Advertisement

GeoInformatica

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 353–373 | Cite as

On the composition and recommendation of multi-feature paths: a comprehensive approach

  • Vincenzo CutronaEmail author
  • Federico Bianchi
  • Michele Ciavotta
  • Andrea Maurino
Article
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

Trackers have become popular devices these days. They are extensively used to record sports activities (e.g., hiking, skiing), mainly in terms of GPS trajectories, which can be shared on social networking platforms with other users looking for leisure tips. Notably, as the number of available trajectories drastically increased over time, in many cases, it has become challenging, if not impossible, the extensive evaluation of all possible alternatives and the manual selection of the most suitable one. Paths are characterized by multiple features (e.g., dirt, asphalt), and a good representation is needed to satisfy user needs. Moreover, paths can be composed to generate new routes. This calls for a recommender system capable to handle both the multi-feature path representation and the implicit definition of alternatives by composition. This paper suggests a novel approach that features a richer trajectory representation based on a semantic annotation to describe significant path features. Annotations are then used for automatic recommendation of new paths that maximize the presence of characteristics matching the user preferences. Finally, a class of algorithm variants is evaluated using an off-line validation process and compared with a baseline solution to test the underlying assumptions.

Keywords

Recommender systems Multi-feature paths Path composition GPS trajectories 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmed M, Wenk C (2012) Constructing street networks from gps trajectories. In: Algorithms—ESA 2012: 20th annual European symposium, 2012. Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, pp 60–71Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Audet S, Albertsson C, Murase M, Asahara A (2013) Robust and efficient polygon overlay on parallel stream processors. In: GIS: Proceedings of the ACM international symposium on advances in geographic information systems, pp 304–313Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aung HH, Guo L, Tan KL (2013) Mining sub-trajectory cliques to find frequent routes. In: Advances in spatial and temporal databases: 13th international Symposium, SSTD 2013. Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, pp 92–109Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baraglia R, Frattari C, Muntean CI, Nardini FM, Silvestri F (2012) A trajectory-based recommender system for tourism. In: Active media technology: 8th international conference, AMT 2012. Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, pp 196–205Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cai G, Lee K, Lee I (2018) Itinerary recommender system with semantic trajectory pattern mining from geo-tagged photos. Expert Syst Appl 94:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cao L, Krumm J (2009) From gps traces to a routable road map. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, GIS ’09 , pp 3–12Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen C, Lu C, Huang Q, Yang Q, Gunopulos D, Guibas L (2016) City-scale map creation and updating using gps collections. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD ’16, pp 1465–1474Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choi BCK, Pak AWP (2005) Bias, overview. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics 1:416–423Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cui G, Luo J, Wang X (2018) Personalized travel route recommendation using collaborative filtering based on gps trajectories. Int J Digital Earth 11(3):284–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davies JJ, Beresford AR, Hopper A (2006) Scalable, distributed, real-time map generation. IEEE Pervasive Comput 5(4):47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edelkamp S, Schrödl S (2003) Route planning and map inference with global positioning traces. In: Computer science in perspective: essays dedicated to Thomas Ottmann. Springer, Berlin, pp 128–151Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gunawardana A, Shani G (2015) Evaluating recommender systems. In: Recommender systems handbook. Springer US, pp 265–308Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herzog D, Massoud H, Wörndl W (2017) Routeme: a mobile recommender system for personalized, multi-modal route planning. In: Proceedings of the 25th conference on user modeling, adaptation and personalization, UMAP ’17, pp 67–75Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karagiorgou S, Pfoser D (2012) On vehicle tracking data-based road network generation. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on advances in geographic information systems, SIGSPATIAL ’12, pp 89–98Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kitayama D, Ozu K, Nakajima S, Sumiya K (2015) A route recommender system based on the user’s visit duration at sightseeing locations. In: Software engineering research, management and applications. Springer International Publishing, pp 177–190Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee JG, Han J, Whang KY (2007) Trajectory clustering: a partition-and-group framework. In: Proceedings of SIGMOD international conference on management of data, SIGMOD’07, pp 593–604Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu H, Schneider M (2012) Similarity measurement of moving object trajectories. In: Proceedings of the third ACM SIGSPATIAL international workshop on GeoStreaming, IWGS ’12, pp 19–22Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meratnia N, de By RA (2004) Spatiotemporal compression techniques for moving point objects. In: Advances in database technology - EDBT 2004: 9th international conference on extending database technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 765–782Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Merrill D, Garland M, Grimshaw A (2012) Scalable gpu graph traversal. SIGPLAN Not 47(8):117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nardini FM, Orlando S, Perego R, Raffaetà A, Renso C, Silvestri C (2018) Analysing trajectories of mobile users: from data warehouses to recommender systems. Springer International Publishing, pp 407–421Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Socharoentum M, Karimi HA (2016) Multi-modal transportation with multi-criteria walking (mmt-mcw): personalized route recommender. Comput Environ Urban Syst 55:44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang C, Shen Y, Yang H, Guo M (2013) Improving rocchio algorithm for updating user profile in recommender systems. In: Web information systems engineering—WISE 2013: 14th international conference, proceedings, Part I. Springer, Berlin, pp 162–174Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yin P, Ye M, Lee WC, Li Z (2014) Mining gps data for trajectory recommendation. In: Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining: 18th Pacific-Asia conference, PAKDD 2014. Proceedings, Part II. Springer International Publishing, pp 50–61Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ying JC, Chen HS, Lin KW, Lu EHC, Tseng VS, Tsai HW, Cheng KH, Lin SC (2014) Semantic trajectory-based high utility item recommendation system. Expert Syst Appl 41(10):4762–4776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yoon H, Zheng Y, Xie X, Woo W (2010) Smart itinerary recommendation based on user-generated gps trajectories. In: Ubiquitous intelligence and computing: 7th international conference, UIC 2010. Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, pp 19–34Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang Y, Siriaraya P, Wang Y, Wakamiya S, Kawai Y, Jatowt A (2018) Walking down a different path: route recommendation based on visual and facility based diversity. In: Companion proceedings of the the Web conference, WWW ’18, pp 171–174Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zheng Y (2015) Trajectory data mining: an overview. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 6(3):29:1–29:41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zheng Y, Xie X (2011) Learning travel recommendations from user-generated gps traces. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 2(1):2:1–2:29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations