GeoInformatica

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 213–239 | Cite as

Towards sustainable mobility behavior: research challenges for location-aware information and communication technology

  • Paul Weiser
  • Simon Scheider
  • Dominik Bucher
  • Peter Kiefer
  • Martin Raubal
Article

Abstract

Private transport accounts for a large amount of total CO2 emissions, thus significantly contributing to global warming. Tools that actively support people in engaging in a more sustainable life-style without restricting their mobility are urgently needed. How can location-aware information and communication technology (ICT) enable novel interactive and participatory approaches that help people in becoming more sustainable? In this survey paper, we discuss the different aspects of this challenge from a technological and cognitive engineering perspective, based on an overview of the main information processes that may influence mobility behavior. We review the state-of-the-art of research with respect to various ways of influencing mobility behavior (e.g., through providing real-time, user-specific, and location-based feedback) and suggest a corresponding research agenda. We conclude that future research has to focus on reflecting individual goals in providing personal feedback and recommendations that take into account different motivational stages. In addition, a long-term and large-scale empirical evaluation of such tools is necessary.

Keywords

Mobility Sustainability Behavior Information and communication technology Location-awareness 

References

  1. 1.
    Abdalla A, Frank AU (2012) Combining trip and task planning: how to get from a to passport. In: Geographic information science. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abdalla A, Frank AU (2014) Designing spatio-temporal pim tools for prospective memory support. In: Principle and application progress in location-based services. Springer International Publishing , pp 227–242Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abdalla A, Weiser P, Frank AU (2013) Design principles for spatio-temporally enabled pim tools: a qualitative analysis of trip planning. In: Geographic information science at the Heart of Europe. Springer International Publishing, pp 323–336Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Agency IE (2009) Transport energy and CO2: moving towards sustainability. OECD PublishingGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aliseda A (2009) Abductive reasoning: challenges ahead. THEORIA. Int J Theory Hist Found Sci 22(3):261–270Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anagnostopoulos T, Anagnostopoulos C, Hadjiefthymiades S (2011) An adaptive location prediction model based on fuzzy control. Comput Commun 34(7):816–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anagnostopoulos T, Anagnostopoulos C, Hadjiefthymiades S, Kyriakakos M, Kalousis A (2009) Predicting the location of mobile users: a machine learning approach. In: Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on pervasive services. ACM, pp 65–72Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ashbrook D, Starner T (2003) Using gps to learn significant locations and predict movement across multiple users. Pers Ubiquit Comput 7(5):275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Auld J, Mohammadian A (2012) Activity planning processes in the agent-based dynamic activity planning and travel scheduling (adapts) model. Transp Res A Policy Pract 46(8):1386–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baker CL, Tenenbaum JB, Saxe RR (2007) Goal inference as inverse planning. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the cognitive science societyGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berchtold M, Budde M, Gordon D, Schmidtke HR, Beigl M (2010) Actiserv: activity recognition service for mobile phonesGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bhat CR, Koppelman FS (1999) Activity-based modeling of travel demand. In: Handbook of transportation Science. Springer, pp 35–61Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brunauer R, Hufnagl M, Rehrl K, Wagner A (2013) Motion pattern analysis enabling accurate travel mode detection from gps data only. In: 16th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems-(ITSC), 2013. IEEE, pp 404–411Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brunauer R, Rehrl K (2014) Deriving driver-centric travel information by mining delay patterns from single gps trajectories. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGSPATIAL international workshop on computational transportation science. ACM, pp 25–30Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brynjarsdottir H, Håkansson M, Pierce J, Baumer E, DiSalvo C, Sengers P (2012) Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 947–956Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bucher D, Weiser P, Scheider S, Raubal M (2015) Matching complementary spatio-temporal needs of people. In: Online proceedings of the 12th international symposium on location-based servicesGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bucher D, Weiser P, Scheider S, Raubal M A model for matching complementary spatio-temporal needs. Spat Cogn Comput. SubmittedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bui HH (2003) A general model for online probabilistic plan recognition. In: IJCAI, vol 3. Citeseer, pp 1309–1315Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Charron S, Koechlin E (2010) Divided representation of concurrent goals in the human frontal lobes. Science 328(5976):360–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Churchill EF (2011) Missing the point. Interactions 18(5):80–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clarke M (1986) Activity modelling-a research tool or a practical planning technique. Behav Res Transport Policy:3–15Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Consolvo S, McDonald DW, Landay JA (2009) Theory-driven design strategies for technologies that support behavior change in everyday life. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI 09, pp 405–414Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Deci EL (1971) Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol 18(1):105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Deci EL, Betley G, Kahle J, Abrams L, Porac J (1981) When trying to win: competition and intrinsic motivation. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 1 7(1):79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L (2011) From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In: Proceedings of the 15th international academic mindtrek conference: envisioning future media environments. ACM, pp 9–15Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dietz T, Gardner GT, Gilligan J, Stern PC, Vandenbergh MP (2009) Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce us carbon emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(44):18452–18456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    DiSalvo C, Sengers P, Brynjarsdóttir H (2010) Mapping the landscape of sustainable hci. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 1975–1984Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fischer C (2008) Feedback on household electricity consumption: A tool for saving energy Energy Effic 1:79–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fiske ST, Taylor SE (2013) Social cognition: from brains to culture. SageGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fogg BJ (1998) Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pp 225–232Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fogg BJ (2002) Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity 2002:5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Froehlich J (2009) Promoting energy efficient behaviors in the home through feedback: The role of human-computer interaction. Proc. HCIC Workshop 9:1–11Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Froehlich J, Dillahunt T, Klasnja P, Mankoff J, Consolvo S, Harrison B, Landay JA Ubigreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habitsGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Froehlich J, Findlater L, Landay J (2010) The design of eco-feedback technology. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 1999–2008Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2006) A function-behaviour-structure ontology of processes. In: Design Computing and Cognition’06. Springer, pp 407–422Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Goetz T (2010) The decision tree: taking control of your health in the new era of personalized medicine. RodaleGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Graziotin D (2013) An analysis of issues against the adoption of dynamic carpooling. arXiv:1306.0361
  38. 38.
    Hägerstraand T (1970) What about people in regional science? Pap Reg Sci 24 (1):7–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hamari J, Koivisto J, Pakkanen T (2014) Do persuasive technologies persuade?-a review of empirical studies. In: Persuasive technology. Springer, pp 118–136Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hamari J, Koivisto J, Sarsa H (2014) Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In: 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), 2014. IEEE, pp 3025–3034Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hartmann D, Klein Tank A, Rusicucci M, Alexander L, Broenniman B, Charabi Y, Dentener F, Dlugokencky E, Easterling D, Kaplan A et al (2013) Observations: atmosphere and surfaceGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hassin RR, Aarts H, Ferguson MJ (2005) Automatic goal inferences. J Exp Soc Psychol 41(2):129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    He HA, Greenberg S, Huang E (2010) One size does not fit all: applying the transtheoretical model to energy feedback technology design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 927–936Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Huber MZ, Hilty LM (2015) Gamification and sustainable consumption: overcoming the limitations of persuasive technologies. In: ICT innovations for sustainability. Springer, pp 367–385Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Iyengar SS, Lepper MR (1999) Rethinking the value of choice: a cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol 76(3):349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jankowski P (1995) Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9(3):251–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Keally M, Xing G, Pyles A (2011) Pbn : Towards practical activity recognition using smartphone-based body sensor networksGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kiefer P (2011) Mobile intention recognition. Springer, New York. PhD Thesis, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kiefer P, Schlieder C (2007) Exploring context-sensitivity in spatial intention recognition. In: 30th German conference on artificial intelligence (KI-2007) Workshop on behavior monitoring and interpretation. ISSN 1613-0073, vol 296. CEUR, pp 102–116Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kuipers B, Levitt T (1988) Navigation and mapping in large-scale space. AI Mag 9(2):25–43Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Abduction D. B. Leake. (1995) experience, and goals: A model of everyday abductive explanation. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 7(4):407–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Liao L, Patterson DJ, Fox D, Kautz H (2007) Learning and inferring transportation routines. Artif Intell 171(5–6):311–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Liu G, Maguire G Jr (1996) A class of mobile motion prediction algorithms for wireless mobile computing and communication. Mobile Netw Appl 1(2):113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lovett T, O’Neill E, Irwin J, Pollington D (2010) The calendar as a sensor: analysis and improvement using data fusion with social networks and location. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on ubiquitous computing, Ubicomp ’10. ACM, New York, pp 3–12Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lu EH-C, Lin C-Y, Tseng VS (2011) Trip-mine: an efficient trip planning approach with travel time constraints. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 12th international conference on mobile data management, MDM ’11, vol 1. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 152–161Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Manzoni V, Maniloff D, Kloeckl K (2010) Transportation mode identification and real-time co 2 emission estimation using smartphones, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Miller HJ (2013) Beyond sharing: cultivating cooperative transportation systems through geographic information science. J Transp Geogr 31:296–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Miller WR, Rollnick S (2002) Motivational interviewing: helping people change. Guilford pressGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Nicholson S (2012) A user-centered theoretical framework for meaningful gamification. In: Games+ Learning+ Society 8Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Parkka J, Ermes M, Korpipaa P, Mantyjarvi J, Peltola J, Korhonen I (2006) Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors. Trans Info Tech Biomed 10(1):119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Patterson DJ, Liao L, Fox D, Kautz H (2003) Inferring high-level behavior from low-level sensors, pp 73–89Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Powers WT (1973) Behavior: the control of perception. Hawthorne, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Prochaska JO, Velicer WF (1997) The transtheoretical change model of health behavior. Am J Health Promot 12:38–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Raper J, Gartner G, Karimi H, Rizos C (2007) Applications of location-based services: a selected review. J Locat Based Serv 1(2):89–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Raper J, Gartner G, Karimi H, Rizos C (2007) A critical evaluation of location based services and their potential. J Locat Based Serv 1(1):5–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Raubal M (2011) Cogito ergo mobilis sum: the impact of location-based services on our mobile lives. SAGE Publications Ltd, pp 159–175Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Raubal M (2011) Cogito ergo mobilis sum: the impact of location-based services on our mobile lives. SAGE Publications Ltd, pp 159–175Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Riboni D, Bettini C (2010) Cosar: hybrid reasoning for context-aware activity recognition. Pers Ubiquit Comput 15(3):271–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Russell S, Norvig P (1995) Artificial intelligence: a modern approachGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ryan R, Deci E (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol 25:54–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55(1):68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Scekic O, Truong H-L, Dustdar S (2013) Incentives and rewarding in social computing. Commun ACM 56(6):72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Scheider S, Kiefer P, Weiser P, Raubal M, Sailer C (2015) Score design for meaningful gamification. In: Proceedings of gamifying research: strategies, opportunities, challenges and ethics (CHI Workshop)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Schmidt M, Weiser P (2012) Web mapping services: development and trends. In: Online maps with APIs and WebServices. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 13–21Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci 18 (5):429–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Seamon D (1980) Body-subject, time-space routines and place-ballets. In: Buttimer A, Seamon D (eds) The human experience of space and place. Croom Helm, London, pp 148–165Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Shin D, Aliaga D, Tunċer B, Arisona SM, Kim S, Zünd D, Schmitt G (2014) Urban sensing: using smartphones for transportation mode classification. Comput Environ Urban SystGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Solomon S (2007) Climate change 2007-the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC, vol 4. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Stenneth L, Wolfson O, Yu PS, Xu B, Morgan S (2011) Transportation mode detection using mobile phones and gis informationGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Stevens S On the theory of measurement. Science 103:677–680Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Tengland P-A (2012) Behavior change or empowerment: on the ethics of health-promotion strategies. Public Health Ethics 5(2):140–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Tomai E, Spanaki M, Prastacos P, Kavouras M (2005) Ontology assisted decision making–a case study in trip planning for tourism. In: On the move to meaningful internet systems 2005: OTM 2005 workshops. Springer, pp 1137–1146Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Tulusan J, Staake T, Fleisch E (2012) Providing eco-driving feedback to corporate car drivers: what impact does a smartphone application have on their fuel efficiency?. In: Proceedings of UbiComp ’12, pp 212–215Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn Psychol 5(2):207–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Vandenbergh MP, Barkenbus J, Gilligan JM (2008) Individual carbon emissions: the low-hanging fruit. UCLA Law Rev 55:8–36Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Vansteenwegen P, Souffriau W, Berghe GV, Oudheusden DV (2011) The city trip planner: an expert system for tourists. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):6540–6546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Weiser P, Bucher D, Cellina F, De Luca V (2015) A taxonomy of motivational affordances for meaningful gamified and persuasive technologies. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on ICT for sustainability (ICT4S). Atlantic Press, pp 271–280Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Weiser P, Scheider S (2014) A civilized cyberspace for geoprivacy. In: 1st workshop on privacy in geographic information collection and analysis. ACMGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Winter S, Sester M, Wolfson O, Geers G (2011) Towards a computational transportation science. J Spatial Inf Sci 2:119–126Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Yan Z, Subbaraju V, Chakraborty D, Misra A, Aberer A (2012) Energy-efficient continuous activity recognition on mobile phones: an activity-adaptive approach. In: 2012 16th international symposium on wearable computers, pp 17–24Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Yuan Y, Raubal M (2012) Extracting dynamic urban mobility patterns from mobile phone data. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference GIScience 2012, volume 7478 of the series lecture notes in computer science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Columbus. See link to article here: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-33024-7_26%23
  93. 93.
    Yuan Y, Raubal M, Liu Y (2012) Correlating mobile phone usage and travel behavior–a case study of Harbin, China. Comput Environ Urban Syst 36(2):118–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Yun R, Scupelli P, Aziz A, Loftness V (2013) Sustainability in the workplace: 9 intervention techniques for behavior change. In: Persuasive technology. Springer, pp 253–265Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Zanna MP, Olson JM, Fazio RH (1980) Attitude–behavior consistency: an individual difference perspective. J Pers Soc Psychol 38(3):432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Zhang P (2008) Technical opinion motivational affordances: reasons for ict design and use. Commun ACM 51(11):145–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Weiser
    • 1
  • Simon Scheider
    • 1
  • Dominik Bucher
    • 1
  • Peter Kiefer
    • 1
  • Martin Raubal
    • 1
  1. 1.ETH ZürichInstitute of Cartography and GeoinformationZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations