GeoJournal

, Volume 73, Issue 1, pp 45–54 | Cite as

The conventions of agri-environmental practice in New Zealand: farmers, retail driven audit schemes and a new spirit of farming

Article

Abstract

Audit schemes dictating the parameters of environmentally and socially acceptable management practice have emerged as a pervasive feature of global agri-food production. While the impacts of such schemes on the global movement of food and fibre and the evolving terrains of power in agri-food relations are well documented, the associated reconstruction of farming identities in the localities where audits are implemented has received less attention. The emerging responses to audit schemes in the New Zealand kiwifruit and dairy sectors are key examples of the contentious nature through which auditing is incorporated within farming practice. Analysis of these responses reveals the potential for audits to alter the spirit of farming in New Zealand, initiating new conventions of interaction between producers and industries. Within a convention theory framework, the incorporation of auditing within standard management practice involves a negotiated process in which the farmers employ strategic justifications of their capability (and value) relative to the quality designations established by the audit. Rather than evaluate the relative merits of a farm, its product and its owner through the craft and skill of the independent land manager, successful farming is increasingly associated with the individual’s ability to conform to an audit’s structures. The global trend toward audit schemes suggests that similar challenges to the spirit of farming may be replicated in other contexts.

Keywords

Agri-food system Audit Convention theory New Zealand Retailers Spirit of farming 

References

  1. Barrett, H. R., Browne, A. W., Harris, P. J. C., & Cadoret, K. (2002). Organic certification and the UK market: Organic imports from developing countries. Food Policy, 27, 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bénatouïl, T. (1999). A tale of two sociologies: The Critical and the Pragmatic stance in contemporary French sociology. European Journal of Social Theory, 2, 379–396.Google Scholar
  3. Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, È. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2, 359–377.Google Scholar
  5. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burch, D., & Lawrence, G. (Eds.). (2007). Supermarkets and agri-food supply chains: Transformations in the production and consumption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. Bureau, J.-C., Jean, S., & Matthews, A. (2006). The consequences of agricultural trade liberalization for developing countries: Distinguishing between genuine benefits and false hopes. World Trade Review, 5, 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Busch, L., & Bain, C. (2004). New! Improved? The transformation of the global agrifood system. Rural Sociology, 69, 321–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, H. (2005, December 5). The rise and rise of EurepGAP: European (re)invention of colonial food relations? International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 13, retrieved July 7, 2007, from http://www.csafe.org.nz/ijsaf/archive/vol13(2)_05/campbell_dec05.pdf.
  10. Campbell, H., Fairweather, J., & Steven, D. (1997). Recent developments in organic food production in New Zealand: Part 2, kiwifruit in the Bay of Plenty. Studies in Rural Sustainability, 2 (Dunedin: Department of Anthropology, University of Otago).Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, H., McLeod, C., & Rosin, C. (2006). Auditing sustainability: The impact of EurepGAP in New Zealand. In G. Holt & M. Reed (Eds.), Sociological perspectives of organic agriculture: From pioneer to policy (pp. 157–173). Wallingford: CABI.Google Scholar
  12. Chiapello, È. (2003). Reconciling the two principal meanings of the notion of ideology: The example of the concept of the ‘Spirit of Capitalism’. European Journal of Social Theory, 6, 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daviron, B., & Ponte, S. (2005). The coffee paradox: Global markets, commodity trade and the elusive promise of development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  14. Dosse, F. (1999). Empire of meaning: The humanization of the social sciences. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  15. Goodman, D., & Watts, M. (1994). Reconfiguring the rural or Fording the divide?: Capitalist restructuring and the global agro-food system. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 22, 1–49.Google Scholar
  16. Holt, G., & Reed, M. (Eds.). (2006). Sociological perspectives of organic agriculture: From pioneer to policy. Wallingford: CABI.Google Scholar
  17. Hunt, L., Rosin, C., McLeod, C., Read, M., Fairweather, J., & Campbell, H. (2005). Understanding approaches to kiwifruit production in New Zealand: Report on first qualitative interviews of ARGOS kiwifruit participants. ARGOS Research Report 05/01. (Christchurch: Agriculture Research Group on Sustainability).Google Scholar
  18. Jay, M. (2007). The political economy of a productivist agriculture: New Zealand dairy discourses. Food Policy, 32, 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirwan, J. (2006). The interpersonal world of direct marketing: Examining conventions of quality at UK farmers’ markets. Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larner, W., & Le Heron, R. (2002). The spaces and subjects of a globalising economy: A situated exploration of method. Environment and Planning D, 20, 753–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Larner, W., Le Heron, R., & Lewis, N. (2007). Co-constituting “After Neoliberalism”: Political projects and globalizing governmentalities in Aotearoa/New Zealand. In K. England & K. Ward (Eds.), Neoliberalization: States, networks, peoples (pp. 223–247). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Marsden, T., Banks, J., & Bristow, G. (2000). Food supply chain approaches: exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40, 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maye, D., Holloway, L., & Kneafsey, M. (Eds.). (2007). Constructing ‘Alternative’ food geographies: Representation and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  24. Morgan, K., Marsden, T., & Murdoch, J. (2006). Worlds of food: Place, power, and provenance in the food chain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Murdoch, J., Marsden, T., & Banks, J. (2000). Quality, nature, and embeddedness: Some theoretical considerations in the context of the food sector. Economic Geography, 76, 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murdoch, J., & Miele, M. (2004). Culinary networks and cultural connections: A conventions perspective. In A. Hughes & S. Reimer (Eds.), Geographies of commodity chains (pp. 102–119). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Ponte, S., & Gibbon, P. (2005). Quality standards, conventions and the governance of global value chains. Economy and Society, 34, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Raynolds, L. T. (2002). Consumer/producer links in Fair Trade coffee networks. Sociologia Ruralis, 42, 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reckwitz, A. (2003). Grundelemente einer Theorie sozialer Praktiken. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 32, 282–301.Google Scholar
  30. Renard, M.-C. (2003). Fair trade: Quality, market and conventions. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Renard, M.-C. (2005). Quality certification, regulation and power in fair trade. Journal of Rural Studies, 21, 419–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ricœur, P. (1986). Lectures on ideology and utopia. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Roberts, D., & Unnevehr, L. (2005). Resolving trade disputes arising from trends in food safety regulation: The role of the multilateral governance framework. World Trade Review, 4, 469–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosin, C. (2004). The political ecology of MERCOSUR/L: Local knowledge and responses to a competitive market. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar
  35. Rosin, C. (2007). Justifying the ‘alternative’: Renegotiating conventions in the yerba mate network. In D. Maye, L. Holloway & M. Kneafsey (Eds.), Constructing ‘Alternative’ food geographies: Representation and practice (pp. 115–132). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  36. Rosin, C., & Campbell, H. (2008). Beyond bifurcation: examining the conventions of organic agriculture in New Zealand. Journal of Rural Studies (in press). Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.05.002.
  37. Rosin, C., Campbell, H., & Hunt, L. (2008). Audit me this! Orchard-level effects of the EurepGAP audit system on New Zealand kiwifruit producers. In C. Stringer & R. Le Heron (Eds.), Agri-food commodity chains and globalising networks (pp. 61–74). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  38. Rosin, C., Hunt, L., Campbell, H., & Fairweather, J. (2007). There are audits, and there are audits: Response of New Zealand kiwifruit orchardists to the implementation of supermarket initiated audit schemes. ARGOS Research Report 07/06. (Christchurch: Agriculture Research Group on Sustainability).Google Scholar
  39. van der Grijp, N. M., Marsden, T., & Cavalcanti, J. S. B. (2005). European retailers as agents of change towards sustainability: The case of fruit production in Brazil. Environmental Sciences, 2, 445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for the Study of Agriculture, Food and EnvironmentUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations