Skip to main content
Log in

National and transnational borderlanders’ attitudes towards the security fence between Israel and the Palestinian Authority

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The subject of the security fence between Israel and the Palestinians in the West Bank has become a major issue in Israel and in the world in the last several years. The main aim of this research is to reveal the attitudes and thoughts about the fence held by local residents living in settlements (borderlanders) in the proximity of a part of the security fence that has already been completed. The research concentrates on the western-Israeli side of the fence, as it aspires to delve into and understand the meaning and implications of the security fence on matters such as personal security, safety of property and freedom of movement, the possibility of maintaining social and economic ties between the two sides and feelings about living in the area in the future. Underlying this research is the transformation occurring in the border area as a result of its closure by construction of the security fence, after many years in which it was open partially. This process has many diverse consequences, some of them contradictory, on the two populations residing near the border in Israel: the majority Jewish population (the national borderlanders), and the minority Arab population (the transnational borderlanders).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avinery, S. (2005). Straddling the fence. Foreign Policy, 147, 72–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biger, G. (2004). Fences and borders around the World. Tel-Aviv: Israeli Ministry of Defense (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Eliezer, U., & Feinstein, Y. (2007). The buttle over our homes: Reconstructing/deconstructing soveregn practices around Israel’s separation barrier on the west bank. Israel Studies, 12(1), 171–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccato, V., & Haining, R. (2004). Crime in border regions: The Scandinavian case of Öresund, 1998–2001. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 807–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics (2004). Statistical abstract of Israel, 55. Jerusalem: State of Israel

  • Donnan, H., & Wilson, T. M. (1999). Borders frontiers of identity. Berg Oxford New York: Nation and State.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folman, Y. (2004). The story of the security fence: Life repudiation indeed? Jerusalem: Carmel (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. (1993). The Routledge Atlas of Arab-Israeli conflict: The complete history of the struggle and the efforts to resolve it. New York: Routledge Historical Atlases.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hageman, K., Berger, S., Gemie, S., & Williams, C. (2004). Creating and crossing borders: The state, future and quality of border studies. Glamorgan: University of Glamorgan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasson, S. (1996). Frontier and periphery as symbolic landscapes. Ecumene: A Journal of Environment, Culture, Meaning, 3(2), 146–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, L. A. (1990). Where north meets south: Cities, space, and politics on the U.S.-Mexico border. Austin: Center for Mexican American Studies, University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keinan, O. (1999). New Immigrants Realized the Zionist Ideals: The Influence of Immigrants’ Settlement on Change in the Ta’anach Region 1948–1967. PhD Thesis, Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University (Hebrew).

  • Khamaisi, R. (2006). The impact of the separation fence on the population in Israel: Initial observation. Jerusalem: The Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimhi I. (Ed.) (2006), The security fence in Jerusalem: Its impact on the city residents. Jerusalem: The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliot, N., & Charney, Y. (2006). The geography of suicide terrorism in Israel. Geojournal, 66, 353–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, K. D. L. (1959). The nature of frontiers and boundaries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 49, 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lezzi, M. (1994). Competition-cooperation: A creative interplay of border regions economic development planning and transborder institutions. In W. Gallusser (Ed.), Political boundaries and coexistence (pp. 322–332). Basel: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, K. D., & Van Naerssen, T. (2003). Migration, identity and belonging. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 18(1), 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, O. J. (1994). Border people: Life and society in the U.S.-Mexico borderlands. Tucson and London: The University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, O. J. (1994a). The dynamics of border interaction: New approaches to border analysis. In C. H. Schofield (Ed.), World boundaries Vol. 1: Global boundaries (pp. 1–15). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, O. J. (2005). Human interaction in the Texas-Mexico borderlands. Border studies: A humanities exhibit, organized by Texas Humanities Resource Center Austin.

  • McCarthy, A. C. (2004). The end of self defense? Israel, the World Court, and the War on Terror. Commentary Magazine, 1 (November), The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, www.defenddemocracy.org.

  • Ministry of Defense. (2004). Israel’s Security Fence (cited 30 June), www.securityfence.mod.gov.il/Pages/Heb/matara.htm.

  • Michael, K., & Ramon, A. (2004). Jerusalem surrounded by a fence. Jerusalem: Jerusalem Institute for Research (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D. (2004). Conflict at the interface: The impact of boundaries and borders on contemporary Ethno-National conflict. In C. Flint (Ed.), Geographies of war and peace (pp. 192–214). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D., & Passi, A. (1998). Fences and neighbours in the postmodern World: Boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 186–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, J. R. V. (1987). Political frontiers and boundaries. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, D. (2002), Borderline collective consciousness: Israeli identity, Arabness” and the Green Line. Palestine-Israel Journal, 8 (9)(issue 4/1), 38–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reches, E. (1993). The Arabs in Israel and the Arabs of the territories: Political ties and national solidarity. The New East, 32, 165–191 (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouhana, N. N. (1997). Palestinian citizens in an ethnic Jewish state: Identities and conflict. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozental, Y. (1988). From war to cease-fire negotiations between Israel and its neighbors. The Idan series, 10, 191–193 (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumley D., Minghi J. V. (Eds.) (1991). The geography of border landscapes. New-York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynhold, J. (2004). Israel’s fence: Can separation make better neighbours? Survival, 46(1), 200–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samoucha, S. (1995). Jewish-Arab relations in Israel in an Era of peace. The New East, 37, 64–68 (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schard, M. L. (2004). Rag doll nations and the politics of differentiation on arbitrary borders: Karelia and Moldova. Nationalities Papers, 32(2), 457–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiftan, D. (1999). The necessity of separation—Israel and Palestinian Authority. Haifa: University of Haifa and Zemora-Bitan (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soffer, A. (1994). Israel’s security landscapes, the impact of military considerations on land uses. Professional Geographer, 38(1), 28–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soffer, A., & Polack, K. (2003). Unilateral separation of Israel from the Palestinian Authority by means of a separation fence—advantages and disadvantages. Haifa: The Geostrategica Chair, The Center for National Security Research, Haifa University (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strüver, A. (2005). Spheres of transnationalism within the European Union: On open doors, thresholds and drawbridges along the Dutch-German border. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(2), 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sofield, T. H. B. (2005). Border tourism and border communities: An overview. Tourism Geographies, 8(2), 102–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Humanitarian and Emergency Policy Group (HEPG) of the Local Aid Coordination Committee (LACC), (2003). The Impact of Israel’s Separation Barrier on the Affected West Bank Communities. (Unite Nations).

  • United Nations, (2006). Preliminary analysis of the humanitarian implications of the April 2006 Barrier Projections (Update 5). Jerusalem: Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Occupied Palestinian territory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtum, H., & Strüver, A. (2002). Borders, strangers, doors and bridges. Space and Polity, 6(2), 141–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtum, H., & Van Der Velde, M. (2004). The power of cross-border labor market immobility. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 95(1), 100–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtum, H. (2005). The geopolitics of borders and boundaries. Geopolitics, 10, 672–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2003). Borders, International Ethics and Geography: ‘Do Good Fences Still Make Good Neighbours?’ Geopolitics, 8(Summer), 22–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wastl-Walter, D., Varadi, M. M., & Veider, F. (2003). Coping with marginality: To stay or to go. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29(5), 797–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalan, E. (1975). The design of agricultural settlements: Technological aspects of rural community development. Jerusalem & Haifa: The Jewish Agency for Israel Rural Settlement Development and the Technion: Faculty of Agricultural Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Tamar Keinan for encouraging us to develop a research about the security fence. We would also like to extend our thanks to Prof. Nurit Kliot from Haifa University, for her advice in preparing this article

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alon Gelbman or Ofra Keinan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gelbman, A., Keinan, O. National and transnational borderlanders’ attitudes towards the security fence between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. GeoJournal 68, 279–291 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9084-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9084-x

Keywords

Navigation