Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 61, Issue 3, pp 239–246 | Cite as

Gender and urban poverty: Single mothers in Amsterdam

  • Joos Droogleever Fortuijn
  • Wim Ostendorf
Article

Abstract

Urban poverty in Western countries is usually defined in terms of social exclusion and integration. Welfare states can be characterized according to three modes of integration, namely market exchange, redistribution and reciprocity. This paper compares the mechanisms of the social integration of unemployed single mothers with those of unemployed men. In two deprived neighbourhoods in Amsterdam, unemployed single mothers and unemployed native-born men were interviewed about their coping strategies with respect to the labour market, social security institutions and social networks. Although the single mothers have serious financial problems, they are better integrated into society at large than the unemployed men are. The single mothers are strongly oriented towards the labour market, successful in getting support from the social security institutions, have strong and supportive social networks, and are integrated into their neighbourhoods. In the conclusion we challenge the idea of vulnerable single mothers and demonstrate the relatively successful integration of this category of women.

Amsterdam coping strategies gender single mothers social exclusion urban poverty 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blok H., et al. 2002: Comparative statistical analysis at national, metropolitan, local and neighbourhood level, the Netherlands: Amsterdam and Rotterdam. Urbex Series 6. AME Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  2. Blok H., Musterd S., Ostendorf W., 2001: Spatial dimensions of urban social exclusion and integration. Urbex Series 9. AME Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  3. CBS, 2000: Enquête Beroepsbevolking 1999. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Voorburg/Heerlen.Google Scholar
  4. CBS, 2002: Statistisch Jaarboek 2002. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Voorburg/Heerlen.Google Scholar
  5. EC, 1992: The Community Battle Against Social Exclusion. Community of the European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
  6. Esping-Andersen G., 1990: The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Fainstein S., Gordon I., Harloe M. (eds.), 1992: Divided cities: New York and London in the Contemporary World. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Knijn T., 2002: Bijstandsmoeders; burgerschap en de grondslagen voor ondersteuning. In: Hortulanus, R. P., J. E. M. Machielse, J. E. M. (eds.), Modern Burgerschap. Het Sociaal Debat 6. Elsevier, 's-Gravenhage.Google Scholar
  9. Kodras J. E., Jones III J. P., 1991: A contextual examination of the feminization of poverty. Geoforum 22(2): 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marshall T. H., 1948: Citizenship and social class. In: Marshall, T. H.: Citizenship and Social Development. Greenwood Press, Westport.Google Scholar
  11. Mingione E., 1991: Fragmented Societies, a sociology of work beyond the market paradigm. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Musterd S., Kesteloot C., Murie A., Ostendorf W., 1999: Urban social exclusion and modes of integration; literature review. Urbex Series 1. AME Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  13. OECD, 2001: Employment Outlook June 2001. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.Google Scholar
  14. Polanyi K., 1944: The Great Transformation. Rinehart, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Rose D., Bourdais C. le: Changing conditions of female single parenthood in Montreal 's inner-city and suburban neighbourhoods. Urban Resources 3(2): 45–52.Google Scholar
  16. Sassen S., 1991: The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.Google Scholar
  17. SCP, 1983: Sociale atlas van de vrouw 1983. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Den Haag.Google Scholar
  18. SCP, 1997: Sociale atlas van de vrouw; deel 4. Veranderingen in de primaire leefsfeer. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau Cahier 141. VUGA, Den Haag.Google Scholar
  19. SCP/CBS, 2001: Armoedemonitor 2001. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbu-reau/Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Den Haag.Google Scholar
  20. Wilson W. J., 1987: The truly disadvantaged, the inner city, the underclass and public policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joos Droogleever Fortuijn
    • 1
  • Wim Ostendorf
    • 1
  1. 1.AMIDST, Faculty of Social and Behavioral SciencesUniversiteit van, Amsterdam nieuweAmsterdamThe Netherlands (

Personalised recommendations