks, H. M. (1982). ASK Information retrieval part. Background and theory. Journal of Documentation, 38(2), 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benkler, Y. (2005). Coase’s penguin, or, linux and the nature of the firm. In R. Ghosh (Ed.), CODE: Collaborative owership and the digital economy (pp. 169–206). MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bernard, L., & Craglia, M. (2005). SDI—from spatial data infrastructure to service driven infrastructure, research workshop on cross-learning between SDI and II. First research workshop on cross-learning on spatial data infrastructures (SDI) and information infrastructures (II), March 31–April 1. International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation.Google Scholar
  6. Bernard, L., Kanellopoulos, L., Annoni, A., & Smits, P. (2005). The European geoportal—one step towards the establishment of a European spatial data infrastructure. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 29(1), 15–31.Google Scholar
  7. Boulos, M. N. K. (2005). Web GIS in practice III: Creating a simple interactive map of England’s strategic health authorities using google maps API, google Earth KML, and MSN virtual Earth map control. International Journal of Health Geographics, 4(22).Google Scholar
  8. Bruce, B. C., & Rubin, A. (1993). Electronic quill: A situated evaluation of using computers for writing in classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Bryant, S. L., Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2005). Becoming wikipedian: Transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. In Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Budhathoki, N. R., & Chhatkuli, R. R. (2003). Building geographic information infrastructure at national level: Nepalese experience. In Proceedings 7th Global Spatial Data Infrastructure Conference, Bangalore, India.Google Scholar
  11. Budhathoki, N. R., & Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2007). Expanding the SDI knowledge base. In H. Onsrud (Ed.), Research and theory in advancing spatial data infrastructure (pp. 7–32). Redlands: ESRI Press.Google Scholar
  12. Byrne, E., & Sahay, S. (2007). Participatory design for social development: A south African case study on community-based health information systems. Information Technology for Development, 13(1), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carrera, F., & Ferreira, J. (2007). The future of spatial data infrastructures: Capacity-building for the emergence of municipal SDIs. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2, 54–73.Google Scholar
  14. Craglia, M. (2007). Volunteered geographic information and spatial data infrastructures: When do parallel lines converge? Retrieved May 27, 2008, from
  15. Craglia, M., & Annoni, A. (2007). INSPIRE: An innovative approach to the development of spatial data infrastructure in Europe. In H. Onsrud (Ed.), Research and theory in advancing spatial data infrastructure (pp. 93–106). Redlands: ESRI Press.Google Scholar
  16. Crompvoets, J., & Bregt, A. (2007). National spatial data clearinghouses, 2000–2005. In H. Onsrud (Ed.), Research and theory in advancing spatial data infrastructure (pp. 133–146). Redlands: ESRI Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dervin, B., & Nilan, M. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science & Technology (ARIST), 21, 3–33.Google Scholar
  18. Edwards, P. N., Jackson, S. J., Bowker, G. C., & Knobel, C. P. (2007). Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics, tension and design: Report of a workshop on “History & Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures”: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  19. Eglash, R. (2004). Appropriating technology: An introduction. In R. Eglash, J. L. Croissant, G. D. Chiro, & R. Fouche (Eds.), Appropriating technology: vernacular science and social power (pp. VII–XXI). University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. Eglash, R., Croissant, J. L., Chiro, G. D., & Fouche, R. (Eds.) (2004). Appropriating technology: Vernacular science and social power. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  21. Elwood, S. (2007). Grassroots groups as stakeholders in spatial data infrastructures: Challenges and opportunities for local data development and sharing. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 22, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elwood, S. (2008, this issue). Volunteered geographic information: Future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal.Google Scholar
  23. Executive office of the President. (1994). Coordinating geographic data acquisition and access: The national spatial data infrastructure. Executive order 12906, Federal Register 59.Google Scholar
  24. Georgiadou, Y., Puri, S. K., & Sahay, S. (2005). Towards a potential research agenda to guide the implementation of spatial data infrastructures—a case study from India. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19(10), 1113–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodchild, M. F. (2007a). Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goodchild, M. F. (2007b). Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2, 24–32.Google Scholar
  27. Goodchild, M. F., Fu, P., & Rich, P. (2007). Sharing geographic information: An assessment of the geospatial one-stop. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(2), 250–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Groot, R., & McLaughlin, J. (2000). Introduction. In R. Groot & J. McLaughlin (Eds.), Geospatial data infrastructure: Concepts, cases, and good practice (pp. 1–12). UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Harvey, F., & Tulloch, D. (2006). Local-government data sharing: Evaluating the foundations of spatial data infrastructures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7), 743–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hertel, G., Niedner, S., & Herrmann, S. (2003). Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy, 32(7), 1159–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hippel, E. V. (2007). Horizontal innovation networks—by and for users. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14(2), 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuznetsov, S. (2006). Motivations of contributors to Wikipedia. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 26(2), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lakhani, K. R., & Hippel, E. V. (2003). How open source software works: “free” user-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 32, 923–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2002). Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 197–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maguire, D. J., & Longley, P. A. (2005). The emergence of geoportals and their role in spatial data infrastructures. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 29(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
  37. Masser, I. (1999). All shapes and sizes: The first generation of national spatial data infrastructures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13(1), 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Masser, I. (2005a). GIS worlds: Creating spatial data infrastructures (First ed.). ESRI Press.Google Scholar
  39. Masser, I. (2005b). Some priorities for SDI related research. In Proceedings International Conference for Global Spatial Data Infrastructure 8, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, C. C. (2006). A beast in the field: The google maps Mashup as GIS/2. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 41(3), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mumford, E., & Henshall, D. (1983). Designing participatively: A participative approach to computer systems design: A case study of the introduction of a new computer system. Manchester Business School.Google Scholar
  43. Nature. (2005). Internet encyclopedias go head to head. Nature, 438, 900–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nature. (2006). Mapping disaster zones: Commentary. Nature, 439, 787–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nedovic-Budic, Z., Feeney, M.-E. F., Rajabifard, A., & Williamson, I. (2004). Are SDIs serving the needs of local planning? Case study of Victoria, Australia and Illinois, USA. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 28(4), 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nov, O. (2007). What motivates wikipedians? Communications of the ACM, 50(11), 60–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Onsrud, H., Poore, B., Rugg, R. T., & Wiggins, L. (2004). The future of the spatial information infrastructure. In R. B. McMaster & E. L. Usery (Eds.), A Research Agenda for Geographic Information Science (pp. 225–255). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  48. Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2005). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Poore, B. S., & Chrisman, N. R. (2006). Order from noise: Toward a social theory of geographic information. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 508–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Puri, S. K. (2006). Technological frames of stakeholders shaping the SDI implementation: A case study from India. Information Technology for Development, 12(4), 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rajabifard, A., Binns, A., Masser, I., & Williamson, I. (2006). The role of sub-national government and the private sector in future spatial data infrastructures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7), 727–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Raymond, E. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowledge Technology and Policy, 12(3), 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rhind, D. (2000). Funding an NGDI. In R. Groot & J. McLaughlin (Eds.), Geospatial data infrastructure: Concepts, cases, and good practice (pp. 39–56). UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Rouse, L. J., Bergeron, S. J., & Harris, T. M. (2007). Participating in the geospatial Web: Collaborative mapping, social networks and participatory GIS. In A. Scharl & K. Tochtermann (Eds.), The geospatial Web: How geobrowsers, social software and the Web 2.0 are shaping the network society (pp. 153–158). London: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  55. Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The methodology of participatory design. Technical Communication, 52(2), 163–174.Google Scholar
  56. Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Journal of Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tulloch, D. L. (2007). Many many maps: Empowerment and online participatory mapping. First Monday.Google Scholar
  58. Tulloch, D., & Fuld, J. (2001). Exploring county-level production of framework data: Analysis of the national framework data survey. The Journal of Urban and Regional Information Systems, 13(2), 11–21.Google Scholar
  59. Turner, A. (2006). Introduction to Neogeography. CA: O’Reilly Media Inc.Google Scholar
  60. Williamson, I. (2003). SDIs—setting the scene. In I. Williamson, A. Rajabifard, & M.-E. F. Feeney (Eds.), Developing spatial data infrastructures: From concept to reality (pp. 3–16). CRC Press.Google Scholar
  61. Williamson, I., Grant, D., & Rajabifarad, A. (2005). Land administration and spatial data infrastructures. In Proceedings Global Spatial Data Infrastructure 8 and FIG Working Week Conference, Cairo.Google Scholar
  62. Wilson, T. D. (1994). Information needs and uses: Fifty years of progress. In B. C. Vickery (Ed.), Fifty years of information progress: A Journal of documentation review (pp. 15–51). London: Aslib. Available at:]
  63. Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49–55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nama Raj Budhathoki
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bertram (Chip) Bruce
    • 1
  • Zorica Nedovic-Budic
    • 1
  1. 1.University of IllinoisUrbana-ChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations