Abstract
Inclined loading reduces the bearing capacity of the foundation. Planar reinforcements, like geogrids, can compensate for the inclined loading’s reduced bearing capacity. The current study designed and developed a system capable of loading at an angle of up to 20°. Loading tests were conducted on a strip foundation with dimensions of 650 × 100 mm and a thickness of 30 mm using this system. The test box has a plan dimension of 670 × 1180 mm and a height of 700 mm. The effect of loading type, vertical reinforcement distance from the soil surface, reinforcement width, the number of reinforcement layers, and load inclination on the bearing capacity was investigated. The tests were conducted in reinforced and unreinforced environments. The results indicate that the maximum bearing capacity is obtained when the first reinforcing layer is 0.3 times the width of the loading plate away from the soil surface. By increasing the width of the reinforcement, the bearing capacity of the foundation increased, and the foundation failed in a further settlement. The inclined loading tests used five different angles of 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20°. The results indicated that the bearing capacity decreases as the load inclination increases. At greater angles, the reduction in bearing capacity is greater. By increasing the number of soil reinforcement layers, the bearing capacity of the soil is increased at all load inclinations. Finally, new relationships for estimating the load inclination coefficient were presented to determine the bearing capacity of strip foundations with reinforced soil.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- B:
-
Width of the loading plate
- b:
-
Width of the reinforcement layer
- Df :
-
Depth of the foundation
- df :
-
Depth of the lowest reinforcement layer
- e:
-
Eccentricity of the load
- h:
-
The distance between the reinforcing layers
- N:
-
Number of reinforcing layers
- u:
-
The distance of the first reinforcing layer to the soil surface
- α:
-
Inclination of the load on the foundation concerning the vertical
- θ:
-
Rotation of the foundation
- λγ i :
-
Load inclination coefficient in the bearing capacity equation
- φ:
-
Friction angle of soil
References
Abbas J (2018) Behavior of a strip footing on reinforced soil subjected to inclined load. In: MATEC web of conferences 162:01022
Abu-Farsakh MY, Gu J, Voyiadjis G, Tao M (2007) Numerical parametric study of strip footing on reinforced embankment soils. Transp Res Board 2004:132–140
Abu-Farsakh M Y, Chen Q, Yoon S (2008) Use of Reinforced Soil Foundation (RSF) to Support Shallow Foundation. Final Report. Louisiana Transportation Research Center (LTRC), Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD), Baton Rouge, LA, Report No. FHWA/LA.07/423
Behera RN, Patra C (2018) Ultimate bearing capacity prediction of eccentrically inclined loaded strip footings. Geotech Geol Eng 36(5):3029–3080
Chen Q, Abu-Farsakh MY, Sharma R, Zhang X (2007) Laboratory investigation of behavior of foundations on geosynthetic-reinforced clayey soil. Transp Res Board 2004:28–38
Das BM, Shin EC, Omar MT (1994) The bearing capacity of surface strip foundation on geogrid reinforced sand and clay a comparative study. Geotech Geol Eng 12(1):1–14
Dash SK, Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K (2001) Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 19:235–256
Dash SK, Reddy PD, Raghukanth STG (2008) Subgrade modulus of geocell-reinforced sand foundations. Gr Improv 161(2):79–87
Debnath L, Ghosh S (2020) Seismic bearing capacity of strip footing resting on reinforced layered soil using chaotic particle swarm optimization technique. Geotech Geol Eng 38:5489–5509
Guido VA, Chang DK, Sweeney MA (1986) Comparison of geogrid and geotextile reinforced earth slabs. Can Geotech J 23:435–440
Gupta S, Mital A (2021) Model studies of bearing capacity of rectangular foundation subjected to eccentric and inclined loads. Innov Infrastruct Solut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00380-1
Hajiani Boushehrian J, Hataf N (2003) Experimental and numerical investigation of the bearing capacity of model circular and ring footings on reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 21:241–256
Hassan SA, Al-Soud MS, Mohammed SA (2018) Behavior of pyramidal shell foundation on reinforced sandy soil. Geotech Geol Eng 22(5):147–158
Huang CC, Tatsuoka F (1990) Bearing capacity of reinforced horizontal sandy ground. Geotext Geomembr 9:51–82
Imani M, Fahimifar A (2021) Effect of load inclination on the bearing capacity of jointed rock foundations. Geotech Geol Eng 39:3033–3045
Lee KM, Manjunath VR (2000) Experimental and numerical studies of geosynthetics-reinforced sand slopes loaded with a footing. Can Geotech J 37:828–842
Mehrjardi GT, Khazaei M (2017) Scale effect on the behaviour of geogrid-reinforced soil under repeated loads. Geotext Geomembr 45:603–615
Motlagh AT, Ghanbari A, Maedeh PA, Wu W (2018) A new analytical approach to estimate the seismic tensile force of geosynthetic reinforcement respect to the uniform surcharge of slopes. Earthq Struct 15:687–699
Raghavendra HB (2004) Effect of properties and length of reinforcement on the load-carrying capacity of reinforced soil beds. Gr Improv 8(3):121–126
Raheem AM, Abdulkarem MA (2016) Experimental testing and analytical modeling of strip footing in reinforced sandy soil with multi-geogrid layers under different loading conditions. Am J Civ Eng 4(1):1–11
Ramaswamy SD, Puroshothama P (1992) Model footing of geogrid reinforced clay. In: Proceedings of the Indian geotechnical conference on geotechnique today 1:183–186
Sahu R, Patra CR, Das BM, Sivakugan N (2016) Bearing capacity of shallow strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand subjected to inclined load. Int J Geotech Eng 10(2):183–189
Sahu R, Patra CR, Sivakugan N, Das BM (2020) Behavior of inclined loaded strip footings resting on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotech Geol Eng 38:5245–5256
Sakti JP, Das BM (1987) Model tests for strip foundation on clay reinforced with geotextile layers. Transp Res Rec 1153:40–45
Sharma V, Kumar A (2018) Behavior of ring footing resting on reinforced sand subjected to eccentric-inclined loading. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 10:347–357
Shin EC, Das BM, Puri VK, Yen SC, Cook EE (1993) Bearing capacity of strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced clay. Geotech Test J 16(4):534–541
Sireesh S, Sitharam TG, Dash SK (2009) Bearing capacity of circular footing on geocell-sand mattress overlying clay bed with a void. Geotext Geomembr 27(2):89–98
Tabatabaei Aghda ST, Ghanbari A, Tavakoli Mehrjardi G (2019) Evaluating the applicability of geocell-reinforced dredged sand using plate and wheel load testing. Transp Infrastruct Geotech 6:21–38
Yetimoglu T, Wu JTH, Saglamer A (1994) Bearing capacity of rectangular footing on geogrid-reinforced sand. J Geotech Eng 120(12):2083–2099
Funding
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the workreported in this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hassani, M., Shokri, M. & Ghanbari, A. Laboratory Study of the Behavior of Geogrid-Reinforced Strip Foundations with Inclined Loading. Geotech Geol Eng 41, 3335–3347 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02458-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02458-w