Evidence of women’s empowerment in India: a study of socio-spatial disparities

Abstract

Various national and international communities have addressed women’s issues and taken various efforts to empower them so as to enhance their social and health status and involve them in developmental activities. The Indian DHS survey (National Family Health Survey, 1998–1999) provides an opportunity to study women’s empowerment in India. The survey collected information on several dimensions of women’s empowerment from 90,303 ever-married women (ages 15–49), from all the states of India. Utilizing these data sets, four indices – household autonomy index, mobility index, attitude towards gender index and attitude towards domestic violence index – are constructed to measure the different dimensions of empowerment. Using these indices, the spatial and socio-economic and cultural disparities that exist within India are analyzed. Finally, an attempt is made to identify some important determinants for women’s empowerment using multiple logistic regression analysis. The results show that at the national level, 43% of the women have high household autonomy; 23% of the women have high freedom to move outside their home; 40% of the women have no gender preference attitude; and only 43% of the women defy domestic violence. But there are significant divergences in these indices of women’s empowerment across the different states and socio-economic and cultural settings within India. Women’s educational levels emerged as an important predictor for all the four dimensions of women’s empowerment. Additionally, media exposure and age have emerged as the important predictors for some dimensions of woman’s empowerment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Bardhan K. (1985). Women’s work, welfare and status: forces of tradition and change in India. Economic and Political Weekly 20(51):2261–2267

    Google Scholar 

  2. Batliwala S., 1995: Defining women’s empowerment: a conceptual framework, education for women’s empowerment. In ASPBAE Position Paper for the Fourth World Conference on Women, Beijing, September 1995, New Delhi, Asia-South Pacific Bureau of Adult Education.

  3. G.M. Das (1987) ArticleTitleSelective discrimination against female children in rural Punjab, India Population and Development Review 13 77–100 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1972121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Desai S., Jain D. (1994). Maternal employment and changes in family dynamics: the social context of women’s work in rural South India. Population and Development Review 20(1):115–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dixon M.R. (1993). Population Policies and Women’s Rights: Transforming Reproductive Choice. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dyson T., Mick M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy and demographic behaviour in India. Population and Development Review 9(1):35–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. George S., Abel R., Miller B.D. (1998). Female infanticide in rural South India. Search Bulletin July–Sept. 12(3):18–26

    Google Scholar 

  8. Germain A. and Kyte R., 1995: The Cairo consensus: the right agenda for the right time. International Women’s Health Coalition, New York.

  9. Govindasamy P., Malhotra A. (1996). Women’s position and family planning in Egypt. Studies in Family Planning 27(6):328–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Government of India (GOI), 2001a: Census of India, 2001: Population totals

  11. Government of India (GOI), 2001b: Census of India 2001, Economic tables

  12. Hegde R.S. (1996). Narratives of silence: rethinking gender, agency and power from the communication experiences of battered women in South India. Communication Studies 47:303–317

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heise L., Ellsberg M. and Gottemoeller M., 1998: Ending violence among women. Population reports, Series L, No. 11. JHU school of public health.

  14. Jaisingh I. (1995). Violence against women: the Indian perspective. In: Peters J., Wolper A. (eds). Women’s Rights, Human Rights. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jejeebhoy S., 1996: Women’s education fertility and proximate determinants of fertility, Population and women, UN.

  16. Jejeebhoy S., 2000: Women’s autonomy in rural India: Its dimensions, determinants and the influence of context. In Harriet B. Presser and Gita Ser (eds.), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: moving beyond Cairo, New York, Oxford University Press

  17. Jejeebhoy S., Sathar Z.A. (2001). Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: The influence of religion and region. Population and Development Review 27(4):687 –712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kabeer N., 1998: Money can’t buy me love? Re-evaluating gender, credit and empowerment in rural Bangladesh. IDS Discussion Paper 363.

  19. Kale M., Dayalchand A., Ray C.R., Sen S., Kurian N., Jadhavar (1990). Epidemology of Nutrition: Age and Sex Differentials’, All India Seminar on Status of Women and Demographic Changes in India. IIPS, Mumbai

    Google Scholar 

  20. Karve I. (1965). Kinship Organisation in India, 3rd ed. Rev. Asia Publishing House, Bombay

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kishor S. (2000). Empowerment of women in Egypt and links to the survival and health of their infants. In: Presser H.B., Sen G. (eds). Women’s Empowerment and Demographic Processes. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kishor S., Gupta K. (2004). Women’s empowerment in India. In: Rajan I., James K.S. (eds). Demographic Change Health Inequality and Human Development in India. CESS, Hyderabad

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mahmud S., Johnston A.M. (1994). Women’s status, empowerment and reproductive outcomes. In: Sen G., Germain A., Chen L.C. (eds). Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment and Rights. Harvard Series on Population and International Health, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  24. Malhotra A, Vanneman, Kishore S. (1995). Fertility, dimensions of patriarchy and development in India. Population and Development Review 21(2):284–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Malhotra A., Mather M. (1997). Do schooling and work empower women in developing countries? Gender and domestic decisions in Sri Lanka. Sociological Forum 12(4):599–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Malhotra A., Schuler S.R. and Boender C., 2002: Measuring women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. Un published paper prepared for the World Bank

  27. Mason K., 1998: Wives’ economic decision making power in the family: five asian countries. In The Changing Family in Comparative Perspective: Asia and the United States (pp. 105–133) Ed. Karen Oppenheim Mason, Honolulu, East West Center.

  28. Mason K., Smith H.L. (2000). Husbands’ versus wives fertility goals and use of contraception : the influence of gender context in five asian countries. Demography 37(3):299–311

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mayoux L., 2000: Micro-finance and the empowerment of women: a review of the key issues. International Labor Organization (ILO), Geneva.

  30. MkNelly B. and McCord M., 2001: Credit with education on women’s empowerment impact review No. 1, October 2001.

  31. Moser O.N.C. (1998). Reassessing Urban Poverty Reduction Strategies: The Asset Vulnerability Framework, in World Development, Vol. 26. The World Bank, Washington DC, pp. 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  32. Prasad S. (1999). Medico legal response to violence against women in India. Violence Against Women 5(5):478–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schuler S.R. and Hashemi S.M., 1993: Defining and studying empowerment of women: A research note from Bangladesh. In JSI working paper No. 3 Arlington, Virginia.

  34. Sen A. (1990). Gender and cooperative conflicts. In: Tinker I. (eds). Persistent Inequalities: Women and World Development. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sen A. (1994). Population policy: authoritarianism versus co-operation. Social change. 24(3–4):20–35

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sopher D.E. (1980). Sex disparity in indian literacy. In: David E. (eds). An Exploration of India: Geographical Perspectives on Society and Culture. Sopher, Logman London

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sample Registration System, 2005: SRS Bulletin, Vol. 39, No. 1, New Delhi, Office of the Registrar.

  38. United Nations, 1995: Population and Development: Programme of Action adopted at the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo 5–13 September, 1994. Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis, United Nations.

  39. United Nations, 1995b: Fourth world Conference on Women, Platform for action, women and poverty, Beijing, China – September 1995.

  40. UNFPA, 2005: State of world population 2005, The promise of equality: gender equity, reproductive health and the Millennium Development Goals, UNFPA

  41. Velkoff V.A., 1998: Women’s education in India, Women of the world, International programs center, WID/98–1.

  42. Youssef N.H. (1982). The interrelationship between the division of labour in the household women’s roles and their impact on fertility. In: Anker R., Buvinic M., Youssel N.H. (eds). Women’s Roles and Population Trends in the Third World. Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamla Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, K., Yesudian, P.P. Evidence of women’s empowerment in India: a study of socio-spatial disparities. GeoJournal 65, 365–380 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-006-7556-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • woman
  • status
  • empowerment
  • autonomy
  • ideology and mobility