Abstract
Residual friction angles of clay soils are commonly determined by laboratory tests, which are time-consuming and costly. It is more desirable to find practical means of estimating the residual strength of soils. Previous researchers attempted to correlate the soil residual strength with clay fraction or Atterberg limits using empirical equations. A large amount of laboratory data demonstrate that the magnitude of residual strength decreases with the increase in the clay content. However, the physical mechanisms of such correlation are not well interpreted. In addition, the decreasing trend has never been modeled with a unique empirical or semi-empirical equation because of the variety of influencing factors such as the clay mineralogy and the applied normal stress. In this study, a new approach is proposed to estimate the residual friction angles of land-sliding soils. The residual friction angle of soils is derived as a weighted average result of the friction angles of nonclay minerals and clay matrix. A structural state coefficient is used as the weight function, and the plasticity index is used to consider the difference in clay mineralogy. The percolation theory is used to physically explain and illustrate the structural state transitional behavior of soils with different clay fractions. The results demonstrate that the semi-empirical approach can be used for predicting residual friction angles of a wide range of soils that differ in geology, soil type, mineralogical properties, and shear strength. The effects of applied normal stress, pore fluid salinity, and particle size on the estimations are also discussed.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10706-023-02436-2/MediaObjects/10706_2023_2436_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10706-023-02436-2/MediaObjects/10706_2023_2436_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10706-023-02436-2/MediaObjects/10706_2023_2436_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10706-023-02436-2/MediaObjects/10706_2023_2436_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10706-023-02436-2/MediaObjects/10706_2023_2436_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10706-023-02436-2/MediaObjects/10706_2023_2436_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10706-023-02436-2/MediaObjects/10706_2023_2436_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10706-023-02436-2/MediaObjects/10706_2023_2436_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10706-023-02436-2/MediaObjects/10706_2023_2436_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10706-023-02436-2/MediaObjects/10706_2023_2436_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10706-023-02436-2/MediaObjects/10706_2023_2436_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10706-023-02436-2/MediaObjects/10706_2023_2436_Fig12_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.
References
Abbey SJ, Eyo EU, Ng’ambi S, (2020) Swell and microstructural characteristics of high-plasticity clay blended with cement. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79:2119–2130
An M, Zhang F, Elsworth D, Xu Z, Chen Z, Zhang L (2020) Friction of longmaxi shale gouges and implications for seismicity during hydraulic fracturing. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB019885
Belokas G (2015) Correlating the residual strength to index properties. In: Geotechnical engineering for infrastructure and development, conference proceedings, p 3105–3110. https://doi.org/10.1680/ecsmge.60678.vol6.484
Bishop AW (1971) Shear strength parameters for undisturbed and remolded soil specimens. In: Proceedings of the roscoe memorial symposium, Cambridge, Mass, p 3–58
Bjerrum L (1954) Geotechnical properties of Norwegian marine clays. Géotechnique 4(2):49–69. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1954.4.2.49
Cancelli A (1977) Residual shear strength and stability analysis of a landslide in fissured over consolidated clays. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 16:193–197
Chen XP, Liu D (2014) Residual strength of slip zone soils. Landslides 11(2):305–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0451-z
Collotta T, Cantoni R, Pavesi U, Ruberl E, Moretti PC (1989) A correlation between residual friction angle, gradation and the index properties of cohesive soils. Géotechnique 39(2):343–346
Crawford BR, Faulkner DR, Rutter EH (2008) Strength, porosity, and permeability development during hydrostatic and shear loading of synthetic quartz-clay fault gouge. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 113(B3):B03207. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004634
Daigle H, Reece JS, Flemings PB (2019) Evolution of the percolation threshold in muds and mudrocks during burial. Geophys Res Lett 46:8064–8073. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083723
Egashira K, Ohtsubo M (1982) Smectite in marine quick-clays of Japan. Clays Clay Miner 30(4):275–280. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1982.0300404
Eid HT, Rabie KH, Wijewickreme D (2016) Drained residual shear strength at effective normal stresses relevant to soil slope stability analyses. Eng Geol 204:94–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.02.003
Gibo S, Egashira K, Hayashi Y (1992) Measurement of residual strength of slip surface soil with a ring shear apparatus and its relation to physical and mineralogical properties of the soils. J Japan Agric Eng Soc 159:57–63
Horn HM, Deere DU (1962) Frictional characteristics of minerals. Geotechnique 12(4):319–335. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1962.12.4.319
Kalteziotis N (1993) The residual shear strength of some Hellenic clayey soils. Geotech Geol Eng 11(2):125–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00423339
Kaya A (2009) Residual and fully softened strength evaluation of soils using artificial neural networks. Geotech Geol Eng 27:281–288
Li B, Wong RCK (2016) Quantifying structural states of soft mudrocks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121(5):3324–3347. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012454
Li B, Wong RCK (2017a) Modeling anisotropic static elastic properties of soft mudrocks with different clay fractions. Geophysics 82(1):MR27–MR37. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0575.1
Li B, Wong RCK (2017b) A mechanistic model for anisotropic thermal strain behavior of soft mudrocks. Eng Geol 228:146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.08.008
Locat J, St-Gelais D (2014) Nature of sensitive clays from Quebec. In: Lheureux JS, Locat A, Leroueil S, Demers D, Locat J (eds) Sensitive clays: from geoscience to risk management. Springer, Dordrecht Netherlands, pp 25–37
Lupini JF, Skinner AE, Vaughan PR (1981) The drained residual strength of cohesive soils. Geotechnique 31(2):181–213
Maio CD, Fenellif GB (1994) Residual strength of kaolin and bentonite: the influence of their constituent pore fluid. Géotechnique 44(2):217–226. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1994.44.2.217
Malthe-Sorenssen A (2015) Percolation and disordered systems - a numerical approach. Springer, Norway, pp 4–10
Mesri G, Cepeda-Diaz AF (1986) Residual shear strength of clays and shales. Geotechnique 36(2):269–274
Moore R (1991) The chemical and mineralogical controls upon the residual strength of pure and natural clays. Geotechnique 41(1):35–47
Nakamura S, Gibo S, Egashira K, Kimura S (2010) Platy layer silicate minerals for controlling residual strength in landslide soils of different origins and geology. Geology 38(8):743–746. https://doi.org/10.1130/G30908.1
Ren S, Zhang Y, Xu N, Wu R, Liu X, Du G (2021) Mobilized strength of gravelly sliding zone soil in reactivated landslide: a case study of a giant landslide in the north-eastern margin of Tibet Plateau. Environ Earth Sci 80:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09638-y
Rosenqvist ITH (1953) Considerations on the sensitivity of Norwegian quick-clays. Géotechnique 3(5):195–200. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1953.3.5.195
Salimi SN, Yazdanjou V, Hamidi A (2008) Shape and size effects of gravel grains on the shear behavior of sandy soils. Landslides and engineered slopes. From the past to the future. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 469–474
Skempton AW (1985) Residual strength of clays in landslides, folded strata and the laboratory. Géotechnique 35(1):3–18
Stark TD, Eid HT (1994) Drained residual strength of cohesive soils. J Geotech Eng 120(5):856–871
Stark TD, Hussain M (2010) Shear strength in preexisting landslides. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(7):957–962
Stark TD, Hussain M (2013) Empirical correlations: drained shear strength for slope stability analyses. J Geotech Geoenvironm Eng 139(6):853–862
Suzuki M, Tsuzuki S, Yamamoto T (2007) Residual strength characteristics of naturally and artificially cemented clays in reversal direct box shear test. Soils Found 47(6):1029–1044
Tembe S, Lockner DA, Wong TF (2010) Effect of clay content and mineralogy on frictional sliding behavior of simulated gouges: Binary and ternary mixtures of quartz, illite, and montmorillonite. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 115(B3):B03416. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jb006383
Tiwari B, Marui H (2001) Shearing behaviour of landslide sliding surface and main scarp soil during drained ring shear test. In: Proceeding 15th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, p 295–298
Tiwari B, Marui H (2003) Estimation of residual shear strength for Bentonite-Kaolin-Toyoura sand mixture. J Japan Landslide Soc 40(2):124–133
Tiwari B, Marui H (2004) Objective oriented multi-stage ring shear test for the shear strength of landslide soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 1302:217–222
Tiwari B, Marui H (2005) A new method for the correlation of residual shear strength of the soil with mineralogical composition. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(9):1139–1150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:9(1139)
Townsend BF, Gilbert PA (1973) Tests to measure residual strengths of some clay shales. Géotechnique 23(2):267–271
Tsiambaos G (1991) Correlation of mineralogy and index properties with residual strength of Iraklion marls. Eng Geol 30:357–369
Tsifoutidis G (1993) Intrinsic properties of Hellenic Marls. Durham University, Durham
Voight B (1973) Correlation between atterberg plasticity limits and residual shear strength of natural soils. Géotechnique 23(2):265–267
Wang L, Han J, Liu S, Yin X (2020) Variation in shearing rate effect on residual strength of slip zone soils due to test conditions. Geotech Geol Eng 38:2773–2785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01186-9
Wen BP, Aydin A, Duzgoren-Aydin NS, Li YR, Chen HY, Xiao SD (2007) Residual strength of slip zones of large land slides in the three Gorges area, China. Eng Geol 93(3):82–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.05.006
Wesley LD (2003) Residual strength of clays and correlations using atterberg limits. Géotechnique 53(7):669–672. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.7.669
Yin H (1992) Acoustic velocity and attenuation of rocks: isotropy, intrinsic anisotropy, and stress induced anisotropy. Dissertation, Department of geophysics. Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Zhang Y, Guo C, Lan H, Zhou N, Yao X (2015) Reactivation mechanism of ancient giant landslides in the tectonically active zone: a case study in Southwest China. Environ Earth Sci 74:1719–1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4180-6
Zhang F, An M, Zhang L, Fang Y, Elsworth D (2020) Effect of mineralogy on friction-dilation relationships for simulated faults: Implications for permeability evolution in caprock faults. Geosci Front 11:439–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2019.05.014
Funding
This work was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant Canada (NO. RGPIN-2017–05169).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BL contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection and analysis were performed by SA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by BL and SA. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript. We certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Akhtar, S., Li, B. A Structural State Model Interpreting the Residual Strength Transition Behavior of Clay Soils. Geotech Geol Eng 41, 2913–2922 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02436-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02436-2