Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Functional localities: an integrated spatial approach towards health care locality definition”

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper demonstrates a spatial approach towards the definition of localities for health care planning. Recent international decentralisation of health care provision, and more specifically devolution within the United Kingdom, emphasises the need to develop a geographical focus in the delimitation of local structures for health care planning. Geographers, but most especially those applying Geographical Information Science (GIS) techniques, have made enormous contributions in this field and more generally in research related to health services. This paper considers some of these previous approaches and moves on in the light of new technologies, and more importantly the availability of appropriate data, to create localities that reflect dynamic spaces of social interaction, administration and policy. The paper’s focus is placed on the importance of flow data that reflects␣the spatial interaction between services and the population. This data, divided into three sub-groups of administration, education and health, allows us to identify the population’s allegiance to place and ultimately create spatially bounded functional localities that reflect this. Whilst the approach is largely technology driven, it also incorporates the expertise of local health care professionals thus recognising the importance of collaboration and multi-sectoral engagement. Although this combined approach impacted upon the way in which the final localities were defined, crucially it enabled us to incorporate features of both rigorous spatial analysis and a wealth of local knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balogh, R. (1996). Exploring the role of localities in Health commissioning: A review of the literature. Social Policy and Administration, 30, 99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, M. (1991). School-performance indicators, the local residential environment, and parental choice. Environment and Planning A, 23, 319–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. A., & Holmes, J. (1971). The delimitation of functional regions, nodal regions and hierarchies by functional distance approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 11, 57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullen, N., Moon, G. & Jones, K. (1993). The definition of geographical communities for health planning: Final report. Chichester, Health Information Research Service, University of Portsmouth.

  • Butler, T., & Roland, M. (1998). How will primary care groups work? British Medical Journal, 316, 214–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Campari, I. (1996). Uncertain boundaries in urban space. In P. A. Burrough, & A. U. Frank (Eds.), Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries (pp. 57–70). London: Taylor and Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, J. (1998). Primary care and the NHS white papers. British Medical Journal, 316, 1687–1688

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. L. (1982). Instrumental reason and policy analysis. In D. T. Herbert, & R. J. Johnston (Eds.), Geography and the urban environment (pp. 41–61). London: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, G. P., & Langley, R. (1996). A review of the potential of GIS and spatial modelling for planning in the new education market. Environment and Planning C, 14, 301–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Medicare. (2001). Caring for medicare: Sustaining a quality system. Canada: Saskatchewan

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (1986). The changing urban and regional system in the United-Kingdom. Regional Studies, 20, 243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombes, M. (2000). Defining locality boundaries with synthetic data. Environment and Planning A, 32, 1499–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombes, M., & Openshaw, S. (2001). Contrasting approaches to identifying ‘Localities’ for research and public administration. In A. Frank, J. Faper, & J. P. Cheylan (Eds.), Life and motion of socio-economic units (pp. 301–315). London: Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Court, M. & Phillips, D. R. (1985). Grassrooting. The Health Services 29th October

  • Craig, N., McGregor, S., Drummond, N., Fischbacher, M., & Iliffe, S. (2002). Factors affecting the shift towards a ‘primary care-led’ NHS: A qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice, 52, 895–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, T. (1990). Getting closer to the consumer? Locality planning in the Exeter health district. Bristol: University of Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (1997). The new NHS: Modern, dependable. London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (2006). Our health, our care, our say: A new direction for community services White Paper. London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan S., & Savage M. (1991). New perspectives on the locality debate. Environment and Planning A, 23, 155–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunford H., & Hughes J. (1988). Pimlico Patch Committee: An experiment in locality planning. London: Primary Health Care Group, King’s Fund Centre

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, G. M., & Finkler, S. A. (1985). Determinants of market share for a hospital’s services. Medical Care, 23, 1003–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, S., & Irvine, B. (2003). Hungary’s health care system. London: Civitas-The Institute for the Study of Civil Society

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, R. (1989). The social-relations of localities-spatial divisions of labor and the local state. Environment and Planning A, 21, 674–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, A. J., & Asthana S. (2000). Estimating the socioeconomic characteristics of school populations with the aid of pupil postcodes and small area census data: An appraisal. Environment and Planning A, 32, 1267–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Ireland (2001). Primary care a new direction: Quality and fairness a health system for you. The Stationery Office, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, J. R., Restuccia, J. D., Tedeschi, P. J., Wilson, P. A., & Zuckerman, H. S. (1981). Measuring community hospital services in Michigan. Health Services Research, 16, 135–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillery, G. A. (1995). Definitions of community: Areas of agreement. Rural Sociology, 20, 111–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Iliffe, S., & Munro, J. (2000). New labour and Britain’s National Health Service: An overview of current reforms. International Journal of Health Services, 30, 309–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, R. A., & Joseph, A. (1993). Space in its place: Developing the link in medical geography. Social Science & Medicine, 37, 711–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M., & Court, M. (1984). A sense of scale. Health and Social Service Journal, 21, 734–735 June

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivell, P. T., Turton, B. J., & Dawson, B. R. P. (1990). Neighbourhoods for health service administration. Social Science and Medicine, 30, 701–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, O., Olesen, F., & Samuelsson, M. (2001). Improving the interface between primary and secondary care: A statement from the European Working Party on Quality in Family Practice (EQuiP). Quality Health Care, 10, 33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. (1988). A guide to Irish parish registers. Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co

    Google Scholar 

  • Naish, J., Macarlean, D., Sharples, P., Curtis, S., Gilham, V., Gregory, I., Ball, C., & Eldridge, S. (1998). Partners in information management: multi sectoral information in a primary care group area. London: Queen Mary and Westfield, East London & City Health Authority & The Wolfson Institute for Preventative Medicine

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Ministry of Health (2001). The primary health care strategy. Wellington

  • Norheim, L. (1999). Community development for health—A Resource Guide for Health Workers. Lancaster: Lancaster University Public Health and Health Professional Development Unit

    Google Scholar 

  • Odoi, A., Wray, R., Emo, M., Birch, S., Hutchison, B., Eyles, J. & Abernathy, T. (2005). Inequalities in neighbourhood socioeconomic characteristics: potential evidence-base for neighbourhood health planning. International Journal of Health Geographics 4

  • Openshaw S., & Alvanides S. (2001). Designing zoning systems for the representation of socio-economic data. In A. Frank, J. Raper & J. P. Cheylan (Eds.), Life and motion of socio-economic units. London: Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortt, N. K. (2002). Defining regions for locality health care planning: A multidimensional approach. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. School of Biological and Environmental Studies. Coleraine, University of Ulster

  • Shortt, N. K., Moore, A. J., Coombes, M., & Wymer, C. (2005). Defining regions for locality health care planning: A multidimensional approach. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 2715–2727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taket, A. R., & Curtis, S. E. (1989). Locality planning for health care: A case study in East London. Area, 21(4):357–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Government. (2001). Primary care strategy-primary care partnerships. Victoria: Australia Department of Human Services

    Google Scholar 

  • WHSSB. (1998). Summary of responses to fit for the future. Derry: Western Health and Social Services Board (WHSSB)

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (1991). Sundsvall statement on supportive environments for health. 3rd International Conference on Health Promotion, Sundsvall, Sweden

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are extremely grateful to Professor Mike Coombes of CURDS at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne and Colin Wymer who both assisted with the ERA analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geography, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh, EH8 4XP, UK

    Niamh K. Shortt & Adrian J. Moore

Authors
  1. Niamh K. Shortt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adrian J. Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niamh K. Shortt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shortt, N.K., Moore, A.J. “Functional localities: an integrated spatial approach towards health care locality definition”. GeoJournal 67, 27–40 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-006-9005-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-006-9005-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation