Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Back-Calculation of the Shear Strength Parameters of Subgrade Soil Based on Lightweight Deflectometer Test Using 3D Numerical Modeling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The undisturbed sampling from natural carbonate gravel-bearing subgrade soil for shear strength tests is a challenging process, or in-situ tests are costly and require time. In addition, mechanical properties of soils, provided through laboratory testing are not commonly in good harmony with the in-situ characteristics of the same soil. For these reasons, back-calculation of the in-situ shear strength parameters and Poisson’s ratio of a 2 m thick subgrade soil was addressed in this study. In this context, a total of nine lightweight deflectometer tests (LWDTs) were performed. Back analyses were performed considering the in-situ measured settlement under the plate with the aid of 3D numerical models based on elastic theory. The dynamic deformation moduli derived from LWDT were used as input for the numerical models. The soil physical properties were obtained from laboratory tests. The subgrade soil was characterized by the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion. Initially, a site-specific Poisson’s ratio was back-calculated. Afterward, the finite element models were operated for trial sets of internal friction angle and cohesion values until the amount of settlement from iterative numerical solution converges to the one derived from the LWDT. Hence, the test results were simulated with 0.001 mm precision. Additionally, settlement under the plate was calculated empirically considering the elastic, half-space medium. The empirical settlement values were well correlated with the test results. As a result of this study, it is recommended to investigate correlations between the LWDT results and physical properties to accurately evaluate the performance of numerical simulation models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Adam C, Adam D (2003) Modeling of the dynamic load plate test with the light falling weight device. Asian J Civ Eng (Build Housing) 2(4):73–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam C, Adam D, Kopf F, Paulmich I (2009) Computational validation of static and dynamic plate load testing. Acta Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-008-0081-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adam D, Adam C, Kopf F (2004) The dynamic load plate test with the light falling weight device: Experimental and numerical investigations. In: Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (11th ICSDEE), Berkeley, University of California, p 649–654

  • Ahmed AT, Khalid HA (2011) Back calculation models to evaluate light falling weight deflectometer moduli of road foundation layer made with bottom ash waste. Transp Res Rec. https://doi.org/10.3141/2227-07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen T (2021) Geotechnical design manual. https://wsdot.wa.gov/engineering-standards/all-manuals-and-standards/manuals/geotechnical-design-manual. Accessed 23 November 2021

  • Alshibli KA, Abu-Farsakh M, Seyman E (2005) Laboratory evaluation of the geogauge and light failing weight deflectometer as construction control tools. J Mater Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:5(560)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asli C, Feng ZQ, Porcher G, Rincent JJ (2012) Back-calculation of elastic modulus of soil and subgrade from portable falling weight deflectometer measurements. Eng Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D2487–17e1 (2017) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  • ASTM D4254–16 (2016) Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  • ASTM D6913/D6913M-17 (2017) Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of soils using sieve analysis. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  • ASTM E2583–07 (2015) standard test method for measuring deflections with a light weight deflectometer (LWD). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  • Brandl H, Adam D, Kopf F, Niederbrucker R (2003) The dynamic load plate test with the light falling weight device (in German). Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie Straßenforschung, Wien, 528

  • Day RA, Hight DW, Potts DM (2001) Coupled pore pressure and stability analysis of embankment dam construction. In: Khalili N (ed) Valliappan S. Computational mechanics-new frontiers for the new millennium, Elsevier, pp 339–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji R, Siddiki N, Nantung T, Kim D (2014) Evaluation of resilient modulus of subgrade and base materials in Indiana and its implementation in MEPDG. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/372838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya O (1981) Miocene reference section for the coastal parts of West Anatolia. Newsl Stratigr 10:164–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JR, Kang HB, Kim D, Park DS, Kim WJ (2007) Evaluation of in situ modulus of compacted subgrades using portable falling weight deflectometer and plate-bearing load test. J Mater Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:6(492)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klvač R, Vrána P, Jiroušek R (2010) Possibilities of using the portable falling weight deflectometer to measure the bearing capacity and compaction of forest soils. J For Sci. https://doi.org/10.17221/71/2009-JFS

