Skip to main content
Log in

Laboratory Study of the Behavior of Geogrid-Reinforced Strip Foundations with Inclined Loading

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inclined loading reduces the bearing capacity of the foundation. Planar reinforcements, like geogrids, can compensate for the inclined loading’s reduced bearing capacity. The current study designed and developed a system capable of loading at an angle of up to 20°. Loading tests were conducted on a strip foundation with dimensions of 650 × 100 mm and a thickness of 30 mm using this system. The test box has a plan dimension of 670 × 1180 mm and a height of 700 mm. The effect of loading type, vertical reinforcement distance from the soil surface, reinforcement width, the number of reinforcement layers, and load inclination on the bearing capacity was investigated. The tests were conducted in reinforced and unreinforced environments. The results indicate that the maximum bearing capacity is obtained when the first reinforcing layer is 0.3 times the width of the loading plate away from the soil surface. By increasing the width of the reinforcement, the bearing capacity of the foundation increased, and the foundation failed in a further settlement. The inclined loading tests used five different angles of 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20°. The results indicated that the bearing capacity decreases as the load inclination increases. At greater angles, the reduction in bearing capacity is greater. By increasing the number of soil reinforcement layers, the bearing capacity of the soil is increased at all load inclinations. Finally, new relationships for estimating the load inclination coefficient were presented to determine the bearing capacity of strip foundations with reinforced soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

B:

Width of the loading plate

b:

Width of the reinforcement layer

Df :

Depth of the foundation

df :

Depth of the lowest reinforcement layer

e:

Eccentricity of the load

h:

The distance between the reinforcing layers

N:

Number of reinforcing layers

u:

The distance of the first reinforcing layer to the soil surface

α:

Inclination of the load on the foundation concerning the vertical

θ:

Rotation of the foundation

λγ i :

Load inclination coefficient in the bearing capacity equation

φ:

Friction angle of soil

References

  • Abbas J (2018) Behavior of a strip footing on reinforced soil subjected to inclined load. In: MATEC web of conferences 162:01022

  • Abu-Farsakh MY, Gu J, Voyiadjis G, Tao M (2007) Numerical parametric study of strip footing on reinforced embankment soils. Transp Res Board 2004:132–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Farsakh M Y, Chen Q, Yoon S (2008) Use of Reinforced Soil Foundation (RSF) to Support Shallow Foundation. Final Report. Louisiana Transportation Research Center (LTRC), Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD), Baton Rouge, LA, Report No. FHWA/LA.07/423

  • Behera RN, Patra C (2018) Ultimate bearing capacity prediction of eccentrically inclined loaded strip footings. Geotech Geol Eng 36(5):3029–3080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Abu-Farsakh MY, Sharma R, Zhang X (2007) Laboratory investigation of behavior of foundations on geosynthetic-reinforced clayey soil. Transp Res Board 2004:28–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das BM, Shin EC, Omar MT (1994) The bearing capacity of surface strip foundation on geogrid reinforced sand and clay a comparative study. Geotech Geol Eng 12(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash SK, Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K (2001) Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 19:235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash SK, Reddy PD, Raghukanth STG (2008) Subgrade modulus of geocell-reinforced sand foundations. Gr Improv 161(2):79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debnath L, Ghosh S (2020) Seismic bearing capacity of strip footing resting on reinforced layered soil using chaotic particle swarm optimization technique. Geotech Geol Eng 38:5489–5509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guido VA, Chang DK, Sweeney MA (1986) Comparison of geogrid and geotextile reinforced earth slabs. Can Geotech J 23:435–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Mital A (2021) Model studies of bearing capacity of rectangular foundation subjected to eccentric and inclined loads. Innov Infrastruct Solut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00380-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajiani Boushehrian J, Hataf N (2003) Experimental and numerical investigation of the bearing capacity of model circular and ring footings on reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 21:241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan SA, Al-Soud MS, Mohammed SA (2018) Behavior of pyramidal shell foundation on reinforced sandy soil. Geotech Geol Eng 22(5):147–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang CC, Tatsuoka F (1990) Bearing capacity of reinforced horizontal sandy ground. Geotext Geomembr 9:51–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imani M, Fahimifar A (2021) Effect of load inclination on the bearing capacity of jointed rock foundations. Geotech Geol Eng 39:3033–3045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KM, Manjunath VR (2000) Experimental and numerical studies of geosynthetics-reinforced sand slopes loaded with a footing. Can Geotech J 37:828–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrjardi GT, Khazaei M (2017) Scale effect on the behaviour of geogrid-reinforced soil under repeated loads. Geotext Geomembr 45:603–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motlagh AT, Ghanbari A, Maedeh PA, Wu W (2018) A new analytical approach to estimate the seismic tensile force of geosynthetic reinforcement respect to the uniform surcharge of slopes. Earthq Struct 15:687–699

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghavendra HB (2004) Effect of properties and length of reinforcement on the load-carrying capacity of reinforced soil beds. Gr Improv 8(3):121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raheem AM, Abdulkarem MA (2016) Experimental testing and analytical modeling of strip footing in reinforced sandy soil with multi-geogrid layers under different loading conditions. Am J Civ Eng 4(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy SD, Puroshothama P (1992) Model footing of geogrid reinforced clay. In: Proceedings of the Indian geotechnical conference on geotechnique today 1:183–186

  • Sahu R, Patra CR, Das BM, Sivakugan N (2016) Bearing capacity of shallow strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand subjected to inclined load. Int J Geotech Eng 10(2):183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu R, Patra CR, Sivakugan N, Das BM (2020) Behavior of inclined loaded strip footings resting on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotech Geol Eng 38:5245–5256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakti JP, Das BM (1987) Model tests for strip foundation on clay reinforced with geotextile layers. Transp Res Rec 1153:40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma V, Kumar A (2018) Behavior of ring footing resting on reinforced sand subjected to eccentric-inclined loading. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 10:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin EC, Das BM, Puri VK, Yen SC, Cook EE (1993) Bearing capacity of strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced clay. Geotech Test J 16(4):534–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sireesh S, Sitharam TG, Dash SK (2009) Bearing capacity of circular footing on geocell-sand mattress overlying clay bed with a void. Geotext Geomembr 27(2):89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabaei Aghda ST, Ghanbari A, Tavakoli Mehrjardi G (2019) Evaluating the applicability of geocell-reinforced dredged sand using plate and wheel load testing. Transp Infrastruct Geotech 6:21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yetimoglu T, Wu JTH, Saglamer A (1994) Bearing capacity of rectangular footing on geogrid-reinforced sand. J Geotech Eng 120(12):2083–2099

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the workreported in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Shokri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassani, M., Shokri, M. & Ghanbari, A. Laboratory Study of the Behavior of Geogrid-Reinforced Strip Foundations with Inclined Loading. Geotech Geol Eng 41, 3335–3347 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02458-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02458-w

Keywords

Navigation