Skip to main content
Log in

Studying the Impact of Continuous and Multiple Earthquake Ground Motions on Pore Pressure in Saturated Sandy Deposits

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The occurrence of a series of earthquakes of different magnitudes or multiple mainshocks has been reported recently. This leads to the liquefaction of sand due to excess pore pressure generation under undrained loading conditions, which alters the stable structure of the soil to an unstable form. The response of saturated sandy deposits under these conditions is rarely experimented by researchers and the present study highlights this issue. Here six shake table test results are analyzed to understand the initiation of liquefaction in the sand at varying base accelerations (0.15 g, 0.2 g and 0.3 g) at continuous and series of identical shaking events. Multiple shaking events were provided to simulate earthquakes at closely spaced time intervals. The surface settlements and response of excess pore water pressure at various depths within a saturated sand bed due to these shaking events are investigated. The results showed that the soil layer near the surface of the soil is most likely to be liquefied. Also, the re-liquefaction resistance of the sand remains constant for the first few shakings, but the dissipation time of excess pore water pressure decreases with increasing density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya P, Sharma K, Acharya IP, Adhikari R (2023) Seismic liquefaction potential of fluvio-lacustrine deposit in the Kathmandu valley Nepal. Geotech Geol Eng 41:1977–1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02387-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhila M, Rangaswamy K, Sankar N (2019) Liquefaction susceptibility of central Kerala. SN Appl Sci 1:583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali MZ, Hussain M (2024) Impact of particle characteristics on the static liquefaction of Jhelum riverbed sand. Geotech Geol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02733-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecemis N (2013) Simulation of seismic liquefaction: 1-g model testing system and shaking table tests. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 17:899–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2013.833140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha I-S, Olson SM, Seo M-W, Kim M-M (2011a) Evaluation of reliquefaction resistance using shaking table tests. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:682–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS: 2720 part 14, (1983). Determination of Density Index (relative density-) of cohesionless soils. New Delhi Bur Indian Stand

  • IS: 2720 part 4, (1985). Grain size distribution of soil. New Delhi Bur Indian Stand

  • Kaiser A, Holden C, Beavan J, Beetham D, Benites R, Celentano A, Collett D, Cousins J, Cubrinovski M, Dellow G, Denys P, (2012) The Mw 6.2 Christchurch earthquake of February 2011: preliminary report. New Zealand journal of geology and geophysics 55(1):67–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2011.641182

  • Kartha GU, Beena KS, Thahir CPM (2019) Shake table studies on embankments on liquefiable soil. Soil dynamics and earthquake geotechnical engineering. Springer, Singapore, pp 101–109

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mesri G, Feng TW, Benak JM (1990) Postdensification penetration resistance of clean sands. J Geotech Eng 116:1095–1115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:7(1095)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepal DB, Deng J, Chen J, Maakoe T (2020) Re-liquefaction of Sand in shaking table. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 758:012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/758/1/012050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norio O, Ye T, Kajitani Y, Shi P, Tatano H. (2011) The 2011 eastern Japan great earthquake disaster: Overview and comments. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 2:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-011-0004-9

  • Padmanabhan G, Shanmugam GK (2022) Reliquefaction assessment studies on saturated sand deposits under repeated acceleration loading using 1-g shaking table experiments. J Earthq Eng 26:2888–2910. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1778588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitilakis D, Dietz M, Wood DM et al (2008) Numerical simulation of dynamic soil–structure interaction in shaking table testing. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28:453–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran CP, John B, Sreekumari K, Rajendran K (2009) Reassessing the earthquake hazard in Kerala based on the historical and current seismicity. J Geol Soc India 73:785–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-009-0063-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razzaghi MS, Ghafory-Ashtiany M (2012) A preliminary reconnaissance report on August 11th, 2012, Varzaghan-Ahar twin earthquakes in NW of Iran. Rep Int …

  • Sassa S, Takagawa T (2019) Liquefied gravity flow-induced tsunami: first evidence and comparison from the 2018 Indonesia Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami disasters. Landslides 16:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1114-x

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma Wagle K, Joshi Y, Ghimire U (2024) Soil characterization and liquefaction potential mapping in Nepal’s Terai region. Geotech Geol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-024-02745-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki T, Toki S (1984) Effects of preshearing on liquefaction characteristics of saturated sand subjected to cyclic loading. Soils Found 24:16–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Ling X, Xu P et al (2010) Shake table test of soil-pile groups-bridge structure interaction in liquefiable ground. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 9:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CA, Dar AR, Crewe AJ (1995) Shaking table modelling of seismic geotechnical problems. In: Proceedings of the 10th European conference on earthquake engineers. pp 441–446

  • Tsuchida H (1970) Prediction and countermeasure against the liquefaction in sand deposits In Abstract of the seminar in the Port and Harbor Research Institute. 31–3331

  • Ulak N (2015) Nepal’s earthquake-2015: Its impact on various sectors. The Gaze: Journal of Tourism and Hospitality 7:58–86.

  • Unni KG, Beena KS, Mahesh C (2018) Development of 1-D shake table testing facility for liquefaction studies. J Inst Eng Ser A 99:423–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varghese RM, Latha GM (2014) Shaking table tests to investigate the influence of various factors on the liquefaction resistance of sands. Nat Hazards 73:1337–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakamatsu K, (2012) Recurrent liquefaction induced by the 2011 great east Japan earthquake. J Japan Assoc Earthq Eng 12:69–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Yang J, Onyejekwe S (2013) Effect of previous cyclic shearing on liquefaction resistance of Mississippi River Valley silt. J Mater Civ Eng 25:1415–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaghmaei-Sabegh S, Ruiz-García J (2016) Nonlinear response analysis of SDOF systems subjected to doublet earthquake ground motions: a case study on 2012 Varzaghan–Ahar events. Eng Struct 110:281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada S, Takamori T, Sato K (2010) Effects on reliquefaction resistance produced by changes in anisotropy during liquefaction. Soils Found 50:9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda S, Tohno I (1988) Sites of reliquefaction caused by the 1983 Nihonkai-Chubu earthquake. Soils Found 28:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye B, Ye G, Zhang F, Yashima A (2007) Experiment and numerical simulation of repeated liquefaction-consolidation of sand. Soils Found 47:547–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye B, Hu H (2018) Investigation on the reliquefaction behaviors of sand using shaking table tests. Proceedings of GeoShanghai international conference. Advances in soil dynamics and foundation engineering. Springer Singapore 300 307

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Kerala State Council for Science, Technology and Environment (KSCSTE) for the financial support offered for the research project entitled “Liquefaction Studies on sand deposits in Kerala”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Methodology: CBB and BKS; formal analysis and investigation: BKS and VJ, writing—original draft preparation: VJ; writing—review and editing: VJ and BKS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veena Jayakrishnan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Data Availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jayakrishnan, V., Beena, K.S. & Blayil, C.B. Studying the Impact of Continuous and Multiple Earthquake Ground Motions on Pore Pressure in Saturated Sandy Deposits. Geotech Geol Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-024-02816-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-024-02816-2

Keywords

Navigation