Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

GIS-based Settlement Risk Assessment and its Effect on Surface Structures: A Case Study for the Tabriz Metro—line 1

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ground deformations caused by tunnelling operation may compromise existing infrastructure and structures. Depending on the state of the buildings, and the amount of settlement that will occur, damage to the buildings could be induced. It is therefore a good practice to conduct a settlement risk assessment. The study presented herein provides information about settlement and damage induced due to metro tunnel excavation operations. During the excavation phase of the tunnel within the Tabriz alluvium (sand to fine-grained sediments with considerable pore pressure), the settlements that caused damages to the surface urban facilities and buildings were monitored. The presented study focuses on the effect of surface settlement that are induced due to tunnel excavation and provides risk-ability maps using a Geographic Information System to represent the degree of ground deformations which vary from very high-risk to very low-risk susceptibility zones. The risk class for each building is determined by a combination of the vulnerability of the structure to settlement-induced damage (which isexpressed as the building class) and the actual chance of settlement-induced damage (which is expressed as the damage category). In order to identify possible damage to each building, the settlements should be linked to building deformations and provide risk maps. The risk maps were prepared based on the severity of the building’s vulnerability, subsidence value, and structure durability classes which was implemented by the finite element code provided by the Plaxis software. According to the results, the buildings and structures located along the tunnel excavation route have suffered structural damage due to the severity of the subsidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

Abbreviations

GIS:

Geographic Information System

TBM:

Tunnel boring machine

DEM:

Discrete element method (numerical)

FEM:

Finite element method (numerical)

FDM:

Finite difference method (numerical)

FEM/DEM:

Finite-distinct element method (numerical)

EPB:

Earth-pressure balanced

SPT:

Standard penetration test

ASTM:

American Society for Testing and Materials

FHWA:

Federal Highway Administration

USCS:

Unified soil classification system

VL :

Volume loss

Vs :

Volume of settlement trough

Smax :

Maximum vertical settlement

C1 :

Conicity contraction

C2 :

Relaxation contraction

Ctotal :

Total contraction

Δ:

Differential settlements of two corners of the building

β:

Angular rotation in radians

L:

The length of the building in the desired section

References

  • Azarafza M, Akgün H, Asghari-Kaljahi E (2018) Stochastic geometry model of rock mass fracture network in tunnels. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 51(3):379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baghban Golpasand MR, Do NA, Dias D, Nikudel MR (2018) Effect of the lateral earth pressure coefficient on settlements during mechanized tunneling. Geomech Eng 16(6):643–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzegari G, Uromeihy A, Zhao J (2014) EPB tunneling challenges in bouldery ground: a new experience on the Tabriz metro line 1. Iran Bull Eng Geol Environ 73(2):429–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzegari G, Shayan F, Chakeri H (2018) Investigations on geotechnical aspects for TBM Specification on the Tabriz Metro Line 3. Iran Geotech Geol Eng 36:3639–3663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boscardin MD, Cording EJ (1989) Building response to excavation-induced settlement. J Geotech Eng 115(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Zhu H, Zhang L (2021) Analytical solution for deep circular tunnels in rock with consideration of disturbed zone, 3D strength and large strain. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54(3):1391–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di H, Zhou S, Guo P, He C, Zhang X, Huang S (2020) Observed long-term differential settlement of metro structures built on soft deposits in the Yangtze River Delta region of China. Can Geotech J 57(6):840–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di H, Zhou S, Yao X, Tian Z (2021) In situ grouting tests for differential settlement treatment of a cut-and-cover metro tunnel in soft soils. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02276-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Z, Ji X, Li X, Wen J (2019) Numerical Investigation of 3D deformations of existing buildings induced by tunnelling. Geotech Geol Eng 37(4):2611–2623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eslami B, Golshani A, Arefizadeh S (2020) Evaluation of constitutive models in prediction of surface settlements in cohesive soils–a case study: Mashhad Metro Line 2. ISSMGE Int J Geoeng Case Histories 5(3):182–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang Y, He C, Nazem A, Yao Z, Grasmick J (2017) Surface settlement prediction for EPB shield tunneling in sandy ground. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(7):2908–2918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai J, Zhou H, Wang K, Qiu J, Wang L, Wang J, Feng Z (2020) Shield-driven induced ground surface and Ming Dynasty city wall settlement of Xi’an metro. Tunnel Undergr Sp Technol 97:103220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrughi A, Rodriguez LM, Castellanza R (2012) Development and Verification of a 3D numerical model for TBM-EPB mechanized excavation. Comput Geotech 40:97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Zhou G, Wang S, Wang K, Wang T (2021) Influence of undercrossing tunnel excavation on the settlement of a metro station in Dalian. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02128-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loganathan N (2011) An innovative method for assessing tunnelling-induced risks to adjacent structures. Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Massinas S, Prountzopoulos GK, Bhardwaj V, Saxena A, Clark J, Sakellariou MG (2018) Design aspects of under-passing a city’s heritage landmark with EPB machines under low overburden; The case of Chandpole Gate in Jaipur Metro, India. Geotech Geol Eng 36(6):3683–3705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikoobakht S, Mehrnahad H, Azarafza M, Asghari-Kaljahi E (2020a) Deformation analyses and plastic zone expansion in the tunnel Isfahan Golab 2 rock mass by convergenceconfinement and numerical methods. J New Find Appl Geol 14(27):55–71 ([In Persian])

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikoobakht S, Mehrnahad H, Azarafza M, Asghari-Kaljahi E (2020b) Deformation analyses and plastic zone expansion in the tunnel Isfahan Golab 2 rock mass by convergence-confinement and numerical methods. New Find Appl Geol 14(27):55–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei AH, Ahmadi-adli M (2020) The volume loss: real estimation and its effect on surface settlements due to excavation of Tabriz Metro tunnel. Geotech Geol Eng 38:2663–2684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei AH, Shirzehhagh M, Golpasand MRB (2019) EPB tunneling in cohesionless soils: a study on Tabriz Metro settlements. Geomech Eng 19(2):153–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiau J, Sams M (2019) Relating volume loss and greenfield settlement. Tunnel Undergr Sp Technol 83:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vu MN, Broere W, Bosch J (2016) Volume loss in shallow tunnelling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 59:77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo C, Kim JM (2007) Tunneling performance prediction using an integrated GIS and neural network. Comput Geotech 34:19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan C, Wang X, Wang N, Zhao Q (2012) Study on the effect of tunnel excavation on surface subsidence based on gis data management. Procedia Environ Sci 12:1387–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JZ, Zhou XP, Yin P (2019a) Visco-plastic deformation analysis of rock tunnels based on fractional derivatives. Tunnel Undergr Sp Technol 85:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Wu K, Cui S, Yu Y, Zheng Z, Zhao J (2019b) Surface settlement induced by subway tunnel construction based on modified peck formula. Geotech Geol Eng 37(4):2823–2835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghanabati A (2007) Geology of Iran. Geological Survey and Mineral Exploration of Iran press, p 708 [In Persian]

  • ASTM D1586 (2018) Standard Test Method for Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  • ASTM D2166 (2016) Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  • ASTM D3080 (2011) Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  • FHWA-NHI-10-034 (2009) Technical Manual for Design and Construction of Road Tunnels—Civil Elements. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Technical Report, p 702

  • Hao D, Zhu R, Wu K, Chen R (2021) Analysis of ground settlement caused by double-line TBM tunnelling under existing building. Geotech Geol Eng 1–13

  • Liu S, Pan G, Liao Z, Liang Y, Li W (2009) GIS-based tunnel deformation monitoring system. 2009 IEEE first international workshop on education technology and computer science, https://doi.org/10.1109/ETCS.2009.655

  • Plaxis Ltd (2020) Geotechnical finite element analyses computer programme. PLAXIS Geotechnical Software, Bentley Systems, Exton, Pennsylvania

  • Netzel H (2009) Building response due to ground movements, Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology. Netherlands

  • Peck RB (1969) Deep excavation and tunnelling in soft grounds. In: 7th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Mexico City, State of the Art Volume, pp 225–290

  • Geological Survey of Iran, GSI (2009) Geological map of Tabriz. Geological survey and mineral exploration of Iran, Tehran, Iran

  • Tabriz Urban Railway Organization (2014) Geotechnical and mechanics of material reports of Tabriz Metro Line 1. Technical Report

  • Yuan CF, Yu Gm, Guo ZH, Li R, Li Cm (2017) Analysis of surface subsidence caused by excavation of urban tunnel based on GIS. 2017 International conference on transportation infrastructure and materials (ICTIM 2017)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to special thank to Prof. Dr. Haluk Akgün (Department of Geological Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey) to help for English language modifications of the paper and regardless thank the anonymous reviewers for providing invaluable review comments and recommendations for improving the scientific level of the article.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Azarafza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Esmatkhah Irani, A., Azadi, A., Nikbakht, M. et al. GIS-based Settlement Risk Assessment and its Effect on Surface Structures: A Case Study for the Tabriz Metro—line 1. Geotech Geol Eng 40, 5081–5102 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02201-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02201-x

Keywords

Navigation