Skip to main content
Log in

Tensile Strength of Cement-Treated Champlain Sea Clay

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Champlain Sea clay, a sensitive marine clay, is commonly found along the Saint Lawrence River basin in Eastern Canada. According to recent studies, cement is efficient in treating Champlain Sea clay. However, there is no information available regarding the tensile strength of cement-treated Champlain Sea clay. This paper presents an experimental investigation on its tensile strength using two indirect testing methods: the Brazilian tensile strength (BTS) test and the unconfined penetration (UP) test. The study shows that both the BTS test and the UP test can be easily implemented to study the tensile strength of cement-treated Champlain Sea clay. Compared to the UP test, the BTS test is recommended in future studies for its more consistent test results and more uniform sample failure modes. The tensile strength was correlated with the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of cement-treated Champlain Sea clay. Based on the BTS test results, the tensile strength can be estimated at approximately 7% of its compressive strength for cement-treated Champlain Sea clay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Some of data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Afroz M, Ahmad A, Sangiuliano T, Lesage K, Cavers W, Liu J (2018) Experimental Investigation of Cement Mixing to Improve Champlain Sea Clay: A Case Study. 71st Canadian Geotechnical Conference

  • Akin ID, Likos WJ (2017) Brazilian tensile strength testing of compacted clay. Geotech Test J 40(4):608–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Omar AJA (1983) Tensile strength of lime-stabilized cohesive soil. Master’s Thesis, University of Texas at El Paso, pp 61

  • American Society for Testing and Materials (2016) ASTM D3967, Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Intact Rock Core Specimens. ASTM International

  • American Society for Testing and Materials (2017) ASTM D1633. Standard Test Methods for Compressive Strength of Molded Soil Cement Cylinders, ASTM International

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce MEC, Berg RR, Collin JG, Filz GM, Terashi M, Yang DS (2013) Deep Mixing for Embankment and Foundation Support. FHWA-HRT-13–046, Federal Highway Administration

  • Burn KN, Hamilton JJ (1968) Settlement of an embankment on Leda clay. Can Geotech J 5(1):16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H (1985) Mechanical behavior of treated cohesive soil using cement hardening agent Doctoral Dissertation. National Central University, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Winter D, Rilho AS, Festugato L, dos Santos Teixeira B (2015) A testing procedure for predicting strength in artificially cemented soft soils. Eng Geol 195:327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford CB (1968) Quick clays of eastern Canada. Eng Geol 2(4):239–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden WJ, Mitchell RJ (1970) The mechanics of landslides in Leda clay. Can Geotech J 7(3):285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewane MS, Silvestri V, James M (2020) The use of laboratory indentation testing to characterize Champlain Sea Clay. Geotech Geol Eng 38(6):6365–6383

  • Fang HY, Chen WF (1971) New method for determination of tensile strength of soils. Highway Research Board, 62–68

  • Fang HY, Fernandez F (1981) Determination of tensile strength of soils by unconfined-penetration test. ASTM STP 740:130–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaspar TAV, Jacobsz SW (2020) Brazilian Tensile Strength Test Conducted on Ductile Unsaturated Soil Samples. Geotech Test J 44(3):799–810

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson WR, Kennedy TW (1968) An indirect tensile test for stabilized materials. University of Texas at Austin, Center for Highway Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Karrow PF (1961) The Champlain Sea and its sediments. Soils in Canada: Geol Pedological Eng Stud 97–108

  • Kawasaki T (1981) Deep mixing method using cement hardening agent. Proc. of 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering 721–724

  • Kim TH, Kim TH, Kang GC, Ge L (2012) Factors influencing crack-induced tensile strength of compacted soil. J Mater Civ Eng 24(3):315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitazume M, Terashi M (2013) The Deep Mixing Method, CRC press

  • Koseki J, Tsutsumi Y, Namikawa T, Mihira S, Salas-Monge R, Sano Y, Nakajima S (2008) Shear and tensile properties of cement-treated sands and their application to mitigation of liquefaction-induced damage. Proc. of the 4th International Symposium on Deformational Characteristics of Geomaterials 27–50

  • La Rochelle P, Chagnon JY, Lefebvre G (1970) Regional geology and landslides in the marine clay deposits of eastern Canada. Can Geotech J 7(2):145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law KT, Bozozuk M (1988) Engineering problems in Leda clay. International Conference of Engineering Problems of Regional Soils, Beijing China 775–792

  • Leavell DA, Peters JF (1987) Uniaxial Tensile Test for Soil (No. WES/TR/GL-87–10), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

  • Li HD, Tang CS, Cheng Q, Li SJ, Gong XP, Shi B (2019) Tensile strength of clayey soil and the strain analysis based on image processing techniques. Eng Geol 253:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Cheng Y, Yin ZY, Han D, Meng J (2020) Size effects in a transversely isotropic rock under brazilian tests: laboratory testing. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53(6):2623–2642

  • Li S, Kirstein A, Gurpersaud N, Liu J (2016) Experimental investigation of cement mixing to improve Champlain Sea clay. 69th Canadian Geotechnical Conference

  • Liang Q, Wu X, Li C, Wang L (2014) Mechanical analysis using the unconfined penetration test on the tensile strength of Q3 loess around Lanzhou City, China. Eng Geol 183:324–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Shi C, Afroz M, Kirstein A (2017) Numerical investigation of long-term settlement of Waba dam. Technical Report, Ryerson University, Canada

  • Lo KY, Ho KS (1991) The effects of electroosmotic field treatment on the soil properties of a soft sensitive clay. Can Geotech J 28(6):763–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locat A, Leroueil S, Bernander S, Demers D, Jostad HP, Ouehb L (2011) Progressive failures in eastern Canadian and Scandinavian sensitive clays. Can Geotech J 48(11):1696–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locat J, Bérubé MA, Choquette M (1990) Laboratory investigations on the lime stabilization of sensitive clays: shear strength development. Can Geotech J 27(3):294–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques MES, Leroueil S (2005) Preconsolidating clay deposit by vacuum and heating in cold environment. Ground Improvement – Case Histories, Edited by Buddhima Indraratna & Jian Chu 3: 1045-1063

  • Monsif MY, Liu J, Gurpersaud N (2019) Fundamental mechanism of cement in stabilizing Champlain Sea clay. Proceedings of Geo-St. John’s, 1–8

  • Monsif MY, Liu J, Gurpersaud N (2021a) Microstructural analyses of cement-based binders in stabilizing Champlain Sea clay. Geotech Geol Eng 39(7):4963–4981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01806-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsif MY, Liu J, Gurpersaud N (2021b) Impact of salinity on strength and microstructure of cement-treated Champlain Sea clay. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 39(11):1360–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris PH, Graham J, Williams DJ (1992) Cracking in drying soils. Can Geotech J 29(2):263–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namikawa T, Koseki J (2007) Evaluation of tensile strength of cement-treated sand based on several types of laboratory tests. Soils Found 47(4):657–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman DA, Bennett DG (1990) The effect of specimen size and stress rate for the Brazilian test- A statistical analysis. Rock Mech Rock Eng 23(2):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen B, Takeyama T, Kitazume M (2016) Internal failure of deep mixing columns reinforced by a shallow stabilized soil beneath an embankment. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 2(4):30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-016-0072-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley RM, Gwyn QHJ, White OL, Rowe RK, Haynes JE, Bohdanowicz A (1983) Leda clay from deep boreholes at Hawkesbury, Ontario. Part I: Geology and geotechnique. Can Geotech J 20(2):288–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn PE, Hutchinson DJ, Diederichs MS, Rowe RK (2011) Characteristics of large landslides in sensitive clay in relation to susceptibility, hazard, and risk. Can Geotech J 48(8):1212–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh S, Viswanadham BVS (2015) Numerical simulation of geogrid-reinforced soil barriers subjected to differential settlements. Int J Geomech 15(4):04014062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling RA, Hughes P, Davie CT, Glendinning S (2015) Tensile Behaviour of Unsaturated Compacted Clay Soils – A Direct Assessment Method. Appl Clay Sci 112–113:123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CS, Shi B, Liu C, Gao L, Inyang HI (2011) Experimental investigation of the desiccation cracking behavior of soil layers during drying. J Mater Civ Eng 23(6):873–878. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CS, Pei XJ, Wang DY, Shi B, Li J (2015) Tensile strength of compacted clayey soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001267.

  • Terashi M (1980) Fundamental Properties of Lime and Cement Treated Soils. Report of PHRI 19(1):33–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Terashi M (1997) Theme lecture: Deep mixing method-Brief state of the art. Proc. 14th International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering 4: 2475–2478

  • Thuro K, Plinninger RJ, Zäh S, Schütz S (2001) Scale effects in rock strength properties. Part 1: Unconfined compressive test and Brazilian test. ISRM Regional Symposium, EUROCK 2001:169–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Topolnicki M (2013) In-situ soil mixing. Ground Improvement, 3rd Ed., 329–433

  • Voottipruex P, Suksawat T, Bergado DT, Jamsawang P (2011) Numerical simulations and parametric study of SDCM and DCM piles under full scale axial and lateral loads. Comput Geotech 38(3):318–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Yin J, Zhong Z (2006) Shape effects in the Brazilian tensile strength test and a 3D FEM correction. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(4):623–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would also like to express thanks to Ontario Power Generation (OPG) for the provision of clay samples from Waba Dam near Arnprior, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

This study was made possible with funding from the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Keller through a Collaborative Research and Development Grant for a project named “Deep Mixing to Stabilize Champlain Sea Clay.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinyuan Liu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Yang, K. & Gurpersaud, N. Tensile Strength of Cement-Treated Champlain Sea Clay. Geotech Geol Eng 40, 5467–5480 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02226-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02226-2

Keywords

Navigation