Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of Particle Characteristics on the Static Liquefaction of Jhelum Riverbed Sand

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The undrained shearing behavior of the Jhelum Riverbed sands and the effect of fines content on their overall response and their static liquefaction potential are still elusive. In this context, the present study aims to understand the undrained shearing response and static liquefaction potential of Jhelum riverbed sands through a series of isotropically consolidated undrained compression (CIUC) triaxial tests. The effect of sand type and fines content were established through CIUC triaxial tests conducted on clean sands obtained from three different locations (Khanabal, Rajbagh, and Sopore) along the Jhelum River and sand-silt mixtures. Results showed that volumetric compressibility (mv) decreased by 67, 65, and 46% as the relative density increased from 15 to 50% for KS, RS, and SS sands, respectively. Compared to clean sands, an increase of 23 and 15% in mv was observed with the addition of 7 and 14% non-plastic fines, respectively. An increase in the undrained shearing resistance by factors of 2.12, 3.08, and 1.98 for KS, RS, and SS, respectively, is observed as the relative density increases from 15 to 50%. An increase in undrained strength by 79.2% is observed when the initial effective confining pressure (\(p^{{\prime }}_{i}\)) is increased from 50 to 150 kPa. It was also observed that Jhelum sands follow normal behavior of increasing contractile tendency as \(p^{{\prime }}_{i}\) increased from 50 to 150 kPa. Specimens with larger mean grain diameter (D50) and lower coefficient of uniformity (CU) values exhibited higher undrained strength as well as higher liquefaction resistance. Higher roundness and sphericity values facilitate a higher generation of excess pore water pressure, resulting in higher liquefaction potential. With the addition of non-plastic fines, the Sopore Sand-silt mixture exhibited higher liquefaction potential, more strain-softening behavior, and higher excess pore pressure, resulting in 83 and 51% reduction in \(p^{{\prime }}_{i}\) at 7 and 14% fines content, respectively. A unique critical state line in \(q - p^{{\prime }}\) space is observed for sand silt mixtures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are included in the manuscript.

Abbreviations

CIUC:

Isotropically consolidated undrained monotonic triaxial compression

KS:

Khanabal sand

RS:

Rajbagh sand

SS:

Sopore sand

SF:

Sopore fines

FC:

Fines content

\(p^{{\prime }}\) :

Mean effective confining pressure

\(p^{{\prime }}_{i}\) :

Initial mean effective confining pressure

q :

Deviatoric stress

Δu :

Excess pore water pressure

r u :

Excess pore water pressure ratio

TSP:

Total stress path

CSL:

Critical state line

M :

Critical stress ratio or slope of CSL

I B :

Undrained brittleness index

C P :

Collapse potential

m v :

Volumetric compressibility

D 50 SS/D 50 SF :

Mean grain diameter ratio of sand

PGA :

Peak ground acceleration

GSD:

Grain size distribution

G s :

Specific gravity

LL :

Liquid limit

PL :

Plastic limit

PI :

Plasticity index

ρ max :

Maximum density

ρ max :

Minimum density

e g :

Intergranular void ratio

e ge :

Equivalent intergranular void ratio

M w :

Moment magnitude.

ϕ peak :

Peak friction angle

ϕ CS :

Critical state friction angle

References

  • Ahmad B, Bhat MI, Bali BS (2009) Historical record of earthquakes in the Kashmir Valley. Himal Geol 30(1):75–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Amini F, Qi GZ (2000) Liquefaction testing of stratified silty sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(3):208–217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:3(208)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D1140-17 (2017) Standard test methods for determining the amount of material finer than 75-μm (no. 200) sieve in soils by washing. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM D3080/D3080M-11 (2011) Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM D4253-16 (2016) Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM D4318-17e1 (2017) Standard test method liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM D4767-11, (2011) Standard test method for consolidated undrained triaxial compression test for cohesive soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM D6913/D6913M-17 (2017) Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of soils using sieve analysis. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM D7928-17 (2017) Standard test method for particle size distribution (gradation) of fine-grained soils using the sedimentation (hydrometer) analysis. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM D854-14 (2014) Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • Bandini P, Sathiskumar S (2009) Effects of silt content and void ratio on the saturated hydraulic conductivity and compressibility of sand-silt mixtures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(12):1976–1980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Been K, Jefferies MG (1985) A state parameter for sands. Géotechnique 35(2):99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benahmed N, Nguyen TK, Hicher PY, Nicolas M (2015) An experimental investigation into the effects of low plastic fines content on the behavior of sand/silt mixtures. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 19(1):109–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2014.939304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat GM, Pandita SK, Singh Y, Sharma V, Singh S, Bhat GR (2005) October 8 Kashmir Earthquake: Impact on Geoenvironment and Structures in the Karnah and Uri Tehsils of Kashmir (India). Post Graduate Department of Geology, University of Jammu

  • Bopp PA, Lade PV (2005) Relative density effects on undrained sand behavior at high pressures. Soils Found 45(1):15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckovalas GD, Andrianopoulos KI, Papadimitriou AG (2003) A critical state interpretation for the cyclic liquefaction resistance of silty sands. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23(2):115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro G (1969) Liquefaction of sands. Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard Soil Mech

  • Chavan D, Sitharam TG, Anbazhagan P (2022) Liquefaction resistance and cyclic response of air injected-desaturated sandy soil. Geotech Geol Eng 40(4):1851–1872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dar JA, Dubey RK (2015) Probabilistic seismic hazard analyses (PSHA) and liquefaction susceptibility evaluation of Kashmir Valley, India. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect A 85:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germaine JT, Germaine AV (2009) Geotechnical laboratory measurements for engineers. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ghadr S, Assadi-Langroudi A (2019) Effect of grain size and shape on undrained behavior of sands. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 5(3):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-019-0170-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobbi S, Reiffsteck P, Lenti L, d’Avila MPS, Semblat JF (2022) Liquefaction triggering in silty sands: effects of non-plastic fines and mixture-packing conditions. Acta Geotech 17(2):391–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01262-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudarzy M, Sarkar D, Lieske W, Wichtmann T (2022) Influence of plastic fines content on the liquefaction susceptibility of sands: monotonic loading. Acta Geotech 17(5):1719–1737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01283-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo P, Su X (2007) shear strength, interparticle locking, and dilatancy of granular materials. Can Geotech J 44(5):579–591. https://doi.org/10.1139/t07-010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanumantharao C, Ramana GV (2011) Effect of non-plastic fines on liquefaction resistance and pore pressure behavior of fine sand. Int J Geotech Earthq Eng (IJGEE) 2(2):57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain M, Sachan A (2019) Volume compressibility and pore pressure response of Kutch soils with varying plastic and non-plastic fines. Geotechnics for transportation infrastructure: recent developments, upcoming technologies and new concepts, vol 2. Springer, Singapore, pp 651–665

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Igwe O (2018) The combined effect of particle size distribution and relative density on the large strain behavior of sandy soils. Geotech Geol Eng 36(2):1037–1048

    Google Scholar 

  • Igwe O, Fukuoka H, Sassa K (2012) The effect of relative density and confining stress on shear properties of sands with varying grading. Geotech Geol Eng 30:1207–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K (1993) Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Géotechnique 43(3):351–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayangondaperumal R, Thakur VC, Suresh N (2008) Liquefaction features of the 2005 Muzaffarabad-Kashmir earthquake and evidence of paleo-earthquakes near Jammu, Kashmir Himalaya. Curr Sci 95:1071–1077

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang M, Yang ZX, Barreto D, Xie YH (2018) The influence of particle-size distribution on critical state behavior of spherical and non-spherical particle assemblies. Granul Matter 20:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keramatikerman M, Chegenizadeh A (2017) Effect of particle shape on monotonic liquefaction: natural and crushed sand. Exp Mech 57(8):1341–1348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-017-0313-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keramatikerman M, Chegenizadeh A, Nikraz H, Sabbar AS (2018) Effect of flyash on liquefaction behavior of sand-bentonite mixture. Soils Found 58(5):1288–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan RA, Shah MY (2016) Earthquake induced liquefaction features in the Karewas of Kashmir valley North-West Himalayas, India: implication to paleo-seismicity. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 90:101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koerner RM (1970) Effect of particle characteristics on soil strength. J Soil Mech Found Div 96:1221–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koester JP (1994) The influence of fine type and contents on cyclic resistance. In: Ground failures under seismic conditions. Geotechnical Special Publication. ASCE, pp 17–33

  • Kokusho T, Hara T, Hiraoka R (2004) Undrained shear strength of granular soils with different particle gradations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130:621–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL (1985) Liquefaction of sands due to non-seismic loading. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley

  • Kramer SL, Seed HB (1988) Initiation of soil liquefaction under static loading conditions. J Geotech Eng 114(4):412–430. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:4(412)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuerbis RH (1989) The effect of gradation and fines content on the undrained loading response of sand. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia

  • Ladd RS (1974) Specimen preparation and liquefaction of sands. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 100(GT10):1180–1184. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lade PV, Yamamuro JA, Liggio CD Jr (2009) Effects of fines content on void ratio, compressibility, and static liquefaction of silty sand. Goemech Eng Int J 1(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lade PV, Yamamuro JA (1997) Effects of non-plastic fines on static liquefaction of sands. Can Geotech J 34(6):918–928. https://doi.org/10.1139/t97-05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakkimsetti B, Latha GM (2023) Role of grain size and shape on undrained monotonic shear, liquefaction, and post-liquefaction behavior of granular ensembles. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 173:108086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lentini V, Castelli F (2019) Liquefaction resistance of sandy soils from undrained cyclic triaxial tests. Geotech Geol Eng 37(1):201–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J (2020) Influence of fines contents on soil liquefaction resistance in cyclic triaxial test. Geotech Geol Eng 38(5):4735–4751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoudi Y, Taiba AC, Belkhatir M, Schanz T (2016a) Experimental investigation on undrained shear behavior of overconsolidated sand-silt mixtures: effect of sample reconstitution. Geotech Test J 39(3):515–523. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20140183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoudi Y, Taiba AC, Belkhatir M, Arab A, Schanz T (2016b) Laboratory study on undrained shear behavior of overconsolidated sand-silt mixtures: effect of the fines content and stress state. Int J Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2016.1252140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monkul MM (2013) Influence of gradation on shear strength and volume change behavior of silty sands. Goemech Eng Int J 5(5):401–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monkul MM, Etminan E, Şenol A (2016) Influence of coefficient of uniformity and base sand gradation on static liquefaction of loose sands with silt. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 89:185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monkul MM, Yamamuro JA (2011) Influence of silt size and content on liquefaction behavior of sands. Can Geotech J 48(6):931–942. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousa A (2016) The “gray zone”: fabric and consistency of natural transitional soils. Arab J Geosci 9:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousa A, Youssef TA (2021) Genesis of transitional behavior in geomaterials: a review and gap analysis. Geomech Geoeng 16(4):298–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulou AI, Tika TM (2008) The effect of fines on critical state and liquefaction resistance characteristics of non-plastic silty sands. Soils Found 48(5):713–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitman TD, Robertson PK, Sego DC (1994) Influence of fines on the collapse of loose sands. Can Geotech J 31(5):728–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polito CP, Martin JR II (2001) Effects of non-plastic fines on the liquefaction resistance of sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(5):408–415. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:5(408)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers MC (1953) A new roundness scale for sedimentary particles. J Sediment Res 23(2):117–119. https://doi.org/10.1306/D4269567-2B26-11D7-8648000102C1865D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghunandan M, Juneja A, Hsiung B (2012) Preparation of reconstituted sand samples in the laboratory. Int J Geotech Eng 6(1):125–131. https://doi.org/10.3328/IJGE.2012.06.01.125-131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Lo SR, Gnanendran CT (2008) On equivalent granular void ratio and steady state behavior of loose sand with fines. Can Geotech J 45(10):1439–1456. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai DC, Murty CVR (2006) Effects of the 2005 Muzaffarabad (Kashmir) earthquake on built environment. Curr Sci 90(8):1066–1070

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousé PC, Fannin RJ, Shuttle DA (2008) Influence of roundness on the void ratio and strength of uniform sand. Géotechnique 58(3):227–231. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.58.3.227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rui S, Guo Z, Si T, Li Y (2020) Effect of particle shape on the liquefaction resistance of calcareous sands. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 137:106302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbar AS, Chegenizadeh A, Nikraz H (2017) Static liquefaction of very loose sand–slag–bentonite mixtures. Soils Found 57(3):341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo RN, Reddy DV, Sukhija BS (2007) Evidence of Liquefaction near Baramulla (Jammu and Kashmir, India) due to the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake. Curr Sci 92(3):293–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Sana H, Nath SK (2016) Liquefaction potential analysis of the Kashmir valley Alluvium, NW Himalaya. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 85:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM, Arango I (1983) Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. J Geotech Eng 109(3):458–482. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:3(458)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah RA, Achyuthan H, Lone AM, Ramanibai R (2017) Diatoms, spatial distribution and physicochemical characteristics of the Wular lake sediments, Kashmir Valley, Jammu and Kashmir. J Geol Soc India 90:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitharam TG, Dash HK (2008) Effect of non-plastic fines on cyclic behavior of sandy soils. In: Geocongress 2008: geosustainability and geohazard mitigation, pp 319–326

  • Taiebat M, Mutabaruka P, Pellenq R, Radjai F (2017) Effect of particle size distribution on 3D packings of spherical particles. In: EPJ web of conferences, vol 140. EDP Sciences, p 02030

  • Thevanayagam S (1998) Effect of fines and confining stress on undrained shear strength of silty sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(6):479–491. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:6(479)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thevanayagam S (2000) Liquefaction potential and undrained fragility of silty soils. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference earthquake engineering. New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering, Wellington

  • Thevanayagam S, Ravishankar K, Mohan S (1997) Effects of fines on monotonic undrained shear strength of sandy soils. Geotech Test J 20(4):394–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsomokos A, Georgiannou VN (2010) Effect of grain shape and angularity on the undrained response of fine sands. Can Geotech J 47(5):539–551. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uthayakumar M, Vaid Y (1998) Static liquefaction of sands under multiaxial loading. Can Geotech J 35(2):273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaid YP, Sivathayalan S (2000) Fundamental factors affecting liquefaction susceptibility of sands. Can Geotech J 37(3):592–606. https://doi.org/10.1139/t00-040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo R, Ishihara K (1996) The steady state of sandy soils. Soils Found 36(2):81–91. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.2_81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voivret C, Radjai F, Delenne JY, El Youssoufi MS (2009) Multiscale force networks in highly polydisperse granular media. Phys Rev Lett 102(17):178001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadell H (1932) Volume, shape, and roundness of rock particles. J Geol 40(5):443–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood FM, Yamamuro JA, Lade PV (2008) Effect of depositional method on the undrained response of silty sand. Can Geotech J 45(11):1525–1537. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamuro JA, Abrantes AE, Lade PV (2011) Effect of strain rate on the stress-strain behavior of sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(12):1169–1178. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamuro JA, Lade PV (1993) Effects of strain rate on instability of granular soils. Geotech Test J 16:304–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamuro JA, Lade PV (1997) Static liquefaction of very loose sands. Can Geotech J 34(6):905–917. https://doi.org/10.1139/t97-057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamuro JA, Wood FM, Lade PV (2008) Effect of depositional method on the microstructure of silty sand. Can Geotech J 45(11):1538–1555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Luo XD (2015) Exploring the relationship between critical state and particle shape for granular materials. J Mech Phys Solids 84:196–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Luo XD (2018) The critical state friction angle of granular materials: does it depend on grading? Acta Geotech 13:535–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeats RS (1992) The Himalayan frontal fault system. In: Annales tectonicae, vol 6, pp 85–98

  • Yoshimine M, Ishihara K (1998) Flow potential of sand during liquefaction. Soils Found 38(3):189–198. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.3_189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimine M, Robertson PK, Wride CE (1999) Undrained shear strength of clean sands to trigger flow liquefaction. Can Geotech J 36(5):891–906. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Hryciw RD (2015) Traditional soil particle sphericity, roundness, and surface roughness by computational geometry. Géotechnique 65(6):494–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zlatovic S, Ishihara K (1997) Normalized behavior of very loose non-plastic soils: Effects of fabric. Soils Found 37(4):47–56. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.37.4_47

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express gratitude towards the authorities of National Institute of Technology Srinagar for helping us in the execution of this work at the institute. The authors are thankful to the Civil Engineering Department of the institute for providing laboratory facilities for carrying out this study. The financial support from MHRD, Govt. of India to the authors Mr. Mir Zeeshan Ali is acknowledged.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology Srinagar, Srinagar, J&K, India

    Mir Zeeshan Ali & Majid Hussain

Authors
  1. Mir Zeeshan Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Majid Hussain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by ZA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ZA and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Hussain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, M.Z., Hussain, M. Impact of Particle Characteristics on the Static Liquefaction of Jhelum Riverbed Sand. Geotech Geol Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02733-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02733-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation