Abstract
The knowledge of the continuous evolution of soil hydraulic characteristics is required for several environmental geotechnical applications such as capillary barrier systems and river bank slope stability analysis. Such data are obtained in the field by embedding suction sensors in slopes for stability analysis. The hydraulic equilibrium time and other limitations of sensors in establishing the hydraulic characteristics are not available for the compacted soils. Thus the influence of initial soil moisture content, initial wetting condition of the suction sensor, and soil compaction density on the hydraulic equilibrium time of the tensiometer was studied on riverbank sand. A laboratory method considering the equilibrium data at each saturation/drying state was proposed for establishing the equilibrium-SWCC data. The hydraulic equilibrium time of the tensiometer for the studied soil was found to vary from a few hours to several days depending upon the magnitude of suction and state of the sensor. The conventional method for estimating the instantaneous SWCC severely overestimated the suction values at a given water content. The sensor response time was found to be the single most influencing factor in the estimation of soil hydraulic characteristics. The in-situ tensiometer application should be replaced with the moisture sensor readings combined with the lab-based proposed equilibrium SWCC approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Some or all data used are available from the corresponding author by request.
References
Agus SS, Schanz T (2005) Comparison of four methods for measuring total suction. Vadose Zone J 4(4):1087–1095. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2004.0133
ASTM D422–63 (2007). Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0422-63R07.
ASTM D6838–02 (2008) Standard test methods for the soil-water characteristic curve for desorption using hanging column, pressure extractor, chilled mirror hygrometer, or centrifuge. ASTM International, West Conshohocken. http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?D6836-16
ASTM D854 (2014) Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM International, West Conshohocken. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0854-14
Bharat TV, Gapak Y (2018) Hydration kinetics of bentonite buffer material: Influence of vapor pressure, bentonite plasticity, and compaction density. Appl Clay Sci 157:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2018.02.029
Bharat TV, Gapak Y (2021) Soil-water characteristic curves of bentonites in isochoric conditions during wetting: measurement and prediction. Can Geotech J 58(5):711–721. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0818
BIS (1970). Classification and identification of soils for general engineering purposes. IS 1498, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
BIS (1983). Determination of density index (relative density) of cohesionless soil. IS 2720 Part 14. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
Buckingham E (1907) Studies on the movement of soil moisture. US Dept Agic Bur Soils Bull 38.
Chetia M, Sekharan S (2016) Evaluation of different laboratory procedures for determining suction–water content relationship of cohesionless geomaterials. J Mater Civ Eng 28(2):04015123. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001399
Cui YJ, Tang AM, Mantho AT, De Laure E (2008) Monitoring field soil suction using a miniature tensiometer. Geotech Test J 31(1):95–100. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ100769
Dapporto S, Rinaldi M, Casagli N, Vannocci P (2003) Mechanisms of riverbank failure along the Arno river, Central Italy. Earth Surf Process Landf J Br Geomorphol Res Group 28(12):1303–1323. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.550
Das P, Bharat TV (2020) Reconstruction of a wetting-induced shallow landslide in Shillong, India. Proc Inst Civil Eng Forensic Eng 173(2):48–53
Deka A, Sreedeep S (2015) Evaluation of measurement methodologies used for establishing water retention characteristic curve of fly ash. J Test Eval 43(5):1066–1077. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20130091
Delage P, Howat MD, Cui YJ (1998) The relationship between suction and swelling properties in a heavily compacted unsaturated clay. Eng Geol 50(1–2):31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(97)00083-5
Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H, Fredlund MD (2012) Unsaturated soil mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, New York
Gapak Y, Tadikonda VB (2018) Hysteretic water-retention behavior of bentonites. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 22(3):04018008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000398
Gapak Y, Das G, Yerramshetty U, Bharat TV (2017) Laboratory determination of volumetric shrinkage behavior of bentonites: a critical appraisal. Appl Clay Sci 135:554–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.10.038
Gottardi G, Gragnano CG, Ranalli M, Tonni L (2020) Reliability analysis of riverbank stability accounting for the intrinsic variability of unsaturated soil parameters. Struct Saf 86:101973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101973
Hooke JM (1979) An analysis of the processes of river bank erosion. J Hydrol 42(1–2):39–62
Hou X, Vanapalli SK, Li T (2020) Water flow in unsaturated soils subjected to multiple infiltration events. Can Geotech J 57(3):366–376. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0566
Karagoly Y, Tripathy S, Cleall PJ, Mahdi T (2018) Suction measurements by a fixed-matrix porous ceramic disc sensor. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Unsaturated Soils, Hong Kong
Kodikara J, Jayasundara C, Zhou AN (2020) A generalised constitutive model for unsaturated compacted soils considering wetting/drying cycles and environmentally-stabilised line. Comput Geotech 118:103332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103332
Leong EC, Tripathy S, Rahardjo H (2003) Total suction measurement of unsaturated soils with a device using the chilled-mirror dew-point technique. Geotechnique 53(2):173–182. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.2.173
Li AG, Tham LG, Yue ZQ, Lee CF, Law KT (2005) Comparison of field and laboratory soil–water characteristic curves. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(9):1176–1180. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:9(1176)
Li Y, Satyanaga A, Rahardjo H (2021) Characteristics of unsaturated soil slope covered with capillary barrier system and deep-rooted grass under different rainfall patterns. Int Soil Water Conserv Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2021.03.004
Lins Y, Schanz T, Fredlund DG (2009) Modified pressure plate apparatus and column testing device for measuring SWCC of sand. Geotech Test J 32(5):450–464. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ101318
Lu N, Likos WJ (2004) Unsaturated soil mechanics. John Wiley, Hoboken
Nam S, Gutierrez M, Diplas P, Petrie J, Wayllace A, Lu N, Muñoz JJ (2010) Comparison of testing techniques and models for establishing the SWCC of riverbank soils. Eng Geol 110(1–2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.09.003
Oliveira OD, Marinho FAM (2008) Suction equilibration time for a high capacity tensiometer. Geotech Test J 31(1):101–105. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ100800
Osman AM, Thorne CR (1988) Riverbank stability analysis. I: theory. J Hydraul Eng 114(2):134–150
Pham HQ, Fredlund DG, Barbour SL (2003) A practical hysteresis model for the soil–water characteristic curve for soils with negligible volume change. Geotechnique 53(2):293–298. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.2.293
Rahardjo H, Santoso VA, Leong EC, Ng YS, Hua CJ (2012) Performance of an instrumented slope covered by a capillary barrier system. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138(4):481–490. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000600
Ranaivomanana H, Das G, Razakamanantsoa A (2022) Modeling of hysteretic behavior of soil–water retention curves using an original pore network model. Transp Porous Med 142(3):559–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-022-01759-7
Rassam DW, Williams DJ (2000) A dynamic method for determining the soil water characteristic curve for coarse-grained soils. Geotech Test J 23(1):67–71. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11124J
Rinaldi M, Casagli N, Dapporto S, Gargini A (2004) Monitoring and modelling of pore water pressure changes and riverbank stability during flow events. Earth Surf Proc Land 29(2):237–254
Singh DN, Kuriyan SJ (2003) Estimation of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity using soil suction measurements obtained by an insertion tensiometer. Can Geotech J 40(2):476–483. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-112
Sobti J, Singh SK (2017) Investigation of hydraulic conductivity and matric suction in sand–bentonite–coal ash mixes. Indian Geotech J 47(4):542–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0282-2
Sun W, Sun DA, Fang L, Liu S (2014) Soil-water characteristics of Gaomiaozi bentonite by vapour equilibrium technique. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6(1):48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2013.12.004
Take WA, Bolton MD (2003) Tensiometer saturation and the reliable measurement of soil suction. Géotechnique 53(2):159–172. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.2.159
Tang AM, Cui YJ (2005) Controlling suction by the vapour equilibrium technique at different temperatures and its application in determining the water retention properties of MX80 clay. Can Geotech J 42(1):287–296. https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-082
Thorne CR, Murphey JB, Little WC (1981) Bank stability and bank material properties in the bluffline streams of northwest Mississippi. In: Appendix D. Report to the US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg District Office, on Stream Channel Stability.
Thorne CR (1992) Bend scour and bank erosion on the meandering Red River, Louisiana. In Lowland floodplain rivers. Geomorphological perspectives pp. 95–115
Topp GC, Davis JL, Annan AP (1980) Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurements in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resour Res 16(3):574–582. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i003p00574
Tripathy S, Tadza MYM, Thomas HR (2014) Soil-water characteristic curves of clays. Can Geotech J 51(8):869–883. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0089
Tripathy S, Al-Khyat S, Cleall PJ, Baille W, Schanz T (2016) Soil suction measurement of unsaturated soils with a sensor using fixed-matrix porous ceramic discs. Indian Geotech J 46(3):252–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-016-0200-z
Van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44(5):892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
Wijaya M, Leong EC (2016) Performance of high-capacity tensiometer in constant water content oedometer test. Int J Geo-Eng 7(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-016-0027-6
Wolman MG (1959) Factors influencing erosion of a cohesive river bank. Am J Sci 257(3):204–216
Yang H, Rahardjo H, Wibawa B, Leong EC (2004) A soil column apparatus for laboratory infiltration study. Geotech Test J 27(4):347–355. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11549
Zhai Q, Rahardjo H (2015) Estimation of permeability function from the soil–water characteristic curve. Eng Geol 199:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.11.001
Funding
The authors received no specific funding for carrying out this research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Patwa, D., Bharat, T.V. Influence of Hydraulic Response Time of Tensiometer in Hydraulic Characteristics Estimation for Riverbank Sand. Geotech Geol Eng 41, 413–427 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02283-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02283-7