Skip to main content
Log in

An Improved Method for Predicting Horizontal Principal Stress: A Case Involving a P Gas Field in Northeastern Sichuan

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In situ stress is an important parameter in the context of petroleum exploration and development. Triaxial mechanical experiments, acoustic emission analyses, and logging interpretation were performed on sandstone, mudstone, and carbonate rocks obtained from northeast Sichuan. Subsequently, the radial deformation characteristics caused by vertical stress were examined. Furthermore, a new in situ stress prediction model was derived based on the experimental results. The experimental results demonstrate that the assumption of the radial strain constraint based on uniaxial strain theory is inconsistent with actual rock deformation, as vertical stress will produce radial strain. Additionally, geo-temperature can also affect Poisson's ratio and Young's modulus of rock, thus resulting in the production of a temperature stress component that cannot be ignored. The newly derived in situ stress prediction model consisted of a skeleton stress component, a tectonic stress component, a pore stress component, and a temperature stress component. Compared to the acoustic emission test results, the prediction error of the new model is less than 8%, thus confirming that the new model conforms to actual geological characteristics, meets the needs of oilfield production, and possesses a certain reliability and scientific meaning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

Abbreviations

P:

Puguang

CAL:

Calliper log

G:

Shear modulus

E:

Young’s modulus

K:

Bulk modulus

α :

Biot coefficient

References

  • Anderson (1973) Determining fracture pressure gradient from well logs. JPT 32:417–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen YF, Su PD, Qin QR (2009) Study on the tectonic factoring of Luojiazhai Structure in Northeast Sichuan basin. J Southwest Pet Univ (sci Technol Ed) 31:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng DJ, Sun BD, Cheng ZG (2014) Current situation and prospect of in-situ stress evaluation based on logging data. Well Logging Technol 38:379–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge HK, Lin YS, Wang SC (1998) In-situ stresses determination technique and its applications in petroleum exploration and development. J Univ Pet China 22:94–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna K, Lin MX, Kibok M (2017) Integrated in situ stress estimation by hydraulic fracturing, borehole observations and numerical analysis at the EXP-1 borehole in Pohang, Korea. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:3141–3155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hikweon L, See HO (2018) Estimation of in situ stresses with hydro-fracturing tests and a statistical method. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51:779–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossein A, Stephan M (2017) Uncertainties in the estimation of in situ stresses: effects of heterogeneity and thermal perturbation. Geomech Geophys Geo-Energy 3:415–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu M, Deng SQ, Chen R (2008) Study on tectonic stress field and its relationship with oil and gas migration in northeast Sichuan Area. Spec Oil Gas Reserv 15:14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang RZ (1981) Initiation and propagation of cracks under hydraulic pressure. Pet Explor Dev 5:62–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang YL, Li MY, Wang LJ (2020) Characteristics and controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoir fractures of the Xujiahe Formation in the Bazhong-Tongnanba area, Northeast Sichuan. Acta Geol Sin 94:1525–1537

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong LY, Chen ZH, Zhen YS (2019) Prediction method and application of formation pressure in block 4 of central Junggar Basin. Henan Sci 37:248–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Li CL, Kong XY (2000) Theoretical study of rock fracture pressure calculation formula in the process of oil well fracturing. Pet Drill Prod Technol 22:54–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Sun YT, Chen J (2011) Logging interpretation method of Feixianguan and Changxing Formations in P gas field. Fault-Block Oil Gas Field 18:508–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Li JW (2018) Calculation of pore pressure and formation stress state based on conventional logging data. China Earth Science Union Academic Annual Conference

  • Liu KX, Lan K, Xiong YM (2011) Logging calculation of in-situ stress in Marine carbonate reservoir in P area. Oil Drill Prod Technol 33:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Chen ZP, Yang L (2019) Application of prediction method of formation pore pressure in deep layers of northern Song Liao Basin. Logging Eng 30:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma YS (1997) The role and significance of crustal stress in petroleum geology and its present situation. J Geomech 3:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma YS (2014) Characteristics and formation mechanism of reef-shoal reservoirs in Changxing Formation-Feixianguan Formations, Yuanba Gas Field. Acta Petrolei Sin 35:1001–1011

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma JH, Sun JM (2002) Calculation of formation stress with logging data. Well Logging Technol 26:347–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews K (1987) How to predict formation pressure and fracture gradient. Oil Gas J 65:92–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad HT, Samira H, Mahdi M (2015) In situ stress measurements of two hydropower projects in Iran by hydraulic fracturing method. Arab J Geosci 8:7073–7085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaevskiy, VN, Economides, M J (2000) The near-state of stress and induced rock damage. The Society of Petroleum Engineers International Symposium on Formation Damage Control 1–10

  • Serdyukov SV, Kurlenya MV, Patutin AV (2016) Hydraulic fracturing for in situ stress measurement. J Min Sci 52:1031–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong CG (1992) Tectonic Evolution of Sichuan Basin, Geological. Publishing House. Beijing, pp 180–201

  • Wang P (1992) A geomechanical technique-types and distribution of geostress under various tectonic forces. Acta Petrolei Sin 13:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia MJ, Zeng DG, Deng RJ (2009) Sedimentary facies and reservoir characteristics of platform marginal reef and shoal of Changxing Formation in P Gas field. Nat Gas Geosci 20:550–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie G (2005) A new method to calculate the maximum and minimum horizontal stress profile using logging data. Well Logging Technol 29:82–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang CH, Chen Q, Zhou W (2002) Characteristics of present in-situ stress field of Penglai Zhen Formation in Luodai Gas Field. Nat Gas Ind 22:106–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasuo Y, Song SR, Wang CY (2008) In-situ stress at the northern portion of the Chelungpu fault, Taiwan, estimated on boring cores recovered from a 2-km-deep hole of TCDP. Earth Planets Space 60:809–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin XY, Ma N, Ma ZQ (2018) Review of in-situ stress prediction technology. Geophys Prospect Pet 57:488–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ML, Mu LW, Lin JH (2016) Comprehensive calculation method of formation principal stress and its application in prediction of casing damage. Prog Geophys 31:1281–1288

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ML, Dong CL, Li JH (2017) The application of geostress layering technology in fracture design optimization. J Geomech 23:467–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao YQ (2009) A method of analyzing crustal stress orientation using imaging logging. Pet Drill Technol 37:39–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Q, Kang YK (2007) The method of calculating reservoir stress with well measuring data and its application in Anpeng oil-bearing block. Pet Geol Eng 21:36–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Yang FL (2015) The logging calculation and calibration methods for crustal stress. Sci Technol Eng 15:43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Zhang L, Wang GW (2005) A new method of in-situ stress analysis in piedmont compression tectonic area based on logging information. Chin J Geol 40:284–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoback M, Barton C, Brudy M (2003) Determination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wells. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:1049–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the use of actual data and the helpful suggestions from my cooperating team. We thank my colleagues for data collection and discussion of the structure of the paper.

Funding

Funding was provided by the National Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 2019ZX06008-003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinxin Fang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fang, X., Feng, H. An Improved Method for Predicting Horizontal Principal Stress: A Case Involving a P Gas Field in Northeastern Sichuan. Geotech Geol Eng 41, 1137–1154 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02327-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02327-y

Keywords

Navigation