  • Koloski JW, Schwarz SD, Tubbs DW (1989) Geotechnical properties of geologic materials. Washington Div Geol Earth Res Bull 78:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopf F, Adam D, Paulmichl I (2005) Investigation of the dynamic plate load test with light-weight deflectometer using the boundary element method. https://insitutek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Investigation_of_ZFG_2000_using_Boundary_Element_Method.pdf. Accessed 23 November 2021

  • Mashinsky EI (2003) Differences between static and dynamic elastic moduli of rocks: physical causes. Geol Geofiz 44(9):953–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller PK, Rinehart RV, Mooney MA (2007) Measurement of soil stress and strain using in-ground instrumentation. In: Proceedings of the ASCE Geoinstitute GeoDenver Conference, Denver, p 10

  • Müller C (2003) The light falling weight device. A new and innovative compaction testing method. Theory and practice. Dissertation, Vienna University of Technology

  • Nazzal MD, Murad YA, Khalid A, Mohammad L (2007) Evaluating the light falling weight deflectometer device for in situ measurement of elastic modulus of pavement layers. Trans Res Rec. https://doi.org/10.3141/2016-02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh JH, Fernando EG, Lee SI, Holzschuher C (2012) Correlation of asphalt concrete layer moduli determined from laboratory and nondestructive field tests. J Transp Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulmichl I, Kopf F, Adam C (2005) Numerical simulation of the dynamic load plate test with the light falling weight device by means of the boundary element method. In: Soize C, Schueller GI (eds) Structural dynamics—EURODYN2005, Proceedings of 6th European conference on structural dynamics, Milpress, Rotterdam, p 1285–1290

  • Pospisil K, Zednik P, Stryk J (2014) Relationship between deformation moduli obtained using light falling weight deflectometer and static plate test on various types of soil. Balt J Road Bridge Eng. https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2014.31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulos HG, Davis EH (1974) Elastic solutions for soil and rock mechanics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Road and Transport Research Association, Working Group for Foundation and Soils (2003) Dynamic plate-load testing with the aid of the light drop-weight tester, technical test code for soil and rock mechanics in road construction. Report No TP BF-StB Part B8.3, Cologne, Germany

  • Rocscience (2012) Settle3 Version 2.016

  • Rocscience (2021) RS3 v.4.020

  • Roksana K, Nowrin T, Hossain S (2019) A Detailed Overview of Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD). In: Proceedings of International Conference on Planning, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh

  • Schleicher F (1926) Zur theorie des Baugrundes. Bauingenieur 48:931–935

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebaaly BE, Mamlouk MS, Davies TG (1986) Dynamic Analysis of Falling Weight Deflectometer Data. In: Transportation Research Record 1070, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, p 63–68

  • Shaban AM (2016) Evaluation of unbound pavement layers moduli using the miniaturized pressuremeter test. Dissertation, Florida Institute of Technology

  • Tawfik MM, El-Mossallamy YM (2017) Application of the finite element method for investigating the dynamic plate loading test. Ain Shams Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompai Z (2008) Conversion between static and dynamic load bearing capacity moduli and introduction of dynamic target values. Per Pol Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.3311/pp.ci.2008-2.06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vardoulakis I (2001) Behavior of granular materials. In: Lemaitre J (ed) Handbook of materials behavior models, vol III. Academic Press, pp 1093–1106

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Winterkorn HF, Fang HF (1975) Foundation engineering handbook. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 148–166

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Emre Haznedaroğlu from Özaltın Construction for putting his time and effort into the lightweight deflectometer tests.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geological Engineering, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 48000, Muğla, Turkey

    Tümay Kadakci Koca

Authors
  1. Tümay Kadakci Koca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tümay Kadakci Koca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author has no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kadakci Koca, T. Back-Calculation of the Shear Strength Parameters of Subgrade Soil Based on Lightweight Deflectometer Test Using 3D Numerical Modeling. Geotech Geol Eng 41, 393–404 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02290-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02290-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation